Hard Numbers on Administrative Bloat

That bloated feeling. Image credit: Microsoft Image Creator

by James A. Bacon

A number of University of Virginia Board of Visitors members have expressed concern about UVa’s runaway costs. Administrative bloat has swollen the university’s cost structure, they say, and  higher costs have been cited in turn to justify tuition increases. So far, the fiscal hawks have been unable to force a discussion of the topic during regular board meetings. Indeed, simple requests for data on headcounts and salary costs have gone unanswered.

The refusal of UVa leadership to share the data is all the more remarkable in that the statistics are readily available. Indeed, much of it is maintained on the UVa website by the office of Institutional Research & Analytics (IR&A). The 17 members of the IR&A staff have the mission of supporting “the University community” — which, presumably, includes the Board of Visitors — in “assessment, planning, and decision-making.”

As it turns out, the IR&A data confirm the suspicions of the fiscal hawks. Between the 2011-12 academic year and the 2021-22 year, UVa’s academic division (excluding the healthcare division) saw the ranks of salaried staff grow dramatically — at twice the pace of faculty — even as enrollment barely budged.

Student enrollment (full-time-equivalent): +8.8%
Total faculty: +9.5%
Total salaried staff: +25.4%

(Student headcount comes from the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia.)

The IR&A numbers raise issues about faculty productivity as well, and we’ll get to that in a follow-up blog post. But the big story over the past decade has been the surging cost of administrative overhead.

The IR&A posts the numbers here under the umbrella of “university data.” In the following table I have summarized the count of “salaried university employees” in the “Academic Division” over the years 2011-2012 through 2021-22.

To view a more legible image of the table click here.

Several sub-trends are evident.

“Administrative general faculty” saw a steady decline over the decade — from 568 employees to 213 employees. These are generally lower-level employees who provide administrative assistance to the faculty, usually at the departmental level. Judging by the numbers, the university has squeezed this category relentlessly. It would make an interesting Board discussion to see if faculty members have experienced a corresponding uptick in administrative duties and if so whether the added responsibilities have impacted their productivity.

The “Classified staff” classification experienced a steady decline over the 10-year period, but it was largely offset by a corresponding increase in “University staff.” I repeatedly asked UVa for definitions of these classifications and explanations for the sub-trends but have received no response over three weeks. However, the UVa HR department defines “classified staff” as salaried, non-faculty employees hired before July 1, 2016, who elected not to participate in the University Staff HR plan. “University Staff” are those hired after July 1, 2016, who do participate. In other words, some of the number changes are the result of reclassifying employees. Still, the two categories combined show a significant increase.

One other category, professional research staff, is worth mentioning. This category consists principally of research associates, research scientists, senior scientists, and principal scientists who have limited-term appointments. Their number increased from 437 to 550 over the period, a 29% increase. This trend coincides with an increase in R&D grants at UVa and should not be equated with administrative featherbedding. The category represents a small sub-set of salaried employees, however, so it accounts for only 14% or so of the total increase in administrative employees.

The IR&A data tell us only part of the story. The university increased the number of salaried staff by 2,000 over 10 years. What do those people do? There is no way of knowing from a high-altitude look at the data.

Also, the IR&A numbers count salaried employees only. The published data do not track more than 12,000 wage-earning employees (2022 numbers). Is the number of these employees increasing or decreasing? Furthermore, the numbers tell us nothing about work outsourced to consultants and vendors. Is that practice waxing or waning?

We can conclude one thing for certain, however. There is no question that the data are readily available. The office of IR&A has it. The Ryan administration has it. The Board of Visitors should have it, too.

Correction: This article has been updated to correct an erroneous statement in the original version that student enrollment increased only 1.1% between fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2022. The correct figure is 8.8%.

Share this article


(comments below)


(comments below)


11 responses to “Hard Numbers on Administrative Bloat”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I am rereading “Yes, Minister” this summer. Sir Humphrey would be so proud of the folks at UVA.

  2. Ben Slone Avatar
    Ben Slone

    UVA, refer to Purdue University.

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      100% correct. Put a real executive in charge of UVa (instead of some academician) and watch those cost increases flatten out.

  3. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/state-university-tuition-increase-spending-41a58100?mod=Searchresults_pos1&page=1 The link is an article from Aug 11 2023 concerning how colleges are raisng tuitions to feed the bloat at schools especially in administrative and athletics.

  4. Teddy007 Avatar

    One could make a much stronger case if one analyzed admin growth at all state universities rather than focusing on just one institution. In administrators are growing faster than faculty or students at all universities, then the reason for the growth would be much easier to identify. However, acting like a disgruntled alum who wants the adminstrators to get off one’s proverbial lawn does not help make a reasonable point.

    1. Carter Melton Avatar
      Carter Melton

      Your assumption is only true if you have identical data mapping at all the subject schools. If you don’t, you end up with organized data chaos !

      1. Teddy007 Avatar

        The topic definitely needs a h arder look than an alum screaming about the students needing to get off his lawn.

        1. Carter Melton Avatar
          Carter Melton

          Asking for quantitative accountability is screaming ? For 30 years my Board asked for it all the time, and as CEO it was my responsibility to provide it.

          Its how you measure and run things.

        2. The topic definitely needs a harder look than an alum screaming about the students needing to get off his lawn.

          The word “student” appears twice in this article, both times in the context of statistics (“student enrollment” and “student headcount”). Where is the screaming about the students needing to get off his lawn? I don’t see it.

        3. The topic definitely needs a harder look than an alum screaming about the students needing to get off his lawn.

          The word “student” appears twice in this article, both times in the context of statistics (“student enrollment” and “student headcount”). Where is the screaming about the students needing to get off his lawn? I don’t see it.

  5. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Maybe on August 31st the desired data will be revealed. A rare blue moon and supermoon on the same day. There is a catch. It could be a cloudy night. Might have to wait 9 years for the next such event.

Leave a Reply