What the #&%@? A Hamas Advocate on the VMI Faculty?

by Sal Vitale

For several years, I, along with other concerned alumni, diligently worked to restore the “Old Corps” leadership and ideals to the management of the Virginia Military Institute Alumni Association. Our efforts faced resistance from those in charge, and now we find ourselves also grappling with issues far beyond governance of the Alumni Agency (VMIAA) and its affiliated organizations, including the Alumni Association.

A particularly troubling matter involves the selection of Philip Crane as a Visiting Professor under VMIAA’s Peay Endowment, whose public involvement in antisemitic activities and support for Hamas raises serious questions about the Institute’s stance on crucial moral issues. This matter requires immediate attention and full transparency from VMI, its Board of Visitors (BOV) and the VMIAA to preserve the integrity of the Institute and its alumni body.

For years, our group of alumni worked diligently to ensure the concerns of VMI graduates are heard and acted upon. One of our key goals was to reinstate proxy voting for the VMIAA Board members, to ensure those selected truly represent the alumni body and not just the interests of a small group. We also pushed for better access to alumni contact information to foster meaningful communication and ensure that all viewpoints are considered when important decisions are being made.

Unfortunately, our efforts were thwarted at every turn. The VMIAA has repeatedly denied us access to critical resources, including alumni contact lists, citing unfounded concerns about personal data usage. We await a ruling from the Virginia Supreme Court on this matter, but a much graver issue demands immediate action: the hiring of Crane, a VMI graduate himself, as a visiting professor.

Crane’s background as a leader of the Palestine Working Group (PWG) while a graduate student at Columbia University from 2022 to 2024 is deeply troubling. That group issued a public statement endorsing Hamas, a recognized terrorist organization. His hiring after his endorsement of violence, especially following the brutal October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks on Israeli civilians, raises alarming questions about VMI’s commitment to upholding its core values. This is not a minor issue—it demands scrutiny. We must ask: Does VMI stand with those who condone violence, or will it take a firm stand against hatred and terrorism?

Crane’s hiring forces us to confront difficult but necessary questions about VMI’s values, particularly regarding its faculty hiring practices and the influence of external political movements. In a world where antisemitism and terrorism are rising globally, we cannot afford to remain silent. VMI must take swift and decisive actions to reaffirm its commitment to fostering an environment of respect, tolerance, and open dialogue.

This is not a call for censorship, nor is it an attack on academic freedom. It is a demand for accountability and transparency. We need to understand how individuals like Crane, whose public actions aligned with groups that support violence and terror, are vetted before being hired as faculty. This issue goes beyond one individual. It speaks to the very future of VMI and its ability to maintain its reputation as an institution that upholds honor, integrity, and respect for human life.

VMI can remedy the situation by returning to the standards of transparency and accountability that it once embodied. We propose a comprehensive review of VMI’s hiring practices, with particular focus on the vetting process for faculty members funded by donor programs like the Peay Endowment. The alumni and donor community deserve a detailed explanation of how these vetting and sections are made, particularly when there are legitimate concerns about the individual’s political affiliations and actions.

VMI alumni and donors deserve to be fully informed about the decisions that affect the future of the Institute. We cannot be expected to remain silent when questions of moral integrity and accountability are at stake. Alumni are not merely financial supporters—they are stakeholders in VMI’s future. It is only fair to give us access to the full facts surrounding Crane’s hiring. This is not just about one professor; it is about VMI’s commitment to the values it has always represented.

We are not here to impose our views on VMI, but to foster a productive dialogue on how to move forward. We understand that academic institutions must protect academic freedom. However, endorsing violence and terrorism should not be protected under the guise of academic freedom. We propose the BOV and VMIAA, fully disclose the details of Mr. Crain’s selection and hiring to alumni, donors, and the public followed by the BOV publishing a path forward to prevent this from recurring. VMI’s integrity is too important to be compromised by external political movements or by its own actions that appear to endorse hate.

We acknowledge that academic freedom is a vital component of university life and professors should have the right to express political views. However, endorsing an organization that engages in terrorist activities and violence against civilians crosses a moral line. This is not simply a matter of differing political views; it is about whether VMI is willing to stand by its values or compromise them in the face of political movements that promote hate and violence.

Some may defend Mr. Crane’s actions at Columbia, claiming they were misinterpreted or that his personal views should not disqualify him from teaching at VMI. However, the facts are clear: Mr. Crane was not simply expressing political views; he served as secretary of a group that endorsed Hamas, a designated terrorist organization. This issue is not about political disagreement; it concerns endorsing violence. VMI must ensure it does not become a platform for hate.

Some may argue that VMI’s decisions do not have the same national implications as those of larger institutions. However, VMI’s alumni body includes many who serve in the military and other vital roles across the country. More than 50% of VMI graduates go on to serve as officers in the U.S. military, and many in the Virginia and other state National Guard units. This makes VMI a critical institution, not just locally, but nationally. The moral example set by VMI must be beyond reproach.

In response to our inquiries, the Alumni Agencies and the administration has been evasive. VMI denied Mr. Crane’s involvement with Hamas-supporting groups, even in the face of clear evidence to the contrary. We provided documented statements from the Palestine Working Group, and we asked straightforward questions: Was Mr. Crane’s involvement in these groups overlooked during the vetting process? Was the process thorough enough to prevent such an appointment? What steps will VMI take to ensure this doesn’thappen again?

The administration refused to provide clear answers to these questions, leaving us with a sense of distrust and frustration. Crane and the BOV could resolve these questions by addressing them directly, but both have remained silent, avoiding the issue.

VMI must take immediate action to address these concerns and repair its reputation as an institution of honor and integrity. VMI must stop using vague language to deflect attention and start providing clear answers. The BOV must begin to act and execute its statutory responsibilities. If VMI is to remain an institution its alumni can be proud of, it must reaffirm its commitment to transparency and accountability in all aspects of its operations, especially when it comes to hiring faculty.

I urge all VMI alumni, donors, and supporters to add their voices to those who demand VMI take a stand for honor, integrity, and respect for all. This is not just about one professor or one appointment; it is about the future of our alma mater and the values it represents.

We cannot allow VMI’s legacy to be defined by inaction. We owe it to ourselves, our fellow alumni, and future generations of cadets to ensure that VMI remains a place where honor and integrity are upheld. This is a fight worth having, and together, we can ensure that VMI continues to stand as a champion of values we can all be proud of.

Sal Vitale is an alumnus of the Virginia Military Institute, Class of 1961.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

9 responses to “What the #&%@? A Hamas Advocate on the VMI Faculty?”

  1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    โ€œWe acknowledge that academic freedom is a vital component of university life and professors should have the right to express political views. However, endorsing an organization that engages in terrorist activities and violence against civilians crosses a moral line. This is not simply a matter of differing political views; it is about whether VMI is willing to stand by its values or compromise them in the face of political movements that promote hate and violence.โ€

    So any VMI faculty who claim Israelโ€™s slaughter of Palestinian civilians is somehow justified should be silenced thenโ€ฆ?

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    There are two million people living in a place that is not their own country and they are not citizens of the country that occupies them. As Americans, who support and fight for freedom, how can we support de facto aparthied?

    It's not wrong to point that out that such circumstances do cause militant groups to form and take over. Hamas took over from the PLO with some support from Israel originally. Israel continues to deny citizenship nor self-determination as a country to 2 million people.

    Pointing out this injustice is not antisemitic.

    Even if you wipe out Hamas, if the conditions don't change, another group
    just as evil will take their place. It's not Hamas it's the conditions that
    lead to their formation and existence. As long as those 2 million people have no country of their own or full citizenship in the country that now occupies them, Hamas and groups like them will exist.

  3. Carmen Villani Jr Avatar
    Carmen Villani Jr

    First, I would like to thank Jim for posting this article. In the last 4 years, I have gotten to know Sal Vitale. He is a man of honor and I consider myself blessed that he is a dear friend and fellow VMI alumnus with a shared view of the challenges facing VMI today. There is a clear problem with leadership at VMI and it starts with the President of the VMI Board of Visitors and extends to the Alumni Association. Instead of dismissing what Sal has expressed here, they should be following it.

    So far, there have been posts to this thread centering on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This issue is not about that, but a terrorist group (Hamas) engaged in unfathomable acts of violence against women and children, the eradication of a population (โ€œfrom the river to the seaโ€), and an instructor at VMI putting his name to a letter attempting to justify such horrific acts.

    Donโ€™t think that is true? Here is what the US State Department had to say: โ€œOn October 7, 2023, more than 1,200 men, women and children, including 46 Americans and citizens of more than 30 countries, were slaughtered by Hamas โ€“ the largest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. Girls and women were sexually assaulted. The depravity of Hamasโ€™s crimes is almost unspeakable. Hamas also took 254 people hostage that day, including 12 Americans."
    See: https://www.state.gov/anniversary-of-october-7th-attack/

    UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres had this to say: โ€œThis is a day for the global community to repeat in the loudest voice our utter condemnation of the abhorrent acts of Hamas, including the taking of hostages.โ€
    See: https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/10/1155396

    Despite the evidence put forth by Accuracy in Media (AIM), VMI officials put out a ridiculous letter with a statement saying that they โ€œbelieve the allegations about Crane are false.โ€ There are no names or signatures on this letter, not to mention no evidence to support their assertion. Since it is on the โ€œOffice of the Superintendentโ€ letterhead, then the Superintendent bears some of the responsibility and yet again a display of poor leadership.

    To those of you with a legal background, do you honestly believe a judge or an opposing lawyer wouldnโ€™t look at such a document and dismiss it as hearsay or at least demand that VMI provide names and evidence to support their claim?
    See: https://adminlb.imodules.com/s/1752/images/gid2/editor_documents/email/crane_statement.pdf?sessionid=d30bb13c-68e6-44ae-87f6-dec5b29a1317&cc=1

    Recently, John Reid did an interview with President Adam Guillette of AIM who broke this story. After the interview, John made the following comment: โ€œhow much more turmoil do you need to see to recognize that there is some sort of problem at VMI?" To those of you dismissing what Sal has said, would you also have no problem with an instructor at VMI being a secretary of a white supremacist group justifying the lynching of black people?

  4. It is most unfortunate that students on college campuses are perhaps the least knowledgeable about issues they claim to care about.

    Hamas, the governing body is Gaza, doesn't want to live in peace. They proved that on October 7.

    Below is an example of what it's like for Arabs in Israel.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcATzU09Kiw

  5. DJRippert Avatar

    The only way to evaluate Israel's conduct of the war in Gaza is to understand the ratio of Hamas fighters killed vs civilians. In the cruel calculus of modern urban warfare, a nation can defend itself so long as it takes precautions to limit the number of civilian deaths.

    A 1:1 ratio or better (more combatants killed than civilians) is often cited as a benchmark in modern urban warfare for demonstrating a serious effort to avoid civilian casualties. Ratios significantly worse than thisโ€”e.g., where civilian deaths far exceed combatant deathsโ€”may indicate insufficient precautions or violations of international laws.

    Challenges in Achieving Low Civilian Casualty Ratios

    1. Population Density: Urban areas are densely populated, making it difficult to avoid civilian harm entirely.

    2. Combatant Behavior: Insurgents or irregular forces may hide among civilians, complicating efforts to target them.

    3. Rules of Engagement: Different militaries and forces may apply varying standards of care in minimizing civilian harm.

    4. Access to Precision Weaponry: Advanced militaries with precision-guided munitions and robust intelligence capabilities are more likely to achieve favorable ratios than less technologically advanced forces.

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    As long as we convince young men that being blown to smithereens by a weapon launched from a thousand miles away is an act of valor, we can count on war profits.

  7. Greg Long Avatar

    I think the most concerning point in the actual documents Mr. Vitale provides (if one chooses to ready them) is that the Alumni Agencies that supposely manage hundreds of millions of dollars in the "Peay Endowment" flatly stated they just "hand over the cash" with no role (or oversight) in how it is spent or any accountability. It appeears they just don't care even to look into the matter. The statement allegedly by the VMI Superintendent does nothing to address theissue other than to again call alumni and everyone else liars when the words in the documents are clear. All the debate of the situation is Gaza aside for a moment, what those documents show is that vast sums of donor money are being controlled by a small group who feels they are above accountability or transparency. A dangerosu group to have in power as should the "politics" change they'll change with it as they do not care about the school or the alumni, just so as the money keeps flowing in to the "Shenandoah Oligarchs" — which seems how VMI got into this mess in the first placee back in 2021.

  8. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    What classes does Crane teach? How is he doing? What do the cadets say about this professor?

  9. Chip Gibson Avatar
    Chip Gibson

    Abundant thanks and compliments, once again, to the Honorable Mr. Vitale for bringing this situation forward. Likely another of his many courageous acts of leadership in the face of overwhelming odds to the contrary during past years. Knowing nothing of this particular case until today, I am now learning. The Old Corps Alumni of the Institute have found and faced the dragons from within – lack of VMI administration and Alumni Association transparency has been a dominant and recurring theme in those struggles these past 4 or so years. The precedent has been established that hard questions must be asked quickly – if not, it all slides under the carpet. Let's see what answers are presented.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT