Poll Shows Partisan Divide on Natural Gas, Solar Site Approvals

By Steve Haner

Virginia registered voters are strongly in favor of allowing utilities to build new natural gas generation plants, a key issue facing Virginia because current state law mandates the complete elimination of that fuel source for electricity generation in 15 years.   

On another key energy issue likely to face the 2025 General Assembly starting Wednesday, Virginians are also opposed to the creation of a new state oversight process that would be empowered to override local objections to the construction of large solar farms. In that case, however, the division is closer — with about half of the Democrats and even one third of the Republicans polled in favor of such a bill.   

The survey was conducted on behalf of the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy by Mason-Dixon Polling & Strategy. Between December 17 and 20, 625 registered voters were questioned. The Thomas Jefferson Institute questions were part of a larger survey conducted by Mason-Dixon on multiple other issues.  

Republican leaders and legislators are getting a clear message on both of these question from their base voters. The message is more mixed for Democrats, and their leadership clearly should at least reconsider the “no way, no how” approach on using natural gas for electricity in the future. But the political analysis always must focus on the Independents, and there Virginia’s Democrats are clearly out of step, while Republicans are in line with the voters both sides need to win the 2025 election contests. 

On the bitter cold morning this was being written, the vast majority of the electricity being generated along the eastern seaboard came from natural gas or coal, both fuels Democratic Party orthodoxy and state law insist must go away. Dominion Energy Virginia is pushing back in its latest integrated resource plan, proposing instead to add up to 6,000 megawatts of additional gas plants in coming years. The idea is being bitterly opposed.  

Here is the question we posed on that issue:  

QUESTION: Virginia’s largest electricity provider wants to build additional natural gas power plants to meet future energy needs. It states that more natural gas will be needed because it works more continually than wind and solar power. Do you support or oppose the construction of new natural gas plants? 

Overall, 66% of respondents said “support” and only 31% “oppose,” with an unusually small 3% claiming to be undecided. Among the 214 self-identified Democrats in the sample, 46% favored more gas and 49% opposed it. The contrast with Republicans was stark (91% versus 7%).  Independents were also comfortably in support of new natural gas plants (62% to 35%). There were 195 Republican respondents and 216 self-identified Independents.  

It is not clear yet whether legislation will be introduced this year to amend or repeal the Virginia Clean Economy Act’s (VCEA) mandated schedule for the full elimination of coal and natural gas. The law grants the regulatory State Corporation Commission discretion to allow additional gas plants if it is convinced that they are needed to maintain reliability. Legislation could either reinforce that autonomy or reduce it, but Governor Glenn Youngkin (R) is on record favoring adding natural gas and keeping it as a fuel source beyond the VCEA deadlines.  

There is no question the issue of local control over the siting of large solar projects, and perhaps other infrastructure favored by the need to comply with the VCEA, will be squarely in front of legislators in the next few months. Developing such a bill has been the major focus of stakeholder groups and a legislative study panel, newly energized with a hard anti-hydrocarbon fuel agenda.   

Question: Local opposition and zoning rules can make it difficult for large solar power farms that often occupy hundreds of acres to get approved. Legislation is being proposed to create a state oversight process that could override local objections or zoning rules and grant the needed permission. Do you support or oppose such legislation? 

Overall, 41% of respondents favored such legislation and 53% opposed it.  Among Democrats the division was 49% in favor and 41% opposed, with a full 10% undecided.  Republicans split 33% in favor and 61% against, with Independents 40% in favor and 58% opposed.   

Mason-Dixon also provides a regional cross tabulation, but the sample sizes are so small they must be viewed cautiously. Opposition to adding new natural gas was strongest in Northern Virginia and weakest in the state’s southwest region. But the issue of allowing a state entity to make project location decisions over local objections didn’t produce much regional variation as opposition remained consistent across the subgroupings.   

Instead, there was an age pattern, with respondents under age 50 slightly favoring a law to provide state override authority and respondents 50 or older opposing it. On the question of adding new natural gas, however, even the younger cohort favored it, 61% to 27%. Black voters comprised 19% of the sample, and they favored adding natural gas (55% to 37%) and split closely on the question of local control over plant locations (43% supporting a state override and 45% opposing it.) 

First published this morning by the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

5 responses to “Poll Shows Partisan Divide on Natural Gas, Solar Site Approvals”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    The GA has expressed a goal of the elimination of coal and natural gas generating plants by a certain time. However the legislation, VCEA, authorizes the SCC to permit the construction of new natural gas facilities, if it is convinced there is a need, which has always been one of the functions of the VCEA. Therefore, why is there a need to change the law, if the SCC has this authority?

    That poll question was one of those that does not easily lend itself to a "yes" or "no" answer. I could have answered, "Yes, if ….", or "No, unless ….."

  2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    โ€œโ€ฆbecause it works more continually than wind and solar power.โ€

    Gee, I wonder what the response may have been had you added that this was not true with battery backup added when renewables become more reliable than fossil fuel generationโ€ฆ? Maybe I can add that point when I pay for my pollโ€ฆ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

  3. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    I'm sure glad that I no longer live in Virginia. The Democrats have forgotten what my distant cousin said about what America needs for energy sources — all of the above. Incremental improvement is improvement.

    And should anyone be surprised that individuals are concerned about what's built in their communities. While people who want renewable energy need to accept the facilities that produce that energy, a takeover of local land use by the state seems outrageous.

  4. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    We have a lazy society thinking we have a choice, that all "dirty" must be done by China (or maybe the Red states can do some). We will only participate in making stuff the world needs to go 'round if we can choose politically acceptable stuff we want to help make.

  5. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    re: " because it works more continually than wind and solar power."

    Bogus question IMO. You could easily have worded this to not portray it as an either/or question.

    1. "Do you oppose building more wind/solar if it provides cheaper power but have gas plants to back it up when needed?

    and the same problem with question 2.

    2. Are you in favor of more wind/solar to power new data centers?

    You've often said in prior comments that a lot depends on how the questions are worded and I agree and this poll proves it!

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT