Bacon's Rebellion

The Democratic Coalition’s Conflicts of Interest Cause Much Political Scrambling

by James C. Sherlock

It is tough to be a Democratic politician in Richmond or Washington. Now that they govern, they find it one big game of coalition whack-a-mole.

I have written today of the conflicts between the interests of teachers unions and those of parents playing out in the Virginia General Assembly. That vital Democratic suburban women demo is in play.

That is the tip of the iceberg for Democrats. They have assembled a coalition whose interests are fundamentally opposed. Those fissures are only fully exposed when they have unfettered governance, which they have now both in Richmond and Washington.

The only things they seem to agree on are big government, free money and government regulation and control of nearly everything except their own interests.

After that, it gets dicey.

The problem is that the Democratic coalition contains many member groups with fundamentally conflicting interests that each holds dear. And when they win full control, all of the members of that coalition want interest fulfillment simultaneously.  Good luck with that.

A few examples:

I honestly don’t know how the politicians keep all of that straight. Actually they don’t. Democrats in Richmond clearly didn’t see the parents’ open-the-schools revolt coming.

The internecine carnage at some level could be fun to watch if the public interest was ever in the conversation.

It is not.

Exit mobile version