by James A. Bacon

Dave Singer is a radiologist at a Virginia hospital. He’s not a front-line physician with primary responsibility for patient care, but, as an in-house expert in reading x-rays, CT scans, MRI scans, and other medical images, he reviews hundreds of cases weekly. His vantage point allows him to spot patterns that might elude physicians who, by the nature of their jobs, focus on individual patients.
Since the COVID-19 epidemic, or, more precisely, since the roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccines, Singer has observed dozens of anomalies. Medical syndromes that he encountered rarely — uncommon types of internal bleeding, blood clots, and cancers, especially among younger patients — have surged in frequency at his hospital.
Drawing upon large bodies of data, scientists in other countries have drawn increasing attention to the risk of vaccine side effects. According to these high-altitude studies, many countries are experiencing higher-than-expected, or “excess,” mortality rates even as the COVID epidemic has receded. Some of the elevated mortality may be attributable to suicides, drug overdoses, delayed medical diagnoses or other repercussions of the COVID shutdowns. Vaccine side effects may be another contributing factor.
Singer’s experience provides a ground-level view. He believes that side effects are far more common than the U.S. medical establishment is willing to acknowledge. One reason — not the only one, but a big one — is that there is no system for capturing information about possible vaccination side effects. There is a system for reporting COVID infections and vaccinations, but doctors and hospitals don’t collect data on potential side effects in the same comprehensive way. Some actively suppress such reporting.
Our COVID statistics, Singer says, are “artifacts of how we measure COVID infections and COVID deaths” — not an accurate reflection of reality.










