VDOT Seeks New Solution to Charlottesville Congestion

Philip Shucet
Philip Shucet

by James A. Bacon

Effectively pulling the plug on the proposed Charlottesville Bypass, the McAuliffe administration has set up an advisory panel to recommend improvements to the U.S. 29 corridor north of Charlottesville. Lead by former Virginia Department of Transportation Commissioner Philip Shucet, the group must submit recommendations by May 14 — less than two months from now.

The Federal Highway Administration told VDOT in February that it would have to conduct a complete environmental assessment before receiving approval for the 6.5-mile bypass around the traffic-snarled highway north of Charlottesville, a process that could take a year or longer and offered no guarantees of approval. “We’ve studied this project for 20 years,” said Transportation Secretary Aubrey Layne today in the March meeting of the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB). “We have to have action taken.”

To move things quickly, Layne appointed a 10-member panel comprised of local government officials, planners and representatives from the business community up and down the U.S. 29 corridor to develop recommendations that (1) improve mobility in the corridor and (2) can be accomplished within the $197 million previously allocated to the bypass. (Additional sums could come from the sale of Right of Way purchased years ago.) The panel will come back to the CTB with a proposal that the board can vote up or down, Layne said.

When it comes to navigating highway department bureaucracy, Shucet knows the ropes. He was popular as highway commissioner during the Warner administration, and won renown in Hampton Roads for reining in runaway spending on the Tidewater Tide light rail project and completing the project on time. The panel will hold three meetings, Shucet said. The first meeting will define “success factors” for the project. The second will narrow down proposals to a manageable number for closer analysis. And the third will present a “solution package” that can be presented to the CTB.

Although Shucet made no reference to it, there is a “solution package” already on the books: Places 29. Generated after an extensive community-involvement process before the McDonnell administration revived the long-dormant bypass, Places29 envisioned a multi-pronged strategy for dealing with congestion: adding separated-grade interchanges at the two most congested intersections, building parallel roads to divert traffic from the highway and making spot improvements to choke points.

However, given the fact that the advisory board is heavily stacked with business interests and elected officials from outside the Charlottesville-Albemarle area, there is no guarantee that the group will agree to pursue Places29. For starters, following all the plan’s recommendations would cost considerably more than $200 million. Secondly, panelists from outside the region are less likely to prioritize local congestion relief at the expense of moving freight quickly through the congested zone. As Layne himself said, “I am determined to bring this conversation back to mobility, congestion and economic purpose.”

During the public comment period, two members of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors expressed their approval of the new approach. “We’re committed as a board to helping you move forward to find a solution quickly,” said Brad Sheffield, a newly elected supervisor who ran in opposition to the bypass. “We’re on board with you.”

Cost overruns were a significant concern for the McAuliffe administration. VDOT staff had warned higher-ups that the problems could drive up project costs by as much as $200 million higher than preliminary cost estimates. Then-Transportation Secretary Sean Connaughton tried to finesse the issue by structuring the bypass as a design-build project allowing for creative solutions from the private sector. The Skanska-Branch Joint Venture won the contract with a bid that came in within the $197 million allocated by the CTB but close examination later revealed issues with its new design that would significantly degrade safety and the time-savings of the bypass, which would cost tens of millions of dollars to fix.

“The road proposed was not meeting the needed purpose for the amount of expenditure,” Layne said. “We need to match the resources available to us to the need.”

Share this article


(comments below)


(comments below)


3 responses to “VDOT Seeks New Solution to Charlottesville Congestion”

  1. If recent history holds true, tomorrow’s Charlottesville Daily Progress story will not mention Places29, although it passed our board of supervisors unanimously four months before connaguhton resurrected the so-called “bypass.” The five-six projects in Places29 were heavily vetted by our area’s planning, political and public communities and received VDOT’s blessing to conclude a five-year intense planning process; all of that heavily covered by the Daily Progress.

    Why does the alleged newspaper of record not mention Places29 today? Because virtually the only locals in favor of the bypass are the handful of businessmen in the North Charlottesville Business Council who are scared that they will lose too much money during construction of the two overpasses which Mr. Bacon mentions. Those business folks are heavy advertisers and the Daily Progress has given up its claim of actually being a newspaper. As a huge advocate of local journalism, I hope I’m wrong and the DP does note tomorrow that the Places29 projects are a good solution to the charge that Sec Layne gave to Mr. Shucet but I’ve learned the hard ways that we do not have honest reporting in Charlottesville.

  2. One of the things that folks might want to do if they get the time and are so inclined is take a trip to Greensboro via Rt 29.

    this will give one the opportunity to see what Rt 29 looks like the last 12 miles between Reidsville and it’s intersection with I40.

    it’s a busy road – 4-lanes divided with median crossovers, a few traffic signals and at-grade side roads entering.

    there are a few old-style – grade-separated interchanges with very short ramps…

    it looks like it would be very difficult to upgrade in-place to a more limited access road. it does not have a section that is as dense commercial as Cville..

    it looks like a bypass would be far easier than in Cville – less dense development – about twice as far.. and NCDOT does sign it as “Future I-73”.

    my point is – you could “fix” Cville – just perfect for the supporters – and the rest of Rt 29 north of Cville and south near the NC border would sill not be nirvana.

    so there’s a real question as to – whether or not Rt 29 – the length of it is every going to be a route the stature of I-81 or I-86 or I-64.

    one would expect some level of discussion along these lines in a NEPA study especially in the area of the Purpose and Need.

    there would be, of course, lots of different opinions and views but simple facts brought to the the narrative would help everyone better understand the possibilities and the probabilities and improbabilities.

    that’s the kind of narrative that would NOT give ammunition to the would-be opposition and that’s the kind of thoughtful narrative that would better inform those who were agnostic about the good or bad of roads.

    that’s the kind of narrative that would give the public more reason to trust VDOT in it’s analyses.

    we don’t have to have the state agency starting off with a narrative that sounds like an advocacy .. encourages politics and in general riles up people by being perceived as dissing people.

    An agency that is honest – does not need to backtrack… or change it’s narrative. The further the issue plays out – the more it confirms the agencies original stated position.

    VDOT – an other government agencies are basically afraid of treating people as if they are adults. They so fear criticism and opposition that they view the public – as an obstacle.. and public-process as something that needs to be “managed”.

Leave a Reply