By Steve Haner
A national industry group that advocates for home energy efficiency contractors has produced another report on how energy costs squeeze the poor the hardest, with Richmond one of its examples. The data was then used as an excuse to call for (you guessed it) the return of an energy carbon tax which paid those same contractors to do energy home improvements.

The American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE) is correct that the lowest income households struggle with basics like electricity, natural gas and other fuels, along with food, rent and clothing. It sucks to be poor.ย My big concern with the new report (full text here) is it doesnโt seem to account for the various government and private programs that provide hard cash to help with these bills, including the nascent Percentage of Income Payment Plan. ย
Richmond has a slightly deeper problem than the nation as a whole.ย Nationally 15% of low-income households face an โenergy burdenโ because they spend more than 6% of their income on it, but in Richmond that exceeds 17%. The big disparity is among renters (13% nationally but 16% in Richmond.)
The pitch of RGGI as the solution came Thursday morning in this from Virginia Mercury, which outlined the problem and then spent the final three paragraphs on the suspended Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, or RGGI. Mercury did a similar story back in April, based on a state report about energy assistance programs, and it also ended with a hard pitch for RGGI dollars to return. From the April report:
(more…)‘Since the first RGGI auction that Virginia participated in back in 2021, RGGI has provided nearly $400M for low-income energy-efficient housing,’ said Chelsea Harnish, executive director of the Energy Efficiency Council, a group that supports RGGI involvement and backed a bill this session that would increase transparency in energy efficiency program determinations. ‘There are no alternative funding options available at either the state or federal level for these programs in terms of program design nor funding levels.’















