Bacon's Rebellion

Revamping Virginia History as Oppression Studies

My beef with the teaching of Virginia history — not enough attention to Bacon’s Rebellion!

Virginia schools do a poor job of teaching the history of African-Americans in the United States and Virginia, says Governor Ralph Northam. Black history is “difficult, complex and often untold,” he said yesterday when addressing the Virginia Commission on African American History Education, a body he created 10 months ago in the wake of his blackface scandal. Black history in schools is often “inadequate” and “inaccurate,” he said.

Reports the Virginia Mercury:

Northam said one of the most pressing issues he hopes the commission will address is casting the end of slavery as the end of oppression for black people. The Jim Crow Era, Massive Resistance and mass incarceration have followed, he said.

“My perception is that when we talk about black oppression, I think a lot of us need to understand that concept a lot better and this needs to start with the education of our children,” Northam said. “Black oppression is alive and well today, it’s just in a different form.”

After reading Northam’s critique of how Virginia schools teach state history, I thought I’d see for myself: What do the schools teach? What are students expected to master for their Standards of Learning exams? What I found surprised me. Northam’s description might have been an accurate representation of how history was taught when he was a pupil, but it bears no resemblance to what’s taught today.

The history of African-Americans is woven throughout the curriculum. Virginia students learn “Virginia Studies” in Grade 4, “U.S. History to 1865” in Grade 5, “U.S. History 1865 to Present” in Grade 6, and “Virginia & U.S. History” in Grade 11.

The following are excerpts from the Standards of Learning and Curriculum Framework documents on the Virginia Department of Education website.

Virginia Studies — Grade 5

United States History to 1865 — Grade 6

United States History: 1865 to the Present — Grade 7

Virginia and United States History — Grade 11

If you subscribe to the New York Times view of American history, in which the nation’s history began not in 1607 when Jamestown was settled but in 1619 when the first slaves arrived in Virginia, and in which slavery, Jim Crow, racism and discrimination were the animating forces that drove the nation’s history and constitute the prism through which everything must be viewed, then, yes, Virginia’s curriculum is indeed inadequate.

But if you believe that U.S. and Virginia history were animated by many other factors — such as, to mention a few, territorial expansion, entrepreneurship and invention, industrialization, interactions with foreign powers, and above all the development of democracy and individual rights, the Virginia curriculum does a pretty good job.

Bacon’s bottom line: There are basically two approaches to teaching Virginia and U.S. history. One approach — the New York Times approach, the Ralph Northam approach — subordinates history to a branch of Oppression Studies. The history of Virginia and the U.S. is a study of oppression — of Indians, of women, of African Americans, of minorities of all sorts. The other approach teaches the animating ideals of the American Revolution and explores the long, painful struggle to apply them to universally.

At its root, the controversy centers on whether we teach our children that our nation was conceived in sin and oppression or whether we have ideals and institutions worth preserving.

Exit mobile version