Now What Do We Do With Him?

by Dick Hall-Sizemore

I was perusing the latest list of Governor Glenn Youngkin’s appointments and could not help smiling when I came across one entry: Carl Beckett, Special Assistant, Department of Corrections.

I have no idea who Carl Beckett is. It was the position that caught my eye.  “Special assistant” is a pretty non-descriptive job title.

Some context is needed. Generally, most state personnel positions fall under the Virginia Personnel Act. Filling those positions is accomplished through a competitive process “based on merit principles.” After a state employee has been hired and completed a probationary period, he or she cannot be dismissed except for certain specified reasons and there are systems in place to ensure due process for the employee.

There is another classification of state employee: at-will. The governor has complete discretion in the hiring (appointing) of people to serve in these positions and they serve at the pleasure of the governor. They include people in the governor’s office; cabinet members and their staff; and agency heads. In addition to these employees in policy positions, the governor may appoint up to two at-will positions for each agency, in addition to the agency head.  The statute authorizing such appointments describes them as those “serving in the capacity of chief deputy, or equivalent, and the employee who has accepted serving in the capacity of a confidential assistant for policy or administration.”

People appointed to these positions are usually folks who have worked in the governor’s campaign or have some other political connection and the administration does not have another suitable position to offer them.

Agencies really do not like these appointments and they resent them. These are people that have been assigned to them by the governor and about whom they had no say in the assignment. Often, the at-will employee does not have any knowledge or experience in the subject matter of the agency. The appointment was not in response to any specific need of the agency or a vacant position within the agency. As a result, the agency has to figure out what to do with this staff person just assigned to it. Finally, there is the assumption or concern, especially with an at-will appointee at the chief deputy, or equivalent, position that the appointee’s chief role is to “spy” on the agency and report back to the governor. Due to all these misgivings, the at-will appointee is usually given an assignment that isolates him or her from the major operations of the agency doing something that will have as little impact as possible.

I hope Mr. Beckett is assigned to a role he finds interesting and something that he thinks will contribute to the good of state government. 


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

13 responses to “Now What Do We Do With Him?”

  1. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    I think your slip could be showing here.
    If the Governor doing the Special Assistant appointing is a D, does the agency believe the Special Assistant is spying?
    Asking for a friend…

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Again, governors of both parties do this and sometimes, yes, the special assistant is there to keep in touch with the Third Floor and vice versa. Spy is a bad word. Liaison sounds better. But sometimes it is a big donor's neice.

      For the appointee this can be a great opportunity to learn and could spark a career.

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Yes.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Maybe. Or maybe, you're on the staffing chart but you have no clue what is going on because you're not on the distro lists? 😉

      2. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        So your answer is even worse than I thought!
        I believe "yes" means the Va govt agency thinks all Special Assistants, D and R appointed, believe they are being "spied" on?
        What happened to noble public servants? Shouldn't they welcome oversight because they are proud of their jobs? Are willing to show the newbie why they are doing it right? Amenable to good faith suggestions that might actually have insight from an outsider?

        Instead, I hear Va bureacrat envy of Fed unaccountability and shut up. Not encouraging!

    3. Clarity77 Avatar
      Clarity77

      Good call as to Dick's "slip" showing. Leftists are always triggered by anything remotely attached to the subject of transparency in government. And the whining confirms you are right over the target.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      The state budget sets a maximum number of positions that an agency can fill. The Dept. of Education seems to have exceeded that limit. There is language in the Appropriation Act that authorizes DPB to increase that limit under certain conditions.

      It is unusal for an agency to exceed its position limit. There are usually enough turnovers and vacancies to keep it from going over the limit.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        so why are they "staffed up" like this?

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Does this mean that Youngkin has essentially taken over the DOE with his folks?

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Always the possibility of the converse. He could be a SME and this is a temporary appointment while he really does provide assistance. Nah!

  3. VaPragamtist Avatar
    VaPragamtist

    Yeah, appointees are assigned to state agencies for a variety of reasons, just like at the federal level. I think the more interesting story occurs when those agency employees are then "borrowed" by the Governor's office, are assigned @governor.virginia.gov email addresses, given PHB credentials, and never actually doing work for the agency.

    It's one way the governor's office hides the actual cost of operating. The budget allows:

    Full-time, part-time, wage or contractual state employees assigned to the Governor's Cabinet Secretaries from agencies and institutions under their control for the purpose of carrying out temporary assignments or projects may not be so assigned for a period exceeding 180 days in any calendar year. The permanent transfer of positions from an agency or institution to the Offices of the Secretaries, or the temporary assignment of agency or institutional employees to the Offices of the Secretaries for periods exceeding 180 days in any calendar year regardless of the separate or discrete nature of the projects, is prohibited without the prior approval of the General Assembly.

    Note the 180 restriction. They're also supposed to be reported to the GA each year.

  4. I guess it beats having these people wandering the streets getting into trouble…

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT