by Derrick Max
Last night, as promised repeatedly during the campaign, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education (the Department). The order also ensures the continued delivery of essential services such as federal student aid and funding for students with disabilities. This historic move will rightly transfer most education funding and authority back to states and local communities — the first step, one would hope, in getting funds to parents, where it belongs.
This has led to the expected outrage from progressives. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer described the attempt to dismantle the Department as “one of the most destructive and devastating steps Donald Trump has ever taken” (probably the hundredth time he has made this assertion). House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries accused the administration of “taking a chainsaw to public education in America,” warning that such actions could lead to increased class size, educator layoffs, and cuts to special education programs.ย
President Trumpโs Department closure, however, aligns with long-standing conservative philosophy that education policy is best that is determined closest to the students being served — namely, state and local entities and parents.ย The Thomas Jefferson Institute recently advocated for the closure of the Department, arguing that federal education oversight and funding imposes uniform standards that hinder schools’ adaptability to local needs and divert resources away from classrooms and towards administrative overhead.ย Eliminating the Department empowers states and local communities to tailor educational policies more effectively, fostering environments that better serve their unique student populations.









