Tag Archives: AAA rating

The Burning Fuse

Image credit: Jason Orender.

Aggregated debt for the 50 states exceeds $4.19 trillion, according to a new report issued by State Budget Solutions. That may pale in comparison to the federal government’s nearly $16 trillion in debt but, then, states have more limited fiscal resources than Uncle Sam. Among other things, they can’t print their own money.

“These budget numbers should serve as a wake up call for every state legislature around the country. Our states are in trouble and no amount of budget gimmicks, political posturing or hiding bills will fix the massive debt that they face,” said Bob Williams, president of State Budget Solutions. “There is no option for status quo or incremental adjustments. Drastic reforms, innovations and political courage are needed to put our states back on the road to fiscal survival.”

The $4.19 trillion figure does represent an incremental improvement from $4.24 trillion the previous year, but the progress in debt reduction is discouraging given the fact that the nation is in its third year of economic expansion and state finances should be improving. SBB’s definition of debt includes bonds, leases, unfunded pension liabilities, post-employment benefits and unemployment trust fund loans.

California is famously the most indebted state measured by absolute dollars, $617 billion. But it also has the largest economy, so the debt burden isn’t as heavy as it is for many other states. Likewise, Virginia, with $64 billion in debt, ranks fairly high in absolute dollars of debt. Yet the Old Dominion’s debt burden, measured as a percentage of the state economy, is one of the lowest in the nation.

In the chart below, I have taken SBB’s debt numbers, aligned them with 2011 state GDP numbers, and shown the debt as a percentage of GDP. States at the top of the list have the lowest debt burden. Nebraska, home of tightwad billionaire Warren Buffett, has the lowest debt/GDP ratio in the country. As for the states at the bottom of the list, Hawaii may be paradise but I wouldn’t want to be a taxpayer there.


Watching its debt and long-term budget obligations is one of the things that Virginia does really well. But that’s no excuse to get complacent. Our economy remains extremely vulnerable to a downturn in federal spending, especially defense spending, and our budget picture could deteriorate in a big hurry. Moreover, we remain mired in institutional dysfunction. There is no serious movement to reform K-12, high ed, health care, transportation or human settlement patterns. The fuse is still burning.

Virginia’s Very Own Boomergeddon Scenario

by James A. Bacon

Virginians take great pride in their status as a state with a AAA credit rating. But if you put any credence in a set of projections made by Jeffrey Miron with the Mercatus Center, increasing indebtedness could start to unravel the commonwealth’s fiscal integrity by 2034… if not long before. We have 23 years before we reach the point of no return.

What happens in 2034? That’s when Virginia’s indebtedness-to-GDP ratio reaches 90%, the point at which, research has shown, sovereign states reach a tipping point at which indebtedness slows economic growth and a fiscal crisis becomes nearly inevitable. So argues Miron in a new paper, “The Fiscal Health of U.S. States.”

The paper draws five broad conclusions about the fiscal condition of the 50 states:

First, state government finances are not on a stable path; if spending patterns continue to follow those of recent decades, the ratio of state debt to output will increase without bound. Second, the key driver of increasing state and local expenditures is health-care costs, especially Medicaid and subsidies for health-insurance exchanges under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2009. Third, states have large implicit debts for unfunded pension liabilities, making their net debt positions substantially worse than official debt statistics indicate. Fourth, if spending trends continue and tax revenues remain near their historical levels relative to output, most states will reach dangerous ratios of debt to GDP within 20 to 30 years. Fifth, states differ in their degrees of fiscal imbalance, but the overriding fact is that all states face fiscal meltdown in the foreseeable future.

Underlying his projections, Miron makes a number of assumptions, which he insists are biased, if anything, toward more optimistic outcomes. He expects that state spending will continue to increase at a rate comparable to the average growth rate of the 1962-2008 time frame. Future expenditure growth will be hard to restrain, he contends, because it will be dominated by Medicaid and other health-care spending. He assumes that interest rates on government debt will remain stable, despite a significant risk that it could run higher, and that economic growth will continue at historical rates despite some evidence that it might be slower. But, critically, he also assumes that tax revenues as a percentage of the economy will not increase as a percentage of the GDP. Political pressures will prevent politicians from raising taxes, so legislators will resort to budgetary gimmickry and off-balance sheet borrowing to make ends meet.

If you find those assumptions to be reasonable, or even somewhat optimistic, then you should be very worried. One very important assumption Miron does not make is that the federal government experiences a fiscal crisis between now and then, cutting back on federal aid to states and localities and crippling the national economy. If you believe that a Boomergeddon-style scenario will occur within the next 15 to 20  years, as I do, then the day of reckoning for the states will come all the sooner.

Virginia is in better condition than the average state, though that will buy it a reprieve of only a few years. The commonwealth’s adjusted debt-to-GDP ratio in 2008 was 7.5%, compared to 11.2% nationally. While states with weaker finances will reach the dreaded 90% debt-to-GDP ratio by as early as 2023, it will take Virginia until 2034. If Virginia manages to reduce expenditure growth by 0.5% less than historical averages, it will delay Doomsday until 2041. By eking out a growth rate 0.5% faster than historical averages, it can delay crunch time until 2042. (Miron does not consider a scenario of a slower rate of spending growth and a higher rate of economic growth.)

As with all such long-term projections, these assume that past trends continue indefinitely as before, which, of course, they won’t. What I fear most is a global investor revolt against sovereign debt, triggered most likely by a default by Spain, Italy and other European Union countries, which drives up risk premiums for sovereign debt in all advanced democratic societies. The contagion could easily spread to California, Illinois, New Jersey and New York. If one of those states defaulted, all states would wind up paying higher interest rates on their debt. States don’t use long-term debt to finance day-to-day government operations, but they do use it to fund critical educational and infrastructure investments needed for economic growth.

I see no evidence that state leaders are on the same wavelength as Miron: They persist in thinking of the commonwealth’s sterling credit rating as unshakable. We still have time to enact fundamental deep-structure reforms to transportation, land use, health care delivery and education that would bring costs in line with revenues, but not as much as we think. The requisite sense of urgency does not exist. Unless the public temperament changes soon, Boomergeddon will not spare Virginia.

Moody’s puts Virginia AAA rating under review

As I noted several weeks ago, if the federal government’s AAA rating is cut owing to skittishness over the debt ceiling, Virginia’s AAA rating could suffer as well. And now, Moody’s has made the possibility of such a downgrade quite clear:

— Moody’s Investors Service has placed on review for possible downgrade the Aaa ratings of the states of Maryland, New Mexico, South Carolina, Tennessee, and the Commonwealth of Virginia. In connection with Moody’s July 13 action placing the Aaa government bond rating of the United States on review for downgrade, Moody’s announced that it would assess the ratings of Aaa-rated states to gauge their sensitivity to sovereign risk. The review actions affect a combined $24 billion of general obligations and related debt.

Other states Moody’s rates as AAA aren’t on the list. So why Virginia, but not, say Alaska or North Carolina? I’ll let the bullet points do the talking:

• Sensitivity to national economic trends compared to other Aaa-rated states based on Moody’s Economy.com measure of employment volatility due to U.S. fluctuations: Above average

• Federal employees as a percentage of the state’s total employment: Above average

• Capital markets risk: Low due to a small amount of puttable variable rate debt outstanding

• Federal procurement contracts as a percentage of state gross domestic product: Above average

• Medicaid as a percentage of total expenditures: Below average

• Available fund balance as a percentage of operating revenue: Below average

While the ratings agency makes it clear that any downgrade of state debt like Virginia’s would be on a case-by-case basis, the points above still ought to be quite sobering for those who believe that Virginia — business friendly, well-managed commonwealth that it may be — controls its own fate. It does not.

Ultimately, it’s the fate of our impoverished Uncle on the Potomac that decides. Remember that as the resident political class beats its breast over its already spent budget surplus.

— Norm Leahy

(Cross posted at Score Radio Network)

Egan-Jones downgrades U.S. debt

by Norm Leahy

A less well-known ratings agency, Egan-Jones, has downgraded the federal government’s debt from AAA to AA+. The report explaining why can be found here. If you’re not a client, Zero Hedge has the press release, complete with charts, which gives you a solid understanding of the report’s contents:

We are taking a negative action not based on the delay in raising the debt ceiling but rather our concern about the high level of debt to GDP in excess of 100% compared to Canada’s 35%. Nonetheless, since the US’s debt is denominated in dollars, a hard default is unlikely.

So the mummery behind the debt ceiling talks has little to do with the government’s fundamentals, which are only getting worse. This additional item is worth remembering as doomsday (or at least doomsday as it is preached in the press) approaches:

Egan-Jones does not view a country’s ability to print its own currency as a guarantee against default. Additionally, Egan-Jones generally views cases of excessive currency devaluation as a de facto default.

Based upon that last bit, one could argue that the Federal Reserve’s mass printing of money over the last several years has effectively rendered the United States a larger version of Zimbabwe.

(Cross posted at Score Radio Network)