Peter Onuf and Francis Cogliano’s latest book slander defenders of Thomas Jefferson in the worst possible manner. Was it really necessary?

by Shaun Kenney
I was looking forward to reading Peter Onuf and Francis Coglianoโs Thomas Jefferson Survives right up until page 12 of the Introduction.
Once upon a time, I had the pleasure of reading Jeffersonian Legacies in my younger days as a consumer of all things Virginia history, which was the result of a conference on Jefferson headed up by Onuf.
The late Daniel P. Jordan โ whose long tenure with the Thomas Jefferson Foundation helped shape the Jeffersonian renaissance โ capstoned the conference celebrating Mr. Jeffersonโs 250th birthday with the following tribute:
While the conference and essays allow fresh voices to be heard on aspects of the Jefferson legacy, good and bad, at times they merely echo partisan arguments about Jeffersonโs life and politics going back to his own era; in other ways they provide a 1990s standard of judgment. The centrality and complexity of Jeffersonโs ideas and career, his extraordinary versatility, his gift of felicitous prose, and the exceptional corpus of letters he left behind will assure that Jefferson will remain a fascinating and compelling subject to examine and ponder for edification and inspiration, for admiration and admonishment, for generations to come.
For those interested in how profound the shift has been on Jefferson from paragon to parasite, Ken Burns is your answer. His 1997 Thomas Jefferson documentary treats Jefferson as a Founding Father, yet his 2026 documentary on The American Revolution only begrudgingly admits George Washington as the indispensable man. In fact, all of the accomplishments of the Founding Fathers are footnotes rather than pivotal moments in history โ and if pivotal, then most certainly imperfect. From this treatment, Jefferson has provided a deep mine from which countless historians have delved and picked apart to exhibit and even invent the very worst of imperfections in an industry rewarding grievance. God forbid to see what a Ken Burns documentary on Jefferson would look like today.
What should fascinate and compel us presently at the 200th anniversary of Jeffersonโs death and the 250th birthday of these States United is that Jordanโs commitment to pluralism and the collision of ideas has been eclipsed by a 2020-ish standard of judgment seeking to recapture Jefferson for the 21st century political left โ or worse still, abandon Jefferson to a caricature and label it as โfar rightโ, a tactic which has proven to be very useful to organizations such as the SPLC.
(more…)







