This column published in the Washington Times this morning is a Virginia story even though the Upper Big Branch mine is located in West Virginia: Massey Energy and Alpha Natural Resources are both Virginia-based companies.
Later this month, the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) is expected to release the findings of its investigation into the deadly explosion at the Upper Big Branch coal mine in West Virginia. But who, if anyone, will investigate the way the MSHA conducted that investigation?
Twenty-nine coal miners died April 5, 2010, when a powerful explosion ripped through Upper Big Branch, which was owned by the former Massey Energy Co. Less than a week after the explosion – before the formal investigation began – the MSHA declared the tragedy to be โa failure first and foremost of Massey Energy Co. management,โ and then set out to prove its point. In a Massey-funded probe into the causes of the disaster, a team of experts not only disputed the MSHAโs anticipated conclusions, but accused the regulatory agency of conducting a โdeeply flawedโ accident investigation. The fix was in from the beginning, contends the Massey report.
In its biased investigation, the agency โlured witnesses, sometimes under false pretensesโ and without an attorney, to interviews where it โframed questions to induce testimony that only supported the MSHAโs conclusions.โ Moreover, the agency interfered with Masseyโs investigation, prohibiting its experts from utilizing essential tools such as photography, modern mine mapping and independent coal-dust sampling. The agency coerced Massey into applying rock dust and water to areas still under investigation, thus destroying evidence, and it ordered the withdrawal of the companyโs scientific experts from the mine on the basis of concocted safety concerns. Most explosively, the company charged the MSHAโs chief investigator with attempting to intimidate its experts with โretaliatory actionโ in order to influence their conclusions.
The companyโs new owner, Alpha Natural Resources, stated that the Massey report was โunauthorized,โ and declared it would conduct its own inquiry. But former Massey chairman Bobby R. Inman, who is no longer with the company, released it in early June, two days after the acquisition was completed, out of โa strong sense of responsibility for all those who mined coal.โ
In his cover letter, Mr. Inman urged Congress to pass legislation to create an independent agency to investigate mine accidents, rather than letting the MSHA โpolice itself.โ An independent West Virginia investigation found that the agencyโs lax enforcement of safety rules made it partly to blame. Whether the MSHA will accept a share of the culpability in its own report is an open question. As judge and jury in the case, the agency can easily cover its own tracks. Mr. Inman cited the National Transportation Safety Board, which investigates airline crashes, as an alternative model.
I have no way of knowing whether to believe Masseyโs experts, who blamed an unforeseeable upwelling of natural gas for the explosion, or the findings of the West Virginia inquiry, which concluded that the disaster was a result of the companyโs violations of multiple safety standards made possible by insufficient regulatory oversight. The West Virginia panel was arguably more independent than the Massey-hired experts, but it wasnโt necessarily any less biased. It drew heavily from the tainted MSHA-directed witness interviews, and it did not have access to forensic evidence collected by the Massey team.
Unfortunately, there is no way to keep politics out of the investigation. Before its acquisition by Alpha, Massey was the largest non-union coal mining company in the country. As such, it became Public Enemy No. 1 for the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA), as well as environmental groups and other allies in the progressive movement. Moreover, the companyโs CEO, Don Blankenship, was a combative and polarizing figure in West Virginia. Mr. Blankenshipโs friendship with a state Supreme Court judge who ruled on a major Massey-related lawsuit was especially scandalous.
Less remarked upon is the pervasive influence of the miners union in West Virginia politics, the employment of former UMWA miners as MSHA inspectors or the role of West Virginiaโs congressional delegation in advancing the unionโs interests in Washington. The UMWA used the Upper Big Branch disaster to put unremitting heat on Massey, depicting the company as a renegade on safety and environmental issues. The publicity from the mine disaster was so negative and all-pervasive that Masseyโs board agreed to sell the highly profitable company. The new owner, Alpha, has ample incentive to make peace with the union and the MSHA, blame former management for the catastrophe and move on.
There is no one left to defend the reputation of the old Massey Energy organization and that of the executives and managers who worked there – no one except Bobby Inman, the 80-year-old former director of the Central Intelligence Agency, who now is a professor at the University of Texas. Mr. Inman is armed with nothing more than an orphaned report, which, regardless of the merits of its contents, will predictably be dismissed as a whitewash.
Still, the issue Mr. Inman raises will not go away. There will be other mine disasters. The politics and prejudices of Central Appalachiaโs ongoing class war will intrude into the investigations, and justice could be derailed as a result. The MSHAโs behavior would be a worthy subject of a congressional hearing, and Mr. Inmanโs idea for an independent investigative agency is one that should be pursued.
(Image credit: Washington Times)





