Now that it’s the New Year, what happened to the Sound and the Fury?
-
New Year’s Catnip
Let me get my nose out of my eggnog. I’m not just talking about a holiday hiatus.Where’s the rage over federal debts and deficit spending? Remember all those months of harrumphing about Arma-and Boomer-Geddon? How we are doomed by negating the Protestant Work Ethic? That we, and Obama, are a bunch of spend-thrift, gluttonous slobs?Where’s EMR and his Calvinistic lectures on “mass overconsumption.” Where’s Boomer-Jim (although he actually sounded sane on his CNN interview)? Groveton?To be sure, the Big Bacon questioned Bob McDonnell in his quest to explain Virginia’s AAA bond rating to the nabobs on Wall Street. I kinda of agreed with the moronic idiocy of this. But then Bob tells the Richmond Times-Disgrace that’s 2011 is going to be a very different kind of year. He’s going to be a take-charge guy. Forget about Deepwater Horizon, ABC stores and Confederate History Month. That’s like, so yesterday.But why the silence? Where’s the scolding? I mean, I enjoy not being told once again what kind of free-spending slob I am. Could it be the Republican victory in November? Groveton and Bacon are secret Republicans despite their claims of indepdence. EMR answers to neither clan, I know.Just to start the New Year out right, let’s quote from the despised Paul Krugman of The New York Times (in this case, on the tax cuts, which is catnip to the Groveton-Bacons, which may be why they are so asleep on the issue):“One day deficits were the great evil and we needed fiscal austerity now now now, never mind the state of the economy. The next day $800 billion in debt financed tax cuts, with the prospect of more to come, was the greatest thing since sliced bread, a triumph of bipartisanship.”So what about it, guys?Peter Galuszka
-
Can the Boomers Retire?
Christine Romans interviewed me this morning for CNN American Morning. A one-on-one interview running more than five minutes on a national cable network is a generous allotment of time, but it barely skims the surface of the weighty topics at stake. Still, I can’t complain. The interview provides a nice introduction to the “Boomergeddon” book.
The Bacon bottom line: 2/3 of Boomers are financially unprepared for retirement (our friend Groveton is a relatively rare exception) and will have to work longer than they ever anticipated. We can’t count on government to act responsibly enough to preserve the integrity of Social Security and Medicare, so we’ll have to add to savings to offset the risk of cutbacks to the retirement safety net.
And how do we do that? Strip the costs out of our lifestyles to lower our spending profile, pay down debt, become as self reliant as possible — and don’t count on the government to bail you out. You’ve got about 15 years to work on it. Good luck!
-
McDonnell to Defend AAA Rating
The sleeper story of the season: Gov. Bob McDonnell, staff and senior legislators will be paying calls on rating agencies S&P, Fitch and Moody’s to defend Virginia’s AA rating.
According to Chelyen Davis with the Free-Lance Star, McDonnell says he has no reason to believe that the AAA is in jeopardy, but he’s never met with the rating analysts and he wants to make sure they “have confidence in what we’re doing.” In particular, he wants to explain how Virginia intends to honor its commitments to the Virginia Retirement System.
Good luck, governor. Make sure you have an explanation handy for that Senate Finance Committee report that says Virginia cannot borrow any more money if it wants to maintains its self-imposed debt capacity cap of 5% of revenue.
-
Christmas 2.0
-
Good News on the Job Front — But No Reason to Get Complacent
Gov. Bob McDonnell made a few big promises when he ran for governor. One of those promises, raising more money for transportation, was a bust. Privatizing the state’s ABC stores, collecting royalties from offshore oil drilling and slapping tolls on Interstate highways have crumbled like the asphalt on Interstate 95. But another of his promises, to promote job creation, has panned out pretty well. So far, McDonnell has lived up to his campaign slogan, “Bob’s for Jobs.”Virginia’s economic development success garnered attention in today’s Wall Street Journal, which noted that the state’s unemployment fell to 6.8% in October, down from 7.2% in February thanks to the net creation of 55,000 new jobs. That was the third best job-creation rate of any state, noted reporter Jennifer Levitz. And it represented a big improvement from 2009, when Gov. Tim Kaine presided over a performance that ranked 35th.Clearly, Virginia benefited from the surge in federal spending last year, but only 2,600 of the new jobs came from additions to the federal payroll, the WSJ noted. (The article offered no numbers for expanded employment by federal contractors, which probably exceeded the number of direct federal jobs.) On the other hand, Virginia benefited relatively little from soaring energy and agricultural prices, as several other top-performing states have. Instead, the Old Dominion has enjoyed a slew of traditional economic development coups in a year when big new corporate expansion announcements were far and few between. The Governor’s office has announced 215 deals so far this year.The article points to two differences between Virginia and other states. Even as it was cutting spending by hundreds of millions of dollars, the General Assembly gave McDonnell $57 million in economic development funds to entice new investment to the state. McDonnell also appointed Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling, as “chief job creation officer,” transforming a largely ceremonial position into a high-profile economic development czar.Philosophically, I’m opposed to the use of government “incentives” to buy jobs. Business subsidies do not create new jobs, they only transfer them from one state to another. I believe in low corporate tax rates for everyone — and no special deductions, credits, exemptions or subsidies for anyone. Our economic development strategy should be to focus on creating a favorable business climate that helps everyone, not a favored few. That said, as a Virginian, I’d much rather have the jobs here in Virginia. I’d rather live in a state that promotes job creation rather than a state like, say, California, where state policy destroys jobs.McDonnell deserves to bask in his job-creation success. And I’m not opposed to his request for an additional $54 million to continue the program. But I would hate for Virginia to get stuck on the idea that buying jobs through incentives is a good long-term formula for prosperity. It’s an economic development philosophy that dates to the 1960s, if not earlier. In the long run, we need to improve K-12 educational performance, achieve productivity breakthroughs in healthcare, patch our crumbling infrastructure, develop more energy-efficient human settlement patterns and build world-class research universities — not by doing things the same old way, as in throwing around money at every desiderata, but by adopting new paradigms for how we deliver and pay for government services.
-
Watch It and Weep!
The looming insolvency of many states and municipalities is getting more and more attention. CBS’ 60 Minutes highlighted the problem Sunday, and everyone concerned about Virginia public policy needs to watch this video.
Needless to say, Virginia is in far better shape than Illinois, New Jersey and California, but it would be foolhardy to think that we are immune from their difficulties. The fact is, we don’t have a good handle on the financial strength of all Virginia’s municipalities and all the independent authorities that have issued debt. We don’t know how much publicly backed debt there is, we don’t know what potential liabilities governments are potentially liable for, and we don’t know how well covered the debt is. We don’t know what impact declining property values will have on municipal revenues, what impact consumer deleveraging will have on sales tax revenues or laggardly economic growth will have on income taxes.
Meanwhile, we face massive cutbacks in federal aid when the “stimulus” package expires, continuing increases in Medicaid spending, and more cuts of unknown magnitude when the newly elected Congress gets serious (or semi-serious) about closing the federal budget gap.
The 50 states, metropolitan regions and municipalities are coming to the end of an the expansionary era that has prevailed since World War II. Spending will be painful to cut. Much of it is baked into the dysfunctional human settlement patterns — scattered, disconnected, low-density — that we have built over the past 60 years. More spending is tied to our dysfunctional, privately-owned-but-highly-regulated health care system, and yet more is tied to our dysfunctional, hyper-bureaucratized public educational system. The days of blindly shoveling more money at roads, schools and health care are over. We cannot afford this madness anymore.
Our major public institutions have evolved as far as they can usefully evolve. They have reached a dead end. Collectively, they are nearing collapse. Virginia has been less profligate than other states, so that foundational truth may not yet be self evident to everyone. But the design flaws in our institutions are endemic — Virginia is only a few years behind the rest.
Government As Usual will not work. We cannot solve our problems by trimming a bit here and there, jacking up taxes and fees but spreading the pain so no one notices, implementing private-sector processes in the search of ephemeral efficiencies, borrowing up to our AAA debt limit, diverting the public’s attention with culture-war issues, and hoping that some economic miracle from source unknown will deliver a revenue windfall from the heavens. No, we must fundamentally re-think the way we deliver and pay for every major public services at the state and municipal level.
Just as we need a new compact between government and citizen at the federal level, we need a new compact at the state, regional and local level. Either we devise the new compact through a deliberative democratic process informed by reasoned debate, or it will be imposed upon us in a panicked crisis mode by remorseless creditors.
-
Is There A Gun Show Loophole?
One of the enduring controversies in Virginia involves the so-called “Gun Show Loophole”. I say so-called because the term “gun show loophole” generates intense debate and considerable emotion. In fact, this article on the “gun show loophole” was inspired by a Bacon’s Rebellion reader who took exception to a comment I posted about the need to close the “gun show loophole”. As I’ve researched this matter it’s become obvious that there are honest people and honest opinions on both sides of this controversy.What’s a gun show anyway? Fundamentally, a gun show is a temporary gathering of firearms enthusiasts. The shows are usually organized by promoters who lease space for the show and then sub-lease display / sale areas (often called tables) to vendors. Most vendors are firearms dealers although there are often people leasing tables and selling knives, jerky, etc. Old Dominion Gun Shows is planning a gun show in mid January in Dale City, VA. You can see their web site here.Can you buy guns at a gun show? Yes. Everybody (on all sides of the issue) know and agree that guns are bought and sold at Virginia gun shows. The ATF estimates that there are 5,000 gun shows a year (across the nation) averaging 1,500 – 15,000 attendees per show. Shows vary in size with smaller shows having 50 tables and large shows having 2,000 tables. ATF estimates that 1,000 guns per show are sold at the big shows. As a point of reference, the Old Dominion Gun Show in Dale City will have 175, six foot tables available to lease for $50 each. I’ve never seen the statistic of total guns sold per year at gun shows but I imagine that a million could be possible. That’s a lot of guns.Are gun sales at gun shows regulated? Yes, sort of….depends a lot on the state. People and companies engaged in the business of buying and selling guns must have a license from the federal government. These merchants must comply with federal law by completing a background check on a potential buyer using the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. However, that requirement only applies to licensed gun dealers. Private citizens who are not engaged “in the business of dealing” firearms who make only “occasional” sales within their home state are under no requirement to conduct background checks on purchasers. They are legally forbidden from selling to a person who they know is prohibited from buying a gun (such as an ex-felon) but they don’t have to verify anything.Gun shows don’t kill people … people kill people. Maybe so but gun shows provide a convenient venue for illegal firearm sales. In fact, there is no doubt that some very questionable gun sales occur during gun shows. One chilling account comes from a young man repeatedly shot during the Virginia Tech massacre. Read his story here.It’s always Virginia. Not in this case. While Virginia has very lax private gun sale regulations the Old Dominion is far from alone. Of the 50 states, only 17 have substantial gun show / private gun sale regulations. The other 33 (including Virginia) allow great latitude in the private sale or transfer of firearms – whether within a gun show or somewhere else.The bottom line – I am a gun ownership advocate. I believe in the Second Amendment and the Supreme Court interpretation of that amendment in the Heller case. However, there is good reason to perform a background check prior to selling a gun. I support the adoption of Colorado’s regulatory approach. Guns sold at gun shows must be through a registered firearms dealer with a background check. Private sales outside of gun shows are allowed without a background check. I can live with private sales and I can live with firearms shows – just not at the same time.
-
Where Was Bob?
While Gov. Robert F. McDonnell was attorney general in 2006, he did nothing when informed about serious accusations that eventually led to the conviction and 10-year sentence of John W. Forbes II, a former state finance secretary.The accusations come from a front-page article today in the Richmond Times-Dispatch that details efforts to bring to justice Forbes, who was convicted in a $4 million fraud case involving a grant from the Virginia Tobacco Indemnification and Community Revitalization CommissionForbes, who served in the cabinet under Republican Gov. Jim Gilmore, used money to set up a program designed to improve adult literacy but instead used a considerable amount of the grant to pay for salaries of himself and his wife and to buy himself a $1 million home.The case is one of the biggest corruption scandals in recent Virginia history but as the newspaper reports, McDonnell did nothing when sent a four-page letter in October 2006 detailing concerns of wrong doing from a woman who worked for Forbes and then was abruptly fired when she asked Forbes about financial irregularities.Neither McDonnell’s nor the attorney general’s office could find the letter, the newspaper says. Former state Sen. Charles R, Hawkins, R-Pittsylvania, who chaired the tobacco commission, also said he had no recollection of the letter.The author of the letter, D.L. Billett Jr. of Chesterfield, whose former wife E. Denise Kent had worked for and had been fired by Forbes, kept pushing for a probe. He told the Times-Dispatch that he spoke with the attorney general’s office after sending the letter in 2006, but was told not to expect much in the way of an investigation. Billett could not remember the name of the official.Finally, Billett sent the information to Sen. John C. Watkins, R-Powhatan, other political figures and the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission. It finally ended up in the hands of the State Police 14 months ago which launched the probe that led to Forbes’ conviction.This sorry chapters raises big questions about McDonnell’s competence, if not his integrity, when he was attorney general. The story seems to be a classic case of sweeping something potentially embarrassing to one’s political party under the rug — in this case than of the Virginia GOP. To their credit, other state Republicans had the integrity to push for a probe.The pressure is now on for the General Assembly to create better checks and balances for public bodies such as the tobacco commission that is supposed to use billions in a settlement against major tobacco companies for the public good.Another aspect is that many of the same Republicans who apparently refused to check into serious allegations of government misfeasance have no trouble painting Washington and the federal government as the source of all evil.Let’s hope the pressure stays on for a reckoning.Peter Galuszka
-
Outing Groveton
Ever wonder who Groveton really is? Since he has become a regular blogger here, I have taken up the science of Grovetonology where I ceaselessly search for identifying clues. But his true identity remains a closely-held mystery.My threshold understanding is the following: Groveton is a guy who is some kind of executive with an IT firm. He jets from Auckland and Amsterdam every week from his home somewhere in Northern Virginia. He says he named himself after a high school somewhere near Manassas. To make us sense he’s a regular guy — one you might not mind having a beer with in an airport lounge — he titillates with wistful comments that he’d really like to partake of foreign fleshpots.I asked the Big Bacon one day if he could provide any hints as to Groveton’s identity. What does he look like, for instance? Jim said: “Well, he’s a middle aged guy, kind of stocky, beefy, ex-football player type.”I chewed on this for a while and then realized it was TBB (Total Bacon Bullshit) designed to throw me off the scent. I mean, he’s clearly a hard conservative. If you broke into the basements of both Bacon’s and Groveton’s homes you’d probably find a high speed telex spitting out daily orders from Cato Central. It wouldn’t surprise me in the least if the disinformation campaign ran really deep.I have come up with some other possibilities I’d like to share with you:- Groveton is really a skinny nerd with a huge subscription list to hard right magazines and blogs and has ‘fair and balanced” Fox News switched on 24/7.
- Grovetown isn’t a guy at all, but a woman posing as a guy.
- Grovetown is really an amalgam of several people. Risse uses this tactic all the time. The “real” Risse identifies himself as “EMR.” That’s simple enough, but he often comments using other names. This is another plot to make us think we are hearing several independent voices. In reality, Risse is a 1950’s style, Kerouac-like subversive who wants to pollute our thought patterns with an enormously complicated vocabulary that he has invented. My advice: Don’t let him inside your head.
Anyway, the Big Bacon has promised to reveal Groveton’s real identity soon. It is now supposedly a secret because Groveton’s employer might be upset that he’s blogging. But that could be TBB, too.
Peter Galuszka (aka “Mr. Gooze”)
-
The New Geography of Racism
Ever wonder why white opposition to darker-skinned immigrants seems to be centered in outer suburbs such as Prince William and Stafford counties? An analysis of new Census data provides the answer.The reason, the American Community Survey reports, is that immigrants from Latin America and other places are flocking to small towns and outer suburbs rather than concentrating in the center of large cities, as had been the case for immigrants for the last two centuries.
According to a New York Times report, Los Angeles County, a traditional Hispanic draw, showed little immigrant growth while immigration exploded in suburban Newton County outside of Atlanta. Closer to home, Stafford County saw its immigrant population triple during the past decade. Other Virginia hot spots are Prince William and Loudoun counties.
The Times notes that many Hispanics are drawn to outer suburbs by lower living costs, as well as by once-plentiful construction jobs that went bust with the recession.
This helps to explain why Stafford County is proposing to get tough on illegal immigrants, and why Prince William County, led by board of supervisors chairman and rising state politician Corey A. Stewart, cracked down starting in 2007.
Prince William’s law prodded many Hispanics to leave the county, regardless of their immigration status or citizenship, because they felt they were being profiled by police. Stewart wants to take the Prince William experience statewide with his “Virginia Rule of Law” campaign.
The sad truth is that these settlement patterns are sparking racism that had seemed to be abating in America. Just 50 years ago, so-called “blockbusting” led African-Americans into tight, white, ethno-centric neighborhoods of big cities such as Chicago and New York.
The battleground has since shifted to the wide highways and big-box stores of outer suburbia. But the dynamics are the same. White Americans had felt safe in such places but somehow now feel threatened by new arrivals. The reason? It’s only skin deep.Peter Galuszka
-
CRESTFALLEN
โCrestfallenโ is the only way to describe the feeling.
After ALL THE WORK on AntiPartisan action and AntiPartisanism, and then not get invited to the โNo Labelsโ kick off on Monday at Columbia University!!
There is no question about the need to stop Whack a Mole Politics and to stop Tossing Rocks at Empty Pigeonholes (TRAPE).
Yes politics IS broken. It has been for at least three decades and becomes more broke with each passing campaign cycle.
BUT how to fix politics?
The โFounding Leadersโ and the invited guests said all the right things…
BUT WAIT:
1,000 people in the audience?
A slick web site already up?
They have raised a million dollars BEFORE it was a public activity?
The โFounding Leadersโ are primarily agents and shills who have worked for the two dominate political Clans.
The only โnameโ from the Commonwealth has been described as the most craftily partisan politician in the large municipality where he lives and from which he was elected to congress and served as the chair of the Elephant Clan fund raising committee in the House.
It was pointed out on another Blog that the ONLY โseniorโ Elephant Clan personalities were FORMER office holders who recently lost a primary to the WingNut / Anger of Ignorance Crowd.
You have to know โthe systemโ to dismantle โthe systemโ but is this just an attempt to preserve the 19th Century โGrand Old Two Party Systemโ?
Is there a way forward that does not involve articulating an AGENDA?
Does it make sense to just raise money to โprotectโ Clan candidates from Right WingNut and Left WingNut attacks?
After all, the primary DRIVERS of civilizationโs dysfunctions are:
Unsustainable human settlement patterns,
A governance structure that does match the economic, social and physical structure of contemporary society, and
An economic system that lives on Mass OverConsumption, speculation and debt AND
WAS ALL CREATED AND IMPLEMENTED WHEN THERE WAS A FUNCTIONING AND CIVIL TWO PARTY SYSTEM โ 1950 to 1990.
How will No Labels produce โwhat citizens wantโ when the vast majority of citizens have no idea what the real options are or what would be in their best interest as individuals, for their Households or as members of the hundreds of โcommunitiesโ (small โcโ) in which every citizen is trying to exist?
The answer will be the Agenda No Labels articulates and how well they integrate those who do not care how โthe systemโ worked before it FAILED.
Perhaps it was not such a bad thing not to be invited…
EMR
-
What It Is; What It Ain’t
Conservatives are all thumped up about regarding U.S. District Judge Henry Hudson’s declaring a critical part of Obamacare unconstitutional.But before they break out the champagne, they need to consider a few points:- The ruling deals only with that part of the health law that has the federal government requiring that all people buy health insurance. While Atty. Gen. Kenneth Cuccinelli won on this point, Hudson did not go along with the Cooch on striking down the law entirely or delaying its implementation until a higher court can rule on an appeal, which the Justice Department has already filed.
- Two other federal judges have upheld the law, including one in Lynchburg. Both were appointed by a Democrat. Hudson is a Bush appointee.
- Virginia is not the only state to challenge Obamacare. About 20 attorneys general are suing in Florida. While the Cooch scored some points, he’s just one of many conservatives who dislikes the law. Indeed, my old college roomate, an ecologist-turned-Republican who is a former congressman from New Hampshire, is against it.
- The “Commerce Clause” aspect which is what Hudson is dwelling upon is a very elastic and flexible concept. It has been used this way and that for years. So while Hudson’s narrow ruling has interpreted the clause one way, it is quite possible an appeals judge might see it differently.
My personal view is mixed. While I enthusiastically embrace health care reform, I do have some misgivings about being forced to buy something. Yet, I understand that one of the reasons why all need to buy health insurance is that productive tax payers get stuck with the emergency room or other bills of cheapskates who skimp on insurance until they are sick or injured.
It could very well be that the only solution to this is socialized medicine with a one-payer system. We are perhaps the only advanced industrial country that doesn’t have one. I know several doctors on the front lines of health care who are sick to death of having to deal with for-profit (or even non-profit) insurance companies that game the managed care program set up three decades ago.
The Dems have suffered a defeat, but it may not last. Meanwhile, I haven’t seen one clear new reform from the GOP or from the naysayers like Jim Bacon who somehow thinks that a medical concierge system might work (sure Jim, if you are rich).
Peter Galuszka
-
Congratulations, Cooch!
Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli racked up the biggest legal victory of his career yesterday when a federal judge ruled for Virginia in its legal challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare). Wrote Federal Judge Henry E. Hudson on the provision that would compel Americans to purchase health insurance or pay a fine:Neither the Supreme Court nor any federal circuit court of appeals has extended Commerce Clause powers to compel an individual to involuntarily enter the stream of commerce by purchasing a commodity in the private market. In doing so, enactment of the Minimum Essential Coverage Provision [the individual mandate] exceeds the Commerce Clause powers vested in Congress under Article 1.
Score one not only for Cuccinelli but for the rollback of the leviathan state. If Hudson’s ruling is upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, as it undoubtedly will be, an an important limit will be placed upon Congress’ power to regulate and coerce Americans any where, any time, for any reason. The ruling also undermines Obamacare’s effort to restructure the health insurance industry by forcing Americans to purchase insurance. With the blow to this critical piece of Obamacare’s financing, the entire scheme may unravel.The only good thing that can be said about Obamacare is that at least the Democrats tried to address runaway medical inflation and shrinking access to the health care system with their own legislative package. Their solution stinks, but they tried. Now that the Republicans have shot it down, let’s see if they come up with anything better.
-
Do You Believe Me Yet?
For months now, I have been harping on the theme that Virginia faces a challenging fiscal future and that we need to start getting our financial affairs in order now. Two more straws in the wind…The combined unfunded liabilities of the Virginia Retirement System and other state-supported pension plans adds up to $17.6 billion, reports the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission. (Read the Times-Dispatch article here.) Contributions by state government and municipalities will have to increase significantly in the next budget biennium, said Tracey Smith, a JLARC analyst in a legislative hearing yesterday.Meanwhile, Virginia has borrowed $346 million from the federal government since October 2009 to pay unemployment benefits, and is projected to need another $613 million by April 2013. The money will have to come from the General Fund because the state’s unemployment trust fund is insolvent. (Read the Times-Dispatch reporting here.)Now, go back and re-read “A Glimpse of Boomergeddon in Virginia’s Future,” which cites a Senate Finance Committee analysis to the effect that Virginia will pay $594 million in interest payments in fiscal 2012 to finance its ever-growing debt. (It’s a short post, so you have no excuse for not reading it.)Gov. Bob McDonnell wants to borrow nearly $4 billion to fund road transportation projects? And he calls himself a fiscal conservative?
-
McDonnell Peddling the Transportation Policies of Yesteryear
Gov. Bob McDonnell has announced a $4 billion transportation plan, most of which would be funded through borrowing. The justification for heaping on new state debt is that building now will prove to be cheaper than building in the future, when construction costs and financing costs rise in tandem with a recovering economy.I can see the logic, but I object to the plan on two grounds. First, I believe that human settlement patterns are undergoing a significant alteration — investment and population are flowing back toward the urban core (as reinforced in today’s Wall Street Journal, “Downtowns Get a Fresh Lease“). McDonnell wants to dump billions of dollars into transportation projects geared to the post-World War II paradigm of endlessly expanding the metropolitan frontier rather than the emerging paradigm of retrofitting what we’ve already built. Most of the money will be wasted. Furthermore, $4 billion is a drop in the bucket compared to our transportation needs. We need to conduct a fundamental re-thinking of our transportation policy — which projects we fund, and how we fund them — before putting the state billions of dollars into debt.
The second reason to object to borrowing more money is that Virginia is already testing the outer limits of its borrowing capacity at a time we need to be shoring up our finances, not borrowing more. State and municipal finances will grow more precarious with each passing year, a fact that will be only partially masked by the anemic economic rebound the country is experiencing.
Virginia faces many long-term challenges: (1) runaway Medicaid costs, (2) weak growth in sales and property tax revenues, and (3) declining largesse from the federal government. To that list of problems, which I have blogged about previously, let me add one more: a long-term rise in interest rates. Permit me to quote myself from the “Boomergeddon” blog at some length:
If the economy picks up steam, U.S. interest rates will rise. Even the Obama administration expects 10-year Treasury bonds to reach 5.3% in several years, up from 3.2% Monday, propelling interest payments on the national debt from roughly $200 billion yearly to $800 billion by 2020. If the sovereign debt contagion spills out of Europe, U.S. Treasury rates will rise even higher as investors charge a risk premium. Now comes [the McKinsey Global Institute in a report, “Farewell to Cheap Capital“] arguing that a third force โ increased global investment and shrinking global savings โ will lead to yet higher interest rates over the next two decades. States the report:
“Nominal and real interest rates are currently at 30-year lows, but both are likely to rise in coming years. If real long-term interest rates were to return to their 40-year average, they would rise by about 150 basis points from the level seen in the fall of 2010, as we write this report. And they may start moving up within five years.”
There has been a decades-long glut of capital as the mature economies of industrialized economies experienced slower growth and declining investment, McKinsey contends. Saving rates have dipped, too, especially in the U.S., but not enough to offset the weaker demand for investment capital. Meanwhile, developing countries, China especially, began saving phenomenal amounts of money as their economies took off. This global shift in the supply and demand of capital โ not just Federal Reserve monkeying with interest rates โ contributed to the global credit bubble of the mid-2000s.
Now the tide is turning, the report argues. China, India and other developing countries are embarking upon a massive wave of capital investment, much of it driven by infrastructure spending as their societies urbanize. The demand for new roads, rail lines, ports, water and power systems, schools, hospitals and other public infrastructure will reach a fever pitch not seen since the rebuilding of Europe after World War II. McKinsey also predicts massive growth in residential real estate investment to provide better housing for the emerging middle class, as well as strong growth in productive capacity. Global investment could increase from $11 trillion annual today to $24 trillion annually by 2030 (measured in constant 2005 dollars), or from 23.7% of global GDP in 2008 to more than 25% by 2030.
The surging demand for capital will not be matched by a commensurate increase in savings. The worldโs largest economies are fast aging, and larger retired populations will draw national savings down, not build them up. The shift will be most dramatic in China, where the government is encouraging people to consume more and the one-child policy will lead within a couple of decades to a lopsided demographic profile of too many retirees and too few young workers entering the workforce.
The shift in the global supply of and demand for capital will likely push up long-term interest rates. And that will present businesses, consumers, investors and governments with very different challenges in the next 30 years.
Consumers are moving in the right direction โ theyโre sloughing off debt. Corporations are saving more, too, if one counts share repurchases as a return of cash to shareholders. But governments are stuck with deep structural deficits. With the national debt as large as it is, roughly 90% of GDP, the U.S. budget is extraordinarily sensitive to increases in interest rates. If economic growth picks back up, the sovereign debt contagion spreads and McKinseyโs looming global capital shortage materializes on schedule, the U.S. could easily see 8% interest rates on its 10-year bonds by 2020. That would boost budget deficits by $500 billion yearly or more above current forecasts โ about the same amount we spend today on all discretionary domestic spending.
In that case, interest rates โ not spending, not tax rates โ will become the prime driver of U.S. budget deficits.
We cannot revert to the comfortable nostrums of yesteryear. The real estate bust and ensuing financial crisis of 2007-2008 created a massive discontinuity. The old economic and financial order is passing away. Our public policies must adapt to the new, emerging order, or Virginia will be swept away in the coming cataclysm of Boomergeddon.





