Miscellaneous Musings

Hanover County teenagers are not that clueless

The members of the Pamunkey Regional Library (Hanover County has the most members) have gone to great lengths to assure that books with explicit sexual content are shelved in the adult section, rather than the “teen section.”

A recent phone call to the library confirmed that any teenager with a library card could check out books from any section of the library.

Striking a Nerve

Bacon’s Rebellion has run two articles (here and here) this year disclosing how some agencies, despite not spending all their capital maintenance reserve (MR) appropriations for many years and thereby building up large balances, continue to receive MR appropriations, which only add to their unspent balance. In the capital budget development instructions for the next budget cycle recently sent to agencies by the Dept. of Planning and Budget, the following admonition was included:

There will be an exercise this fall to better understand how well agencies are able to fully utilize their maintenance reserve funding.  Although specifics on this exercise will be forthcoming, the amount of uncommitted maintenance reserve funding at an agency will be taken into account for agencies requesting additional capital funding for large maintenance-type projects.

This is the first time that this language, or anything similar to it, has appeared in the capital budget instructions and it could be viewed as a shot across the bow of agencies.  However, if carried out as indicated, this exercise will be a waste of time. It seems that agencies will be asked to identify uncommitted MR funding. The capital project staff of any agency worth its salt could show that every dime of its MR balance is committed. For example, there is no doubt that the Dept. of Corrections can show its balance of more than $100 million “committed” to legitimate projects. Left unsaid will be the fact that it would likely take the agency 10 years to spend that amount of money on maintenance reserve projects.

Raping a park

The city of Richmond never ceases to amaze. 

First, some background. A 43-mile regional trail, the Fall Line, stretching from the town of Ashland to the city of Colonial Heights has been approved. One segment will go through Bryan Park in Richmond and construction is scheduled to start soon.

[Disclosure:  The author lives in a neighborhood adjacent to Bryan Park and uses it frequently.]

Bryan Park has a fairly extensive system of paved roads. About one-half of those roads, those in the “back area” in which there is not much public activity, are closed to vehicular traffic. There is a considerable amount of bicycle and foot traffic on these roadways, which are heavily shaded by mature trees.

Instead of using these existing roadways, however, the plan is to construct a new ¾ mile-long, 14-foot wide (10 feet of pavement and 2 feet of shoulder on each side) roadway (trail) through the middle of the park. This “trail” will take users along the edge of soccer fields, a pickleball court, a playground, and down a steep hill through the middle of a frequently used Frisbee golf course.

There are two reasons given for wanting to construct a new paved pathway, rather than using the existing roadways that are now closed to vehicles.

  1. “It should be visible and aligned to high-volume areas to encourage high use and trail awareness,” said Brantley Tyndall, who leads Fall Line Trail planning for Richmond Sports Backers. It shouldn’t be “hidden along the periphery.” It is hard to understand how walking beside soccer fields that are being actively used is going to encourage high use of the trail. It is doubtful that people coming to Bryan Park to play or watch soccer or play Frisbee golf would use the Fall Line trail instead of driving there if the trail were in the middle of the park, rather than on the periphery.
  2. It would be dangerous for trail-users to use the roads. That would be true if it were proposed that the trail be routed along the roadways that vehicles are allowed to use. But that is not what is being proposed as an alternative. Furthermore, the roads are dangerous for walkers to use on Saturdays because of actions by the city itself. The roads are packed on Saturdays because the city allows the RVA Big [Farmers] Market to operate there. 

Opponents of the proposed route, citing the lack of necessity for the proposed route, warn of the environmental damage that constructing the route would entail. Their particular concern is about the impact on the large trees near the route. Tyndall of the Sports Backers, contends that fewer than 10 trees will require removing. However, that does not account for the damage that will inevitably be done to roots of other trees, including severing and compacting, that could well lead to a slow decline and death of more trees. Furthermore, the machinery necessary to dig out the base of the trail and pave it over will inevitably cause unforeseen damage.

Then there is the question of the estimated $3 million cost of building a new pathway through the park. Of course, the city does not have to worry about such unnecessary spending because the Fall Line is being financed by the Central Virginia Transportation Authority, along with state and federal grants.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

18 responses to “Miscellaneous Musings”

  1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    I agree with the naysayers about the Bryan Park issue. Find another way. Although change is often inevitable so that the young can enjoy a new project, the old should not be penalized. They should find a way to not destroy what people enjoy now to build a new enjoyment.

  2. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    Devon Henry will get the contract!

  3. RE: Striking a Nerve

    I think this approach is okay for a couple of years, as long as it is coupled with an urgent call to get started on projects for which funds have already been allocated. Then, about three years from now, the instruction should be changed to: "the amount of maintenance reserve funding actually expended by the agency will be taken into account for agencies requesting additional capital funding for large maintenance-type projects."

    And from that point they should base the maximum allocation for each agency in any budget cycle on the amount that agency [productively] spent on capital maintenance reserve projects in the previous budget cycle.

  4. I also agree with you regarding the new trail in Bryan Park. I have never even been there, but from past experience with a large park system I know that if at all possible, it is best to connect to existing travel ways and paths when planning and constructing the many parts of a large-scale trail system. It saves money and minimizes environmental impact.

    As for trees, a good 'rule of thumb' is to refrain from excavating or compacting earth anywhere beneath the canopy of a tree you want to save. This leaves the majority of the tree's critical root structure undisturbed. It's not 100% effective at alleviating damage to all trees, but working anywhere within the tree's canopy 'footprint' definitely carries a higher risk of causing damage that might not be apparent at the time the work is performed.

  5. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    re: the trail and park – narrative here pretty much follow what I read in RTD.

    It's hard too tell from "afar", but it sounds like the planners of the trail did not really do a good meeting with the folks that use the park to try to find an agreeable compromise. We had an issue up here similar in that a road was being widened by VDOT and they wanted to add a bike/ped path to one that was already there so they proposed cutting down trees to make it wider. That went over badly and VDOT got a black eye out of it.

  6. Teddy007 Avatar

    What is the issue with the library?

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Dick assumes that whoever asked the library to remove the racy books from the teen section expected that this would prevent teens from checking out those books. He presents no evidence for that theory. That's his strawman. Then, he notes that the library did remove the racy books from the teen section but teens can still check them out.

      This is a classic strawman argument.

      One wonders how Dick would feel if his local grocery store suddenly started selling sex toys in the vegetable section.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        re: " This is a classic strawman argument."

        pretty mild comparatively to other posts… ๐Ÿ˜‰

        One wonders how Dick would feel if his local grocery store suddenly started selling sex toys in the vegetable section.

        yeah, but could teens buy them?

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          You can't even access the website without at least lying about being over 18.

          https://adamevestores.com/adult-toy-stores/?code=VA

          You can't access internet porn sites in Virginia without going through an age verification process.

          But the government-employee clowns who work at your local library can hand out porn to kids without any age verification or a care in the world.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            You think kids can’t access porn without lying? ๐Ÿ˜‰

          2. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            At least the sex toy sites ask. That's more than the librarians do.

            The porn site verification process is much more sophisticated.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I think these days, if a kid wants porn and sex toys, it’s as easy as getting pot and other illegal stuff.

      2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I forgot to include the link from the article. Here is the applicable quote: "Community critics said the Pamunkey system had allowed their children to access โ€œpornโ€ by leaving some of these books on shelves marked for teenagers." https://richmond.com/news/local/government-politics/hanover-king-william-library-pamunkey-system-ban-sexual-content/article_bbbbd240-5697-11ef-91a4-2fd5429cd26b.html

        So, there goes the strawman.

        If I found sex toys in the vegetable section, I would think that was a little weird, but I would not be outraged.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          To update Mae West at the grocery store: "Is that a carrot in your cart, or are you just happy to see me?"

  7. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The MR issue sounds a lot like human nature. Any organization is going to have longer term issues with maintenance , older stuff that breaks or goes bad, damage, etc, etc… they KNOW it is going to happen , they don't know when and if they try to add it to their budget when it does break, they risk
    not having it funded, so if there is a "fund" for future work, they will sit on it
    until they need it. Perhaps the state can consolidate this into a single state pot of money like the School literary fund and allow agencies to access it
    at the time they have the need. It seems like a silly issue on the face of it
    in a way. It's not like the agencies are hoarding the money to spend on frills.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Having a maintenance reserve fund is a good idea. It can be used for major jobs that fall between routine maintenance and a capital project. If something unexpected happens, such as a sewer or water line break, the money and authorization to spend it is immediately available. Almost all agencies spend a majority of their annual MR appropriation. However, a few agencies constantly have significant year-end balances, which carry over from year to year. If they have not demonstrated that (1) they have a large maintenance reserve need or (2) are incapabale, for whatever reason, of spending a good portion of their appropriation, why should they continue to receive MR appropriations? Before providing additional appropriations, the governor and/or legislature should tell those agencies that they will not get any additional MR appropriation until they have spent down XX percent of their current balances.

      Putting it into a big pool and letting agencies "access it at the time they have the need" would create more paperwork and take up the time of agency and DPB staff. The basic idea behind the MR fund is to provide agencies flexibility to handle relatively small projects.

  8. Lefty665 Avatar

    They're better than no brains. My response was to a comment about sex toys in the vegetable section. I was discreet enough to use a carrot rather than a pornographic zucchini.

    1. Clarity77 Avatar
      Clarity77

      Like I said.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT