by James A. Bacon
Defenders of the higher-ed status quo don’t dispute the imbalance of partisan and ideological views in college faculties, a reality that is so well documented that there is no sense in pretending otherwise. Rather, they’ve adopted a rhetorical gambit to put their critics on the defensive — painting them as hypocritical for wanting to rectify the asymmetry.
Conservatives, they contend, reject preferential hiring to address racial and ethnic imbalances in college faculties, but they are happy to see hiring preferences to bolster the number of scholars with right-of-center sympathies. As my colleague Dick Hall-Sizemore sums up the logic in yesterday’s post: “Some might call it DEI for conservatives.”
Dick is hardly alone in his view. I’ve heard similar sentiments expressed, in the comments section of this blog and, more respectfully, from members of the University of Virginia faculty with whom I engage.
Some may be tempted to dismiss “DEI for conservatives” as mere sophistry. But I take the messaging seriously. It compels us to ask important questions: How do we restore a semblance of intellectual diversity to higher education? What is our ultimate goal? How will we know when we reach it? By what means do we accomplish it?
(more…)











