• INTRO TO CITIZEN MEDIA, THE NEXT STEP

    CITIZEN MEDIA, THE NEXT STEP is one on six Perspectives being developed at SYNERGY.

    This Perspective is the evolution of the 24 November 2010 post on BRB and the logical next step from THE ESTATES MATRIX โ€“ PART TWO of TRILO-G.

    The original intent was to post just the Overview in Chapter 1 and Chapter 5. However, with interest in the ill-timed proposal to cut funding for NPR drawing attention on this Blog, it seems useful to post the entire first five chapters.

    Citizen Media IS the way to provide citizens with the information they need. Enterprise Media cannot do that and Agency Media has a different role.

    Those not wanting to read the entire text will find that the Overview in Chapter One and the Summary at the start of Chapter Three provides a useful introduction.

    Comments are welcome. This post is NOT subject to the Litmus Test in Chapter Five but derogatory and off-topic posts will be deleted per Mr. Baconโ€™s grant of that pejorative to posters.

    EMR


  • CITIZEN MEDIA, THE NEXT STEP CHAP 1

    CITIZEN MEDIA, THE NEXT STEP

    Citizen Media serves the interests of the New Fourth Estate โ€“ citizens and their Households. Citizen Media is the source for information citizens must have to make intelligent decisions in the voting booth and in the market place.

    OVERVIEW (Beta 1)

    In 1999 Robert W. McChesney published the highly regarded and widely quoted book Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. McChesney documented the devastating economic and social impacts of concentrated ownership of Enterprise Media (aka, corporate media or MainStream Media). McChesneyโ€™s focus was the impact of media concentration on democratic processes at the nation-state scale but the scathing condemnation of media in the hands of very large Enterpriseโ€™s touched on mediaโ€™s negative contribution to a broad range of economic and social dysfunctions in contemporary society.

    Now, twelve years later, the crisis of Rich Media, Poor Democracy and uninformed citizens have grown worse, far worse.

    The Internet has not โ€˜solvedโ€™ the problems of media concentration; it has made understanding the core problems more complex. One need only Google โ€˜rich media, poor democracyโ€™ to receive a fire hose of condemnation of Enterprise Media practice, especially following the 2010 federal elections. One need only survey the Blogisphere to feel the rising tide of anger from the uninformed. This hostility is termed The Anger of Ignorance or โ€œintentional ignorance.โ€

    As well founded as McChesneyโ€™s perspective was, it did little to change the tide. The reason? McChesney provided no overarching Conceptual Framework that citizens could use to sort out facts and realities and to reach a consensus on needed action. Like many in โ€˜Journalismโ€™ he believed articulation problems was enough. To his credit, McChesney stated that change in media โ€“ and thus in dissemination of the information citizens needed โ€“ must be part of larger transformations but did not establish a context for those transformations.

    McChesney focused on the nation-state scale impact of Enterprise Media. That was and is very important but there has been even greater negative media impact at the Regional, SubRegional, Community, Village, Neighborhood and Cluster scales. See End Note One

    It is time for another try.

    THE ESTATES MATRIX examines the evolution of the three โ€œEstates of the Realmโ€ from 1304 to 1775. It also outlines the Fundamental Transformation of these three Estates after1775.

    During the period 1775 to 2000, the three historical Estates that had evolved over thousands of years transformed into the four contemporary Estates โ€“ Agency, Enterprise, Institution and Citizens / Households.

    These four Estates evolved to manage contemporary civilization just as the three well widely recognized Estates of the Realm had evolved up to 1775. THE ESTATES MATRIX also outlines the need for, and role of media serving each of the four New Estates, and especially Citizen Media serving the New Fourth Estate.

    CITIZEN MEDIA, THE NEXT STEP launches from the foundation established by THE ESTATES MATRIX. See End Note Two

    CITIZEN MEDIA, THE NEXT STEP is a multi-chapter Perspective that presents a comprehensive review of what Citizen Media is and how it could evolve to serve the needs of the New Fourth Estate โ€“ citizens and their Households.

    Chapter One (Getting Off on the Right Foot) opens with a review of unfounded perspective of True Believers in Journalism (with a Capital โ€˜Jโ€™) and their efforts to perpetuate the Myth that there once was a valid Fourth Estate comprised of print media family Enterprises.

    Next, Chapter One outlines the three major challenges facing Citizen Media. Chapter One concludes with an articulation of Synergyโ€™s oft stated THE BOTTOM LINE as it applied to Citizen Media.

    This rendition of Synergyโ€™s THE BOTTOM LINE lays out the context and questions which will determine if homo sapiens can preserve an advanced technology-based civilization or, at least evolve a NEW BRONZE AGE. Also see ENOUGH? (Forthcoming)

    Chapter Two (Citizen Media Context) further considers the three challenges facing Citizen Media and examines the economic, social and physical context in which Citizen Media must evolve and flourish if citizens are to have the information they need to make intelligent decisions.

    Chapter Three (Intentional Information Sabotage and Other Lesser Crimes) considers specific obstacles that stand in the way of citizens receiving the information they need to make well- informed decisions based on sound public judgements in the voting booth and in the marketplace. This chapter explore the definitions of Yackers, True Believers, Shills and Agents and considers the extent of Idea Spam and Intentional Information Sabotage.

    Chapter Four (The Litmus Test Concept) provides the framework for a tool to protect Citizen Media from Idea Spam and Intentional Information Sabotage, forces that thwart the emergence of a reliable sources of information upon which citizen can depend.

    Chapter Five (Prototype Litmus Test) outlines the proposed Litmus Test to screen counterproductive input in dialogue intended to evolve consensus on the best interests of citizens, individually and collectively. Application of The Litmus Test is a technique to nurture the evolution of perspectives and consensus on new strategies and tactics in spite of Idea Spammers and Intentional Information Saboteurs lurking among Yackers, True Believers, Shills and Agents.

    Between December 2000 and March 2011 the โ€œArab Springโ€ erupted across North Africa and the Middle East. These events provide important lessons and underline the importance of the evolution of Citizen Media. See ENOUGH? (Forthcoming)

    Future chapters will address Citizen Media funding and operations as well as provide graphic examples of why the evolution of Citizen Media is the sine qua non of a sustainable trajectory for human civilization.

    Read the full essay.


  • CITIZEN MEDIA, THE NEXT STEP

    CITIZEN MEDIA

    CHAPTER TWO โ€“ CITIZEN MEDIA CONTEXT

    Citizen Media serves the interests of the New Fourth Estate โ€“ citizens and their Households. Citizen Media is the source for information citizens must have to make intelligent decisions in the voting booth and in the market place.

    Chapter Two further explores the three primary challenges facing Citizen Media and profiles the contemporary economic and social context in which Citizen Media must emerge, function and flourish to be an effective source of citizen information and understanding.

    Chapter Two opens with an examination of why citizen understanding of human settlement patterns is critically important. The Answer is: The growing complexity of Urban society. This complexity requires a comprehensive Conceptual Framework and a robust Vocabulary to convey useful information to citizens.

    A number of helpful comments were received in response to the Beta 1 version of CHAPTER ONE posted on 24 Nov at www.baconsrebellion.blogspot.com as โ€œMore on the Role of Citizens Media.โ€ Much of the feedback focused on the three primary challenges faced by Citizen Media:

    I. PROCESS โ€“ Creating a process that involves journalists and the Principles of Journalism but does not rely on the myth that a media โ€˜fourth Estateโ€™ or anything like it still exists. See THE ESTATES MATRIX.

    II. PARTICIPATION โ€“ Establishing a significant and continuing role of volunteer citizens. (The reasons for extensive volunteer citizen participation in Citizen Media are further articulated in the Beta 2 version Chapter One โ€“ Getting Off On the Right Foot and in this Chapter.)

    III. UNDERSTANDING THE CONTEXT OF CONTEMPORARY HUMAN EXISTENCE โ€“ Creating a clear understanding of the spacial context of human economic, social and physical activity. This understanding is essential so that the information citizens need to make intelligent decisions in the voting booth and in the market place is has a consistent spacial context.

    There are questions about I. PROCESS and II. PARTICIPATION some of which are explored in the Beta 2 version Chapter One (Getting Off On the Right Foot). However, much more confusion revolves around Challenge III. UNDERSTANDING THE CONTEXT OF CONTEMPORARY HUMAN EXISTENCE.

    ??Why do those concerned with citizens having information to make intelligent decisions in the voting booth and in the marketplace need to worry about UNDERSTANDING the basics of human settlement patterns??

    Chapter Two addresses this question. The short answer is:

    Because human settlement patterns are THE CONTEXT OF CONTEMPORARY HUMAN EXISTENCE See End Note One

    1. As noted in the Beta 2 version of Chapter One (Getting Off On the Right Foot) there is a fourth major challenge. This is the challenge that many who consider Citizen Media focus on first: Who pays the bills for Citizen Media and from what revenue stream? There are answers to this challenge and to other questions but every question requires addressing the initial three challenges first. Who pays the bills and from what revenue stream and other questions will be addressed in future chapters of CITIZEN MEDIA, THE NEXT STEP.

    SECTION 2.1 โ€“ WHY SPACIAL CONTEXT IS IMPORTANT (Beta 1)

    In the discussion on the Beta 1 version of CHAPTER ONE, a number of commentors raised the question:

    โ€œWhy is Challenge III โ€“ creating a comprehensive citizen understanding of functional human settlement patterns โ€“ so critically important to evolving Citizen Media?โ€ See End Note Two

    2. Astute readers will note that in the Beta 2 version of Chapter One, the challenge is articulated as โ€œUNDERSTANDING THE CONTEXT OF CONTEMPORARY HUMAN EXISTENCEโ€ replacing the language in the Beta 1 version โ€“ โ€œunderstanding of functional human settlement patterns.โ€ This is because of the controlling role of settlement patterns have on economic, social and physical human activities in contemporary advance-technology society. This is the SAME challenge stated a different way.

    The reason is that:

    Functional and sustainable humans settlement patterns are the sine qua non of most productive and sustainable economic, social and physical activities in Urban human societies.

    The foundations for this reality are spelled out in THE SHAPE OF THE FUTURE, Vol I (PARTS ONE AND TWO).

    While the focus of the work of SYNERGY is on the Fundamental Transformation to evolve functional and sustainable human settlement patterns, the Transformation of settlement patterns will NOT occur without a Fundamental Transformation of governance structure AND a Fundamental Transformation of the economic systems to support democracy and a market economy.

    TRILO-G: FOUNDATIONS, BRIDGES, ACTION documents the need for these THREE Fundamental Transformations โ€“ settlement patterns, governance structure and economic system.

    Read the full essay.


  • CITIZEN MEDIA, THE NEXT STEP CHAP 3

    CITIZEN MEDIA

    CHAPTER THREE โ€“ INTENTIONAL INFORMATION SABOTAGE AND LESSER CRIMES

    Citizen Media serves the interests of the New Fourth Estate โ€“ citizens and their Households. Citizen Media is the source for information citizens must have to make intelligent decisions in the voting booth and in the market place.

    Chapter Three shifts from a focus on the contemporary context in which Citizen Media must arise and flourish, the topic of Chapter Two, to the examination of a specific set of challenges including Idea Spam and Intentional Information Sabotage.

    SECTION 3.1 SUMMARY (Beta 2)

    Chapter Three addresses the question:

    Who controls the identification and certification of information that citizens need in order to make informed decisions?

    To maximize individual freedom, the first option in a simple, small, homogeneous society is to allow anyone say anything to anyone, anytime with no filters or certification.

    At the scales of Household, Cluster, Neighborhood and Village (family, extended family, clan and tribe) peer pressure solved almost all the communication problems. This included taking cranky uncle out on a hunting party from which he did not return. It was not always โ€˜democraticโ€™ but part of learning to speak for clan members was learning what to say and how to say it.

    In a large, heterogeneous, complex society, absolute freedom of expression yields chaos. Yelling โ€˜fireโ€™ in theater is NOT protected speech. However, saying hateful things IS protected unless the statements damage the interests of others and the speaker / writer KNOWS the statements are false. (There are higher standards for โ€˜public figuresโ€™ than for non-public figures.)

    As a general rule, all speech that meets threshold criteria such as those established by the US Supreme Courtโ€™s interpretations of the US Constitution should be โ€œfree.โ€

    However, in a complex society citizens need a way to sort out and understand the intent beyond โ€œthe media is the messageโ€ or โ€œall the news that is fit to print.โ€ Citizens need to understand the intent of the message and have a way to evolve agreement free from Idea Spam and Intentional Information Sabotage.

    In a complex society that is in need of multiple Fundamental Transformations to achieve a sustainable trajectory, a consensus on intelligent citizen action must grow from a concept into a well-considered public judgement of more than a simple majority WITHOUT Idea Spam and Intentional Information Sabotage obstructing the path to that well-considered public judgement. See Coming to Public Judgement: Making Democracy Work in a Complex World Daniel Yankelovich (1991).

    In a democratic society all citizens must have access to ideas that ANYONE believes but individuals and Households as well as Enterprises and Institutions would be wise to โ€“ and Agencies MUST โ€“ take actions based ONLY on ideas that have factual basis and broad citizen support โ€“ These are known as well considered public judgements. Gone are the days when โ€˜representativesโ€™ can โ€˜know what is best for you.โ€™ See ENOUGH? (Forthcoming)

    Reaching a well-considered public judgement is NEVER popular with some minorities. Those who have the interest and ability to undermine progress are frequently those at the top of the Ziggurat who benefit from the current trajectory โ€“ aka, Business-As-Usual. Consider here, the timeless axiom by Nicholas Machiavelli concerning the difficulty of changing โ€œthe current order.โ€
    Existence of the 20%/60%/20% Guideline in an ever more complex society points to the need for a firewall; a democratically arrived at system to identify and certify of information that citizens must have in order to make informed decisions. Chapter 3 of TRILO-G (Myths That Drive Abandonment and Scatteration) and GLOSSARY (PART THIRTEEN of TRILO-G) discuss the 20%/60%/20% Guideline.

    A firewall would protect citizens from โ€œunidentifiedโ€ and โ€˜unsupportedโ€™ information as well from as Idea Spam and Intentional Information Sabotage during the period when citizens are making up their minds about what is in their best interest โ€“ individually AND collectively.

    To preserve democratic governance and market economies that fairly allocate resources, Agency action must be NOT be based on the narrow interest of a few. This includes the wealthy at the top of the Ziggurat and of Enterprises and Institutions owned and supported by concentrations of wealth.

    The scale of the obscene wealth gap between those at the top of the Ziggurat and all the rest of the citizens โ€“ and the fact it is growing wider by the month โ€“ is confirmed by recent studies. See End Note One

    1. In โ€œSurveying the Aftermath of the Stormโ€ a report released in March 2011, the Federal Reserve Board documented that between 2007 and 2009 the โ€œaverage Americanโ€ Household lost 23 percent of its wealth. (CNN 24 Mar 11). The same report indicated that nearly 63 percent of the Households had a drop in net worth. However, in January 2011 The Economic Policy Institute documented that the top one percent of US Households had 225 times the net worth of the average Household. That was UP from โ€˜ONLYโ€ 190 times the net worth of the average Household in 2004. In other words, the richest got RICHER during The Great Recession. For the reasons for the widening Wealth Gap see Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy and Everyday Life, Robert Reich (2007) and CORNERED: The New Monopoly Capitalism and the Economics of Destruction, Barry C. Lynn (2010). For a succinct proposal for a solution see โ€œFire the Richโ€ in 29 Nov 09 CounterPunch by David Macaray.

    A proposal to establish a disinformation firewall to shield Citizen Media (citizen information sources) from Idea Spam and Intentional Information Sabotage is outlined in Chapters Four and Five.

    Continue reading this essay.


  • CITIZEN MEDIA, THE NEXT STEP CHAP FOUR

    CITIZEN MEDIA

    CHAPTER FOUR โ€“ THE LITMUS TEST CONCEPT

    Citizen Media serves the interests of the New Fourth Estate โ€“ citizens and their Households. Citizen Media is the source for information citizens must have to make intelligent decisions in the voting booth and in the market place.

    Chapter Four provides an overview of a Litmus Test. Each Citizen Media Outlet might choose to have a Litmus Test. The Prototype outlined in this chapter would be used to screen / validate comments and input in the discussion of human settlement patterns and their impact on the economic, social and physical well being of citizens.

    SECTION 4.1 AN ANALOGY (Beta 1)

    One way to understand the need for a Litmus Test for comments and input on ideas and strategies in the Citizen Media Context is based on an experience by the author over 50 years ago. One of the many ways the author paid for eight years of undergraduate and graduate study at three universities was as a professional food taster.

    The Department of Home Economics department at the University of Montana received a contract from the US Navy to develop and test freeze dried food for use on Navy submarines. The Department hired a team of students who ate in the central dining facility to do daily QUALITATIVE taste testing of recipes under development.

    After extensive screening a team of male students who matched the age and health profiles of a typical submarine crew was selected. Even though each student had pre qualified to be on the team, before every daily taste test each student was given a test update โ€“ three cups of water with additives so that he water tasted salty, sweet, sour, bitter or un-flavored. Only after one pasted the โ€˜right nowโ€™ test did they receive the days payment (a silver dollar) and were asked to give their qualitative opinion on the item of the day.

    After all, why pay any attention to someoneโ€™s view the QUALITY of a Navy Bean soup (a big favorite) or a pudding (lots of puddings) if for some reason they could not โ€˜tasteโ€™ at the time for what every reason: Too much to drink or too much red pepper on a pizza the night before; just brushed their teeth; had a peppermint life savor between classes, etc. The same is true for opinions on the information, strategies and ideas that Citizens need to consider in coming to well considered public judgements.

    Why pay attention to someone who has demonstrated that they do not know what they are talking about?

    Unless one understands the basis and context for the discussion there is no way to make an informed comment beyond โ€œI do not understand.โ€ Unless the commentor knows what they are talking about, the listeners / readers do not know if it is a serious question from a well founded critique by a well informed individual or just Idea Spam โ€“ or worse โ€“ Intentional Information Sabotage.

    Read the full essay.


  • CITIZEN MEDIA, THE NEXT STEP CHAP 5

    CITIZEN MEDIA

    CHAPTER FIVE โ€“ PROTOTYPE LITMUS TEST

    Citizen Media serves the interests of the New Fourth Estate โ€“ citizens and their Households. Citizen Media is the source for information citizens must have to make intelligent decisions in the voting booth and in the market place.

    Chapter Five presents a draft Prototype Litmus Test focused on the evolution of the New Urban Region Conceptual Framework and Vocabulary. This test applies not to Citizen Media in general but to the work of SYNERGY as relates to the Fundamental Transformation of human settlement patterns and the related Fundamental Transformations of governance structure and of the economic system as outlined in THE SHAPE OF THE FUTURE and in TRILO-G.

    SECTION 5.1 โ€“ A PROTOTYPE LITMUS TEST FOR DISCUSSION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL TRANSFORMATION OF HUMAN SETTLEMENT PATTERNS (Beta 3)

    The following is a brief outline of key points parts of the Human Settlement Pattern Discussion Litmus Test.

    I. QUESTION GUIDELINES

    Questions are welcome subject to the following guidelines:

    A. The fact that there are question guidelines and that questions are subject to those guidelines will be stated in each Perspective posted on the forum.

    B. Legitimate questions will be answered, however, to save time be sure to read the post with care.

    C. If one is not sure they understand the post, first check the definitions of Capitalized words in GLOSSARY accessed from the RESOURCE page at www.emrisse.com

    D. After checking the Capitalized words if the reader is still are not sure they understand what is being said, the place to start is with the LINER NOTES for The Shape of the Future and then the LINER NOTES for TRILO-G. Both LINER NOTES are accessed from the RESOURCE page at www.emrisse.com

    E. Questions that are repetitive and appear to be asked just to waste the time and effort of users of the Outlet will be ignored. Questions of repeat offenders will be deleted.

    II. COMMENT GUIDELINES

    Comments and observations are welcome subject to the following guidelines:

    A. The fact that there are comment guidelines and that comments are subject to those guidelines will be stated in each Perspective posted on the forum / Outlet.

    B. For those new to the forum / Outlet, reference must be made to the place to find background and details of the guidelines.

    C. When relevant, there will be posted a list of those who are pre-qualified to comment based on past demonstration of their understanding of the context and objectives of the forum / Outlet.

    D. In the comment being offered, the commentor must acknowledge that they understand the Citizen Media forum / Outletโ€™s Perspective established in the following Context and Parameters Documents.

    E. All commentors will be required to use their own name or be placed on the pre-qualified list by the forum / Outlet originator after providing reason why anonymity is appropriate in their case.

    F. First time commentors who violate Comment Guidelines will referred to Context Documents and Parameters. Repeat offenders deleted.

    Read the rest of this essay.


  • The New Frontier of Auto Safety: Transportation Pricing

    Want to reduce the number of traffic accidents and automobile fatalities? Cracking down on drunk driving, enforcing seatbelt usage, installing air bags and banning texting while driving all have proven useful. But, while the incidence of traffic fatalities has declined from five per year in 1960 to two per year in 2000, the total number of fatalities has barely budged because Americans are driving so much more, says Todd Litman with the Victoria Transport Policy Institute in a recent paper, “Pricing for Traffic Safety.”

    Pricing transportation so that drivers directly pay for the costs associated with their automobile travel can be justified on economic grounds, contends Litman. A major side benefit, rarely mentioned by pricing advocates, is that reducing the number of vehicle miles traveled also cuts the number of automobile accidents as well.

    VDOT take notice!


  • How Long Will the VRS Money Last?

    Here’s the good news: If the Virginia Retirement System can generate an annual return on investment of 8% annually in the future, it will last until 2040 before the money runs out.

    Here’s the bad news: If the assumed returns are more modest (or more realistic) — say, 6% annually — assets will last only until 2033, about the same time that the Social Security is expected to run out of money.

    So finds a new study by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, “Can State and Local Pensions Muddle Through?,” using the conventional “ongoing” methodology for calculating pension fund exhaustion dates. Using the more stringent “termination” framework, the news is even more grim: Under a 6%-return scenario, the VRS could run dry by 2025.

    That information appears in Appendix B in the report. You can see there how the VRS fares against other state and municipal retirement plans. It’s not a pretty sight. Though far from the worst, the VRS is in worse shape than many others.

    The CRC’s calculations assume, of course, no significant changes to the way the retirement plans are structured. Gov. Bob McDonnell, as did former Gov. Tim Kaine before him, recommends sweeping reforms to the retirement system for public employees. Those who would oppose the reforms should take a look at the CRC study, which has no obvious ideological axe to grind, and contemplate what retirement for Virginia’s public employees would look like if we stick with the status quo.

    I suppose there is one alternative to reforming the plans — stick up the taxpayers. That tends to be the preferred solution of my esteemed liberal colleague, Peter Galuszka, who in the previous post trotted out a laundry list of taxes that could be tapped to pay for continued state funding of NPR. But it might be a hard sell politically to ask taxpayers, few of whom participate in defined benefit plans, to cough up more money than they already do to support public employees in a retirement far more comfortable than they are likely to enjoy. Good luck with that!


  • Save NPR Funding!

    The wolves are circling NPR, the supposed bug-a-boo of liberal bias.

    The conservatives are building momentum, in one form or another, to cut the influential radio, television and Internet system that provides badly-needed news, analysis and foreign reporting when market-driven news sources have chopped away most of their assets in pursuit of ever-dwindling net income (or so they say).

    Here in Virginia, Gov. Robert McDonnell, a staunch right-winger, wants to stop $4.2 million in state funding the Virginia’s NPR stations. The Republican-led House of Representatives wants to cut far more across the nation. Rationale for the cuts runs the right wing gamut from U.S. Rep. Eric Cantor who complains that NPR is “too liberal” to James A, Bacon Jr., who says that the 30-plus-year-old government funding model is dogmatically wrong although he likes NPR and is willing to kick in a few bucks of his own dough as NPR struggles to come up with a new business model. (THANK YOU, Jim!).

    To set the stage for de-fanging NPR, the right-wing uses its omnibus financial crisis — the concept that government spending is way out of control and we have to take extraordinary measures to stem it. There is some truth here but the timing is suspect. The campaign started just about on the day that Barack Obama was inaugurated as president. His predecessor blew out federal spending through two wars, tax cuts for the rich, Medicare prescription plan changes after Bill Clinton contained it. Using the scare tactics of a debt Armageddon, the right wing is swiftly moving in various, seemingly pre-planned ways (Cantor here, Bacon there) to get rid of NPR once and for all.

    Not that NPR hasn’t screwed up. The firing of Juan Williams was completely out of line and and NPR executive stupidly fell victim to a ham-handed covert ruse by a right-wing video outfit (highly suspect itself). About 29 year ago, I co-broke a story in the Richmond Times-Dispatch about how the president of WCVE — Richmond’s public tv station — was self-dealing by using public money to buy tv remote equipment that was quickly amortized and then used by the president’s private, for-profit company to make commercials and broadcast basketball games.

    In Virginia, the current financial crisis model doesn’t exactly hold water. True the state of billions in the hole for roads, education and other critical needs. But that’s the fault of the General Assembly, not state NPR stations. Last year, McDonnell seemed to pull a rabbit out of the hat by coming in with a budget surplus, but he did so by playing accounting tricks with the state retirement system. As far as roads, poof, suddenly there was an extra billion lying around left by Democratic Gov. Time Kaine for a rainy day.

    So, just how bad is Virginia’s fiscal crisis anyway? Let’s look at ways we can find the $4.2 million to save NPR funding. Consider these:

    • The Washington Post has reported that as the state is crimping on funding help for education and the mentally ill, the General Assembly renewed a $45 million annual provision for two big utilities, Dominion and Appalachian Power, to buy coal mined in Virginia. The measure has been on the books since 1999and gives tax credits worth $3 per ton for Old Dominion coal. Why is this government welfare needed? Metallurgical coal which the state produces now fetches $200 a metric done at the mine. Global demand for Central Appalachian met coal is so strong that Norfolk Southern railroad is scrambling to come up with 2,500 new hopper cars and collier are backed up at anchor in Hampton Roads. Why does coal need help?
    • One thing I heard on NPR. Amazon.com doesn’t pay state sales taxes. Here’s a company that brings in more than $35 billion in revenues by selling goods over the Net. Virginia should think about getting its share. Back in the early Net days, people like then-governor George Allen, anxious to embrace the “digital Dominion,” fought taxing the Net. Well, that was then. Amazon.com ain’t exactly a start-up any more,.
    • The gas tax. We pay among the lowest of any state in the country. This is the simplest solution.

    So there you have it. Finding $4.2 million to save NPR funding shouldn’t be that hard, just as it shouldn’t be to ease the pain for the sick and students who need an education. It’s time to get past the financial-crisis panic mentality and the worry-mongers.

    Peter Galuszka


  • The Right Reason to De-Fund Public Broadcasting

    There’s a right reason and a wrong reason to support Gov. Bob McDonnell in his proposal to eliminate state funding for public broadcasting. According to today’s Times-Dispatch, McDonnell seeks to cut $4.2 million over the next two years.

    The wrong reason is that public broadcasting is “biased” and “liberal.” That’s the justification that Rep. Eric Cantor, R-7th, who is leading the effort to eliminate federal funding, gave in a recent radio interview. The implication of Cantor’s remarks was that if NPR and PBS were more conservative, federal funding would be less objectionable. Wow, think about that. The government-funding-is-OK-as-long-as-it-serves-conservative-ends was the basis of George W. Bush’s “compassionate conservatism,” and look where that got us in the fight to tame spending and deficits.

    The right reason is the one that McDonnell cited in the Times-Dispatch: “Television and radio broadcasts are not core functions of government.” It’s that simple. When federal, state and local governments face the greatest financial strains since the Great Depression, with worse to come, there is no justification whatsoever for government funding of news or entertainment. Government’s role should be restricted to undertaking important functions that the private sector cannot fulfill itself. In the realm of news and entertainment media, that is demonstrably not the case, more so than ever now that the Internet has inspired an unprecedented proliferation of news, opinion and programming sources.

    For the record, I’m an NPR fan. I’m a conservative, and I agree that a bias does exist, although it’s more subtle than many fellow conservatives seem to think. I find that NPR, which I listen to several times a week, has excellent programming. While some of its stories may have a liberal slant, they are far more nuanced than the sound-bite versions of the equally slanted news aired by private-sector broadcast news. I listen to NPR in order to hear the thoughtful, well-informed liberal view of an issue as opposed to, say, the dishonest, cartoon-character version peddled by the likes of Ed Schultz or Keith Olbermann. Bottom line: NPR contributes to the marketplace of ideas, as opposed to the marketplace of venom and bile.

    (Other than the news, I watch very little TV, so I have no informed opinion on the nature of PBS programming.)

    If the state defunded NPR, as it should, and if the Richmond NPR radio station were faced with cutting programming, I’d gladly chip in a few bucks during the annual telethons. My wife already does. That’s the proper way for the public to support media programming. The people who enjoy NPR and PBS are the ones who should pay for the privilege.

    Read Norm Leahy’s spin on the issue on his new blog at The Score. Like me, he argues that broadcasting is not a core government function, nor even a peripheral one — not that NPR is “too liberal.”


  • Johnny’s Right to Be Fat and Stupid

    Two recent actions by the McDonnell Administration raise questions about just how much state public education is being short-changed by el-cheapo spending practices.

    First, Gov. Bob McDonnell vetoed a bill that would have expanded to 150 minutes a week the required physical education that children in lower and middle schools would get. The average now in some, not all, schools is about 90 minutes.

    Secondly, after a firestorm of controversy over an errant history textbook, the Department of Education has required publishers, not teachers or administrators, to be responsible for fact-checking. The matter stemmed from a Connecticut publisher whose fourth-grade history book was riddled with factual errors and bad punctuation, stating, erroneously, that African-Americans fought by the thousands for the Southern the Civil War.

    The stated reasons for not requiring PT are that many schools just don’t have the facilities to handle kickball, running, baseball or basketball. Many in the education bureaucracy did not want the bill for the same reasons, although legislators, including a doctor, thought it would do much to stem the childhood obesity problems that are running amok in Virginia and the rest of the nation.

    Many school-age kids are far too tubby than they should be. They don’t exercise, drink sugary-super-sized sodas and fatty fast food and spend most of their time away from school in front of the Wii screen playing computer games.

    Indeed, the right to be fat has been seized by some on the ultra-conservative circuit as a right equal to that of bearing arms or going to one’s own church. Any institution, such as the schools, that try to direct kids to a healthier lifestyle, incredibly, are dubbed socialist.

    For evidence, tune into your local American Family Radio show and listen to how the right to eat a three-patty- thick-burger at Hardee’s is now an unalienable right. My wife, a teacher, found this out the hard way a couple of years ago when she gently suggested that maybe one child’s lunch his mother packed should not be merely an extra big biscuit covered with sausage gravy.

    If parents and our culture are not going to get the children exercising, is it wrong to have the state do it? Apparently, according to libertarians who are wiling to die for their rights and have the kids die of diabetes.

    The textbook case merely shifts “responsibility” for fact-checking to textbook publishers. Teachers do go to Richmond each year where for about $200 in pin money go over the books as for suitability. But can you depend on the publishers to fact-check?

    Who knows and who cares, as long as the state doesn’t have to pay for it. That’s the silver-lining. Johnny and Janie can weigh 300 pounds and learn a lot of wrong stuff, but we get to save some pennies. The Virginia Way!

    Peter Galuszka

  • The Tax-free Corporation

    Here’s a news item you aren’t likely to see in “Boomergeddon:” U.S. industrial behemoth General Electric paid no taxes in 2010. That’s right: zippo, nada, nichevo.

    How can it be? As the Boomergeddons and Baconauts complain, we’re heading towards financial meltdown in terms of deficits and debt. Their culprits are entitlement programs, the Washington establishment, poor people demanding aid, free-spending middle class types, and (did I mention this yet?), the government, government, government.

    But GE? The famed and successful maker of lightbulbs, refrigerators, diesel locomotives, high tech medical gear and nuclear reactors (of the type used at Fukushima)? Last year, according to the New York Times, GE had worldwide profits of $14.2 billion, with $5.1 billion coming from outside the U.S.

    Incredibly, it paid no taxes in the U.S. and, in fact, insisted on a tax benefit of $3.2 billion.

    How can that be? The Boomergeddons claim that America’s tax rate of 35 percent is a major impediment to the prosperity of U.S. corporations whose good performance (not to mentioned outsized CEO salaries) trickle down to us lower in the food chain through taxes, jobs, etc.

    So how did GE do it? It has a first rate tax department, obviously, including lots of ex-Treasury Department types. It puts ins creativity to work at finding tax breaks, in fact, that’s part of the corporate “mission” statement. One rich seam to mine was GE Capital, with ties to Richmond, which found interesting tax dodges as a lender.

    Is this good for the U.S. economy? Ask yourself but the answer should be very simple.

    Peter Galuszka

  • Sandy Alberta, the Saudi Arabia Next Door

    (Let me introduce my latest op-ed piece in the Washington Times with the observation that the preferred U.S. path to “energy independence” is conservation — not just higher mileage standards or electric vehicles but “deep” conservation enabled by the reform of human settlement patterns. But that’s not something that can be explained in a 750-word op-ed piece, so I didn’t get into it.)

    The Middle East is experiencing one of its periodic convulsions and, as day follows night, tsunamis follow earthquakes and trouble follows Lindsay Lohan, Americaโ€™s chattering classes have renewed talk about โ€œenergy independence.โ€ Americaโ€™s reliance upon โ€œforeignโ€ oil is said to be undesirable. Why? Because it makes us vulnerable to Arab oil embargoes, anti-American crackpots like Moammar Gadhafi and Hugo Chavez, and madmen bent upon acquiring nuclear weapons and dominating the Persian Gulf oil fields.

    There are very good reasons for wanting to extract ourselves from the chaos of the Middle East. But does that really mean we should forsake all โ€œforeignโ€ oil? To the extent that we can avoid buying our petroleum from people who either (a) hate us, or (b) could be taken over next week by people who hate us, energy independence is a good idea. But to the extent that it becomes a justification to squander tens of billions of dollars on white elephants ranging from synfuel facilities (Carter administration) to solar-energy fabrication plants (Obama administration), itโ€™s a bad idea.

    Permit me to suggest an alternate definition of โ€œenergy independenceโ€: The United States ceases to purchase oil from parts of the world where supplies can be disrupted by wars, civil strife, regime change or capricious government edict and instead buys it from democratic, peace-loving countries that appreciate the benefits of free markets and abide by the rule of law โ€“ in other words, countries like Canada.

    Many Americans think most of our foreign oil comes from Saudi Arabia. In fact, more than half comes from the Western Hemisphere: Venezuela, Mexico and Canada. Oil production in the two Latin countries has declined in recent years, but oil output is booming in Canada. Indeed, our friends the Canucks export 2.7 million barrels of petroleum per day, accounting for roughly 30 percent of total U.S. imports.

    Yes, our courteous, self-effacing friend to the north has quietly emerged as the No. 1 foreign supplier of oil to the United States. Development of new extractive technologies and $50-plus-per-barrel oil prices have made the vast Athabascan oil sands, located primarily in Alberta, economical to mine. Between conventional oil sources and the oil sands, Canada sits atop 175 billion barrels of oil, the third-largest proven reserves in the world. The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers forecasts that production will increase to 4.3 million barrels per day by 2025.

    As Brian Crowley, managing director of the Ottawa-based MacDonald-Laurier Institute puts it, โ€œAlbertaโ€™s oil sands constitute a geopolitical fact of global significance.โ€ Current reserve estimates are based on the assumption that 10 percent of the oil sands are recoverable, he says. If new technology boosts recovery to 20 percent, he says, that would put โ€œa second Saudi Arabiaโ€ on Americaโ€™s doorstep โ€“ a Saudi Arabia that doesnโ€™t commit human rights abuses, fund radicalizing madrassas or send the United States into a blind panic when a neighboring power threatens to invade.

    The Canadians speak of a strategic U.S.-Canadian energy relationship that would foster development of Canadian oil resources for shipment to U.S. markets. The only trouble is, few Americans are listening. The U.S. commentariat discusses non sequiturs like fostering a strategic U.S.-Russian energy partnership, creating โ€œgreenโ€ wind and solar-energy farms that require massive subsidies or building electric cars that, if the early sales of General Motorsโ€™ Volt are any indication, nobody wants to buy.

    The Canadians are willing to ship us all the oil we want, subject to their ability to expand capacity. Thereโ€™s just one catch: They need a way to get it to us. That means building pipelines such as TransCanadaโ€™s proposed multibillion-dollar pipeline, which would link Canada to the vast petrochemical refining complex in Houston. What Canadians want is regulatory approval for construction of the pipelines โ€“ approval that, given the opposition of the environmental lobby, is far from guaranteed.

    As Americans, we need to ask ourselves: Where would we prefer to get our oil? From Saudi Arabia, which manipulates oil prices to extract maximum wealth from American consumers? From Russia, where Vladimir โ€œturn off the tapโ€ Putin uses his control over oil and natural-gas supplies as a strategic political weapon? From Iran, which uses oil revenue to fund development of an atomic bomb? Or from Canada, a country with a democratic market economy, which recycles some of its oil revenues by purchasing American goods and where an influential environmental movement lobbies for appropriate environmental safeguards?

    Only in the bizarro world of Washington could the answer fail to be blindingly obvious.


  • The Song of the Uninsured Musician

    Today is the first anniversary of Obamacare, otherwise known as the Affordable Health Care for America Act. And despite the Sound and the Fury, basic problems still remain unsolved.

    Over the past year, there’s been plenty of gnashing of teeth, mostly from the GOP, well-funded by the managed care industry, which wants Obamacare repealed or killed by a lack of funds.

    Hot shot Attorneys General, such as our own Kenneth Cuccinelli, are challenging the constitutionality of the law, claiming its mandate to have all Americans buy health plans goes contrary to the foundation of America. Henrico County’s Eric Cantor, House Majority Leader, is working in tandem with the “Cooch” on Capitol Hill, leading his “Young Guns” against health care reform, which he claims in unaffordable.

    Let’s take a look at things a little closer to home.

    On March 15, Page Wilson, a singer-songwriter from Hanover County who was well-known in Central Virginia. died of natural causes. In his 57 years, Wilson had worked the circuits with his own version of Roots music, Rockabily, zydeco, country and folk. He has helped numerous local musicians make it in a tough market and shunned selling out to the big money music interests in Nashville, Los Angeles or other cultural centers.

    Wilson, whose band “Reckless Abandon” played many down-home sites, such as the Pocahontas State Park, also hosted a Saturday night public radio show out of Richmond called the “Out of the Blue Radio Revenue.” Wilson’s extremely broad playlist entertained and eduated listeners like me when at home on a Saturday night. It was one of the nice things of living in the Richmond area, even though his show was available anywhere throughthe Web.

    Living the musician’s lifestyle took its toll on Wilson. He had money issues and his health deterioriated. Back in 2008, some of the muisicians he had backed hosted a concert for him called “Party for Page,” to raise money to help. “I’m on the verge of losing my house to foreclosure,” he was quoted as saying. “If the dog is hurt, the sled don’t run. And this dog is hurting right now.”

    The much-maligned Obamacare does one thing — it is the only serious plan around that would provide health coverage for everyone, including self-employed types such as Page Wilson and myself. That’s why we need to have everyone buy plans — so those that do don’t end up paying for those that don’t. It’s a hard fact of life and the Obama plan has a way to help people of little means do so.

    The only alternative would be universal, government health care — not a bad idea in my book, or that of many doctors I know. But the monied interests, and those beholden to the managed care firms who got their tremedous power with the last major health insurance shift in the late 1970s and 80s, are ready to defend their strong positions with lobbying bucks, with their Cantors and Cuccinelli’s in support. Neither has proposed a serious alternate plan.

    It’s too late to help Page WIllson, however. He was one of 46 million Amerians who did not have health insurance and it was a factor in his death. Oh, I forgot, the right-wing loudly disputes that 46 million number, if we are to believe the American Spectator.

    Funny but I don’t see any other ideas — just nit picking. As the arguments drone on, we’re losing more talented, uninsured Americans, just like Page Wilson.

    Peter Galuszka


  • A WRAP — THE NEXT STEP

    NOTE ON JIM BACONโ€™S COMMENT

    Jim Bacon made and important comment on the 18 March A WRAP post.

    That post now has a number of comments and has slipped into history status. This response would require at least five comments due to the limit on comment length of Blogger so it is a new posted. This comment repeats all of Mr. Baconโ€™s original comment.

    We hope this post clarifies EMRโ€™s view:

    PART ONE

    Jim Bacon said:

    โ€œEMR and Observer appear to be disappointed that I returned from my vacation with the same insistence that the impending collapse of federal and state agency finances is the most urgent and massive problem facing the United States.โ€

    EMR cannot speak for Observer but as to EMR, that is a correct characterization. One of the great benefits of travel is to come back with a new perspective. That has been the case every time EMR has returned from Hawaii.

    EMRโ€™s disappointment is NOT because EMR thinks Agency debt / deficits are NOT important. (Yes, a double negative.)

    EMR KNOWS Agency debt / deficits are important. However, Agency debt / deficits are a symptom of a much larger problem โ€“ Agency structure dysfunction.

    More important, the Agency debt / deficit CANNOT be solved without broad citizen understandings of and willingness to act on at least three Fundamental Transformations.

    To solve the Agency debt / deficit problem โ€“ and all the other problems, including the many upon which EMR and Mr. Bacon agree โ€“ there must be a coalition of interests, not a โ€œthis is the most important one and the rest of you need to get on my bandwagon.โ€

    That is especially true if the Agency debt / deficit problem is blamed on โ€˜othersโ€™ who occupy empty pigeon holes and who are just too stubborn or stupid to understand why THEY must change.

    When MGM says that going after one or another problem as โ€˜the most importantโ€™ is a โ€˜waste of time,โ€™ EMR suspects he means that โ€˜times is a wasting.โ€™ There is not time to get it right on issue A and then move to issue B, then C, then D,…

    In a democracy there must be agreement on the need for action and the only way to get a critical mass of support is to address A, B, C … Z.

    Citizen will not yet support solutions to this or that problem because they do not yet see breadth of the systemic dysfunctions โ€“ economic, social and physical. In EMRโ€™s view, they will never get there picking on one problem at a time.

    โ€œFrankly, I cannot see how it can be argued otherwise.โ€

    Hopefully, we can come to a consensus on why this it not a wise course โ€“ especially for those like Jim Bacon who see much more of the full spectrum of reality than the average single issue advocate.

    ……………….

    PART TWO

    โ€œOf course, I agree that dysfunctional human settlement patterns create a massive drain on economic efficiency and productivity and a detriment to the quality of life.โ€

    Mr. Bacon and EMR have long agreed on this point.

    โ€œOf course, I agree that our society is draining down natural capital, and we will pay the price for atrocities committed upon the environment.โ€

    That is good but these are TWO different topics.

    An intelligent harvest / use / plan for replacement (substitution) of Natural Capital is possible without committing โ€˜atrocities.โ€™ The fact that atrocities have been committed, and are continuing to be committed, is topic one.

    Far more important is the fact that the โ€˜more developedโ€™ Regions and nation-states living on Natural Capital made accessible by technological โ€˜advancesโ€™ has distorted ALL the parameters of a sustainable civilization.

    It is as if every Household, every Enterprise, every Institution and YES, every Agency has had a no-limits checking account ECONOMIC context AND a no need to be civil or cooperative SOCIAL context AS WELL AS a โ€˜there is no tomorrowโ€™ perspective on the physical environment.

    Yes, part of this Mass OverConsumption has โ€˜helpedโ€™ Regions outside the US. However, many did not want that help, much of the help was really โ€˜helpโ€™ for US Enterprises (The Banana Republics) and to further US interests (cheap oil to support dysfunctional settlement patterns). Fighting World War I and II, the Marshall Plan, etc. were great but there are many more examples of wasting resources โ€“ including Natural Capital โ€“ to meet questionable objectives.

    EMR wishes he knew of a way to better express the huge gulf between

    1) Citizen, Enterprise, Institution and Agency expectations, and

    2) Finite reality

    That has resulted over the past 200 years from living off of Natural Capital โ€“ life on blueberry hill / big rock candy mountain.

    As Mr. Bacon knows from having reviewed an early draft of ENOUGH?, that EMR perspective is that the turmoil in North Africa and the Middle East will bring the fact that there is NOT ENOUGH into focus, sooner rather than later.

    โ€œ(I don’t share the alarmism about global warming, but there are plenty of other environmental problems that I find very worrisome).โ€

    On this issue a compromise is to agree to call it โ€˜climate changeโ€™ and wait until the flock of Black Swans is so large that they CANNOT be ignored, regardless of what they are called.

    โ€œWhere I part company is over the idea that DHSP (dysfunctional human settlement patterns) and EC (environmental collapse) take precedence over all other problems, and that all other problems can largely be seen as sub-sets of DHSP and EC.โ€

    If this is โ€˜where we part company,โ€™ we have NOT parted company.

    THE SHAPE OF THE FUTURE documents that human settlement patterns have controlling impact on the economic, social and physical well being of humans and their Organizations (Agencies, Enterprises, Institutions and Households)

    However, TRILO-G makes it clear that a Fundamental Transformation of human settlement patterns will NOT be possible without a Fundamental Transformation of governance structure …

    (AS NOTED BELOW THE DEBT / DEFICIT ISSUE IS A RESULT OF FAILURE TO EVOLVE A GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE THAT REFLECTS THE ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND PHYSICAL REALITY IN 2011.)

    … and Fundamental Transformation of the economic system from one based on competition and consumption to one that gives equal weight to cooperation, resiliency and rational regulation to serve the interest of all citizens.

    (More on that below with respect to Vocabulary and conceptual framework.)

    To summerize: Functional human settlement patterns are NOT more important than a debt / deficit solution, they are both โ€“ along with other problems facing civilization โ€“ dependent on comprehensive solutions โ€“ the Three Fundamental Transformations noted above for starters.

    Synergyโ€™s current work on CITIZEN MEDIA, THE NEXT STEP, on PRIMER and on ENOUGH?, is driven by the realization that the other projects (THE CURRENT TRAJECTORY and ALPHA VIL 21 as well as WHAT COMES AFTER THE CAR) which ARE related to the human settlement patterns (The Affordable and Accessible Housing Crisis, The Mobility and Access Crisis and The Helter Skelter Crisis) will go no where without:

    1) A source of information that citizens can rely on to make intelligent decisions in the voting booth and in the marketplace (CITIZEN MEDIA, THE NEXT STEP)

    2) A Vocabulary with which to reach consensus on comprehensive Conceptual Frameworks, (PRIMER) and

    3) Enough economic, social and physical resources to create a sustainable trajectory for civilization (ENOUGH?)

    These are the VERY SAME things that are required to achieve solve the Agency debt / deficit Crisis.

    ………………

    PART III

    Jim Bac
    on further stated:

    โ€œThe federal budget deficit may be related tangentially [to DHSP and EC], but for the most part it is an independent phenomenon.โ€

    Not really.

    Beyond the John Muirโ€™s โ€œeverything tied to everything elseโ€paradigm for both causes and solutions, there is this reality:

    The Agency debt / deficit problem is a result of the structure of governance. Until the structure is changed โ€“ move the level of decision to the levels (yes, levelS) of impact, there will continue to be an Agency debt / deficit problem. The Agency debt / deficit problem is the logical course of action for those at the state and federal level who are elected by uninformed citizens and must serve the interests of those who pay for their elections. All those problems are Agency structure problems.

    โ€œIf we fixed DHSP and EC tomorrow, the national government still would be only a decade or two away from insolvency.โ€

    Not necessarily.

    If citizens understood the need to address DHSP and EC they would ALSO understand the need to eliminate the Agency debt / deficit problem.

    Fairly allocating location-variable costs in a first step to cure DHSP and EC AND an important part of solving the Agency debt / deficit problem.

    Also note that the final beneficiaries of the Agency debt / deficit problem is the top 5 percent of the Ziggurat. All the welfare queens in the country have not taken home as much as the TARP (and non TARP) executives. But it is those at the top of the Ziggurat who make the political Clan contributions. See AFTERSHOCK. (More on this when to get to Vocabulary.)

    โ€œThe reason I believe that fiscal solvency is the most urgent issue is that it is only a decade or two away. (Some people think it is only three or four *years* away.) Environmental collapse is down the road.โ€

    Again, not necessarily.

    It depends on how one defines โ€˜environmental collapse.โ€™ In a sense, Peak Oil IS an environmental collapse.

    The rising price of food and energy may be seen as a collapse. The economic incentive to shift grain production from food for poor Regions to fuel for rich Regions may be seen as a trigger to collapse.

    Food prices were a trigger for the North Africa / Middle East Arab Spring. As you know we explore this in ENOUGH? (โ€œIf money to buy food and iPhones does not flow TO the Arab Street, blood will flow IN the Arab Street.)

    โ€œThere will be no hope of solving our environmental issues if the federal government is functionally bankrupt. Cleaning up the environment will take a massive expenditure of capital, which simply will not be available.โ€

    EMR is not sure this is the case.

    Most of the โ€˜clean upโ€™ will be paid for by the revenue stream created by ongoing programs. For example new sewerage plants to clean up surface water will be paid for from increased sewerage fees. Better agricultural practices will be paid for with higher food prices (AND NON INDUSTRIAL AG).

    The REAL KEY will be if those in the bottom 90 percent of the Ziggurat have money to pay their bills.

    (THEY WILL IF THEY GET A FAIR WAGE AND DO NOT HAVE TO PAY FOR DYSFUNCTIONAL MOBILITY AND ACCESS AND HOUSING SCATTERATION โ€“ just had to toss that in. This supports Observers comment on the recent post concerning progressive tax rates. )

    โ€œWe can talk about achieving fundamental change in governance structures. I share that goal.โ€

    That is great because the Agency debt / deficit problem is a RESULT of Agency (governance) structure as noted above.

    โ€œHowever, I am under no illusions that creating alpha region governments, alpha community governments and on down the line will solve the problems created by a federal government in which expenditures exceed revenues by roughly $1 trillion a year over the course of the economic cycle and in which interest payments on the debt will increasingly crowd out all expenditures of any kind.โ€

    There must be Fundamental Transformation of governance structure (Agencies) up and down the scale. If there were functional governance structures at and below the Regional scale, the problems caused by kicking issues up to the federal level.

    Pork fat is easier to trim, one pig at a time.

    โ€œTo put this in terms that Observer might find familiar, we cannot put human settlement patterns and agencies on a sustainable trajectory without putting agency finances on a sustainable trajectory.โ€

    That is very true.

    However, the obverse is also true:

    We cannot put Agency finances on a sustainable trajectory without citizen support for a range of Fundamental Transformations.

    โ€œBut we have to be realistic. It is the work of a generation or longer (perhaps akin to the task of abolishing slavery) to bring about fundamental change in governance structures…โ€

    The issue is NOT how fast we can COMPLETE Fundamental Transformations, the key is how fast majority of citizens understand the NEED to make those Transformations. See Chapter 29 of THE SHAPE OF THE FUTURE concerning the 10 year process to transform governance structure. Once started, not completed, citizens can support other meaningful steps for all three Fundamental Transformations.

    For example many would agree to a change in Social Security benefits if at the same time there was a change to allow interest rates to go up to 5 or 6 percent so all the money the oldsters saved could revive the cash flow they expected when they put the money away. The current fiscal policy of cheap interest so the big boys will โ€˜investโ€™ and โ€˜grow the economyโ€™ must be seen for what it is โ€“ a short term strategy for those at the top of the Ziggurat to make even more than they are now… Professor Bartlett is a big help here. Thank you again Groveton.

    โ€œ… and human settlement patterns….โ€

    As EMR has noted repeatedly, the biggest change required to transform the pattern of human activity and land use is INSIDE CITIZENS HEADS. That is being proven out in the steps needed to achieve a sustainable trajectory in ALPHA VIL 21.

    โ€œassuming we can even persuade our fellow countrymen that fundamental change of the type we seek is even desirable.โ€

    Recall what the five of us agreed in 2004 in Charlottesville that resulted in PROPERTY DYNAMICS.

    Think where we would be if Friends of Virginiaโ€™s Future had the education program outlined in PART ELEVEN of TRILO-G when everyoneโ€™s property values went down 20 to 40 percent due to Enterprise, Agent and misinformed citizen greed! Outside R=30 it is still going down. See THE CURRENT TRAJECTORY.

    โ€œThe collapse of the federal government will occur long before fundamental change takes place.โ€

    But to prevent collapse in the economic, social and physical Spheres โ€“ including Agency collapse โ€“ there must have broad citizen agreement on the course of action not just convince โ€˜liberalsโ€™ or โ€˜conservativesโ€™ to abandon their positions and jump on a single issue band wagon, no matter how important some think that is.

    โ€œLet’s see how many people care about protecting the environment and investing in shared vehicle systems when unemployment hits 20%, Social Security/Medicare payments are being cut and the American empire (upon which the global trading system depends) is collapsing around us.โ€

    That is EXACTLY why citizens must come to support solution of all the problems or humans (there will be few CITIZENS left) will not solve any of them.

    See THE BOTTOM LINE which ACSGP posted as a comment following the 18 March A WRAP post. (EMR will copy and reorder those two posts. Thanks to AZA for at least getting the first one up second.)

    ……………….

    PART FOUR

    As promised above here is the note on Vocabulary and Conceptual Framework.

    As
    EMR has stressed to Groveton in their exchanges:

    While it may seem like a pain, citizens must come to grips with the use of a robust Vocabulary and comprehensive Conceptual Frameworks. (One will note that Groveton and Larry are still pounding away at one another about social security without regard to the fact that Social Security is an Agency program and insurance is an Enterprise program as noted in the 18 March A WRAP post.)

    Mr. Bacon may recall that in his comments on the draft of THE LITMUS TEST in CITIZEN MEDIA, THE NEXT STEP he addressed the Fundamental Theses Three (โ€œCompetition is in the drivers seat of contemporary civilizationโ€) by saying โ€œI partially agree. But competition has been partially supplanted by rent seeking (at all levels of government) as an organizing principle for the economy.โ€)

    โ€˜RENT SEEKINGโ€™ and MONOPOLY behaviors ARE COMPETITIVE behaviors. They are not Cooperative behaviors.

    Recall above the need to:

    Balance competitive and consumptive activities with cooperative and conservative behaviors to achieve a sustainable trajectory.

    On a finite planet with limited resources, there is NO alternative.

    Markets only work:

    If all citizen have resources to participate in the market AND

    There are effective and fair regulation by Agencies to protect citizens from unsustainable competitive behaviors โ€“ that includes monopoly and rent seeking behaviors among others. See again THE BOTTOM LINE.

    Agencies will only develop rational regulations and sustainable budget / debt / deficit strategies if Agencies at all scales of governance evolve to reflect economic, social and physical reality.

    That will only happen when there is wide-spread agreement on Vocabulary and Conceptual Frameworks โ€“ such as THE ESTATES MATRIX.

    That is a wrap.

    EMR