Image credit: ChatGPT

by James A. Bacon

Once again the University of Virginia Board of Visitors is conducting the ritual of pretending to be involved in setting rates for tuition, fees, room and board, this time for the 2025-26 fiscal year. The board’s Finance Committee met earlier this month for an hour and forty-five minutes to hear presentations by UVA staff. Other than an introduction by Finance Chair Robert M. Blue, the minutes record no comments or questions by any board member.

Blue framed the purpose of the meeting as, in the phrasing of the minutes, “educating and orienting committee members to some key issues that align with actions on the agenda in December.”

He then turned over the meeting to Chief Operating Officer J.J. Davis to provide “some useful historical context to set the stage for upcoming actions, and to help committee members make decisions from an informed perspective.”

Gaining an “informed perspective” did not extend to allowing committee members to ask substantive questions about UVA’s cost structure or high-tuition/high-aid financial model. Several board members appointed by Governor Glenn Youngkin have pushed for cuts to the university’s administrative staff but have been unable to open up the issue in the finance committee, much less in the full board. Finance Chair Blue and Rector Robert Hardie (who functions as chair of the full board) are both holdovers from the Northam administration. With President Jim Ryan, they control the agenda. Divisions among Youngkin appointees and don’t-rock-the-boat guidance from the Governor’s Office have stymied any action by reformers.

According to the minutes:

Davis reviewed metrics on the value proposition that UVA offers, including affordability and accessibility, academic excellence and career preparedness, and community engagement and societal impact. She said significant effort is made to manage operational costs without compromising quality including strategic investing to offset costs, renegotiating contracts, and increasing operational efficiencies. Through partnerships and philanthropic support, the University has been able to minimize the need for cost increases that impact students.

By comparison to other public universities, UVA is widely acknowledged to be a “bargain” — offering educational value for the dollar — for in-state undergraduate students. However, it is manifestly not a good deal for out-of-state students, who pay Ivy League-level tuition & fees. Moreover, as The Jefferson Council has documented in detail, UVA’s high-tuition/high-aid financial model punishes middle-class families.

As the months-long budget-setting process grinds forward, the administration will present its recommendations to the full Board in December for approval. By then, the elaborate budget dance will have reached its predestined conclusion.

James A. Bacon is contributing editor of The Jefferson Council.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

5 responses to “Cavalier Kabuki”

  1. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    The lack of oversight from the BOV is a disgrace, and it isn't just the current "adults" appointed by Gov Youngkin.

    UVA is off of its educational mission. As an in-State current parent, I don't believe UVA is worth the in-State cost, much less the highway robbery charge to out of State.

    Of course, what is the real cost? I have a real problem with the Communist academic support method – rich parents pay full price, and everybody else is negotiable… What is the real cost? Is it $10,000 for in-State, and $40,000 out of State? That would be far more honest, but the Academy is so used to being unaccountable that the finance deceit doesn't seem to bother them.

    In a publicly-traded company, an absent Board of Directors runs the risk of D&O lawsuits (fully insured, but there is reputational risk for being asleep at the wheel). Ever since the botched removal of Teresa Sullivan, and the pick of Jim Ryan (who is far better at implementing Leftism throughout UVA and Central Va than Teresa could ever be!), the BOV has let the inmates run the asylum.

    UVA is awash in money. Academic standards are down. Students in worst mental health ever. Faculty is overwhelmingly Leftist (95% of political contributions go to Dems). Free speech exists only on paper, or for favored Leftist causes (not one UVA Law professor has said anything about the years of lawfare against Trump, Trump's lawyers, and the disparate treatment and due process abuses of the J6 still imprisoned? Not ONE?). Honor Code is, at best, on life support. Jefferson is demeaned and known lies are spread…by UVA faculty! The anti-American, anti-merit, often illegal DEI poison is in every school, down to the department level. UVA admissions continues to tilt the field to cheat racially (with a wink and a nod to pretend it wishes to comply with the law) from the recent SFFA decision. And we have a crazed Dem controlled General Assembly that will likely try to oppose Youngkin BOV appointees…

    There is an awful lot of work to do, but the "feckless BOV" has been feckless for a LOOOONG time.

  2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Gotta hand it to Trump – Department of Government Efficiencyโ€ฆ never took him for a Monty Python fanโ€ฆ

  3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    All those high hopes that Yougkin and his appointees would bring great change to "the University" and slash costs–dashed. Youngkin is now a "don't-rock-the-boat" governor. There is "division among the Youngkin appointees." This was easily predictable.

    One sentence particularly caught my attention: "Gaining an โ€œinformed perspectiveโ€ did not extend to allowing committee members to ask substantive questions about UVAโ€™s cost structure or high-tuition/high-aid financial model." They weren't "allowed" to ask substantive questions? These are highly-accomplished people. How does one prevent them from asking questions?

    Jim seems to be of two minds about tuition. In the past, he has been critical of what he views as high tuition at UVa and in this piece he refers to a "high tuition/high-aid" model. But he also acknowledges. "By comparison to other public universities, UVA is widely acknowledged to be a โ€œbargainโ€ โ€” offering educational value for the dollar โ€” for in-state undergraduate students." The parents of state students pay taxes to support the school. If the parents of out-of-state students are willing to pay "Ivy-League level tuition", some of which goes to provide financial aid to in-state students, what is the probem?

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT