by The Jefferson Council
Prejudiced professors fail to do their homework
A letter signed by 191 University of Virginia faculty membersย accuses the Board of Visitors of running a “sham” process, engaging in โhastyโ behavior, and conducting a โsecretive” search in selecting Scott Beardsley as UVA’s next President. These are serious charges leveled against serious people. They deserve serious scrutiny.
They don’t survive it.
The letter is a case study in what happens when predetermined conclusions go looking for evidence rather than the other way around. It is riddled with unsubstantiated accusations, embarrassing omissions, and at least one central claim that is provably, demonstrably false, as anyone who bothered to read both Beardsleyโs and Jim Ryanโs presidential employment contracts would immediately know.
The UVA community (students, alumni, donors, administrators and faculty who did not sign) deserves to know what this letter actually is: advocacy dressed as scholarship, and sloppy advocacy at that.
The “poison pill” that isn’t — the letter’s most damning error
Let’s start with the claim that should disqualify the letter’s authors from being taken seriously on contract matters: the assertion that Scott Beardsley’s employment agreement contains a presidential “poison pill” making it financially catastrophic to remove him.
This is false. Itโs not debatable and not a matter of interpretation.
(more…)














