• Neither House nor Senate Budget Raises General Taxes

    But the Senate Strips the Data Center Tax Break Next Year

    by Steve Haner

    The Senate and House of Delegates financial committees met on Sunday to approve competing sets of amendments to the next Virginia budget, neither proposing any general tax increases. The Senate version included modest tax reform: a small taxpayer rebate for this year and an increase in the income tax standard deduction. ย 

    The Senate, however, allows the existing sales tax exemption for the data center industry to expire at the end of 2026, which raises almost an additional $1 billion over the next two years. A portion of the sales tax is dedicated to transportation, and the extra sales tax money to be paid by the data centers is earmarked for public transit in Northern Virginia.ย ย ย 

    The full Senate and House are expected to pass their competing budget bills in the coming week, setting up the annual conference committee process to reconcile differences before the scheduled General Assembly adjournment on March 14. Because of the Senateโ€™s move against the data centers and its proposed tax reforms, a contentious conference is possible.ย 

    Both budgets include an increase of the base legislative salary to $45,000 per year starting in 2028. Neither committee discussed the raises openly during their meetings, with the only mention coming when a Senate Republican spoke up to announce he would abstain on that individual item.ย ย 

    (more…)


  • Jeanine’s Memes

    Two women engaged in a conversation, with one expressing disbelief about the effectiveness of education spending. Text overlay indicates a quote about spending $3 trillion on education and questioning the outcomes.

    See more memes at The Bull Elephant.


  • It’s Just a Box!

    Virginia is one of three states that require businesses that sell caskets to get a funeral director’s license.


  • Tariff Ruling Correct, Good for Virginia

    by Derrick A. Max

    The Supreme Courtโ€™s decision in Learning Resources v. Trump is a landmark reaffirmation of one of the Constitutionโ€™s most fundamental principles: the power to tax belongs to Congress alone. Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution explicitly vests in the legislative branch the authority โ€œto lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises.โ€ Tariffs are taxes, and the Court rightly held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose sweeping tariffs without clear congressional authorization.

    Chief Justice Robertsโ€™ opinion underscores what constitutional conservatives have long warned: permitting the Executive to wield such sweeping taxation authority erodes the separation of powers and undermines democratic accountability. Without this limit, revenue policy, the heart of governance, could be made unilaterally by a single individual rather than debated and enacted by the peopleโ€™s elected representatives. We did not overthrow a tax and tariff Monarch to be replaced by a tax and tariff executive.

    Yesterdayโ€™s Supreme Court decision vindicates the concerns voiced by the Thomas Jefferson Institute, and by former Virginia Governor George Allen who participated in this case. In earlier commentary, Governor Allen criticized these tariffs as โ€œan unconstitutional seizure of taxation power,โ€ a position rooted not in ideology but in constitutional textualism. The Framers deliberately placed fiscal authority in the legislative branch to prevent exactly the kind of executive overreach this case presented.

    Governor Allen rightly warned about the risk of creating a unilateral emergency power, that when in the hands of a future President of the Left, could be used to declare a climate emergency to impose massive tariffs on all sorts of items and fuels in furtherance of the leftistโ€™s hysterical green agenda.  

    (more…)

  • Time to End the Baseless Attacks on UVA’s Presidential Search

    by The Jefferson Council

    The Rotunda at the University of Virginia, featuring a circular structure with a domed roof and large white columns against a blue sky.

    If you have listened to some of the continuous, repetitive commentary surrounding UVAโ€™s recent presidential search, you might be led to believe it was some kind of rushed, politicized backroom maneuver. The facts and the truth tell a totally different story.

    In fact, the search committee was the broadest and most inclusive in UVA history and the timeline itself was clearly in accordance with recent University history. The committee had twenty-eight members (the largest number ever), composed of faculty, students, and a bipartisan group of present and former Board members. The search committee also created a dedicated website inviting public engagement and input. By any reasonable measure, this was an expansive and inclusive process.

    The timeline actually followed by the committee was squarely in sync with prior UVA presidential searches. At five months, it mirrored the searches that brought John Casteen and Terry Sullivan to UVA, thus giving the lie to the oft repeated calumny that this was an intentionally rushed process. Moreover, the search firm retainedโ€”Isaacson, Millerโ€”was the same one that recruited Jim Ryan. There was no sudden deviation from past practice, no improvised structure, no secret alternative track. The process followed was established and familiar.

    What is different is not the process, but the highly coordinated reaction to the outcome.

    (more…)

  • Finally, a Law to Help Teachers!

    by Matt Hurt

    This year HB568 was introduced in the General Assembly.ย The bill aims to reduce the amount of work required by educators to comply with the Virginia Literacy Act by leveraging technology.ย  If enacted, this law would significantly reduce the time teachers and reading specialists spend on paperwork, allowing them to devote more time to helping students learn to read.

    A joyful teacher in a suit stands in a classroom, celebrating while covered in red streamers, as surprised students watch in amazement.
    Teacher shredding red tape. Image credit: Grok

    The Virginia Literacy Act (VLA) has many requirements related to reading instruction in grades Kindergarten through eight, with different expectations across grade bands.ย This article focuses on the requirements for students in grades Kindergarten through 3; however, HB568 would be beneficial across all grades.

    Among other requirements, the VLA mandates that student reading be assessed using the VALLSS assessment.ย In Kindergarten through third grade, this assessment functions as a screener to identify students who may be struggling readers.ย Students who are identified as โ€œhigh riskโ€ based on VALLSS results are required to have a reading plan.ย The goals and objectives to be written in each studentโ€™s plan must be derived directly from VALLSS data and address the specific reading weakness for each student.

    During the 2023โ€“2024 school year, a group of reading specialists and division literacy leaders from our consortium met to address the daunting task of creating and managing the large number of reading plans anticipated under the VLA.ย Over several months, the group researched commercially available solutions to help manage this workload. While a few options were identified, they were ultimately found to be insufficient.ย ย 

    A smaller group of these educators continued to meet and eventually decided that we needed to build our own technology solution to meet the requirements of the VLA.ย They developed a detailed document outlining functional expectations for such a system.ย Several divisions in the consortium endorsed the idea and agreed to fund its development.ย A programmer was hired to bring the educatorsโ€™ vision to life, resulting in a program later named the โ€œVLA Trackerโ€.

    (more…)

  • Bacon Meme of the Week

    Packages of cinnamon-flavored bacon labeled 'Cinnamon Toast Crunch' on a store shelf, featuring colorful branding and a humorous caption questioning the necessity of this product.

  • Note on Comments

    The goal of Bacon’s Rebellion has always been to maintain a high-quality comments section where people of diverse views can engage in civil dialogue on topics of state and local interest. Inevitably, commenters, being human, are tempted to stray from matters addressed in the columns. Before long, some wind up debating the price of eggs in China. Readers of the comments who are curious to see what others are saying about the column can be deluged with irrelevant material.

    To address that problem, Bacon’s Rebellion is limiting new threads to two per reader. That restriction does not apply to those responding to the comments of others. Readers still will be able to respond to one another on existing threads as much as they like. (We will monitor those threads, however, to make sure readers aren’t using them to introduce new and off-topic subjects.)

    If readers have a burning desire to discuss issues not raised by our regular columnists and guest contributors, I will consider setting up a special post where you can go at it with your favorite antagonists. Email me your suggestions at [email protected].


  • Give Us Your Voter Registration Rolls

    by Dick Hall-Sizemore

    The Trump administration has sued the Commonwealth of Virginia for refusing to turn over its voting registration rolls to the U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ).

    The Commonwealth is not alone. Currently, the administration has sued 24 states and the District of Columbia for refusing the demand. The states sued were primarily those with Democrat governors.

    Last May, the administration sent โ€œrequestsโ€ to all the states for digital copies of their registration rolls to include at least the following information: โ€œthe voter registrantโ€™s full name, date of birth, residential address, his or her state driverโ€™s license number or the last four digits of the registrantโ€™s social security number.โ€ย The purpose of the request was to enable the DOJ โ€œto test, analyze, and assess statesโ€™ VRLs [Voting Registration Lists] for proper list maintenance and compliance with federal law.โ€

    Along with submitting the data, states were asked to sign a โ€œConfidential Memorandum of Understandingโ€. That MOU included among provisions:

    • โ€œAfter analysis and assessment of your stateโ€™s VRL, the Justice Department will securely notify you or your state of any voter list maintenance issues, insufficiencies, inadequacies, deficiencies, anomalies, or concerns, the Justice Department found when testing, assessing, and analyzing your stateโ€™s VRL.โ€
    • โ€œYou agree therefore that within forty-five (45) days of receiving that notice from the Justice Department of any issues, insufficiencies, inadequacies, deficiencies, anomalies, or concerns, your state will clean its VRL/Data by removing ineligible voters and resubmit the updated VRL/Data to the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department to verify proper list maintenance has occurred by your state.โ€
    (more…)

  • The Death of Fair Representation

    Every partisan-drawn map is an insult, but Virginiaโ€™s is the most insulting.

    A cartoon-style illustration of the state of Virginia depicted as a character with large eyes and a distressed expression, lying on a colorful map background, with a playful and humorous design.
    Image credit: Bing Image Creator

    by Derrick A. Max

    There is a difference between redistricting and rigging. One is a constitutional necessity. The other is political temptation.ย Right now, Virginia stands at the crossroads between the two.ย On April 21st the voters will decide which way we turn.

    Using current congressional delegation data and 2024 presidential vote totals, we can measure fairness in a straightforward way: compare a partyโ€™s statewide vote share in the last Presidential election to the percentage of congressional seats it holds. Basically, the larger the gap between popular votes and Congressional seats, the more distorted the map.ย Yes, it is a crude measure, but it is insightful and measurable across all states.

    By that standard, the Commonwealth is currently one of the fairest large states in America.ย In Virginia, Democrats hold 6 of 11 seats or (54.5%) and Kamala Harris won 51.8% of the presidential vote in 2024.ย That creates a current seat/vote gap of just +2.7 points.

    In district drawing terms, that is remarkably proportional.ย Compare that to:

    Maryland: a +24.9-point gap
    California: a +24.2-point gap
    North Carolina: a +20.5-point gap.

    (more…)

  • States Confront Rising Energy Costs

    Data center demands create headaches for lawmakers

    Aerial view of a large industrial facility with multiple buildings and rooftop cooling units, surrounded by greenery and power lines.
    Data center complex in Ashburn

    by David J. Toscano

    As Donald Trump continues his campaign against offshore wind[1]ย and encourages the U.S. military to buy expensive, dirty coal[2], state governments are left to manage electricity affordability, reliability, andย climate goals on their own.

    It is a delicate balance. Consumers naturally want lower rates and reliability. But when it comes to energy policy, there is no free lunch. It is not simply finding the cheapest electrons, but ensuring that they can get to our homes, even if they have been generated from thousands of miles away. This requires transmission and distribution, two costly infrastructural needs whose costs are rising as our demand for electricity soars. When infrastructure is neglected, consumers face higher prices and power outages. Texas learned this lesson the hard way in 2021, when years of underinvestment caused major power outages during a historic winter storm. Today, Texasโ€™s electricity rates and monthly bills exceed those of many states, even those that promote climate change initiatives.

    With limited federal leadership, states must decide how to lower bills now without undermining long-term reliability and sustainabilityโ€”and be honest about who bears the costs.

    (more…)

  • Is Boeing Leaving Virginia?

    Not exactly. Calm down.

    A military fighter jet flying above fluffy white clouds against a blue sky.

    by Chris Saxman

    Boeing is relocating the headquarters of its Defense, Space & Security division from Arlington, Virginia back to St. Louis, Missouri to align leadership more closely with its primary engineering and manufacturing workforce.

    Company officials indicated the move is intended to improve operational focus, program execution, and proximity to production facilities.

    Boeingโ€™s overall corporate headquarters remains in Arlington, but defense leadership will now operate closer to its largest concentration of defense employees.

    • Leadership closer to 18,000+ regional defense employees
    • Greater alignment with engineering and manufacturing hubs
    • Focus on execution and program performance
    • Not a tax or political relocation
    (more…)

  • Same Controversy, New Plaintiffs, New Arguments

    by Steve Emmert

    (Steve Emmert, who formerly published the Virginia Appellate News & Analysis blog, offered this legal perspective on Virginia’s redistricting debate. — JAB)

    I continue to believe that the impetus for this new filing was a recognition by the plaintiffsโ€™ lawyers that the judgeโ€™s original order last month contained everything they wanted except specificity. (Iโ€™m reading between the lines here, as I have no inside knowledge and have had no contact with any of the lawyers in the case. Iโ€™m also inferring and therefore assuming that the lawyers for the plaintiffs in the two cases are the same, but I can’t be certain of that yet.) They could have gone back to the judge and asked for an amended injunction order in the original lawsuit, but that foreseeably would have snagged them in a procedural issue related to the appeal to the Supreme Court.

    The cleaner approach would be to get a new set of plaintiffs and file a new lawsuit, ensuring that the matter fell into the fertile soil of a court that had already ruled their way, albeit imperfectly. And as weโ€™ve seen, that’s what they did. They filed the new suit on Wednesday and managed to get a lightning-fast hearing that convened yesterday at noon. From what I can see, that was some very effective lawyering.

    I believe that this time, the lawyers โ€” assuredly the plaintiffsโ€™ lawyers โ€” prepared a carefully worded order and simply handed it up to the judge at the close of the hearing. It contains language that distinguishes this suit from the previous one on the simple ground that the parties are different, so they arenโ€™t stuck with proceedings in the original lawsuit.

    (more…)

  • Restore “Fairness”? Fairness to Whom?

    Map of Virginia displaying various districts, each represented by different colors and numbers, indicating administrative or electoral boundaries.
    Proposed new congressional districts

    by Ken Reid

    The Republican National Committee (RNC), and Virginia U.S. House Reps. Morgan Griffith, R-9, and Ben Cline, R-6, announced Feb. 18 a second challenge to the Democrat-controlled General Assemblyโ€™s April 21 ballot measure to suspend bipartisan redistricting โ€“ which passed in 2020 by a roughly 65-35 margin โ€“ so the GA can gerrymander Virginiaโ€™s 11 congressional districts to give Democrats a 10-1 advantage (vs. a 6-5 edge now).

    A circuit court judge in Tazewell County, where the suit was filed, issued an injunction to stop the State Board of Elections from going forward with any work to prepare for the special election.

    The GOP suit raises several new legal and constitutional objections to the referendum, some of which are comprehensible only to lawyers, but at least one of which any voter can understand. Specifically, is the reference to “fairness” in the referendum legal?

    Here is the language that will appear on the ballot:ย ย 

    Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia’s standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?

    (more…)

  • Virginia Dems Lose Leftist Media Support Over Gerrymandering

    by Kerry Dougherty

    Maybe, just maybe, Virginia Democrats have gone too far. Their lopsided congressional district map, designed to create safe districts for handpicked Dem candidates may simply be too brazen to get a nod from voters in April.

    Looks like brazen election rigging is a bridge too far for the leftist fan club of the legacy media.

    After all, when the The New York Times calls out your chicanery, youโ€™re in trouble. When they join the chorus of Dem-loyal outlets like The Washington Post and Virginia Mercury, this amounts to a media coup.

    Dem loyalists are alarmed.

    In a Wednesday piece by Times political reporter Reid J. Epstein, An Architect of Virginiaโ€™s Redistricting Will Run for A Newย  Seat Himself: Dan Helmer, A Democratic State Lawmaker Played A Key Role In Putting Redrawn Congressional Maps Before State Voters, the Times staffer spotlights the shameless partisan behavior of Helmer and other Dems.

    Earlier this week, Helmer announced that heโ€™s running for the new 7th Congressional District seat. You know, the one created just for him! Continue reading.