• Same Controversy, New Plaintiffs, New Arguments

    by Steve Emmert

    (Steve Emmert, who formerly published the Virginia Appellate News & Analysis blog, offered this legal perspective on Virginia’s redistricting debate. — JAB)

    I continue to believe that the impetus for this new filing was a recognition by the plaintiffsโ€™ lawyers that the judgeโ€™s original order last month contained everything they wanted except specificity. (Iโ€™m reading between the lines here, as I have no inside knowledge and have had no contact with any of the lawyers in the case. Iโ€™m also inferring and therefore assuming that the lawyers for the plaintiffs in the two cases are the same, but I can’t be certain of that yet.) They could have gone back to the judge and asked for an amended injunction order in the original lawsuit, but that foreseeably would have snagged them in a procedural issue related to the appeal to the Supreme Court.

    The cleaner approach would be to get a new set of plaintiffs and file a new lawsuit, ensuring that the matter fell into the fertile soil of a court that had already ruled their way, albeit imperfectly. And as weโ€™ve seen, that’s what they did. They filed the new suit on Wednesday and managed to get a lightning-fast hearing that convened yesterday at noon. From what I can see, that was some very effective lawyering.

    I believe that this time, the lawyers โ€” assuredly the plaintiffsโ€™ lawyers โ€” prepared a carefully worded order and simply handed it up to the judge at the close of the hearing. It contains language that distinguishes this suit from the previous one on the simple ground that the parties are different, so they arenโ€™t stuck with proceedings in the original lawsuit.

    (more…)

  • Restore “Fairness”? Fairness to Whom?

    Map of Virginia displaying various districts, each represented by different colors and numbers, indicating administrative or electoral boundaries.
    Proposed new congressional districts

    by Ken Reid

    The Republican National Committee (RNC), and Virginia U.S. House Reps. Morgan Griffith, R-9, and Ben Cline, R-6, announced Feb. 18 a second challenge to the Democrat-controlled General Assemblyโ€™s April 21 ballot measure to suspend bipartisan redistricting โ€“ which passed in 2020 by a roughly 65-35 margin โ€“ so the GA can gerrymander Virginiaโ€™s 11 congressional districts to give Democrats a 10-1 advantage (vs. a 6-5 edge now).

    A circuit court judge in Tazewell County, where the suit was filed, issued an injunction to stop the State Board of Elections from going forward with any work to prepare for the special election.

    The GOP suit raises several new legal and constitutional objections to the referendum, some of which are comprehensible only to lawyers, but at least one of which any voter can understand. Specifically, is the reference to “fairness” in the referendum legal?

    Here is the language that will appear on the ballot:ย ย 

    Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia’s standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?

    (more…)

  • Virginia Dems Lose Leftist Media Support Over Gerrymandering

    by Kerry Dougherty

    Maybe, just maybe, Virginia Democrats have gone too far. Their lopsided congressional district map, designed to create safe districts for handpicked Dem candidates may simply be too brazen to get a nod from voters in April.

    Looks like brazen election rigging is a bridge too far for the leftist fan club of the legacy media.

    After all, when the The New York Times calls out your chicanery, youโ€™re in trouble. When they join the chorus of Dem-loyal outlets like The Washington Post and Virginia Mercury, this amounts to a media coup.

    Dem loyalists are alarmed.

    In a Wednesday piece by Times political reporter Reid J. Epstein, An Architect of Virginiaโ€™s Redistricting Will Run for A Newย  Seat Himself: Dan Helmer, A Democratic State Lawmaker Played A Key Role In Putting Redrawn Congressional Maps Before State Voters, the Times staffer spotlights the shameless partisan behavior of Helmer and other Dems.

    Earlier this week, Helmer announced that heโ€™s running for the new 7th Congressional District seat. You know, the one created just for him! Continue reading.


  • No, RTD, That Bill Does Not Cut Future Electric Rates

    by Steve Haner

    The nonsense that the General Assembly is passing a bill to shift huge energy costs onto data centers and off all the other utility customers is going to be a bipartisan meme.ย A bill that merely punts that issue to the regulatory State Corporation Commission passed on a unanimous State Senate vote. ย ย 

    Senate Bill 253, which first appeared last week as a last-minute substitute to an unrelated bill, was touted as โ€œLegislation to Cut Electric Ratesโ€ฆโ€ in a Richmond Times-Dispatch headline. The paper went on to describe the bill as โ€œpromisingโ€ a three percent rate reduction for residential customers.ย Did either reporter listed in the by-line read the language in question?ย ย 

    The House companion bill, House Bill 1393, was not approved unanimously. It received nay votes from most House Republicans.ย These bills will be the political fig leaf some legislators will try to hide behind as all the other energy bills they have passed will be raising costs in coming years.

    All the relevant enactment clause in the bills does is direct Dominion Energy Virginia, and only Dominion, to โ€œpropose to the State Corporation Commission in a petitionโ€ (emphasis added) a series of changes in how various major capital costs are allocated by customer class, imposing them in full on the large mega users.ย The SCC, which had already stated it was going to examine those same allocation issues, has full discretion to say no. Look again at the language:

    (more…)

  • Will Virginia Criminalize Opposition to Islam?

    by Daniel Greenfield

    A smiling man in a blue suit jacket and light blue shirt sitting on stairs.
    State Senator Saddam Azlan Salim

    Senator Saddam Azlan Salim, D-Faircax, claims that Virginia is in the middle of an โ€˜Islamophobiaโ€™ crisis. The second Muslim selected for the state senate, after Ghazala Hashmi who is now Virginiaโ€™s Lt. Governor, the Bangladeshi immigrant, from a country where non-Muslims are being murdered in the streets, has made complaining about “Islamophobia” in his new home his signature issue.

    Salimโ€™s first priority has been a bill to define “Islamophobia.” The most notable thing about his bill — SB 624 “assault and battery; definition of ‘Islamophobia’ penalty” — is how completely unnecessary it is. Virginia already has multiple layers of hate crimes enhancements for assaults motivated by race, ethnicity and religion. During Gov. Glenn Youngkinโ€™s term, the legislature passed SB 7 (Senate Bill 7) and its HB counterpart enhancing the assault charge for anyone who โ€œintentionally selects the person against whom a simple assault is committed because of his race, religious conviction, gender, disability, gender identity, sexual orientation, color, or ethnic or national origin.โ€

    That should cover Islam and Muslims. And yet Salim introduced a three-page bill with 10 clauses in its first section, a whole lot of which do nothing more than add “(including Islam)” where it isnโ€™t remotely needed or useful. For example, โ€œbecause of his race, religious conviction (including Islam), gender, disability, gender identityโ€ or โ€œbecause of his race, religious conviction (including Islam).โ€ Islam appears to be the only religion being singled out this way.

    (SB 624, which had 15 Democratic co-sponsors, was referred to the Courts of Justice Committee and continued to the next session. — JAB)

    Why provide Islam with this privileged status? Because it makes Islam distinct, which is a step towards making it superior, and making Islam distinct and superior is the religious mission of all believing Muslims.

    (more…)

  • Buttressing Virginia’s AAA Finances

    Running budget surpluses, cutting taxes, and maxing out the rainy day fund

    Professional headshot of a man with light gray hair, smiling, wearing a suit and tie against a neutral background.
    Steve Cummings

    Excerpt from the Feb. 13 Oinkonomics podcast interview of former Secretary of Finance Steve Cummings about Governor Glenn Youngkin’s fiscal legacy:

    “We were able to generate $10 billion in cumulative surpluses. Some of that was last year, where a conservative position was taken at the end of the year to hold some money back in addition to our reserve fund. The extra dollars that were held back in the budget added another $900 million. So, $10 billion of cumulative surplus, the ability to return $9 billion to taxpayers within the four-year term of the Governor. Much of that is recurring. That will continue forever. So, itโ€™s not one and done.

    “We did have rebates [based on] one-time events. We took a rainy-day reserve fund from about $2.5 billion at the end of the Northam administration. Itโ€™s now $4.7 billion. It is at the required level. As compared to the other 13 or 14 AAA-rated states, we are the number two funded rainy-day reserve fund. At the beginning, we were third from the bottom. So, taxpayer money, rainy day reserve fund, and then you just go through the list of major policy areas that were able to get accomplished. Economic development Iโ€™d put first, and that ties into what we have been able to do with respect to the general fund revenue side, has really been stunning.”


  • Rigging Elections to Save Democracy

    Last week the state Supreme Court negated the 2020 votes of 2.8 million Virginians who supported redistricting reform.

    A judge in a courtroom holding up a ruling document labeled 'DISENFRANCHISED,' with a large crowd of supporters in the background, some wearing blue and others in red, raising their fists in protest.
    Image credit: ChatGPT

    by Scott Dreyer

    On Friday, February 13, the Supreme Court of Virginia (SCOVA) overruled a lower judge and stated that an election about the redistricting of Virginiaโ€™s 11 Congressional seats can proceed.

    Democrats, angered by President Trumpโ€™s urging GOP-led states to gerrymander their Congressional lines ahead of this yearโ€™s midterm elections, claim they are changing Virginiaโ€™s lines now to make elections โ€œfair.โ€ They see adding four new Democrat Congressmen from Virginia as a way to offset possible new Republican Congressmen from other states such as Texas, North Carolina, and Missouri.

    Republicans, on the other hand, claim that what other states are doing should not dictate what happens here, and also point to a 2020 election where over 65% of Virginia voters wanted to ban political gerrymandering by the General Assembly.

    Moreover, to make it harder to amend the Virginia Constitution, state law requires a full election cycle to pass between the General Assembly voting to put an amendment before the voters and the actual vote for that proposed amendment. And for full disclosure, the text of such proposed amendments must be made public at least 90 days before voting begins.

    Detractors of the new maps point out that state Democrats, in their fast push to get the issue before voters, failed to meet the above two criteria, and thus the proposal is illegal.

    (more…)

  • Radical Progressive Bills Advance in General Assembly

    Car tax relief dies as radical Democrat legislation moves forward.

    A large group of colorful, cartoonish monster plush toys piled in front of a white building with columns, resembling a government structure.
    Image credit: Chat GPT

    by Victoria Manning

    Car tax relief was a central issue in the 2025 Virginia gubernatorial race. Both candidatesย publicly supportedย ending the car tax. Yet now that sheโ€™s governor, Abigail Spanberger has failed to deliver. Meanwhile, Democrats are pushing legislation to raise taxes and impose radical social justice ideology onto local communities and public schools.

    As Democrats torpedoed a Republican bill to eliminate the car tax in committee, even a Democrat-backed bill to simply study the possibility of nixing the tax failed to garner enough support.

    Restoration News has reviewed thousands of bills filed this legislative session in Virginia. Weโ€™ve highlighted some that stand out for their negative impact on the public and some for their sheer absurdity. The current schedule requires legislation to be passed by March 14, and then those bills head to the governorโ€™s desk for approval. The public can check the status of bills and provide public comment through the Virginia legislative information system.

    Democratic-Sponsored Legislation Passed in House or Senate

    HB1โ€”Increases the minimum wage to $13.75 by January 2027 and to $15 by January 2028. In 2020, it was $7.25. Passed in House.

    HB 6โ€”Establishes the right to obtain contraception, with no age limit or parental consent. Passed in House.

    (more…)

  • They Think Your Electric Bill is Just a Piggy Bank to Raid

    by Steve Haner

    Key energy legislation poised to pass the 2026 General Assembly will increase your future electricity bills, not lower them. The bills will worsen price increases already caused by the Virginia Clean Economy Act, which passed the last time Virginia was under one-party control. ย 

    As the Assembly crosses its first deadline, with each chamber now able to only consider bills approved by the other body, several of the proposals discussed below have passed on both sides. They likely will end up in front of Governor Abigail Spanberger (D) for final approval.ย 

    Many will raise future electricity costs for everyone. Others will have a more targeted impact, as the Assemblyโ€™s majority is creating or expanding programs that use ratepayer funds to pay for energy home improvements for the favored few. Why raise taxes when you can hide social spending programs on utility bills?ย ย 

    The demarcation line toย identifyย those deserving the financial investment in their residences,ย as opposed to thoseย whoย provide the cash,ย seems to be 200 percent of the officialย federal poverty measure. That is an income ofย $66,000 for aย family of four inย 2026.ย 

    That will be the new, higherย eligibilityย cut-off for the existingย Percentage of Income Paymentย Programย (PIPP), first authorized in 2020, underย House Bill 884. PIPP creates a monthly bill cap for its enrollees, and the pending bill also lowers that cap, which will further increase its reach. The cap now kicks in if the electricity bill (including heat) exceeds ten percent of the enrolleeโ€™s income, but under this bill the cap is lowered to five percent of income.ย 

    (more…)


  • Don’t Mess With Texas Natural Gas

    Natural gas kept the lights on in Texas during the coldest days of this past January, just the way it did in Virginia.The popular Democratic nonsense narrative that Texas is achieving energy nirvana with all its solar and wind and battery assets should just be disregarded.

    You can see above what was working during the peak cold period in the Lone Star state, which goes it alone on electricity and is not part of an interstate energy marketplace like our PJM Interconnection.ย Battery assets, all the rage with the 2026 Virginia General Assembly, made only minor contributions on the shoulders of when solar was available.

    Texas relies less on nuclear or coal power than Virginia and PJM, so natural gas may have been an even larger contributor than here to maintaining power service. Reported WattsUpWithThat.Com:

    From January 24 through January 27, fossil fuels and nuclear power delivered 77% of the electricity, wind delivered a fairly steady 15% and the combination of solar power and batteries delivered a paltry 8% of the electricity generationโ€ฆ (The wind actually does not look that steady in that graph but faded as solar rose.)

    (more…)

  • Why Stonewall Jackson Is Still Worth Honoring

    by Donald Smith

    A historical portrait of a man with a beard, wearing a military uniform and sunglasses, conveying a bold and confident demeanor.
    Dude! Image credit: Chat GPT

    The Capitol Square Preservation Council, which has the mission to review any major changes to the monuments in Capitol Square. Although it still exists, it has been defunded and no longer operates. These are my prepared remarks for the presentation I would gladly offer to the council, should it convene again, to consider the fate of Confederate monuments in the square.

    If the people and government of the Commonwealth cannot bring themselves to honor the legacy of Thomas โ€œStonewallโ€ Jackson, they will look silly, shallow, emotionally and culturally brittle, and incapable of dealing with complex matters. His statue should remain in Capitol Square.

    My name is Donald Smith, and I am a proud Son of Virginia. My mother was born in a cabin—I am not kidding, an actual cabin—outside of Lexington.  That cabin was built by my great-grandfather, Givens Kirkpatrick.  He, along with his father and all of his brothers, fought under the Confederate flag.  Their legacy, and the legacies of hundreds of thousands of past Virginians, are tied in with the legacy of Stonewall Jackson, the quirky but brilliant general who not only led them, but was one of them.

    Thomas J., โ€œStonewallโ€ Jackson, was unique in many ways.

    He came from a disadvantaged background. He lost his parents in childhood and was raised by an indifferent uncle. He was dirt-poor. He represents the vast majority of Virginians in the 1800s, who had to struggle to make ends meet. He was not a โ€œFirst Family of Virginiaโ€ Cavalier.

    (more…)

  • Dems Donโ€™t Want To Talk About Their River Of Poop

    by Kerry Dougherty

    In the past month Virginiaโ€™s two senators and governor have been busy on social medial.

    Mark Warner interrupted his relentless whining about President Trump long enough to demand that Kristi Noem and Pete Hegseth be sacked and to blame Robert Kennedy for an outbreak of measles among adults. Tim Kaine constantly blamed Trump for prices that have remained stubbornly high since his pal, Joe Biden, created 9.5% inflation. Meanwhile, heโ€™s ranted incessantly about Trumpโ€™s tariffs and ICE.

    Spanbergerโ€™s team clearly realizes the new gov is increasingly seen as a she-witch by voters who believe she lied about being moderate to get elected. Theyโ€™re attempting to soften her image with X posts that showed her merrily grilling some sort of meat, celebrating the birthday of Shadow Governor Louise Lucas and finally, on Saturday, wishing her husband a happy Valentineโ€™s Day.

    Continue reading.


  • Virginia’s Medicaid Finances

    Includes $21.8 million paid to managed care programs for dead enrollees.

    (more…)

  • How to Make Sure Virginia Universities Are Governed by Unaccountable, Leftist Oligarchies Forever


  • SCC Rejects Effort to Reverse Its Gas Plant Approval

    by Steve Haner

    Rendering of Chesterfield project from Dominion’s public website.

    The Virginia State Corporation Commission has rejected a petition for reconsideration pushed by opponents of Dominion Energyโ€™s planned Chesterfield natural gas generators. The environmental activist groups could now appeal the SCCโ€™s approval of the plant to the Virginia Supreme Court.

    The SCC is a court, after all, so its decisions can be appealed.ย  Whether continued legal wrangling over the 944-megawatt facility will delay the utilityโ€™s construction timeline is not clear, but there was no order from the SCC for the utility to pause preliminary work during the two months of this reconsideration process.

    The petition for reconsideration was filed on December 15 last year and answered by Dominion on January 16 this year. In a decision that was dated February 12, the three-member Commission stood by its conclusion that imminent threats to the electrical system’s reliability were sufficient to authorize the utility to build a new carbon-emitting power plant, despite the hurdles put in place by the Virginia Clean Economy Act.ย 

    โ€œIn addition to Dominionโ€™s evidence on this issue, expert witnesses for the Commissionโ€™s Staff (โ€œStaffโ€™) and for the Office of the Attorney Generalโ€™s Division of Consumer Counsel (โ€œConsumer Counselโ€) did not question Dominionโ€™s conclusion that a threat to reliability exists,โ€ the Commission wrote.

    (more…)