Save Data Centers from the Luddites

Image credit: ChatGPT

by James A. Bacon

Luddites, unite! You have nothing to lose but your fossil fuels!

Concern among environmentalists is growing in Virginia as it dawns upon them that Artificial Intelligence creates demand for data centers, which in turn boosts demand for electricity… which in turn emits carbon dioxide… which in turn drives global warming.

A case in point can be seen in an op-ed, published today in the Daily Progress, by Eric Bonds, a sociologist who teaches human rights, climate change and environmental justice at the University of Mary Washington. Writes Bonds:

There are limits to how much electricity we can produce for data centers without also shattering our commitment to shift away from fossil fuels. Ultimately, a transition to renewable energy will require that we slow or stop the current data center boom in order to get there.

Bonds is absolutely correct that there are limits to the amount of energy that can be economically produced in a Net Zero electricity regime. But has it occurred to him that AI can be part of the solution?

Let’s think this through.

A week ago Governor Glenn Youngkin announced plans by Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS) to build the world’s first commercial nuclear fusion reactor in Virginia. That project must overcome innumerable obstacles if it’s to become reality. The company has devised magnets capable of containing 150-million-degree temperatures, but the engineering of scaling from the lab to a commercial-scale facility is daunting. Artificial Intelligence can help with that.

Nuclear fusion will be the ultimate green fuel, producing limitless electricity without emitting CO2 or other pollutants. Greenies should be willing to move heaven and earth to make it a reality.

Admittedly, fusion power is still years off under the best of circumstances — CFS is aiming for the early 2030s. Meanwhile, we need renewable energy such as solar and wind to bridge us to the future. AI potentially can help engineers squeeze more energy out of solar power cells and design turbines that extract more energy out of the wind (and stand up to hurricanes and, who knows, maybe even save the whales).

AI might even help solve another barrier to renewable fuels — the inability to store excess electricity that solar and wind generate for when it’s needed. Using batteries to store energy is still very expensive. Batteries are economical only in limited situations such as tweaking the electric grid or, most ambitiously, short-term load shifting. Perhaps AI can help scientists explore new, more powerful battery chemistries — or accelerate the development of alternative energy-storage mechanisms such hydrogen storage and flywheels.

Maybe AI can accelerate the development of deep geothermal technologies. Extracting the heat stored beneath the earth’s surface could cleanly power human civilization for thousands of years.

Then there’s the vast realm of energy conservation: heat recycling, better insulation, precision agriculture that uses less energy, more walkable human settlement patterns that rely less upon automobiles. The human imagination (bolstered by AI) is the limit.

There are enormous downsides to AI if it spins out of control (as it inevitably will). Some apocalyptic scenarios seem frighteningly plausible, and humanity will have to develop institutional mechanisms to prevent them from occurring. But I would argue that AI is far more likely to help humanity solve the climate-change issue than make it worse. Here in Virginia, let’s be part of the solution.

There’s one more factor that Virginians need to take into account as this debate evolves. Halting construction of data centers in Virginia won’t halt construction of data centers — it will just shift the location of data centers to other states and jurisdictions. Luddite interventions won’t prevent the release of one molecule of CO2 into the atmosphere. We’ll just deprive ourselves of the economic benefits of maintaining our status as the data-center capital of the world.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

14 responses to “Save Data Centers from the Luddites”

  1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    With all due respect, the idea of a person trained in sociology, which is a legitimate discipline that studies collective human behavior, teaching courses on climate change seems like a bit of a reach. Where is the "trust science" crowd?

    The AI train has left the station. It's being incorporated into virtually every part of society and the economy. Indeed, the Illinois Supreme Court has just ruled that members of the bar can use AI under certain circumstances. https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/illinois-top-court-say-judges-lawyers-can-use-ai-with-limits-2024-12-19 The federal government is using it. https://ai.gov/ai-in-gov/ Environmental groups are finding uses for AI. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/how-artificial-intelligence-helping-tackle-environmental-challenges

    And AI needs datacenters. Datacenters need large amounts of electricity and water. It seems reasonable to push datacenter operators to become as efficient as possible in their use of these resources, but the idea that datacenter growth will be slowed dramatically or even stopped is absurd. This is truly a Luddite effort in action. And it's time to say so.

  2. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Your projections are just as faith-based as the jeremiads of the climate catastrophe clowns, Jim. AI is no panacea, just another tool. It will be wonderful if practical fusion generation appears, but I think another two decades is a more likely timeline than another one, and the cost may be (literally) astronomical, given the process it seeks to contain and control. We'll be burning gas and probably also coal well into the second half of this century. Huge parts of the world are expanding use of coal.

    The whole house of cards needs to be knocked down. There is no climate crisis and barely any measurable climate change. Then we can make decisions based on engineering and economics.

  3. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    AI will not be slowed and data centers will increase. Why not cash in now so that Virginia takes charge of the industry. I agree with Fairfax, we need to make sure they are energy efficient, but to eliminate them would have a very detrimental economic impact. I like "green" but to get there may take some time and we need to invest in data centers now.

  4. The New Religion, followed by the hair-under-the-armpit lunatics, led by their false prophets, will oppose any steps that limit their propensity for control and adulation from the magnificent Marxists in America.

  5. LarrytheG Avatar

    If you can accomplish something in the "cloud" that saves a physical trip in a vehicle, does it reduce fossil fuel usage?

    Goes along with the idea , maybe, that if an electric gas is powered by electricity from natural gas, is it less polluting than a vehicle using gasoline?

    IF we trade burning electricity generated from natural gas for less vehicle miles burning gasoline? How do we know or make that calculation?

    Are we gaining productivity from using more electricity?

    How do we gain productivity but don't know/understand what less productive thing is being replaced by a more productive thing?

    One presumes that all the billion of dollars getting spent to get "cloud" services is cheaper than what the cloud services are replacing? But we apparently cannot name what the less productive thing being replaced…is?

  6. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    Hey – we chased all the banks out, so why not chase this out…and build huge non-economic, farmland destroying and ultimately toxic solar farms instead?
    Go Greenies! Love "the people" by impoverishing and freezing everybody…equally!

  7. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    โ€œBonds is absolutely correct that there are limits to the amount of energy that can be economically produced in a Net Zero electricity regimeโ€

    There really are not.

    โ€œwe need renewable energy such as solar and wind to bridge us to the future.โ€

    Solar and wind are already clean, reliable, and low maintenanceโ€ฆ they are not some sort of bridgeโ€ฆ they are our futureโ€ฆ thank Godโ€ฆ

    โ€œUsing batteries to store energy is still very expensiveโ€

    No, it is notโ€ฆ and you realize you are arguing for nuclear energyโ€ฆ the most expensive option availableโ€ฆ

  8. DJRippert Avatar

    Well, I'm up to my eyeballs in data and AI and I've noticed a trend – highly educated people getting very nervous about AI. You can almost feel the heat being generated inside those pointy heads as people like OpenAI CEO Sam Altman talks about an AI assistant functioning at the PhD level.

    Many writers, marketing people, artists, software developers, and PhDs are claiming that today's AI is extremely overrated or that today's AI is extremely dangerous.

    Apparently, AI threatens the years and years of work these people put in to make themselves (in their opinion, at least) smarter than the rest of the world and superior to the rest of the world.

    Yesterday, OpenAI announced (but did not release) its latest model – o3. They claimed the model achieved some impressive scores on challenging benchmarks. However, a straightforward prompt consumed $20 worth of compute while the complex prompts that aced the benchmarks consumed $3,000 of compute.

    Leading AI models may soon be economically out of reach for anybody except the largest companies.

  9. Put up coal plants next to the data centers to power them. The time to death from pollution or climate change will be far longer than the time to death once AI is running all our systems, as well as programming itself, and it decides us meat puppets are far more trouble than we are worth and AI support for us expires. It won't be long now.

    Those not in the IT business may not know that the innocuous sounding but most bone chilling phrase is the error message "Support for that feature has expired". It means the decision has been made, and if you depended on that feature you're screwed with no recourse.

    We're doing it to ourselves. Future civilizations will look back at us and shake their heads at how we destroyed ourselves. They will view us as quaintly naive as we view the Romans for destroying themselves with lead poisoning. The then new lead technology was wonderful. Pipes brought water to businesses and homes, pretty glaze to pottery and made wine sweeter. Cave canum.

    We won't be able to say we were not warned. Folks with understanding of IT like Hawking, Gates and Musk have expressed their fear of AI. They know something about the issue.

  10. Large Language Models are not going to go Terminator. This is not actual sentient intelligence: AI is a buzzword to sell it to companies terrified of missing another Big Tech Moment like the internet. See NFTs just a few years ago.

    โ€œHallucinationsโ€ are largely an intractable problem with LLMs which is going to make them inherently unreliable. This is not helped by indiscriminate feeding (read: unauthorized use) if data which has become so glutted with LLM output that weโ€™re basically inbreeding them. For example, so much art on the internet is now LLM garbage that itโ€™s going to be difficult to solve common art generation issues because the model is learning off the same art issues.

    Calling out faulty, overly resource-intensive tech does not a Luddite make.

  11. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Texas (of all places) is becoming increasingly renewable. There are more solar-battery frams coming on line. Manufacturing costs have fallen off the roof, they require little maintenance, they produce energy dirt cheap all day, store it, and sell it at higher prices 6 hours later. What a racket! Racquet?

  12. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    In general, the green idea has been, if we can stop growth, then we can envision ratcheting down from here to 25%, 50%, 75% reduction in fossil fuels. But the world energy use is growing almost as fast as the envisioned ratcheting down, at least for some decades until world population starts an expected demographic downturn in the long term.

  13. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Tech Gone Awry

    Email received: โ€œThere is an important message for you from your healthcare provider. To view your message log on to your MyCare account and select โ€œHealthcare Messagingโ€.

    Oh god. Whatโ€™s that password? Ah!

    User name: XYZBbout
    Password: ******************

    A text message has been sent to the phone ending in 5623 (Ding)
    Enter code: 7678643
    pulldown click click
    Message: Our office will be closed on the 24 & 25. If you have an emergency dial 9-1-1

  14. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    JAB, honest question, do you use AI to write your pieces? If so, at what point? Draftโ€ฆ? Cleanupโ€ฆ? None at allโ€ฆ? Just curious. Merry Christmas!

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT