The Woke Scare Is Four Times Worse Than the Red Scare

by James A. Bacon

More than a third (35%) of tenured and tenure-track faculty at 55 of the nation’s most prestigious colleges and universities say they have toned down their writing for fear of engendering controversy, according to a new survey by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). That compares to 9% during the Red Scare of the 1950s.

More than a quarter (27%) say they feel unable to speak freely for fear of offending someone, and 40% say they worry about damaging their reputations, notes FIRE in its report, “Silence in the Classroom.”

Sadly, the University of Virginia and Virginia Tech, both covered by the survey were no exceptions to the rule. At Virginia Tech, 22% of faculty members say they hide their political beliefs from colleagues “very often” or “fairly often. At UVA, the figure is 13%.

Conservatives are most afraid to speak their minds, although reluctance to freely share one’s mind is found across the ideological spectrum.

Perhaps the reason Virginia Tech profs are more timid about revealing their political sympathies than at UVA is that there are more self-described conservatives (26%) and moderates (11%) in the faculty there than at UVA (19% and 15% respectively).

Non-tenured faculty, who enjoy less job security, are more scared than tenured faculty.

Conservative, non-tenured faculty? FIRE didn’t break that group out, but I expect they’d describe themselves as terrified to speak out.

One professor at the University of Virginia told FIRE that when the university decided to install a DEI administrator, “our Dean stated flatly, and publicly, that they wished they could do away with tenure protections and fire anyone who disagreed.”

As a member of the Jefferson Council, I confess that I find the survey somewhat hopeful. I’m not the least surprised that large swaths of the faculty are intimidated. But I’m encouraged that an entire third of UVA respondents identifies as conservative or moderate. (That’s based on 118 survey responses at UVA.)

The situation at Mr. Jefferson’s University may not be as far gone as I’d feared. There may well be a tipping point at which conservatives, libertarians, moderates, old-fashioned liberals and free thinkers might reassert themselves if the Board of Visitors was willing to provide a little cover.

Here follow the questionnaire responses for UVA and Tech:

James A. Bacon is contributing editor to The Jefferson Council.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

6 responses to “The Woke Scare Is Four Times Worse Than the Red Scare”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    How do you know that that 35 percent that have toned down their writing for fear of engendering controversty are all conervative ? Perhaps some who you consider "woke" are toning it down out of fear of political reprisal.

    So, UVa. is not quite the hotbed of liberalism that you have described.

  2. Chip Gibson Avatar
    Chip Gibson

    A sad state of affairs throughout Old Virginia which must be reversed quickly; as well, the long string of damage and degradation repaired. Now that woke is feeling the choke, the Commonwealth should add to the grand flag, within the seal – between Virginia and Sic Semper Tyrannis….Ain't Skeered. God Bless the Great Commonwealth!

  3. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Oh, JAB, nice piece of propaganda. –Upon what study or data was the 9% "red scare" in the 1950s based to illustrate the "four times worse" conclusion?
    The FIRE study did not include faculty at law, medical, or veterinary academies. While 112,510 were polled (of what estimated potential total of faculty?), 6,269 or 5.7% responded, an average of some 113 per the 55 institutions. UVa and VT fit neatly at 118 and 122 respondents respectively. Again what is the total faculty population at each VA institution? Of the 240 VA responses, 119 (about 1/2) opined DEI "Never/rarely justified" in hiring. Not conclusive of "large swaths" of the faculty. FIRE has not committed arson upon "woke."

  4. DJRippert Avatar

    It would be more interesting to poll the students to see what percentage are either:

    (a) afraid to discuss their political beliefs, or ..
    (b) change their answer on papers and projects to comply with what they perceive is the political perspective of the professor

  5. Irene Leech Avatar
    Irene Leech

    I've long believed that university faculty represent a much broader array of perspectives than many recognize and that most seek to help students learn TO think not WHAT to think. Today, fewer tenure track positions are available and a large portion have been changed to short term contracts for professor of practice or collegiate faculty or some other non-tenure track role. This makes it much quicker and easier to get rid of folks.

    There are many ways to stifle faculty and today they are used far more than they were when my career began. For this reason, among others, if I were starting a career now, I'd look hard for alternatives to university faculty positions. I can't recommend the path I've taken to others.

    P.S. Very few faculty I know contribute to political campaigns. Some consciously contribute to both sides of the aisle if they contribute. I don't believe contributions are a valid measure of wokeness vs conservativeness or anything else relative to faculty perspectives.

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    A manโ€™s cleverness is measured by his answers, his wisdom by his questions.

    Probably why there are never any questions posed here except in the comments.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT