by Steve Haner
Today a Senate committee is scheduled to take up the billย directing Virginiaโs two investor-owned utilities to proposeย hugeย battery installationsย whichย will cover square miles of ground,ย cost ratepayers billions of dollarsย andย whichย will produce zero energy to power our homes and businesses.ย ย The bill has Governor Abigail Spanbergerโs endorsement.ย ย
So far, legislators have been in a โsee, hear and speak no evilโ posture on the issue, almost disinterested in the proposalโs overall cost, impact on ratepayer bills, or any challenges to the batteriesโ safety or energy benefits.ย ย
If the Senate discussion mirrors the brief presentation (there was no debate) on the House version of the bill last week,ย which was approved by a subcommittee with a newย substitute,ย it will shed no real light.ย ย ย
During the House subcommittee discussion Thursday, a lobbyist for Dominion Energy Virginia made it clear the company does not support the substitute as it stands and cited safety concerns. They want to use tougher fire protection rules thanย now in the bill, but the language explicitly prevents that. She stood at the podium waving the red flag ofย fire safetyย and not one legislator asked her whyย Dominionย isย nervous.ย ย












