By Steve Haner
The best defense has always been a good offense.ย With Virginia Democrats under some political pressure over their wind, solar and electric vehicle addictions (not enough pressure, in my opinion), Virginiaโs environmental activists are counterattacking at Republicans who wonโt drink their green Kool-Aid.
The Virginia League of Conservation Voters has announced a digital media buy aimed at nine Republican House members who voted against some of LCVโs favorite bills.ย The claim is that Republican votes caused rate increases which enriched some unnamed big energy company.ย Dominion Energy is unnamed in the ads, of course, because it gives more money to Democrats than it does Republicans in Virginia.ย It has spent twice as much so far this cycle buying Democrat loyalty as Clean Virginia has, and that is saying something.ย So Democrats have to tiptoe around Dominion this year, but that’s another story.
You can see the ads here and here.ย In this old comms guyโs opinion, Iโve seen better. The longer one in particular is confusing, but they are both worthless unless somehow they get tied to the individual candidates and the election. Instead, the message in the tag line is โclean energy lowers prices.โย No, and it isnโt even that clean, but thatโs also another story.
In explaining why it did this, LCVโs release on its website cited three specific 2025 bills, two of which passed and one of them vetoed.ย Let us explore those bills in the order in which they listed them, and why someone might have voted against them.ย None of them lower any prices at all.ย
House Bill 2266, which was signed into law, is described by them as cutting โexcessive interconnection costs โฆto make small clean energy projects more affordable and bring projects online faster.โย Well, no, but it directs the State Corporation Commission to work with the utilities on improving that process. That is not a bill that this observer targeted as obnoxious. I should have.












