Pandering to the Old Folks

The three gubernatorial candidates addressed about 400 people at a Richmond forum sponsored by AARP Virginia Monday and, not surprisingly, told the crowd why old people should vote for them.

Mr. Russ “Blunt Talk” Potts, 66, noted that he was the only candidate who was a member of the American Association of Retired People and “the only guy with gray hair running in this race.” Wow, that’s a great way to get someone to identify with your vision for Virginia — emphasize your similarity in age. Let’s see. I’m 52. Tim Kaine is five years younger, Jerry Kilgore is eight years younger, and Russ Potts is 12 years older than me. I guess that means I should vote for Kaine. And I would, oh, yes, I would, if it weren’t for the fact that…

Kaine’s idea of appealing to old people is to shovel money at them. He would seek additional money from the 2006 state budget if rising heat bills begin to hurt low-income seniors, according to the Richmond Times-Dispatch. He said he’d spend more money on Meals for Wheels, an adult day care service for the handicapped that has a long waiting list. And he bragged about the Warner administration’s track record of boosting the pay of caregivers and Medicaid reimbursement rates.

Kilgore matched Kaine pander for pander. He, too, would seek to help old folks hurt by rising heating costs, increase funding for rural medical clinics, and give tax incentives for the purchase of long-term care insurance.

If I were running for governor, here’s what I would tell old people: You old people have more disposable income, more assets and more free time than your children and grandchildren. Sure, some of you are poor, and I’ll make sure that there’s a social safety net to guarantee that your basic needs are taken care of. But I’m not treating you as a privileged class deserving of special consideration based on your age. What I will do is stop sticking it to your children and grand-children by promising you stuff and taxing them to pay for it!


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

  1. Anonymous Avatar

    And you would LOSE.

  2. SouthoftheJames.com Avatar
    SouthoftheJames.com

    RTD: “Asked about long waiting lists for such senior services as Meals On Wheels, adult day care and transportation for the handicapped, Kaine said the only way to pare those lists is to spend more money.”

    Hmm, in actuality, a lot of the waiting lists for those types of services developed due to shortages of volunteers, less charitable giving from private donors, restrictive federal regulations governing the provision of Medicaid/Medicare-funded services to the elderly and disabled, and red tape in state liscensing. Throwing money at these programs will not solve things. But, neither will tax credits…

    — Conaway

  3. Anonymous Avatar

    This is one reason I think voting should be much more tightly integrated into everyday civic life so that everyone will start doing it, even for smaller races.

    Because right now, it’s mostly the elderly that vote most reliably. And of course they are the ones who get pandered to.

  4. I have a ton of gray hair, and I’m younger than Kaine or Kilgore. Can I run for Governor or not? I’m confused with Potts’ standard.

  5. Ray Hyde Avatar

    I have an elderly friend. Because he had more assets and more disposable income than his unemployed Ph.D son-in-law, who has been unable to keep reliable work due to reductions in government spending in his specialty area, his daughter and son-in-law have been boomerang babies for years. Now his disposable income has been disposed of and he is failing mentally.

    Fortunately he has long-term care insurance on which he has been paying premiums to the tune of $300 plus per month. I don’t know how long he has had the policy, but I gather it has been some time.

    Facing more and more impending uncertatinty he turned to a financial advisor (far too late, I think), for help.

    It turns out his insurance is only sufficient to provide for at-home look-in care three times a week. He probably need full time care, and soon, but there is no money to do it. He still owns his home and has retirement income, so he is not poor enough to qualify for a government safety net, and not anywhere rich enough to pay for nursing home care.

    Like the rest of us, he has trouble discerning any meaningful difference between the candidates, only for a different reason.

    His son-in-laws specialty? Social services.

  6. The reality is that social security worked. Jim is right. People over 65 are now the richest segment of our society. Unfortunately, with aging comes an increasingly self-centered focus on our personal physical and fiscal security. That means we’re unable to see ourselves as others see us… privileged and well-kept for the most part.

    Seniors don’t need more special tax breaks based on age rather than financial circumstance.

    But, anonymous is right, too. As long as seniors control the ballot box, folks like Jim and me who think that they protest too much won’t be able to get elected.

    Think about what that means for public policy in the next decades when the elderly become an increasingly large proportion of our population.

    I hope to run counter to the tide even as my hair grays. If I lose perspective, one of you younger generation folks feel free to tape a “kick me” sign on my back.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT