• “They’re back!”

    In this past Sunday’s Washington Post’s Outlook section, the back page featured the opinion editorial “Don’t Shortchange Virginia” by the ‘Foundation For Virginia’ Executive Director Michael Edwards. He wrote about impending Global economic frights — and those “pay me now, or pay me later” monster’s galore of the upcoming 2005 election campaign.

    Just like in the movie, Poltergeist II: The Other Side, the ‘Foundation for Virginia’ is back for another spooky ‘revenue enhancement’ sequel.

    In 2004, the Foundation of Virginia warned the Commonwealth of the impending doom of Wall Street’s AAA bond ratings and our lack of state revenue. But I’ve never seen ‘proof positive’ documentation that the bond rating was endangered.

    But Governor Mollycoddle said the sky was falling! And his citizen meetings around the Commonwealth touted the lunatic ravings of the our state Bureaucrats and Educrats and Labor to fear the future! While state revenues kept trending upwards into the double digits…

    Like the ghosts of Poltergeist II, the mystic realms (modus operandi) of the ‘Foundation For Virginia’ are simply set for another round of scare tactics. But this time, it’s the vengeful spirits of the Global marketplace and Virginian’s ability to remain viable and competitive in the future.

    “Build more Roads or Die!” — is their transportation battle cry! With semiautonomous regional taxing authorities and mega-billion Marshall Planning tailored for Virginian’s special interests.

    In the book ‘Road to Serfdom’ author Friedrich Hayek wrote the movement of totalitarianism “comes from the two great vested interest: organized capital and organized labor.” And their aim is “not a totalitarian system, but rather a sort of corporate society … in which the organized industries would appear as semi-independent and self governing estates”

    How prophetic?


  • That’s What I Call a Bachelor Pad

    I don’t know Steve Chapman, the young conservative who’s challenging Harry Parrish for the GOP nomination for the 50th House of Delegates district in the Manassas area, but I’ve been getting his e-mails at Rebellion Headquarters. He strikes me as a spunky young man. He’s an entrepreneur who started a successful power-wash business at the age of 16. (He holds the contract to clean the tombstones at Arlington National Cemetery.) He’s also signed the no-tax pledge.

    Now comes word from the Washington Post that Mr. Chapman may be in hot water. Parrish, or his minions, have questioned whether Chapman maintains a legitimate residence in the 50th district. Chapman concedes that he has lived in three different residences over the past six months, but swears that he maintains a legitimate residence in Manassas. Based on the Washington Post’s report, though, it may not be the kind of home that he’d want to bring mom to. Saeth the Post:

    At the Manassas condominium on Richmond Avenue, Chapman said, “Welcome to ‘Pimp My Ride,’ ” as he opened the door — referring to an MTV show where skilled mechanics transform dilapidated vehicles into luxury cars.

    The cluttered, one-story condominium was filled with dirty furniture. The walls were not painted. The kitchen had no refrigerator and a broken stove. The bathroom, he said, was “under renovation.”

    In a bedroom, two old mattresses were stacked on top of each other and had no sheets. “It’s luxurious,” Chapman said sarcastically. “I have an ergonomic pillow so I get a good night’s sleep.”

    Ergonomic pillow. Pimp My Ride. I love it. The kid’s got a sense of humor. He’s got my vote — or, at least he would if I lived in his district.


  • Anti-Development or Plain Old Discrimination?

    Jim, what if you decided to take all your blog earnings and buy 400 acres of Fauquier County open space so that you could build a “Bacon’s Rebellion Resort.” While I know you have exceptional sales skills, don’t you think that some folks in proximity to your proposed development might oppose it, no matter what you had planned for the property? Don’t you think some of these opponents might be well-heeled, having the wherewithal to get bumper stickers printed saying, “Crush the Rebellion?” Would you characterize these opponents as anti-development zealots or anti-Wahoo bigots?

    Last night Sheila Crump Johnson, co-founder of Black Entertainment Television (later sold for $3 billion)spoke at a Richmond conference. Jeffrey Kelly of the Richmond Times-Dispatch described her remarks this way:

    But she said it is her latest venture, Salamander Hospitality in Middleburg, that has opened her eyes to the discrimination that can accompany a minority business.

    Days after she announced the 400-acre resort and spa in Northern Virginia, she told the banquet audience of roughly 800 last night, she began seeing “Don’t BET Middleburg” bumper stickers and receiving various forms of hate mail.

    “I didn’t think it was going to hit that hard,” she said. Johnson now has round-the-clock security and said she has received death threats against her and her two children.

    Obviously, hate mail and threats are in a class of repulsive behavior all their own. We have no way of knowing if these were a few isolated crackpots or a more systematic effort. No matter what, they certainly shattered the myth of Middleburg gentility.

    But the bumper stickers? Can’t anti-development forces use a shorthand to identify the project they oppose? It’s a catchy message, packing more information than “Stop Salamander.” BET is an internationally known acronym. I haven’t spent all that much time around Middleburg lately, but I suspect a lot of developments in the area have been vigorously opposed.

    The folks who worked at Disney in the 90’s might be able to tell Ms. Johnson something about anti-development bumper stickers and hate mail received when they tried to locate in nearby Prince William County.

    Not everything is discrimination.


  • Fitch “Gets It” on Transportation

    GOP gubernatorial hopeful George Fitch has issued a meaty press release detailing his philosophy for dealing with Virginia’s transportation woes. The fiscal conservative totally disavows the need for tax increases–either on a state level, or through regional transportation authorities as proposed by Jerry Kilgore. Said Fitch: โ€œKilgoreโ€™s suggestion that new taxes may be needed is a terrible idea which Virginians have rejected again and again.โ€

    (To be fair to Kilgore, the former Attorney General did not say that “new taxes may be needed.” He proposed setting up regional transportation authorities which, among other powers, would have the power to levy taxes. It would be more accurate to say that Kilgore’s plan would “enable” new taxes.)

    Among Fitch’s observations were these:

    We need a more balanced approach to transportation planning including more decision making at the local and regional level. … However, regional authorities should not have taxing authority as Jerry Kilgore suggests โ€“ just planning and more decision-making authority. Another government layer of taxing authority is too dangerous and is not necessary.

    Estimates are that more than $20 billion of our unmet transportation needs could have been avoided if we had planned and coordinated growth with transportation. What we have now are large scale developments occurring where adequate infrastructure does not exist. Large subdivisions leapfrog over the countryside on narrow rural roads. High-density development is allowed to occur in villages without ensuring the infrastructure. Haymarket and Gainesville are one of many examples. To reduce these problems, the infrastructure must be in place or must be developing simultaneously with growth.


  • Potts’ Criticism of Kilgore Transportation Plan Betrays His Own Ignorance

    State Sen. Russell Potts, the renegade Republican running for governor, made an interesting–and alarming–observation in criticizing Jerry Kilgore’s transportation plan. As quoted by Chris Graham in the August Free Press today, he said: “The idea of regional transportation authorities is ludicrous. We are one commonwealth, not a collection of regions. The fact of the matter is, you either need to lead, follow or get the hell out of the way.”

    Got that? We are one commonwealth, not a collection of regions. God save us all if Potts actually were elected governor and presided over state transportation policy. Yes, we are one commonwealth. But we also happen to be a collection of regions. Indeed, regions, metropolitan statistical areas, city states–call them what you will–are fast surpassing state and national governments as the critical organizing entities of the globally competitive economy.

    To quote economic development professor Richard Florida in his latest book, “The Flight of the Creative Class”: “Cities are the key economic and social organizing units of the creative age. They promote economies of scale, incubate new technology and match human capital to opportunities, ideas to places, and innovations to investment.” Companies choose cities/regions to do business in, not states. Talented individuals choose cities/regions to live in, not states. Yes, states still play a governance role, but they are not paramount, as Potts suggests.

    In the transportation realm, cities/regions (or as Ed Risse calls them, New Urban Regions) are the prime organizing unit. Traditional city/county boundaries are meaningless when it comes to peoples’ driving patterns. People live, work, shop and seek amenities within a regional context. That’s why Kilgore’s idea to establish regional transportation authorities does make sense. Kilgore’s plan is vulnerable to criticism because it envisions giving taxing and spending powers to authorities without also giving them any means to influence land use–the main factor that shapes demand for transportation amenities. But that point eludes Potts entirely.

    With his one quote, Potts has revealed a very deep ignorance of the social and economic dynamics underlying Virginia’s transportation challenges. His comments on the topic cannot be taken seriously.


  • Advocate for the Developers

    Is John Foote the man who stands between Northern Virginia and smart growth?


  • Staying Out of the Way

    I’m guest blogging over at Commonwealth Conservative. Good thing–I’d just get in the way of this “twang tussle/Accent-gate” firestorm. I sure hope no one but us political junkies are paying attention.


  • More on the “Twang Tussle”

    Jeff Schapiro plays the “twang tussle” straight down the middle in today’s Richmond Times-Dispatch in a he-said, she-said story. He details the Kilgore crew’s counter charges in rural newspapers depicting Kaine as intolerant of rural Virginians:

    “Harvard-educated liberal lawyer Tim Kaine is showing his true colors by attacking Jerry Kilgore’s Southwest Virginia accent,” the Kilgore newspaper ad said. It includes a headline that shoults, “Liberal Democrat Tim Kaine: SHAME ON YOU.”

    I’ve changed my tune since my orginal post yesterday. I now think that the Kilgore campaign is way out of line. Tim Kaine never “attacked” Kilgore’s accent. His campaign made a vague statement — “Kilgore has been making things up about me and letting slick radio announcers do his dirty work” — which the Kilgore crew construed as attacking his accent.

    Kilgore Deputy Press Secretary J. Tucker Martin explained to me yesterday that the quote must be viewed in the context of off-the-record comments made by campaign surrogates, posts on Kilgore campaign blogs and the infamous jerrytheduck.com website that plays an unflattering audio file of Kilgore speaking. I have no doubt that individuals in the Kaine campaign have poked cruel fun at Kilgore’s voice, which, at its worst, overlays his indigenous SW Virginia drawl with a certain, shall we say… school marm prissiness.

    But I don’t think Martin’s case adds up. Unless the average suburban voter happens to be a campaign insider, he or she does not hear the mean jokes told by Kaine campaign staffers, doesn’t frequent the Kaine campaign blogs and has never heard of, much less visited, jerrytheduck.com. I find it unlikely that Kaine’s original comment would have triggered any of those associations, much less that the Kaine campaign would have thought that the comment would have triggered those associations.

    The benign explanation for the Kilgore campaign’s counter-attack is that staffers, acutely sensitive to the issue of their man’s spoken voice and accent, simply overreacted. My advice: Get over it, guys.


  • More on the Accent Flap: How Kilgore Put 2 and 2 Together

    Blogger “Tom” found a transcript of the Jerry Kilgore radio spot that inspired charges from the Kilgore camp that the lieutenant governor is “mocking” his Southwest Virginia accent. Here’s the relevant portion of what the ad said:

    โ€œIโ€™m Tim Kaine and Iโ€™m running for Governor. If I have something to say Iโ€™m not afraid to say it myself. But Jerry Kilgore has been making things up about me and letting slick radio announcers do his dirty work. Virginia deserves a leader who says what he believes himself. …

    What’s so offensive about that? It reads to me as if Kaine were criticizing Kilgore for hurling charges at him while distancing himself personally from the actual accusations. Sounds like fair game to me. What, then set off the Kilgore camp? I received this response from J. Tucker Martin, Kilgore’s deputy press secretary:

    The Kaine campaign may be many things, but they arenโ€™t dumb when it comes to how to spread a risky political attack. Quite simply, they know better than to just flat out say โ€œKilgore talks funnyโ€ and leave it like that. Their strategy is one that builds on several levels, and with the hope that no one will be able to put 2 and 2 together. Honestly I think they have significantly underestimated the press and the publicโ€™s ability to see through the lines.

    How have they done this? Easy. On one hand they air an ad specifically commenting on the absence of Jerry Kilgoreโ€™s voice. Then on the other they launch an attack site, jerrytheduck, that includes a soundbite of Jerry Kilgore. Why is this important? Because the ostensible purpose of that website is to highlight Jerry Kilgoreโ€™s seeming disinterest in debates (a completely incorrect assertion that I will leave for another time). So why include a soundbite of Jerry Kilgore taken FROM A DEBATE between Kilgore and Kaine in 2003? That soundbite, on its face, would seem to undercut the entire point of the website. The fact that it is there, and highlighted, demonstrates that there must be another purpose. That purpose is evident when one combines the radio ad with the website.

    Futhermore, any member of the Richmond press corps can attest to the jokes and off the record comments made by the Kaine campaign and its surrogates when it comes to Jerry Kilgoreโ€™s accent. Combine that with the posts found on the Kaine echo chamber blogs, and you have a completely coordinated and craven attempt to demean Jerry Kilgoreโ€™s native accent for political points. Just like most political rumor mills, you will not find one smoking gun. You have to put the pieces together. Larry Sabato has had no problem doing this, nor have other political observers. …


  • Kilgore Plays the Victimization Card

    Ever since Democrats perfected the art of fulminating with moral outrage over the expression of “insensitive” remarks by Republicans, GOP candidates have been adopting the tactic as well. The latest instance of this politics of symbolism over substance comes from Jerry Kilgore.

    The issue, of course, surrounds the unmistakable allusions by the Tim Kaine camp to Jerry Kilgore’s strong Central Appalachian — read “hillbilly” — accent. This was a huge tactical error on Kaine’s part. It’s not as if the suburban voters of Northern Virginia and elsewhere needed any reminding of Kilgore’s accent. The prejudice against “ignorant hillbillies, rednecks and assorted Deliverance creatures”, especially among Northern transplants, is so strong that it needs no reinforcement. But by raising the issue even in a veiled way–charging Kaine of being scared to run radio ads using his own voice–the Kaine-ites would have been better off to have simply handed Kilgore a tire iron and said, “Beat me!”

    Now Kilgore is retaliating by running newspaper ads in small-town newspapers, calling attention to the Kaine ads, and accusing Kaine of making rural accents a political issue. The Kilgore ads quote Representatives Virgil Goode (5th) and Bob Goodlatte (6th). โ€œTim Kaineโ€™s effort to divide Virginians by region is nothing short of disgusting,โ€ runs the Goodlatte quote. โ€œWhen a candidate for office openly derides the way a good portion of our citizens speak, it says an awful lot about the character of the man running the ad.โ€ Kilgore’s counter attack plays well to the rural resentment of snobby urban elites. This one issue has the potential to measurably diminish Kaine’s appeal in rural Virginia.

    Shame on the Democrats for their hypocricy. Can you imagine the furor if a Republican candidate made veiled allusions to the African-American accent of, say, Lieutenant Gov. candidate Viola Baskerville?

    And shame on Kilgore for playing the “victimization” card. That’s a Democratic trope, and an unbecoming one at that. It’s a shame that Republicans are mimicking the ugliest tactics of the other side.


  • Touching Bases

    Potential military base closings are hanging like a sword of Damocles over Virginia. In the Daily Press, John Bull reviews contingency development plans for Ft. Monroe, an obvious target, and hints that a Federal agency might be interested in taking over another base in the Hampton Roads area, should one become “available.”

    Turning closed military bases over to local authorities for development offers great opportunities for “smart growth,” as well as opportunities for rapacious profit-making. The battle to save bases can lead to battles over utilization of the losers.


  • Damn the Congress, Full Speed Ahead

    In a follow-up to a story about Rep. Tom Davis’ involvement in a controversial development around the Vienna Metro Station, the project developer is undeterred by Davis’ efforts to scuttle it.


  • Blog Blather

    Yesterday was both a day without blogging and a day without sunshine.

    I missed weighing in yesterday on the vapid Richmond Times-Dispatch front-page-above-the-fold blogging story. Commonwealth Conservative, as usual, was on top of it, drafting off of One Man’s Trash, and River City Rapids had two rebuttals.

    Over a year ago, and maybe two (I can’t find the link), award-winning T-D political reporter Pamela Stallsmith did a front page, below the fold story on political blogs. Maybe yesterday equal time was being given to less polished views on blogging. Blogs with less than stirring content deserve scrutiny, too, I guess.

    At least we know that politically oriented blogs are read by at least one editorial writer for the RT-D and I know that several RT-D reporters also peruse them. Maybe they check out cat bloggers, too.

    Last week at a business function I met a young woman who revealed that she had a blog. I went to it, as I have occasionally to other blogs of that generation, and found the focus on relationships and the shallow but hip anti-Bushism tossed in as if to validate bona fides. There’s a lesson in those blogs for advertisers and political strategists, but I’m not smart enough to figure out what it is.

    Update: The Jaded JD accuses me of elitism based on this post and he has a point, considering the imprecise words I used. Let me just say in my defense that if were truly an elitist, I wouldn’t be reading all the blogs that I do, blogs of every stripe and persuasion, and I wouldn’t link to as many as I do. I’ve been blogging for longer than most of my Virginia blog colleagues and I’ve been as big a booster of blogging, for all purposes, as anyone.


  • Gov. Warner Sets New Record

    Our very own Gov. Pinocchio has set a new record in returning voting rights to more felons in our state’s history. He also leads the nation in restoring felons’ rights. For the full story click here.


  • Why’s an AG Candidate Talking about Transportation Policy?

    This communique comes from Steve Baril in response to comments appearing in this blog asking why a candidate for Attorney General is making transportation a major platform in his campaign. — Jim Bacon

    Some of your readers and others across the State have asked about the Attorney General’s role in transportation. The question has arisen in connection with my Marshall Plan for transportation. Aside from Jerry Kilgore, I’m the only statewide candidate offering a long-term, comprehensive plan to solve Virginia’s transportation problems. So, I’d like to answer the question head-on.

    There are three good reasons why an AG candidate should speak out on transportation: litigation, legal advice and leadership.

    1. Every major transportation project hits its first roadblock when the anti’s of one stripe or another file a lawsuit to block the project. Who’s going to defend VDOT and the Commonwealth? The AG’s office. It makes sense to have the best qualified lawyer in this race representing Virginia to advance these projects as quickly as possible.

    2. It is also the Attorney General’s job to advise the Governor and VDOT on public-private partnership initiatives, privatizing and outsourcing VDOT’s traditional functions, including maintenance work. It makes perfect sense to arm our next Governor, Jerry Kilgore, with an Attorney General who is completely wired-in to one of the most critical challenges facing the Commonwealth — transportation.

    3. Finally, statewide office is a bully pulpit for leadership. There is no shortage of politicians. What we lack is statesmanship. The Republican Party should produce as many leaders as possible who can champion issues like transportation. For example, Jerry Kilgore did it with domestic violence, though he was criticized for not tending to his knitting. The fact remains, Virginia is better off today because Jerry took up this very important issue, sought legislative action, and won the day in the General Assembly. I am offering the same leadership today on transportation. It is an area where I have a proven track record of success, having spearheaded the completion of Route 288 around Richmond, a road that the so-called experts said couldn’t be built in my lifetime.

    If you want politics as usual, then I won’t be your guy. If you want straight talk and honest solutions to real problems like transportation and keeping Virginia safe, then I’m your man!

    That’s why Iโ€™m receiving such a tremendous response to my Marshall Plan for transportation. Virginia has had enough career politicians who say one thing, yet do another. They want honest, straight talk, and a can-do attitude to get things done! I did it with Route 288. I’ll do it for transportation across Virginia.

    — Steve Baril