by Donald Smith

“The past is a foreign country. They do things differently there.” — British writer L.P. Hartley

“Being woke is like a magic moral time machine, where you judge everyone [who lived in the past] against what you would have done in 1066, and you always win. Presentism is just a way to congratulate yourself about being better than George Washington because you have a gay friend and he didn’t. But if he were alive today, he would too. And if you were alive then, you wouldn’t.” –Bill Maher, TV talk show host.

Magic moral time machine

I am the proud descendant of Confederate cavalrymen — and I am glad the Confederacy lost. Abraham Lincoln, shortly after his famous debates with Stephen Douglas, described slavery as a cancer. The Civil War cut that cancer out of the South and started in on a long path to healing. The war was a blessing, in that it ended slavery quickly. I’ve read that the Founding Fathers hoped to put slavery on the path to eventual extinction. Well, that was great for the Fathers, but not the slaves. No one asked THEM if they were willing to wait, in chains, for slavery to die off gradually, eventually, some day….

But, I am confident that, if I had lived in a Southern state in early 1861, I would have fought for the Confederacy. Even if I loved the Union and loathed slavery. Here are some reasons why.

I would have feared a slave insurrection. Thirty years earlier, in 1831, Nat Turner led a slave revolt that killed not only slaveowners and overseers, but white women and children, too. In October of 1859, John Brown’s aborted attempt to start a guerilla war and free slaves in Virginia, and his subsequent execution, caused a torrent of rejoicing in the North. This is from Rebel Yell, a biography of Stonewall Jackson and finalist for the Pulitzer Prize written by S.C. Gwynne:

The day he was executed, church bells had tolled in many Northern towns and cities; sermons were preached on the purity and correctness of his motives, and people all over the North prayed for the soul of this martyr to liberty… Henry David Thoreau called him a “crucified hero”… Everyone was suddenly talking about the grandeur and nobility of the man, the rightness of what he had done.

The reaction of Southerners to such Northern expressions of sympathy was horror mixed with disbelief that their brethren could possibly wish upon them the fate that Brown had planned…. He had, after all, intended to arm slaves and set them free, which presumably meant setting them upon their masters, which meant that people in Connecticut and Massachusetts were now endorsing the violent deaths of white men, women and children all over the South.

Jackson, in a letter written in January 1861, said that it appeared that the “free states” were willing to “excite our slaves to servile insurrection in which our Families will be murdered without quarter or mercy.” As Nat Turner’s white victims were.

If I were a white Southerner in 1861, even if I were an abolitionist, I might have started to think that it was a bad idea to remain in a Union where residents in other states had apparently decided that MY family and I were collateral damage that THEY were willing to accept (from a safe distance, of course), in order to end slavery.

I would have realized that I was part of a community. David McCullouch, in the first episode of the landmark Civil War PBS series, said that most Union and Confederate soldiers had never gone more than a hundred miles from their homes. Most hadn’t even gone a few miles.

It wasn’t easy to just pick up and relocate in 1861. There were no planes, interstate highways or cars. You couldn’t work remotely. You needed to be part of a community, and be accepted by that community. (Unless you wanted to live as a hermit).

My great-grandfather (a Confederate cavalryman) and grandfather were subsistence farmers south of the Shenandoah Valley in Virginia. My mom tells me about how they needed to work with other farmers to tend their fields and harvest their crops. They sold meat and produce to local stores and restaurants to help pay their bills. If their neighbors and the community had shunned them, they would have been in a world of hurt.

In 1862 and 1863, there was intense community pressure to join the Confederate forces. Duty called! If any community perceives you as a shirker, there are consequences. I would have felt intense pressure to make the same sacrifices my friends and neighbors were making, and to not let them and my community down. If my friends and neighbors were enlisting, I probably would have felt compelled to enlist, too.

I wouldn’t have wanted to go to jail. The Confederate government instituted universal conscription in early 1862. Every white male from ages 18 to 35 was liable to serve, unless they had an exemption from military service or provided a substitute to serve in their place. Most subsistence farmers or average workers couldn’t afford a substitute and didn’t work in occupations (e.g., doctor, arms factory worker, overseer) that qualified for an exemption. Many Southern men enlisted because they didn’t want to be conscripted. (Conscripts had a poor reputation in many towns in the early years of the war. All the proper, patriotic men enlisted, don’t you know?!)

I might not have taken kindly to being invaded. Even if I’d supported the Union, I probably wouldn’t have wanted armies marching through my community and my home. Thousands of marching men and horses, even if they’re not shooting at anyone, tend to tear up the countryside and take all the food and farm animals. They cause lots of damage, even if they don’t intend to. And, in 1864, the Union Army very, very much intended to do lots of damage throughout the South (Georgia, the Shenandoah Valley, etc.) I can imagine taking up arms to try and stop that.

Remember Shelby Foote’s anecdote from the Civil War PBS miniseries, where Union officers asked a Confederate prisoner why he was fighting the war. His response: “I’m fighting because you’re down here!”

It’s easy to dismiss Confederates as having simply fought for slavery. It’s also lazy and shallow thinking. And it’s presentism. In 1861, I would have been a product of the times I lived in, the place where I lived and the attitudes and beliefs of my community. Undoubtedly I wouldn’t have had an openly gay friend, or been an open abolitionist, in Virginia—would you have?

Donald Smith grew up in Richmond and graduated from the University of Virginia. His mother was born in a log cabin that her grandfather (a former Confederate cavalryman) built near Lexington. Family members still live there today.

 


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

62 responses to “What Would You Have Done in 1861?”

  1. Jim Loving Avatar
    Jim Loving

    Donald give's a great perspective for his great-grandfather and mine, who also enlisted in the Confederate Army in January of 1862 in Petersburg in the VA Heavy Artillery Unit and was captured on 5/30/1864 at the battle of Old Church near Cold Harbor. Fortunately for me he was captured and not KIA as I would not be here.

    My great-grandfather too was an illiterate farmer. He likely fought for the reasons Donald stated here.

    Presentism does not change the fact for every southern state's aritlces of succession stating protection for the institution of chattel slavery was the reason for their rebellion and insurection against the Constitution of the United States of America. It also helps to explain the mindset that help them to negotiate in 1876 and end to reconstruction and the beginning of the terror of the Jim Crow South right up until in Prince George County after Brown vs Board of Education they closed the schools rather than integrate them with black people.

    Presentism does not explain the racism of the southern lost cause, history does.

    1. Clarity77 Avatar
      Clarity77

      My mother's grandfather likewise like that of you and the author, joined at 17 from Alabama and like yours managed to survive a POW camp(Elmyra, NY), and that is the reason I am thankfully here like you. His family like the overwhelming majority had nothing to do with slavery but were driven to defend their state from northern invaders, including those on my father's side of the family from Pennsylvania.

      In my limited experience as to studying the Civil War I find very few accounts as to who exactly were the "elites" of that day and age, who actually owned the slaves and therefore the power to then ignite the Civil War. They were a different breed who unlike the Founding Fathers were obviously in no way inclined to do away with slavery but rather to fight to the death to hold onto their power and money. Even if it entailed the destruction of our young constitutional republic by way of destroying the constitution, dividing the populace, stoking anger, hate and violence.

      A system is defined by what it does, and what the slavery system ultimately did was to kill. Much like what fascism, communism, and Marxism promoted and have perpetrated in subsequent history. And yes by using presentism as a propaganda tool in which to judge the past and manipulate the present.

      Is this starting to sound like present day America under our current elites? What ties them together for those of us who study human nature as we know it is the same now as in past millenia, including the behavior of those who initiated the Civil War? You cannot change the stripes on a zebra.

      I would like to see an analysis of comparative behavior between the elites of today and those of the South immediately preceding the Civil War. And I would start with their political leanings as it has been pointed out repeatedly the fact that no Republican owned any significant number of slaves in the South in 1861. Therefore, all the southern slave holding elites were in fact democrats. And even when defeated sought to hold onto power and money in the subsequent Jim Crow era and beyond to today I would argue in observing their stranglehold on the black population by way of various manipulative techniques.

      Again, you cannot change the stripes on a zebra. Period. If anyone reading would know of an available analysis of Civil War southern democrat elites as seen in present day democrat elites I would appreciate a link. I am sure it would be eye opening to say the least.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        โ€œAgain, you cannot change the stripes on a zebra.โ€

        No, but you can move the zebra to a new zoo – still a zebra.

        1. Clarity77 Avatar
          Clarity77

          Correct. Whether new zoo or system, as I spoke of earlier, the "zebra" can only change when it decides to make that choice. Otherwise it goes forward repeating mindlessly. And that is fine for the common or Frasier's zebra in nature but when it comes to the human "zebra" one would think at some point it would seek to stop repeating the insanity of its past history. Fortunately, we who observe this insane dynamic are given the choice by our Creator to do otherwise.

      2. Jim Loving Avatar
        Jim Loving

        There has always been an anti-liberal sect within the US from the very beginning until the present day that were opposed to the ideas and principles in the Declaration of Independence and codified in the US Constitution. The Southern Slave Holders were prepared to fight and secede to defend their property and economy based on chattel slavery, then post Civil War, fight the principles of "all men are created equal" through the violent Jim Crow south, the anti-Civil Rights Resistance, championed and led by Virginians, and now screaming "DEI" and "Woke" as code for the same old song. Robert Kagan covered it in his most recent book and I wrote an essay on it. https://medium.com/@jylterps/defending-liberalism-and-modernity-from-antiliberal-authoritarian-destruction-and-revenge-9ae152af6d0a

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Indeed.

        2. Donald Smith Avatar
          Donald Smith

          So, if you'd been a Virginia subsistence farmer in early 1862, when the conscription law went into effect, what would you have done?

    2. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      By today's standards, virtually all whites in the 1860s were racists, to include virtually all Northerners. And, as people familiar with Jackie Robinson's entry into major league baseball can tell you, there was plenty of racism in Northern cities—Philadelphia, Cincinnati, Boston—well into the 20th century.

      Before you start throwing bricks, I'll stipulate that there's lots of glass in the South's house…but we're not the only ones with lots of glass in our house.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        re: " By today's standards, virtually all whites in the 1860s were racists, to include virtually all Northerners."

        If true, how did such a minority of forces overcome the majority on both the necessity for the war itself and the subsequent efforts later to end Jim Crow?

        Was it the original forces of DEI that overcame the majority view?

  2. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I don't disagree. What I don't understand is the constant need to write about this, over and over. Who are you trying to convince? What side was your family on in the English Civil War? Or 100 Years War?

    1. Clarity77 Avatar
      Clarity77

      Quite simple. Those who do not learn from history…………

      1. Clarity77 Avatar
        Clarity77

        Or put another way, repeating the same while expecting a different result, a definition of…………..you can fill in the blanks.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Clearly we are not a rational organism.

          1. Clarity77 Avatar
            Clarity77

            It is all about intention. The Founding Fathers in their wisdom based in the fear of God with additional insight from the ancients such as Aristotle, and then building on the sages of the Enlightenment, proved and put it into action. Our Constitution stands as testament to their intention. But of course there are always those devoid of wisdom who will in their insanity seek to tear it all down, killing many on the way down. History serves as a teacher to those whose eyes are open and not shut.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Well then, we embarked on something different, but will it outlast us? Or, even January?

          3. Clarity77 Avatar
            Clarity77

            From time to time leaders have arisen who have the awareness necessary to transform cultures and nations for the betterment of mankind. Key to their abilities is a knowing of the subconscious mind and its inherent insanity that can only be addressed by way of intention. In the meantime most choose to sleepwalk into their demise guided by ne'er do wells who have managed to gain power. Sadly they only choose to awake when the suffering becomes too much to bear. Witness Venezuela at present.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Tell me, how much history must we learn to stop repeating it?

        Near as I can tell, it hasnโ€™t stopped us yet. Perhaps you can point out a minister, general, or other banal bogeyman who avoided carnage and actually said, โ€œWhoa! No way. The last time that happened, we lost that war, so not me.โ€

    2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
      f/k/a_tmtfairfax

      Yes, it's getting old. I had two 2nd great grandfathers fight for the Union in the Civil War, although one was in a short-term militia unit raised in response to one of Morgan's Raids. I had ancestors fight on both sides of the Revolution, one dying of smallpox and the other going broke after the war. And some sources I've read suggest that one line of my family came to England from Normandy as a knight in William the Conqueror's army.

      It's fascinating to me but I'm not sure what it proves today.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Yes. I'm pretty sure I had ancestors that fought in the civil war but I have not spent anytime tracing back because of what you just said " what it proves today". Why is that important to some of us and not others?

      2. Donald Smith Avatar
        Donald Smith

        "Yes, it's getting old."

        So, don't read what I write.

    3. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      Steve, why do you obsess about Dominion Power and energy issues? There's more to life than just paying the electric bill.

      I think our heritage is a topic that's just as important as energy issues.

  3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    โ€œUndoubtedly I wouldnโ€™t have had an openly gay friend, or been an open abolitionist, in Virginiaโ€”would you have?โ€

    The fact that there were abolitionist and Unionist communities in Virginia demonstrates that there were indeed two sides to the war locallyโ€ฆ one right and one wrong. No โ€œpresentismโ€ need be invoked at all. Just because a position is popular does not make it right.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Yes, yes. Virginians fought and died on both sidesโ€ฆ even if only one receives commemoration. Where, oh where, are the monuments to our Union Dead within the boundaries of the Old Dumbonion? (Aside from any in lands ceded back from DC)

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        That's the thing. Documented history is one thing. Memorials are another. Who merits memorials and who not?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          I like thisโ€ฆ โ€œ the Yankee monument delivered by mistake to Halifax County now is exhibited in the local museumโ€โ€ฆ โ€œ a Confederate soldier, erected in 1937, still stands in front of the Halifax County Courthouseโ€

          1. WayneS Avatar

            I chuckled over that one, as well.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            โ€œBah, USPS. Should have used Railroad Express. Label clearly says Halifax, Massachusetts! Well, should forward it?โ€
            โ€œDamned Yankees. Let โ€˜em figure it out on their own. Stick in the warehouse with all the rest of the Civil War junk.โ€

    2. WayneS Avatar

      Just because a position is popular does not make it right.

      Well said.

    3. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      So, you would have moved to a Unionist or abolitionist community, then?

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Personally, I would not have had to. Roots in PA.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The "everybody did it back then" is weak tea for me when clearly not everyone did AND the movement against it was not small but big and getting bigger.

    But I'll accept for the sake of argument that slavery was not uncommon and practiced in a lot of places.

    What I have a problem with is what happened AFTER slavery and continued for more than 100 years, and we still have arguable vestiges of it and clearly generational impacts that continue.

    The issue is not slavery, it's Jim Crow and White Supremacy after slavery ended.

    1. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      Thank you Saint Larry for your great example of presentist morality.
      I am sure at the pearly gates St. Peter will conduct you to a mansionesque suite.
      Whatโ€™s your position on baby killing?
      Whatโ€™s your position on using the law to punish and jail people who disagree with you?
      Whatโ€™s your position on cheating in any manner in elections? Is cheating wrong? Is lying wrong? Is stealing wrong? Is treating stealers differently based on skin color wrong? Is allowing men to steal womenโ€™s athletic achievements wrong? You have any daughters? Want a dude with his package in the locker room with her? Why arenโ€™t you speaking up? I think Iโ€™ve made my pointโ€ฆ

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        No saint. Just a guy that likes the truth of it. Acknowledge the truth and be part of responding to the issues if you care.

        I don't "connect" it to other issues like you like to.

        Each of them stands on their own with their own issues.

        I don't like "abortion" but it is necessary at times – that's the simple reality.

        I don't like people who abuse their kids either but it does happen and we are duty-bound to address it.

        The world is not a simple place. The things that trouble many of us have no easy answers but we also cannot impose our solutions on others – we do very much need
        government and Democracy, warts and all.

        1. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          So why Mr. Presentist are you willing to excuse the baby-killing as necessary? And child abuse? And you didn't address the other things the Marxist party you support is doing.
          Just keepin' it real in the presentist world with Larry the G…

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I'm not addressing all the things you think are "connected" because they're simply not in my view.

            Each is an issue that stands on it's own both in terms of the problem and how to respond.

            Each issue, if we address it , can be improved to a place where a majority of people will find it acceptable if not perfect.

            That's the thing. Those who see things as all "connected" and want only their all or nothing solutions are doomed to fail altogether and essentially separate themselves for society in general and from any real or practical "good" changes.

          2. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Oh…thank you Saint Larry! Can we address them now?
            How about cheating in elections? Is it good or bad? Please come down from the mountain with the necessary wisdom.
            There is right and wrong. There is good and bad. There are absoutes. All humans fall short. Some humility about your own status (and mine!) is a good thing.
            And, just to set the record straight, it isn’t what the majority decides as “right,” because the majority is often wrong. There is one perfect judge – I ain’t it, you ain’t it and no one on earth is.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Won’t address all the other myriad things that you seem to think is connecting to this issue.
            Won’t address what you think is right or wrong when it’s only your view and not everyone.
            In this country, we vote on the issues and we govern that way no matter what individuals think is
            right or wrong in their own minds. I support the way the country was established and governed and
            I accept it won’t agree with everything I think is right or wrong. I suggest that’s a reasonable and pragmatic
            position.

          4. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            How conveeeenient…
            Thank you Scarlett O'Hara.
            I can't think of it now…but tomorrow is another day!
            Have we gotten apologies from the Frenchmen who took the French Revolution to excess? I mean they were the majority, amirite? How about the majority of Germans who stayed silent as Hitler started his genocidal program? How about the majority of Democrats condoning cheating in elections? Does that cause a loss of trust in "democracy"? What's your position on Venezuela? Should the peasants shut up like good little peasants? Hey, isn't the Dominion system somehow descended from the Venezuelan? Hmmm…
            Meanwhile, Larry the G is the perfect citizen, total equanimity, a model for all, willing to just always accept the majority view. One day Larry, the "majority" will come for you and you'll wonder where it went wrong.

  5. JonathanSwifter Avatar
    JonathanSwifter

    I would have sat the war out while calling for compensated emancipation, as did Thomas Jefferson Randolph at the time of the Nat Turner rebellion. No slavery, no war.

    1. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      So, you would have risked arrest for evading the draft law, plus shunning by your community? Good for you!

      1. JonathanSwifter Avatar
        JonathanSwifter

        The draft law was contrary to the principles of liberty on which the confederacy, and union, were supposedly founded. Nice portrait of the General though. – A.P. Hill

        1. Donald Smith Avatar
          Donald Smith

          Nice dodging of my direct question to you, and the general thesis of my article.

          1. JonathanSwifter Avatar
            JonathanSwifter

            Directly answered it. Conscription justifiably aroused great opposition in South and North. If thousands had followed the example of R.E. Lee, and taken several years off to put plantations in the financial condition needed to free the servants, the war could have been avoided.

          2. Donald Smith Avatar
            Donald Smith

            How would you have sat the war out, with a mandatory conscription law? Would you have used The Force to make the local authorities look the other way?

            How would you have brought your crops in from the field, if your neighbors refused to help you? How would you have paid your bills, if everyone refused to hire you?

  6. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I, too, had ancestors who fought for the Confederacy and were prisoners of war. One was captured twice! In addition, some of my ancestors and those of my wife owned slaves. (Their descendants are having a reunion in Clarksville this coming weekend.) If I had been alive then, I, like you, would have probably joined the Confederate Army. Community pressure is a strong force.

    Although your argument is well made, it has the quality of setting up a strawman. I don't think "presentism" condemns so much the ordinary Confederate soldier, but the leaders of the sourthern states and the large slave holders who profited from the labor of Black men and women. People like Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry who admitted that slavery was wrong and evil, but could not bring themselves to give up that cheap labor.

    And the whole argument that southern whites were afraid of slave uprisings and thus supported the Confederacy is a weak one. Indeed, they probably had good reason to be afraid. Who could blame Blacks for turning violently against people who kept them in chains, literally and figuratively, sold their familes off, raped their wives and daughters, kept them in ignorance, etc? The answer, of course, was to end slavery. But that route was not to their economic advantage.

    In summary, we should not condemn the ordinary Confederate soldier, who likely had little choice in whether he served. On the other hand, neither should we glorify him. I am the descendant of Confederate soldiers, but I am neither ashamed nor proud of it.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Had you lived then, you would not have been you. You โ€” as you are now โ€”would not have fought for the South, for you would not do so now.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        maybe.

      2. WayneS Avatar

        If I had been round in 1861, I would most likely have been dead, or deaf, or both. On several occasions during my early childhood I had ear infections that were severe enough to be life-threatening, and which damaged my hearing. Modern anti-biotics saved me, but they were not around in 1861.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          In 1860, the average life expectancy in the United States was 39.4 years. This is an increase from 35 years in 1776

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      re: "save uprisings" – which tends to support the idea that folks knew it was wrong and knew the slaves themselves did not "like" it even if it was a common practice.

      Despite this the practice continued and leaders and citizens went to war over it and continued maltreatment of people even after they were no longer slaves – for generations.

    3. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      "And the whole argument that southern whites were afraid of slave uprisings and thus supported the Confederacy is a weak one. Indeed, they probably had good reason to be afraid."

      Doesn't your second sentence contradict your first?

      And, if you had been a subsistence farmer in Virginia, with a family, in 1861, would you have been so cavalier about their safety?

      S.C. Gwynne didn't seem to think it was a weak argument, when he wrote Rebel Yell.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I agree, there is some convoluted thinking but it's not Dicks'

        So the argument seems to go like this: " We fear for our safety from the enslaved but we cannot free them because….. we need slaves" ? or some such?

        that's seems a pretty weak and conflicted argument, no?

        1. Donald Smith Avatar
          Donald Smith

          Larry, as far as I'm concerned, your opinions are irrelevant.

          If you ever climb out of the comments section and write a few front-page articles yourself, I may change my mind.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I don’t have a need to write articles trumpeting my own “heritage” which I would never want to impose on others anyhow and especially those whom it would insult. We’re all entitled to our own heritage but we are not entitled to impose it on others and claim grievance if others take offense. I have much more sympathy for those whose “heritage” was suppressed and denied.

  7. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Itโ€™s done. Let it go. Iโ€™m happy that my father, mother, aunts and uncles fought to defeat the Axis Powers, but thatโ€™s their accomplishment, not mine. I have no more claim to their pride than I do their shame for whatever untold sins they may have committed.

    Thank them for their DNA and move along. Stop taking it personally.

  8. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    If slavery is morally corrupt now then it was morally corrupt then. Thatโ€™s not presentism. Thatโ€™s morality.

    If you accept that morality can evolve in a scant few generations then what value is there to God and religion? What โ€œguidanceโ€ does a compass give if it is not constant? Sir, your navigational instruments are worthless.

    Now, about the morally corrupt treatment of those in the LBGT communitiesโ€ฆ.

  9. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    My dad and I visited Gettysburg today. Perfect day. Not hot. Little Round Top is reopened to visitors now. The Park Service did a good job of rehabilitating that area. I visited the places where six of my kinsmen fought today.

    Captain George Thomas Baskerville, 23rd NC Infantry was mortally wounded on Oak Hill. Volunteer. Valedictorian of his class at the University of North Carolina. His graduation address was given in Latin. His wife, upon hearing the news of Captain Baskerville's death, took to a sick bed and died from grief 10 days later. Their orphaned children were playmates and near family members of my Lockett clan down in Mecklenburg County.

    Private Marcus Mills, 49th Virginia Infantry. Fought at Culps Hill. I saw the spot were the 49th mowed down scores of boys from Indiana at Spanglers Spring. Drafted man. Credited with turning Lee on Traveler around at the Battle of Spotsylvania. Lived until 1913.

    Captain William Marshall Tredway Jr and Sgt. Thomas Booker Tredway participated in Pickett's Charge. Volunteers. Their father signed the Ordinance of Secession for Virginia. Jr. made it home to become Mayor of Chatham, Va. Tom Tredway lunged over the wounded Lt. Colonel Rawley White Martin and took a bullet to save him. Just 17 years old when VMI graduate Tom died. Martin went on to become a noted physician and helped found the Medical College of Virginia.

    Captain Philip Lockett, 14th Virginia Infantry. Volunteer. Expelled for a scathing editorial of Lincoln in the Randolph Macon College paper. Wounded, captured and exchanged during Pickett's Charge. Made it to Appomattox. After the war Lockett was a successful lawyer and a friend to the freed slave. Defended them for free in court and registered thousands of black men to vote for the first time. All at great personal cost. I made a tombstone from scratch to mark his forgotten grave in Roanoke.

    Lt. James Wyatt Whitehead. 53rd Virginia Infantry. Volunteer. Wounded and captured during Pickett's Charge. Survived Johnson's Island POW Camp. Became a successful merchant, ardent Baptist, and community servant to the people of Chatham, VA. I am the fourth man in my family to carry his name.

    I stood in awe today on the ground those men fought on.

    1. VirginiaGroyper Avatar
      VirginiaGroyper

      Beautifully written. My ancestor holds the distinction of being one of only four West Point grads that fought for the Union and switched sides. He defended Fort Sumter during the shelling, but left with Virginia when she seceded.

  10. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    ah, historyโ€ฆ too bad no one completes the evaluation between not knowing at the risk of repetition, or knowing at the cost of constant relitigation.

    A word of caution. Do not become enamored with the family history lest someday 23&Me expose an adoption or some other splicing in the family tree.

  11. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O'Keefe

    I fail to understand the waste of time in a back and forth speculating about the past. It's history and should simply be accepted as such. The time spent debating the past is time not spent on addressing the over abundance of current problems. If we don't address them better than we have, we may not have a future that is as good as the present. Our goal should be to make the future better for future generations and preserving the republic that the founding fathers created for us.

    1. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      Well then, don't read what I write. If there are BR articles that don't interest me, I don't read them.

      I think this is an important topic, so I write on it. I think my ancestors deserve to be defended, so I defend them.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT