Sentara’s Opportunity to Improve Hospital-to-Nursing Facility Patient Transitions

Courtesy of Sentara Norfolk General Hospital

by James C. Sherlock

Sentara Healthcare in October announced an important initiative to improve the quality and availability of primary care. It will double number of advanced practice providers (APPs) in its primary care facilities.  

APP refers to nurse practitioners, physician assistants, clinical nurse specialists, certified registered nurse anesthetists, or certified nurse midwives.

In order to shift administrative duties away from physicians and APPs, the teams will also include medical assistants, clinical pharmacists, and others. Hopefully the others include dietitians.

It is a great idea.

I have a suggestion that can leverage that investment in a way that offers to both:

  • benefit patients, hospitals and skilled nursing facilities; and
  • save a great deal of patient, payer and facility time and money.

Hospital-to-nursing facility transitions are a deadly mess.

A 2017 study found:

  • One in four Medicare patients hospitalized for acute medical illness is discharged to a skilled nursing facility (SNF);
  • 23% of these patients are readmitted to the hospital within 30 days.
  • The care transition from hospital to SNF is often marked by disruptions in care and poor communication among hospital and SNF providers.

One of the problems is that patient assessments are by federal law and regulation performed twice, once at the hospital attendant to discharge and a second time at the SNF within five days of admission.  

Another is lack of qualified multi-disciplinary staff at the hospitals and especially the SNFs.

Nursing facilities report both payroll-based daily staffing and patient admissions to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) quarterly. My reviews of those reports show that many of Virginia’s disproportionately and chronically understaffed SNFs do not report enough of the right skilled practitioners on their payrolls to be conducting those patient assessments within the timeframe and with the personnel required. More about that in a future series.

With Sentara’s new provider mix in its primary care facilities, it will be in a position in Norfolk and Virginia Beach (it owns all of the hospitals there) to pioneer a nationwide solution to the patient transfer problem. Sentara can:

  • provide patient assessment services to both hospitals and nursing facilities;
  • conduct them with the right mix of skills; and
  • do each assessment once not twice.

I counted the net admissions on the days in which the patient population increased in Norfolk and Virginia Beach nursing facilities in Q2 of 2024. In that specific subset of days, there were almost 1,100 net admissions. Since there is no way with the data available to count total admissions (days with both admissions and discharges mask those admissions), that will have to suffice.

The point is that, say, 90% of those patients were admitted into SNF beds of the facilities since the NF beds by definition are long-term stays. So, as a working estimate, there were significantly more than 1,000 hospital discharges and 1,000 SNF admissions in three months in Norfolk and Virginia Beach alone.

If Sentara were to initiate a program to participate with its hospitals and primary care practices, the government agency funding the test would have to:

  • work with Sentara to identify participating SNFs,
  • hire a contractor to act with participation of the principals to design, size and conduct the test; and  
  • pay the participants for their work.

Sentara, if agreeing to participate, will wish to limit the SNF participation in order to limit participation of its new primary care teams in the project, but it could truly break important new ground for the nation’s sickest patients and their healthcare providers.

CMS, which rarely is offered opportunities to improve care while saving money, should pay for the trial without hesitation. The solution offered for testing will not be replicable everywhere, but in metro areas it holds great promise. CMS funds a lot of things without nearly the potential payoff of this idea.

Virginia Medicaid has a stake in the success of both Sentara’s current initiative and this potential new one. Commercial insurers, including Sentara’s own Optima, should be happy to participate in a test.  

I hope Sentara, VDH, Virginia Medicaid, VHCA (the nursing home lobbyist) and private insurers will join to pursue such a test with a joint proposal to CMS.  

Regardless, I offer my congratulations to Sentara for the primary care expansion initiative.

 


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

2 responses to “Sentara’s Opportunity to Improve Hospital-to-Nursing Facility Patient Transitions”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Glad to have you back with your insights into the medical care system.

    It does seem redundant to have two patient assessments. I assume the rationale for requiring that is have the two serve as a check on on the other.

    Isn't there a financial penalty in Medicare for readmissions within a certain time period? Why isn't that enough incentive to improve the transition from discharge to SNF admission?

    I assume that Sentara would need to get a waiver from CMS to conduct this experiment. How likely is that to be granted?

    I understand how patients would benefit under this approach, but I don't understand how Sentara would save money.

  2. Mr. Sherlock,

    Great to hear from you again.

    While anecdotal, I can easily relate to the 2017 study findings from my mother's recent experience.

    In the last months of her life, my mother made frequent trips to the hospital from the assisted living/nursing home where she lived. Why? Because she was 92 and her entire body was shutting down.

    These trips were extremely expensive and an emotional nightmare for my mother, who was also suffering from severe dementia. She had no idea what was happening to her or why. At the hospital, she was completely unable to communicate her condition, medical history, or even what she eat recently. Upon notification of her trip to the hospital (by ambulance), I would drop everything to be with her and help the doctors and hospital staff with their questions.

    I don't believe the nursing facility was at fault, as they couldn't ignore her pain and discomfort, or let her condition deteriorate without taking the only action available to them.

    The answer for my mother's situation was in-home Medicare Hospice care. Once I understood what it was and that agreeing to it wasn't signing her death certificate, everything changed for the better.

    Medicare contracts with 3rd party providers to provide the needed services, even if the patient is already in a nursing facility. My experience with the service was great.

    They quickly provided a hospital bed, pre approved drug kit to ensure that my mother didn't suffer (or wait for doctor approval and prescription delivery when needed). They offered counseling services for my mother and family, and even arranged for minister to come to her bedside.

    This obviously isn't the solution for every situation, but I would encourage those with loved ones in the last stages of life to become familiar with this option.

    I don't recall the service provider that cared for my mother, but this is a good description of the service.

    https://leadingagevirginia.org/page/Hospice

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT