by Emilio Jaksetic
On November 13, 2025, Baconโs Rebellion posted an article by The Jefferson Council entitled โSpanbergerโs Political Amnesia.โ That article criticized Governor-elect Abigail Spanbergerโs letter to the University of Virginiaโs (UVA) Board of Visitors (BOV) in which she asked the BOV to refrain from choosing a new President for UVA until she can appoint new members to the BOV. The Jefferson Council succinctly identified the political double standard displayed by Governor-elect Spanbergerโs request by comparing it to the political hardball efforts of Virginia Democrats to make significant post-election decisions and appointments affecting UVA before then Governor-elect Youngkin could become Governor.
The Jefferson Councilโs discussion of the political aspects of Governor-elect Spanbergerโs letter is apt and noteworthy. However, it is important to also consider how her letter also raises serious rule-of-law issues. Why? Because although Governor-elect Spanbergerโs letter may appear to be reasonable on the surface, it is problematic when viewed in the context of the Virginia Constitution and the Virginia Code. What follows are the reasons why I assert Governor-elect Spanbergerโs letter poses a threat to the rule of law.
First, Governor-elect Spanbergerโs electoral victory in November 2025 gives her the right to take the oath of office and become Governor at the end of Governor Youngkinโs term, but it does not give her any legal basis to exercise any authority that an incumbent Governor possesses. The authority and power of Virginiaโs Governor rest with the incumbent Governor, not a Governor-elect. Governor Youngkinโs November 13, 2025, letter to Governor-elect Spanberger properly points that out. But beyond the traditional practices referred to by Governor Youngkin, there is an important rule-of-law aspect involved.
The idea that a Governor-elect is not yet the Governor is more than a mere truism. It reflects an important legal distinction.
(more…)









