Bacon's Rebellion

See the news release below.

I blogged before that the only letter I’ve written to Sen Allen was last year when he made his first wrong vote on making homosexuals a protected class of persons.

As I said, I got a long, snippy letter from his staff. I didn’t mention that to him at a fund-raiser in Newport News a few months ago. But, then I didn’t know about this written memo of his.

He will vote for the crime bill, because golly gee its a crime bill with a bad amendment. That would be more plausible if he would work in public to rescind the memo.

This is not good.

FPN NEWS CONTACT: Joe Glover – 434-846-0500

Senator urged to keep promise vs. hate crimes – – this time

George Allen broke “no sexual orientation” pledge, but has a chance to get it right now

————————————————————

(FOREST, VA) – The leader of a Virginia-based pro-family organization is urging U.S. Senator George Allen (R-VA) to honor a written campaign promise to oppose adding “sexual orientation” to the list of federal “hate crimes.”

“George Allen broke his promise to not support adding “sexual orientation” to the federal list of hate crimes last year. We’re asking him not to break that promise again now,” said Family Policy Network (FPN) president Joe Glover in a written statement.

On October 27, just days before his election to the Senate in 2000, then-candidate Allen promised to oppose hate crimes designation for homosexuals, in exchange for a guarantee from conservative leaders to drop the issue – rather than publicly criticize his prior statements in support of such legislation.

Allen’s promise, which was written on “Allen 2000″ campaign stationary, was signed by the candidate himself. The letter (see below) clearly states that, if elected, Allen would not support adding sexual orientation to the list of federal hate crimes “or any other similar legislation.” The letter also expresses Allen’s belief that such legislation would “have the effect of elevating sexual orientation to civil rights status,” which he promised he would not do.

Also in the letter, Allen added that he had “always been an advocate for increased penalties on anyone who commits a violent crime” in an apparent attempt to justify his previous willingness to support the hate crimes designation for sexual orientation.

“That might make a good sound bite,” Glover said, “but it doesn’t explain why killing grandma for the money in her purse should be any less a crime than killing someone else for engaging in same-sex sodomy.”

Allen broke the promise in June of 2004 when he helped pass a Senate bill to add “sexual orientation” to the list of federal hate crimes (see story). The legislation eventually expired because Republican leaders never scheduled a vote in the House of Representatives. This year, however, the House has already passed the language. It will now be considered by the Senate.

Glover says, “This time, we’re asking Senator Allen to remember his promise. If he doesn’t, we won’t let him forget it.”

————————————————————

RELATED INFORMATION:

Letter from George Allen, promising not to support adding “sexual orientation” to hate crimes:

See the letter online at this location:

http://va.familypolicy.net/Allen_vs_HC.gif

From today’s Fredericksburg Free Lance-Star:

“Manassas has become the first city in America where every family can access high-speed Internet service simply by plugging into a common electrical wall socket. … The technology being put to use in Manassas is called broadband over power line (BPL) and it carries data over the city’s electrical grid. … Customers are provided with a modem to plug into their home electrical sockets.”

The service costs $28.95 per month — less than what the cable and DSL typically costs. Where the technology could prove to be really significant is in rural areas where broadband service doesn’t exist at all. Said Joseph E. Gerus, CEO of Communications Technologies Inc. , the Chantilly telecommunications company involved with the project: “What we are announcing today in Manassas is something that we could be rolling out in a year or two in literally scores of communities across the United States.”

Presumably, they’re paying attention down in Southside, where installing a broadband network is a high priority — and public money is available to fund it. The Tobacco Indemnification and Community Revitalization Commission, underwritten by tobacco settlement funds, is committing $21 million to bring broadband to six new communities: Dinwiddie, Appomattox, Bedford, South Hill, Martinsville and Danville. (See article in the Petersburg Progress-Index.)

They aren’t using the Manassas technology in Southside, but I’m wondering if Broadband Over Power Line might drive down the cost of extending broadband access beyond the mill-town population clusters to dispersed residents in the countryside. I’d bet there are a number of rural electrical cooperatives that would love to diversify their revenue stream.

The Library of Virginia has selected the Bacon’s Rebellion blog “for inclusion in its historic collection of Internet materials” relating to Virginia’s 2005 state-wide elections for governor, lieutenant governor and attorney general.

According to an e-mail I received from Kathy Jordan, electronic resources manager:

The Library will engage in the collection of content from your Web site at regular intervals from September through the election. The Library will make this collection available to researchers onsite in the Library’s reading room. After the election, the content of the site will become part of the Library’s archival collection and continue to be available as an historical record of public opinion.

Naturally, we’re flattered that the Library of Virginia would deem Bacon’s Rebellion worthy of preservation for posterity. I fully expect that the Library will do the same for many of the Commonwealth’s other excellent blogs.

What’s truly significant is not the selection of this or that blog but the fact that the Library of Virginia even has an electronic resources manager whose job is to archive electronic content. Think about that! Some future historian will delve into our blogs for insight into the thinking of everyday people. We will yield a bounty of authenticity that researchers could never find in the newspapers or broadcast video files.

So, be careful what you post on the Rebellion! Not only will we think you’re a knucklehead, historians a hundred years from now could conclude that you’re a knucklehead, too!

The debate over what is a tax increase has raged on since the primary. Given, when a local governing body votes to raise the real estate tax rate, it is a tax increase. Previously debated: If a local governing body fails to lower the rate sufficient to overcome assessment increases, is that a tax increase? And now comes this question from Chesterfield County, as reported today in the Richmond TD. When a local governing body takes steps that raise assessments, is that a tax increase?

I say yes. There is no question the value of my home here in Chesterfield will rise or fall based on the going price for comparable new homes — some of them very near by. When the price of those new homes rises to cover this higher proffer, eventually the value of existing homes will rise as well. With all due respect to the powers that be in Chesterfield, it is insulting to me for them to deny something that a freshman in Econ 101 can figure out. If proffers and impact fees only produced the direct revenue and no indirect revenue, I’m not sure so many localities would be so eager to adopt them. And now that the local homebuilders have made an effort to teach a little econ to the taxpayers in existing home, at least we can have an honest discussion.

I’ve plugged one of Tim Kaine’s ads and one of Russ Potts’ ads. Now I’ve finally come across a Jerry Kilgore ad that I really like. Just call me a sucker for anything that makes me laugh.

If you’ve ever wondered what Jerry’s twin brother Terry looks like, you’ll see him here. Terry’s a dead ringer for his brother. Even sounds just like him. If they sent Terry out on the campaign trail, no one could even tell the difference. Just think of it: Two Jerry Kilgores could attend twice as many events, shake twice as many hands and kiss twice as many babies. Tim Kaine wouldn’t stand a chance. View ad here.

Well, Labor Day has come and gone, and it still doesn’t look like the electorate is getting excited about Virginia’s gubernatorial campaign. According to a story in the Richmond Times-Dispatch this morning, with a deadline looming, registrars in the Richmond area are reporting a diminished number of people signing up to vote.

Wrote Tyler Whitley: “Mark Coakley, registrar in Henrico County, said about 50 people have come by the county government complex to register in person. Another 250 have sought absentee ballots, far under the total from last year, he said.” The City of Richmond had received 88 applications, but “20 plus” were rejected because they were inaccurate. Wow, only 100 new voters in jurisdictions with a combined population of 450,000. You can’t get much more apathetic than that.

Robert D. Holsworth, chair of the government and public affairs department at VCU, noted that no defining issues have emerged from the campaign. That impression is backed up by a recent Rasmussen poll showing that voters were most interested in bread-and-butter issues, while candidates are focusing largely on the cultural wedge issues.

If turnout looks like it will be exceptionally low, expect the candidates to abandon their appeal to uncommitted moderate voters and start riling up their motivated base.

My Democratic friends have been telling me for so long now that Jerry Kilgore’s “hick” accent would turn off sophisticated Northern Virginia voters that I started believing them. So it comes as a surprise to see that the Northern Virginia Technology Council’s political action committee has endorsed Kilgore for governor. I blow off most endorsements as either meaningless or predictable. But the TechPAC announcement, which comes at a time that Kilgore’s lead in the polls has shriveled to nothing, could give him a significant lift in the final weeks of the campaign.

States the Kilgore campaign press release:

“After careful deliberation, NVTC TechPAC determined that Jerry Kilgore is the better choice when it comes to sustaining and growing Northern Virginia’s vibrant technology industry, and he takes stronger positions on several of our key issues,” said John Backus, Chairman of TechPAC and Managing Director of Draper Atlantic. “Kilgore has a record of substantial achievement on issues important to our industry including the strengthening of Virginia’s anti-spam and anti-phishing laws, initiatives he championed as Attorney General.”

While Attorney General, Kilgore successfully pushed for the nation’s toughest anti-Spam law and used it to obtain the first-ever felony Spam conviction in the United States. Additionally, he improved the computer crimes statutes to make “phishing” – using e-mail to lure victims into providing personal information – a crime. Kilgore also toughened laws against using computers for child pornography. He was the first Attorney General to appoint a Deputy Attorney General to specialize in technology issues.

The Oct. 3, 2005, edition of Bacon’s Rebellion is now online. In addition to our usual keen political insight, we offer two perspectives on the racial turmoil at the University of Virginia:

UVa Under Siege — from Within
Racial incidents at the University of Virginia last August were all too real. But the administration’s over-reaction needlessly fed black students’ fears and alienation.
by James A. Bacon

Separate but Equal at UVa
The University of Virginia must work to overcome Virginia’s legacy of discrimination — but supporting the self-segregation of black students is not the way to do it.
by Conaway Haskins

No, I’m not talking about the under-representation of sheep in Blacksburg, as opposed to cows and ducks.

Virginia Tech will hire a “multi-cultural-program” director and reorganize several offices to help improve “campus diversity,” the Associated Press reports. The move comes in response to an eight percent decline in applications from black high school students since 2001. Campus race relations have been tinged, the story notes, by a series of incidents over the years, including one last year in which someone scrawled “threatening messages” on the door of the local chapter of the NAACP.

I have some questions: What is the purpose of “campus diversity?” Presumably, the goal is to make African-Americans feel more comfortable on campus in the hopes that more will apply and decide to stay. How, then, does one go about achieving that goal? Does making a fetish of “diversity” and the differences between people help African-Americans blend in? Does the systematic cultivation of group identity encourage whites (and others) to interact with African-Americans on a color-blind basis as individuals?

We can look to the University of Virginia to see what “diversity” has wrought. Conaway Haskins, publisher of the South of the James blog, and I will bring different perspectives — one black, one white — to the state of diversity at UVa in Monday’s edition of Bacon’s Rebellion.

I’ll pass on any close commentary on the most recent Rasmussen Poll. I’ll read it more closely with the rest of you. The comfortable lead Kilgore showed in a recent Washington Post poll (of the most likely voters) has yet to be confirmed in any other published poll. Mason Dixon will be out again, soon.

Pamela Stallsmith with the Richmond Times-Dispatch and Mike Porter with NBC12 have queried Tim Kaine, Jerry Kilgore and Russ Potts on the major issues of the gubernatorial campaign, filmed the responses and posted the video clips online.

Line up the candidates side by side and see what they have to say about the major issues, from taxes and education to transportation and illegal immigrants. The clips here are short and succinct. It beats reading those boring op-ed pieces on the campaign websites. (By the way, when I describe the clips as “campaign issues for dummies,” I’m not being insulting. It’s nice to have this stuff condensed to a palatable format.)

A tip of the hat to Chris Smith for leading us to this resource.

Jerry Kilgore has fleshed out the details of his transportation plan. Kilgore (or someone on his campaign staff) has devoted a lot of thinking to it, and it deserves more attention than it’s gotten so far from the political journalists covering the campaign — especially when it’s entirely foreseeable that transportation funding will be one of the top issues of the 2006 General Assembly. I have been critiquing the Kilgore plan piece by piece over on the Road to Ruin blog. Here’s what we’ve published so far:

Kilgore on Transportation: Demand Management
Kilgore on Transportation: There’s Something New About This?
Kilgore on Transportation: Privatize Maintenance
Kilgore on Transportation: Regional Authorities

Hollywood liberal Ben Affleck has been spotted shopping for real estate near Charlottesville amidst rumors that he’s being courted to run against Republican George Allen in 2008. Someone had better warn the poor guy: He’s got a better chance of getting back together with J-Lo than winning a U.S. Senate race in Virginia. Read Christina Nuckols’ musings on the topic here.

Jerry Kilgore has boxed himself in a corner on the tax issue and has no room to maneuver. Now Gov. Mark Warner has joined Tim Kaine in pummeling him, landing punch after punch. Kilgore is acting as if he doesn’t have any fight left in him.

In a recent fund-raising letter, Warner, who heretofore has avoided criticizing Kilgore, attacked the Republican candidate for governor for resisting his 2004 tax plan. In today’s Richmond Times-Dispatch, Jeff Schapiro describes Warner’s argument this way:

Warner refers to Kaine as his partner in the 2004 struggle that led to a $1.4 billion tax increase. The widely backed plan, Warner says, was resisted by Kilgore-led Republicans who “stood against us every step of the way.” Warner chides Kilgore for proposing “massive” bond-backed debt, for urging a voter veto on the budget, and for pushing unsustainable tax cuts and transportation spending. “That’s the kind of fiscal irresponsibility that got us into trouble in the first place.”

How can Kilgore respond? Despite opposing the 2004 tax hike, he undercuts himself by saying he doesn’t want to undo them. Instead, he proposes targeted tax cuts like an income tax credit for parents buying school supplies. Now, there’s a proposal that will move the masses! Despite a budget surplus that grows bigger every month, rendering Warner’s tax increases more and more superfluous, Kilgore has seemingly abandoned the issue.

Kilgore needs to take the battle back to Warner and Kaine. Here’s what he needs to say: When the budget crisis was waning in 2004, you jacked up spending, ignored the economic rebound that was already occurring, and raised taxes that many people said were never needed. When the rebound grew stronger in fiscal 2005 and revenues came rolling in, you refused to admit you’d made a mistake. As the surplus grows today, you still refuse to give anything back to the taxpayers. You’re writing a blank check to the politicians in Richmond who will find a way to spend every penny — and still want more.

Warner and Kaine are acting, despite massive evidence to the contrary, as if their 2004 tax increase was vindicated. That’s largely because Kilgore is too timid to challenge them. I shake my head in amazement and disappointment.

The city of Martinsville enjoys a unique economic development opportunity presented by the bankruptcy of cable provider Adelphia, suggests consultant Robert F. Sepe, proprietor of Cary, N.C.-based Action Audits LLC. Sayeth the Martinsville Bulletin:

The city could use Adelphia’s existing infrastructure to greatly enhance the Martinsville Information Network (MINet), which now links mostly schools and government offices. The city then could provide companies with “super-high-speed” Internet, voice and video transmissions, which would give Martinsville “a presence anywhere in the world,” said Sepe.

Apparently, the city is taking the idea very seriously. Says the Bulletin: “Action Audits … has determined the city franchise’s value. City officials have declined to release it, though, saying that doing so may hinder any negotiations with Adelphia that may occur.”

If Martinsville winds up taking over its local Adelphia operation, it could provide a model for other communities in Virginia served by the cable company.

Philosophically, I have major problems with local governments getting into the telecommunications business. They don’t possess the expertise to do a good job managing an on-going business enterprise like a cable company. On the other hand, Martinsville and Henry County have every reason to be frustrated by the unwillingness of private-sector businesses to invest in local telecommunications infrastructure — investments that offer enormous social benefits to the community.

Are there no alternatives for communities to incentivize cable and telecom companies to accelerate investment locally without incurring the responsibility of operating the business?