UVA’s Religious Diversity Task Force Issues Report

by James A. Bacon

Responding to a report from the Task Force on Religious Diversity and Belonging, the University of Virginia Board of Visitors passed a resolution at a special board meeting Thursday, directing the administration to “ensure that there is zero tolerance for harassment, bias, and discrimination based on religious differences on University Grounds.”

Formed in December after the University was engulfed in controversy over the conflict in Israel and Gaza, the task force had made a series of recommendations on how the University can “foster greater connection and understanding within and between different religious groups.” Those recommendations are summarized in UVA Today and detailed in the task force’s Final Report

The underlying assumption of the report is that to enhance “belonging,” the University needs to grant greater accommodations to students, faculty, and staff of “minoritized” and “marginalized” religions.

At no point did the report consider the possibility that the University places too much emphasis on students’ “identity” or that the organized cultivation of grievances by multifarious oppressed minorities might contribute to the very alienation among Muslims and Jews that the task force was asked to address.

At UVA the answer to every perceived problem invites solutions that only administrators and faculty members can deliver. Thus, the task force’s proposed remedies entail more administrative “communication,” more administratively abetted “dialogue,” more courses on religious topics, and more accommodations on Grounds for religious practices.

Provost Ian Baucom set up the task force December 5 as an 11-person advisory group to President Jim Ryan. Christa Davis Acampora, dean of the College of Arts & Sciences, served as chair. The group was given several charges:

  • examine the extent to which Jews and Muslims (and to a lesser extent other religious minorities) experience a sense of “belonging” at UVA;
  • assess reports of antisemitic and Islamophobic incidents going back to 2017, the year of the infamous Unite the Right rally;
  • evaluate educational offerings about religion, including the history and impact of antisemitism, Islamophobia, and other forms of religious bigotry; and
  • incorporate its findings into the broader framework of the university’s commitment to Diversity, Equity & Inclusion.

The University of Virginia was founded as a secular institution, states the report. “Two of Thomas Jefferson’s proudest accomplishments were authorship of the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, ensuring religious liberty in the state, and the founding of the University of Virginia, which placed not a church but a library at its center.” Jefferson’s vision originally excluded the teaching of theology, as was common at most other universities in his time.

While noting that UVA operated within “an implicitly Protestant Christian framework” — using “the calendar” (because it was based on an early Christian reckoning??), building a non-denominational Christian chapel, and accepting religion as a distinct and separate sphere of life — UVA remained a religious “neutral space.” It fostered a curriculum that allowed the study of many different religions, and it permitted a diverse array of religiously affiliated groups to organize. “For all its inadequacies,” states the report, “the founding vision of a modern, secular university is of enduring value.”

The report does not make clear what those “inadequacies” are.

To examine “engagement,” the task force availed itself of student survey data dating back to 2018. It also organized 11 focus-group sessions: five with student affinity groups. Two other sessions were canceled for a lack of interest. The total of 96 participants effectively spoke for 25,000 graduate and undergraduate students.

When polled between the antisemitic rhetoric of the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville and the anti-Zionist rhetoric of the 2023 pro-Palestinian demonstrations, Jewish students felt the strongest sense of “belonging” at UVA, and Muslims the lowest, the study says. By contrast, both groups were at the bottom of the list (which included agnostics/atheists, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus and others) of those who felt “respected.”

The report narrative did not take note of the fact that 77% of Muslims and 78% of Jews did believe their religious beliefs are respected.

Among those who felt disrespected, what form did the disrespect take? The report provides no insight. It provides no quotes from the focus groups. The only indirect clues come from a summary of information about formal complaints that had been brought to the attention of the administration through the “just report it” system for filing anonymous charges of bias, discrimination and harassment, through incidents investigated by the Equal Opportunity and Civil Rights (OECR) office, and through threat assessment cases.

The OECR office logged 56 bias incidents in 2023 through May 2024, of which 33 were reported by Jews, nine by Muslims, two by Christians, and one by a Hindu. That compared to only 22 incidents logged in 2022, of which nine were against Jews and six against Muslims. Of the 29 religion-related incidents brought to the attention of the Threat Assessment Team, none posed a serious threat, and only one required ongoing assessment.

The task force found no lack of resources for students to maintain their religious practices. “Students by and large are able to connect with their own communities of faith and related cultural affinity groups, and are supported in doing so,” the report says. “Undergraduates benefit from myriad student groups and activities to support religious life and identity.”

The biggest void, the report found, was in institutions that encouraged students of different religions to interact with one another. “Those resources that exist for undergraduates are focused primarily on religious identity rather than inter-religious understanding.”

UVA also offers students many opportunities to learn about their religion academically. The report Identified three dozen courses in Spring 2024 and more than 75 over the period of the past academic year across numerous academic departments. “These courses address religious cultures, traditions, and forms of bigotry.”

The report did not ask why students at a university supposedly dedicated to diversity, inclusiveness and the broadening of intellectual horizons might choose to sequester themselves with others of like religious identity rather than interact with others different from them.

The list of task force recommendations is long. The report assumes that the onus is on UVA as an educational institution to remedy any dissatisfaction the students might experience. Here are highlights:

  • Prayer space. Ensure access to prayer/meditation spaces in the living, learning, and working spaces of the University;
  • Food preparation. Explore opportunities to enhance food preparation facilities and options in dining and residence halls consistent with the religious diversity of the University (i.e., kosher, halal, faith-specific fast-breaking foods, etc.);
  • Calendar. A calendar that is more responsive to minority religious holidays;
  • Chaplaincy. Devise a sustainable chaplaincy/faith advisor program. ”The need for a chaplaincy position for Muslim students has clearly arisen, and/or partnership with a privately run and funded Muslim Life Program”;
  • Incident reporting. Refine incident coding processes concerning reported instances of bias, harassment, and discrimination based on religion;
  • Academic offerings. Expand the range of academic offerings—courses and other programming—that provide students opportunities to engage differences within and across religious traditions;
  • Institutional support. Enhance opportunities for faculty/staff support for religious student groups, including providing resources, development, and training;
  • Faculty support. Expand hiring of new faculty, support for graduate students, and creation of new courses that would contribute to deepening engagement with a variety of religious traditions, histories, and identities.

Notably not on the list:

  • Private action. Communicate clearly to students that they are in America where they have the freedom to practice any religion they choose. However, there is separation between church/temple/mosque and state. Furthermore, UVA is an agency of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and Americans have a long tradition of hostility toward state-supported religions. If students wish to practice their religion on their own time and in their own place, they are free to do so. There are abundant privately supported organizations in Charlottesville to help them do so.

Christian students have the support of various churches and associations in the Charlottesville area. Jewish students have off-Grounds support in the form of the Hillel House and Chabad House. On Grounds, the Muslims have a Muslim Students Association, a Muslim Institute for Leadership and Empowerment, and a Graduate and Professional Muslims Association. Off-Grounds, there is an Islamic Society of Central Virginia.

 

 

 


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

26 responses to “UVA’s Religious Diversity Task Force Issues Report”

  1. Chip Gibson Avatar
    Chip Gibson

    "Private Action" says it all, Sir. We Americans are tolerant and benevolent, but not submissive. Freedom means you are free to leave, or to not move here at all. Freedom does not mean you may bear your conflicting beliefs upon this Nation and inflict hate upon others.

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    It seems that the idea of freedom to practice whatever religion what one chooses is implied in the report. As is the idea of separation of church and state–the report states that the university was founded as a secular institution. Are you implying that the administration is doing too much in the way of providing chaplains and courses on religion? You seem dissatisfied with the report and its findings and recommendations, but it is not clear what concerns you.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      DE&I, as usual.

    2. StarboardLift Avatar
      StarboardLift

      What I read here and find troubling is UVA's example (among higher ed institutions, in general) of limitless willingness to take on every and any thing as its duty–to fix, regulate, administer, oversee…these behemoths are running parallel universes with redundancy. There isn't one thing on the list that isn't available elsewhere. The appetite for 360-degree agency is frightening, unaffordable and has nothing to do with educating citizenry.

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I donโ€™t see Pastafarian explicitly mentioned. Iโ€™m not sure my childโ€™s religious practice will be protected. It involves a ritual โ€œhanging of the wet spaghettiโ€ in which the sacred sacrament is strained with a tennis racket and tossed to a wall in remembrance of St. Felix of Unger.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I posted this link on another article, https://www.voanews.com/a/archaeologists-in-virginia-find-colonial-era-garden-clues-about-slaves-who-tended-it-/7755174.html

    As noted in the article, various headless skeletal animals were found beneath various posts in the garden. Somebody was practicing non-Christian religions in Colonial Williamsburg (probably still are given their financials).

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      "headless" animals.. hmmm

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Chickens, snakes, etc.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          in “graves” ?

  5. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    re: " "students of my religious beliefs are respected on this campus"

    do we know how many answered this question ?

    From a practical perspective, would we expect any one individual to know of (any/all/some) others of their religion on campus and their "respect" of others?

    1. The respondents are providing their opinions. They are not declaring the statement to be true for everyone.

  6. Lefty665 Avatar

    Nice to see you around!

  7. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    I wonder what percentage of today's UVa students actively practice any religion.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Some seem more defined by the religions they abhor than the religion they practice.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Hmm, iz dat you Lazarus?

    2. I wonder what percentage of today's UVa students actively practice any religion.

      I don't.

  8. Lefty665 Avatar

    That secular university had it pretty much right. Hands off religion was the right policy. What part of neither establishing nor preventing the exercise of religion does the UVa of today not understand?

    If kids want a school that encourages religion and provides a religious education they can go to a religious denominated school. That is not the role of a public university.

    In Virginia those include Union Theological Seminary, Liberty and Regent. UofR used to be strongly Baptist, dunno if it still is since it became woke. Do any other religions have institutions of higher education in Virginia?

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Those other institutions you mention teach one religion as the only right religion. UVa. is not encouraging any religion; it is trying to accommodate students with varied reiligious backgrounds and preferences. Like other public liberals arts colleges and universities, it has a variety of courses exploring the beliefs and practices of major world religions. William and Mary has a department of religious studies; so does GMU . JMU has a Department of Philosophy and Religion . Etc.

      One could argue that UVa. is going too far. I wonder if that is Jim's argument. On the other hand, he has been quick to complain that certain religions, i.e. Judaism, do not get the proper respect by the university.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        Union Theological not so much, but what difference does that make? Departments of religious studies at public institutions violate the establishment clause.

        These things in particular at UVa also appear to violate the establishment clause:

        <i>Prayer space. Ensure access to prayer/meditation spaces in the living, learning, and working spaces of the University;

        Food preparation. Explore opportunities to enhance food preparation facilities and options in dining and residence halls consistent with the religious diversity of the <b>University
        Chaplaincy</b>. Devise a sustainable chaplaincy/faith advisor program.โ€ฏ

        Academic offerings. Expand the range of academic offeringsโ€”courses and other programmingโ€”that provide students opportunities to engage differences within and across religious traditions;

        Institutional support. Enhance opportunities for faculty/staff support for religious student groups, including providing resources, development, and training;

        Faculty support. Expand hiring of new faculty, support for graduate students, and creation of new courses that would contribute to deepening engagement with a variety of religious traditions, histories, and identities.</i>

        Jefferson's secular university had it right.

        1. Departments of religious studies at public institutions violate the establishment clause.

          I disagree. The study of the history and development of various religions is an important part of the study of mankind and its societies. A department of religious studies within the framework of a College of Humanities does not violate the establishment clause.

          Teaching about the various religious beliefs of people, societies and cultures is fine. Advocating for or supporting a particular religion is not.

          With that said, the items in your list appear to me to support specific religious beliefs, and therefore are not acceptable at a public university.

  9. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I did read his article, more than once. His concluding paragraph implies that university should not be doing anything to encourage students "to interact with others different from them." I just wanted to confirm whether that is the point he wants to make.

    1. Lefty665 Avatar

      Your inference is in error, JAB implies no such thing.

      My reading, as I have posted elsewhere in this thread, is that UVa is in willful violation of the establishment clause of the Constitution.

      As a public institution the University has no business spending any resources on religion.

  10. Other than teaching academic courses about religion, of course.

  11. Robert Jackson Avatar
    Robert Jackson

    It seems reasonable to require a public university to treat religious groups the same as it treats other recognized campus entities. Indeed, a number of courts have so held. But there's a big difference in my mind between making meeting space available and building a place of worship.

    Reasonable student requests for religious accommodation should also be granted. For example, allowing a student to take a key test on a day other than an important religious holiday.

    Teaching about religion is fine, while teaching religion is not, except, of course, by religious groups in campus facilities, used on the same basis as any other recognized organization.

  12. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    not to muddy the waters, but what about how the military handles this?

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT