Monthly Archives: June 2007

On the Path to Outsourcing: The Biggest Computer Crash in Recent History

One of the crowning accomplishments of the Warner administration was creation of the Virginia Information Technologies Agency, which was supposed to rationalize the state’s IT systems. Yesterday, widespread computer crashes across state government disrupted service to at least one-fifth of Virginia government agencies, reports Peter Bacque at the Times-Dispatch.

The effects: State and local police couldn’t check driver’s licenses and vehicle registrations. More than 14,000 child-support payments could be delayed. Consumers couldn’t examine corporate records. Some agencies were temporarily unable to pay end-of-fiscal-year bills.

Was this the biggest computer crash in state government history? In my recollection, it is. Perhaps someone with a better memory can set me straight.

More to the point: What went wrong?

Bacque quotes VITA spokesperson Marcella Williamson as follows: “We know the state’s IT network needs work and requires money. That’s why the state and VITA partnered with Northrop Grumman. … The construction of the new data center in Chesterfield County and the backup data center in Lebanon in Russell County will help prevent these kinds of problems, or solve them much more quickly.”

The state is in the midst of a $1.9 billion outsourcing of its aging computer and communication systems to Northrop Grumman Corp. The Chesterfield center should be in use next month and the Lebanon operation by year’s end.

VITA needs more money? Really? I thought that the new management structure was supposed to achieve major efficiencies, increase security and provide more redundancy and back-up as protection against catastrophic failure. Clearly, it failed — big time — to provide the back-up. There is more to this story than has been reported so far. Let us hope that the Times-Dispatch gives Bacque the time he needs to dig deeper.

GRAPHIC PROOF

The front page of today’s WaPo Business section has a graphic that should become the screen saver for every politician and every advocate for Fundamental Change.

The graphic portrays federal spending as a percentage of GNP — history and projections to 2050.

The article has the “positions” of six of the 37 people who has declared an interest in being the next president.

Read it and weep.

Then figure out how much new spending will be needed in Virginia to fix the mental health system to avoid more VaTechs.

In the Metro section there is an article on how much paying low wages to teachers costs in recruiting and retraining.

Then there is the Mobility and Access Crisis and the Affordable and Accessible Housing Crisis and the Energy Crisis and the Food Security Crisis and the….

If anyone thinks that in 2007 or 2008 the “do not raise taxes” crowd will get a word in edgewise with all these “needs” …

The only answer is Fundamental Change.

Sorry, you are going to have to come to understand the meaning, scope and path to implementation of Fundamental Change of human settlement patterns and Fundamental Change in governance structure.

There is no other exit.

EMR

A New Use for Night Soil

From the Guardian comes word of research into new sources of biofuels:

Britain could meet much of its future energy demand by turning waste products such as wood, plastic bags and even human sewage into transport fuels, scientists said yesterday.

So-called “second generation” biofuels could also be produced from agricultural wastes such as straw, as well as farmed energy crops such as willow, and would be free of the controversies that surround current green fuels. A network of waste converters across the country could produce a third of the diesel required by UK motorists while slashing greenhouse gas emissions, the scientists said.

Building the plants that would make such biofuel products doesn’t come cheap. But let’s face it, the supply of raw materials is in abundant. And unlike ethanol, it wouldn’t require an enormous federal subsidy to produce (yet…somewhere the bureaucratic wheels are turning to develop poop price supports…or will be, if the idea catches on here).

If ever there was an opportunity for Virginia to take the lead in alternative energy production, here it is.

Opposition Builds to “Big Grid”

Bipartisan opposition in Virginia is building to create a National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor that would allow electric power companies to obtain the power of eminent domain to build transmission lines.

The latest statement comes from Attorney General Bob McDonnell, who has voiced his support for Wolf-Hinchey Amendment, co-sponsored by U.S. Rep. Frank Wolf, R-10th. The legislation would defund implementation of National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor legislation over the next fiscal year, allowing time for the additional input from the states and discussion with the federal government.

This is one of the great public policy battles of our era, even though it has garnered little attention from the national press: Big Grid vs. Distributed Energy. The business models of the major East Coast power companies are predicated on building massive power plants in isolated areas and distributing electricity to population centers with obtrusive transmission lines. The alternate model is based on incentivizing conservation and encouraing local, small-scale (and, often, renewable) power sources.

Where is Virginia’s leadership on this issue? The Kaine administration is due to publish its statewide energy plan soon. It will be interesting to see how the Kaniacs address this critical issue.

The Road with Six Names

There’s a road known as Church Road where it starts in Fairfax County. After crossing Rt. 28 in Loudoun County, it changes names to Waxpool Road. The byway transmutes into Farmwell Road, and then Ashburn Farm Parkway and then Sycolin Road. Upon reaching Leesburg, it morphs into Plaza Street.

This is insane. How the blue blazes is anyone in the region supposed to find their way around? If this were the only road in Virginia with multiple names, I might give it a rest. But it’s not. We’ve got ’em all over the place, and they’re a plague upon anyone not intimately familiar with local geography. As navigationally challenged as I am, I have been befuddled more than once by these ridiculous name-swappers.

Loudoun Supervisor Stephen J. Snow, R-Dulles, wants to stop the madness. According to Leesburg Today, he has asked for the Board of Supervisors to study simplifying some of the road names in and around Ashburn, Sterling and Dulles. Good. Maybe other localities will follow Loudoun’s lead!

U.S. 460 Proposals Advance

Three private-sector proposals to upgrade U.S. 460 between Suffolk and Petersburg into a four-lane, limited-access highway are all worth a closer look, a state transportation review panel has decided. The Commonwealth Transportation Board will consider the panel’s recommendations for the 55-mile project this July.

There are no state funds available to underwrite the toll-road project, but public monies could be made available by the newly approved Hampton Roads Transportation Authority. According to Peter Bacque with the Times-Dispatch, the three proposals include:

  • Virginia Corridor Partners, $1.56 billion-$1.91 billion, with no state contribution.
  • Intinere, $1.5 billion-$1.9 billion, with up to $734 million in state funds.
  • Cintra 460, $1.05 billion-$1.37 billion, with up to $174.5 million in state funds.

On the face of it, the Virginia Corridor Partners proposal, which would require no state contribution, would seem to be the obvious choice. But the devil is in the details. How high would the tolls be and how long would they last? Bacque says it cost as much as $13.20 to drive the full length, and tolls could last as long as 50 to 99 years.

THOSE LIVING IN OLD GLASS HOUSES …

Under the post “A YARD WHERE JOHNNY CAN RUN AND PLAY
At 8:46 PM, Anonymous said…

“M. Risse’s comments about settlement patterns have a deep foundation of irony for me because he lives in one of those giant houses in a small lot in a modern subdivision rather than in the city or in a place more consistent with his perspectives.

“I am a preservationist, and I live and put my wallet there, albeit I do not sell books about it.

“One can write a book advocating no alcohol but still drink. The reader may never know; does it matter?”

The work of SYNERGY/Planning is centered on a branch of science that is not yet widely understood. For this reason, the experience and veracity of spokespersons is critical. An off-hand statement such as this is deceptive, damaging and requires a factual response.

Let us examine the statement of Anon 8:46 in detail:

“M. Risse’s comments about settlement patterns have a deep foundation of irony for me because he lives in one of those giant houses in a small lot in a modern subdivision rather than in the city or in a place more consistent with his perspectives.”

What is “ironic” is that Anon 8:46 has no idea about what he / she speaks.

“… he lives in one of those giant houses in a small lot in a modern subdivision rather than in the city or in a place more consistent with his perspectives.”

As an overview, if Anon 8:46 had any idea of the parameters of functional human settlement patterns he would know that this “place” – this Dooryard (Derby Way), this Cluster (Menlough), this Neighborhood (Culpeper / Menlough / Hospital Hill), this Village (Greater Warrenton) and this Community (Greater Warrenton-Fauquier) is / are fully consistent with our perspectives.

He / She would also know we recommend never using the term “city” because the use of the word, other than as part of the legal name of a municipality, generates confusion about the structure and function of human settlement patterns and compounds Geographic Illiteracy and Spacial Ignorance.

We will deal with “giant” house and “modern subdivision” below but first some history.

BACKGROUND

Over first 32 years of our life we lived in 21 dwellings from Puerto Rico to Hawaii. Two were built by my father, six were historic structures. The dwellings ranged in context from a flat over a bakery in Old San Juan to a log house backing up to forest and mountains that stretched for 135 miles – Flathead National Forest Service / Bob Marshal Wilderness / Sun River Game Preserve.

The first house I purchased was a Queen Anne on Maple Street in a small college town from which I could walk to work. When our oldest child could kick a soccer ball into the flower beds we moved to a Planned New Community.

Over the next 30 years I lived in Single Family Attached Dwellings in three Planned New Communities. The cluster density averaged 30 persons per acre and the community density averaged 10 persons per acre. These places had the elements of good places to raise a family that we list in our column “A YARD WHERE JOHNNY CAN RUN AND PLAY.” These were not just places to live but places where we worked and where we evolved the concepts found in our writing.

We were living in a Planned New Community when the 1973 Arab Oil Embargo provided a dramatic view of the future. We did everything we could to cut our energy consumption and reduce what is now termed our ecological footprint. Our family activities, mobility choices and lifestyle were featured on the front page of the community newspaper. When someone says put your money where your mouth is – been there, done that.

The problem was that very few others did what we did. We drove the old rabbit until our employer said he was embarrassed that a senior executive in his firm was driving such a ratty old car. He bought us Porsche.

THE SEARCH

When we completed The Shape of the Future in 2000 we spent the better part of two years looking for the best place to live next. I have a hearing loss due to military service and noise bothers me. While well located from many perspectives Fairfax Center near the confluence of I-66, US Route 50 and Fairfax Parkway is a very loud place due to the tire howl of traffic on these routes. The political erosion of the original Fairfax Center plan was also a pain to live with.

We considered places from Chincoteague, MD to Shepherdstown WV and from Southern PA to Charlottesville. Due to our regional, national and international work, a location in the Washington-Baltimore New Urban Region and not too far from Dulles was ideal.

After settling on a place in the Piedmont of Virginia we surveyed half a dozen urban enclaves and choose Greater Warrenton. We drew quarter and half mile radii from the Court House and looked at every building for sale. Early 2002 was not a time where there were a lot of houses on the market. We wanted to be within 1/4 mile of Main Street but could not find a building that would meet our needs.

I had not lived in a single family detached dwelling for 30 years and when we could not find an attached dwelling or other suitable structure, one of the tradeoffs was that a single family detached dwelling would provide an opportunity to further our research and broaden our experience. Those who read our work will be finding out what we have learned in TRILO-G. Some of it may surprise you, it did me.

THIS PLACE

Dwelling:

The house at 124 Derby Way is a “used house” and about average for its age and price range. It is not “giant” by any stretch. It is in the mid 3,000s sq ft on three floors depending on what is counted. There are two bedrooms. The lower level is devoted to our office and a large studio with conference space and four work stations for the different tasks involved in our work. There is also a map and file room, a storage closet, etc. The third level is devoted to my partner and wife’s office, studio and a guest room. We live on the first floor although that is also where the main office library is located.

The lot is one fifth of an acre and provides an opportunity to understand the benefits and burdens of living in a single family detached dwelling. It is the first time I have had an attached garage and it serves as a shop. If you have an Autonomobile, an attached garage is a fine thing.

The travel generated by the dwelling is minimal. We hold some meetings here. We meet with our assistant who lives in Greater Warrenton once a week. We communicate via email and she picks up work when she is out anyway running errands. No commuting, thank you. We have two vehicles and drive them a total of less than 5,000 miles per year. The vehicles consume far less than our per capita share energy and meet our personal safety and comfort needs.

Cluster:

When I first saw Menlough, years before we purchased the house on Derby Way, my first impression was that it was too low in density and too far from Main Street. We have found living here has given us the opportunity to help solve some horticultural problems for the cluster and test governance concepts at the cluster scale.

A Three Cluster Neighborhood:

What is not apparent from first glance is that Menlough is one of three clusters making up one of the only Planned Unit Developments in Greater Warrenton-Fauquier. These clusters contain most of the dwellings in the Neighborhood. The other clusters are small single family dwellings primarily on one level marketed to empty nesters and single family attached dwellings.

The primary amenity of the Planned Unit Development is the pathway system. Right across from our driveway is a pathway that leads to a number of attractive walking opportunities and provides access to the community hospital (which has a very nice restaurant – Bistro On The Hill – open to the public), the town police station where cluster and other public meetings are held, a hardware store / lumber yard, laundry, pizza shop, 2 convenience stores, a veterinarian, dentist, orthopedic practice, an optometrist, auto repair / inspection, tattoo shop, a floor covering store, an office building, etc. Over the past five years we have had occasion to use many of these services including the tattoo shop. Main street is a hike of half a mile but not beyond question on foot.

The Village:

The Town of Warrenton, Greater Warrenton and Greater Warrenton-Fauquier provide a great laboratory for considering the role of urban enclaves in the evolution of Balanced But Disaggregated Communities. They provide opportunities for innovation as our current column “The Conservation Imperative” suggests.

At this point in my life – approaching 70 – the most important thing is have a pleasant place to complete our work. When we complete TRILO-G we may move to a single family attached dwelling, having learned about as much as we can from single family detached dwellings.

ONE LAST POINT

Anon 8:46 said: “I am a preservationist, and I live and put my wallet there, albeit I do not sell books about it.”

I count myself a preservationist as well. We co-founded and served as professional staff for a ground breaking regional preservation effort, authored a regional historic architecture guide, authored the first state historic preservation plan drafted under the National Historic Preservation Act, contributed to the rescue of several historic buildings including a sugar mill on a small Caribbean island, etc,. I do not happened to have been married to a person who wanted to take on the challenge of living in and restoring a historic structure (aside from the sugar mill) when that opportunity arose. Does this mean I could not write a book about preservation?

“One can write a book advocating no alcohol but still drink. The reader may never know; does it matter?”

This snide remark implies our work is not based on experience and is taking money under false pretenses.

AN APOLOGY IS IN ORDER, ANON 8:46.

You might want to buy a few copies of TRILO-G and distribute them to your preservationist friends. Without a sustainable future, preservation is a futile effort.

EMR

Hybrids, Batteries and the Grid


As a long-time Virginia booster, I just hate it when the Old Dominion so glaringly lags other states in innovation. Especially when that state is California, so many of whose inhabitants border on the criminally insane. But there’s no denying it in this case: Californians put Virginians to shame when it comes to pioneering new technologies and market-based strategies for conserving energy.

The latest case in point comes from Silicon Valley, where venture capitalists and entrepreneurs are channeling their creative talents into energy conservation and alternate fuels. The New York Times profiles an initiative by Google (of all companies!) and Pacific Gas & Electric, which have unveiled a “vision of a future in which cars and trucks are partly powered by the country’s electric grids, and vice versa.”

Earlier this week, the companies displayed six Toyota Prius and Ford Escape hybrid vehicles which have been modified to draw power from the electric grid. The vehicles can go up to 75 miles per gallon of gas, double the mph of a regular hybrid. One vehicle also was modified to feed electricity back to the power company.

The advantage of reducing gasoline consumption is evident to all. More subtle is the benefit of two-way electricity flow between automobile batteries and the electric grid. Utilities invest billions of dollars in power plants designed to meet peak energy needs, often burning costly natural gas as a fuel. If power companies could pay automobile owners to extract electricity from the batteries of their parked cars during periods of peak demand, they could dramatically reduce the cost of peak-load electricity.

Where is the General Assembly on energy conservation? Where is the State Corporation Commission? Clearly, Dominion isn’t interested. Ever since pushing the use of electric vehicles a decade or so ago, the power company has been missing in action. Why? Because under the current regulatory structure — and the new one soon to be implemented — conservation doesn’t pay.

(Hat tip to Larry Gross for pointing me to the NYT article.)

Sliding Down the Slippery Slope

The University of Virginia will allow same-sex partners of students and employees to join the university’s gyms. Gay and lesbian staff members had pushed the university for years to add the benefit, according to the Daily Progress.

Earlier this month, Virginia Attorney General Bob McDonnell informed the university it could provide gym memberships to adults who live with an employee or student but are not their spouse. UVa had been reluctant to grant the benefit, citing a 2004 opinion by then-Attorney General Jerry W. Kilgore that said the school should not grant benefits involving relationships not recognized by Virginia law.

Effective July 1, the DP reports, the Plus One program will allow a person living with a faculty or staff member to purchase a gym membership for $270 a year.

McDonnell’s ruling applies to “significant others” of the opposite sex, does it not? I can sympathise to some degree with the plight of gays, who do not possess the right to marry in Virginia. As long as they’re in a committed, long-term relationship, why shouldn’t they enjoy the same civil rights as heteros? But I have no particular sympathy for unmarried heteros. Why should the prerogatives and benefits of marriage be extended to a couple in a transient relationship just because they happen to be shacking up?

It looks like we’re stepping onto a very slippery slope here. What grounds are there to discriminate against anyone for any type of domestic arrangement? How long until others apply the gym-benefit precedent to health insurance and other benefits?

A YARD WHERE JOHNNY CAN RUN AND PLAY

The front page of today’s WaPo features “Getting Lost in the Great Indoors: Many Adults Worry About Children Losing Touch With Nature” by Donna St. George. It is enough to make you cry.

It should make a lot of BaconsRebellion bloggers wince. All those champions of dysfunctional Autonomobile driven settlement patterns who claim they are investing in big lots for the kids and freedom…

As we point out in our December 2003 column (same title as this post) it is the cumulative impact of all those big, unused lots covered with grass that result in long drives to work, to services and to all the “organized activities” that now fill children’s lives.

Two of the first five “child-friendly assets” we list for places to raise children address the concerns of those quoted in the WaPo article.

Now why cannot WaPo hire editors who understand human settlement patterns and the underlying cause of all these front-page stories?

EMR

Prepaid Electricity

Something that ought to be right up Jim’s alley: prepaying for electricity as a means of energy conservation:

A half-dozen utilities are trying prepaid programs now, but that could accelerate quickly if Texas utility regulators approve rules this summer allowing it. Experimentation with prepaid-service meters is part of a broader trend that is changing the electric meter from a dumb recorder of kilowatt hours consumed into a conservation tool capable of helping people monitor their use and which will allow utilities to talk directly to customers.

Billions of dollars are being spent by utilities to install advanced meters that track the amount of energy consumed at different times of the day, a capability that is expected to lead to rate plans that include higher prices when wholesale energy costs are higher and cheaper prices at times of slack demand.

But it’s also possible that utilities trying to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions from power plants in response to looming global warming legislation could use the meters to encourage conservation. If more people paid for electricity in advance, like they do for gasoline, they might want to make it stretch further.

Salt River Project, a Phoenix utility with the largest prepaid program in the U.S., said it has observed a conservation effect among its prepaid customers, with a 12% reduction in average bills. It’s not due to disconnections, says customer-service analyst Jennie King, “because most prepaid customers never suffer disconnections.”

In the next few years, some experts expect prepaid electric service to become a standard feature of U.S. utilities, as it already is in the U.K., China and South Africa.

Interesting. A major downside, as noted in the article, is that folks have to go to the utility’s local office to put more money in their accounts, as opposed to doing it online, or by other, remote, means. And there is the possibility that people can be cut off when they max-out their balances (but rude awakenings can sometimes impart valuable lessons).

Overall, though, if a system like this can encourage people to get a firmer handle on their electric bills and usage, then it’s probably worth exploring further.

Interstate 81 Update: Rail Lines and Passing Lanes

When Gov. Timothy M. Kaine was running for governor two years ago, he presented some attractive ideas for dealing with congestion along Interstate 81, the major transportation bottleneck in Western Virginia. In place of the competing, multi-billion dollar proposals advanced by private interests during the Warner administration, Kaine advocated less ambitious — and less expensive — solutions. First, add new truck-passing lanes where they were needed, and second, divert container traffic from trucks to rail.

As the public-private partnership proposals languish, it looks like state transportation policy is inching closer and closer to Kaine’s campaign ideas. In his story published today, “Relieving Interstate 81,” Peter Galuszka brings the I-81 saga up to date.

In an Environmental Impact Statement, VDOT has reached two important policy conclusions regarding I-81. One was to nix the proposed “truck only” lanes on the grounds that they created too much capacity for trucks and not enough for automobiles. The other was to finance improvements through truck tolls. Meanwhile, the only specific projects on the drawing boards call for spending $140 million to build truck-passing lanes near Christiansburg and Lexington. That sounds an awful lot like Kaine’s campaign plan.

Closing the loop on Kaine’s campaign proposal, Norfolk Southern now has proposed a $2 billion upgrade for its rail system with the idea of taking one million trucks per year off the nation’s highways. The railroad is asking Virginia, which would benefit from the diversion of traffic of I-81, to chip in $40 million.

It’s not clear how many trucks would be taken off Virginia highways, and there’s a good chance that organic growth in truck traffic would fill I-81 back up within a decade or less. But there’s no permanent solution in a growing economy. If $180 million — which would buy us the truck-passing lanes, plus the Norfolk Southern upgrades — can buy congestion relief for five to 10 years, it’s probably more cost effective than any other plan out there. But I’d like to see more authoritative numbers before drawing any solid conclusions.

VT Massacre: What’s Needed Now, Mo’ Money or More Answers?

You knew it had to happen sooner or later. Preventing another Virginia Tech massacre would come down to money — mo’ money. Joe Samaha, whose daughter Reema was killed by Seung Hui Cho, pleaded with the House Welfare and Institutions Committee to pass legislation that will “fund mental-health care, with the coordination of education, policies and administration of the laws.”

Committee Chairman Philip A. Hamilton, R-Newport News, agreed, according to the Washington Post’s reporting of the hearing. “We can make all the policy changes we want, but if we don’t allocate adequate resources to address the policy changes, then we’ve actually done nothing.”

While agreeing that funding should be a priority in the 2008 legislative session, Del. Brian J. Moran, D-Alexandria, contended that it is important how the money is spent. Said Moran: “We need to make sure that training is a component so there’s no misunderstanding about what mental-health professionals are supposed to do.”

Moran has the right instincts: We can’t just throw money at the problem. We need to target dollars spent to ensure that mental health systems are operating properly. Training may be a component of what’s needed. But there’s an important piece of the story that the press, and presumably the lawmakers too, have overlooked.

Here’s how the WaPo summarized the institutional breakdown:

Cho encountered the state’s mental-health system when he was referred to the New River Valley Community Services Board in 2005, 16 months before the shootings. Virginia Tech police said that he had harassed two female students and that he was suicidal. The board, the government mental-health agency that serves Blacksburg, found that Cho was “mentally ill and in need of hospitalization,” according to court papers.

The next day, a special justice assigned to Cho decided that he was “an imminent danger to himself as a result of mental illness” and ordered him into involuntary outpatient treatment. But three law enforcement sources familiar with Cho’s medical records have said that Cho never received treatment. There was no follow-up from the community services board or the courts.

Why was there no follow up? Mental health administrators blame insufficient funding to fully participate in judicial mental health hearings and follow up on court-ordered treatment. Is that the end of the story? Read today’s column in Bacon’s Rebellion, Isolated Case or System Failure?”, by Sam Mela, a former member of the Central Virginia Community Services Board. He argues that the lack of follow-up represented a breakdown in quality assurance.

Writes Mela: “A key tenet of QA is to elevate the priority of critical issues until they are resolved. Who was the person in charge of Quality Assurance at the New River Valley Community Services Board?”

Other questions he asks: “Is every community services board in the state of Virginia so under-funded that it is out of compliance with Virginia mental health law? Or are only some boards out of compliance? Or, is the problem limited to the New River Valley Community Services Board?”

Darn good questions. Let’s get answers before we start spreading around the greenbacks.

Fire Trucks and Bike Lanes

This week, I return to an issue I raised a half year ago — “design by fire truck.” Fire chiefs around Virginia and around the country often conflict with developers who want to create pedestrian-friendly streetscapes. Designers of the New Urbanist persuasion prefer narrow streets because they slow traffic, which puts pedestrians more at ease. Fire chiefs prefer broader streets that have room for their big fire trucks and their outriggers.

Doug Cole, a principal of Design Forum Inc., which is designing the Wilton and the James project in Henrico County, beat his brains out trying to find a way to satisfy the county fire department yet preserve the vision for the project’s main boulevard. Eventually, he found the answer: add a 6-foot-wide bicycle lane. The lane provided the space the fire trucks needed while keeping the main traffic lane narrow enough to dissuade drivers from speeding.

What’s really interesting is what happened next. One bicycle lane didn’t make much sense. Cole persuaded HHHunt, the Wilton on the James developer, to lace the entire project with bicycle paths, and then to link them to the anticipated Capital Trail running from Richmond and Williamsburg. Now plans call for the Capital Trail to loop through Wilton on the James, following the scenic course of the river.

The developers are happy. The fire chief is happy. Pedestrians are happy. And bicyclers are happy. Everybody wins. Read the full story in “Fire Trucks and Bike Lanes.”

(Photo credit: Invisible Structures Inc.)

Tanned and Rested, the Rebellion is Ready for Action

It wasn’t easy coming home — I’ll add Jackson Hole, Wyo., to Ocracoke, N.C., and Round Hill, Jamaica, as one of my favorite places outside Virginia — but I’m back and I’m rarin’ to go.

You can find the June 19, 2006, edition of the Bacon’s Rebellion e-zine here. Don’t miss a single issue — click here for a free subscription.

For your reading pleasure, here’s this week’s line-up of columns and features:

Fire Trucks and Bike Lanes
Wilton on the James has solved the intractable “design by fire truck” issue without sacrificing its commitment to a pedestrian-oriented community. The result: an impressive network of bike paths.
by James A. Bacon

Megapolitan
Consider one great statistical region named “Chesapeake.”
by Doug Koelemay

The Conservation Imperative
No fantastical technology, green or otherwise, can keep the world on its increasingly energy-intensive development path. We need to get serious about conservation.
by EM Risse

Unconstitutional Power Grab
Two congressmen want to stop the states from utilizing public-private partnerships to finance new road construction. A little thing called the Tenth Amendment stands in the way.
by Geoff Segal

It’s All Our Fault!
Don’t blame the politicians, blame the voters. According to Bryan Caplan, they can exercise their irrational biases — against foreigners, oil companies, the market, whomever — with no fear of retribution.
By Norman Leahy

Isolated Case or System Failure?
The most critical questions of the Virginia Tech shootings are going unasked. Why did Virginia’s mental health agencies let Seung-Hui Cho fall between the cracks? Is anyone else at risk?
by Sam Mela

Nice & Curious Questions
Virginia’s Counties: A Day’s Journey to the Courthouse
by Edwin S. Clay III and Patricia Bangs