Globalism, Wokeness and the Great Political Realignment

Image credit: ChatGPT

by James A. Bacon

Phillip and Tanja Thompson aren’t ready to join the Republican Party, but their patience with Democrats is wearing thin. Once upon a time, they write, the Democratic Party stood up for working people. “Today, we’re left wondering if there’s room for the values we cherish,” they write in a Richmond Times-Dispatch op-ed.

It’s not that they disagree with Democrats about such issues as restoring voting rights for felons, say the African-American husband and wife, but they believe the Ds have lost interest in the issues that matter most to them — like economic opportunity, public safety and quality of life. “The party leans heavily on highly visible social issues that cater to select groups, often sidelining the bread-and-butter concerns that used to drive working families to the polls. Special interests seem to have taken center stage over expanding opportunity for all.”

Adopting a new worldview is not something that people do easily. Most people change their political loyalties by only a few degrees at a time. But a massive political realignment is occurring, and the Thompsons seem to be a part of it, even if they haven’t yet made the partisan jump from one party to the other.

Anyone who wants to understand modern politics needs to understand that realignment. The Democratic Party is no longer the party of FDR. It is a coalition led by educated elites, and its preoccupations are those of educated elites. Likewise, the Republican Party is becoming the party of working people. The transition is not complete, as both parties retain muscle memories of who they once were, but the process is far along, and it is driven by underlying changes in America’s class structure.

Comprehending the new class struggle has been a priority of mine, and I recommend several books to Bacon’s Rebellion readers who strive to understand the deeper forces at work in society.

We Have Never Been Woke: The Cultural Contradictions of a New Elite

In We Have Never Been Woke, Musa Al-Gharbi, a Stony Brook University sociologist, offers the most incisive critique I have yet seen. He argues that a new elite class, referred to as “symbolic capitalists,” has acquired enormous power to dictate the cultural discourse. These elites work in fields that deal with words, ideas, images, and data, such as academia, media, and nonprofits. They overlap to some degree with economic elites — they tend to be highly compensated compared to other Americans — but are envious of the wealth, power and status of the super-rich.

Symbolic capitalists, Al-Gharbi says, are notable for their quest for status, which they achieve through virtue signaling: posing as allies of progressive causes such as antiracism, feminism and LGBQT rights. They see working people as holding “wrong” views of race, gender and sexuality. They view those who do not conform to their views, especially working class Whites, as not merely misguided or wrong but morally deficient. Notably, they frame social justice issues in a way that allows them to gain power and status, often at the expense of the marginalized and disadvantaged.

This overwhelmingly White cultural elite now dominates the Democratic Party and sets its agenda. Thus, the preoccupations of mostly White symbolic capitalists preoccupy the Democratic Party.

Second Class: How the Elites Betrayed America’s Working Men and Women

Journalist Batya Ungar-Sargon tells the story of America’s new class divide from the perspective of the working people. American elites in media, academia and politics, she argues, have betrayed the working class, shifting their focus from economic issues to cultural and identity issues that concern the elites themselves. She is most scornful of the media, which has abandoned its role as champion of the underdog in favor of acting as mouthpiece for the power elites.

Second Class is not an academic treatise like We Have Never Been Woke. Ungar-Sargon interviewed dozens (if not hundreds) of working people, and she is attentive to different gradations with the working class: those who have achieved a middle-class lifestyle, those who live paycheck to paycheck, and those whose lives are a daily struggle for survival. Giving a voice to the voiceless, she finds the thinking of working people to be far more nuanced and tolerant than portrayed by the cultural elites, indeed more nuanced and tolerant than the orthodoxies of the cultural elites themselves.

Troubled: A Memoir of Foster Case, Family, and Social Class

Rob Henderson, whose birth father was Hispanic and birth mother was Korean, entered the foster care system at an early age, bounced around in the system, and was adopted as a boy by a working-class family. In a memoir evocative of J.D. Vance’s Hillbilly Elegy, he vividly describes the challenges he faced and the self-defeating behavior he adopted due to the absence of a stable family. As with Vance, a stint in the military turned his life around, and he ended up at Yale.

Henderson coined the phrase, “luxury beliefs” to describe ideas that confer status on members of the upper class but which in practice inflict enormous costs on the lower classes. In particular, he refers to cultural elites’ expressed views toward non-traditional family structures in which single parenthood or polyamorous relationships are just as valid as intact nuclear families. While such views signal virtue and open-mindedness, the spread of non-traditional households has been disastrous for children, who crave the stability and support provided by stable two-parent families.

Regime Change: Toward a Postliberal Future

Patrick Deneen, a political science professor at Yale University, argues that classical liberalism, an ideology designed to protect and expand individual liberties, is crumbling under the weight of its own contradictions. America’s “managerial elites” have prospered under the regime of market liberalism, but free trade and globalism have hollowed out regional economies, devastated communities, and undermined social cohesion.

Deneen also has sharp words for liberal cultural elites in academia, media, and politics, whose policies work to maintain the status quo and suppress challenges to their authority. Wokeness, he contends, is a form of virtue signaling used to maintain status that distracts from more pressing economic and social problems.

The Age of Entitlement: America Since the Sixties

Journalist Christopher Caldwell argues that the Civil Rights Act of 1964, designed to end segregation and racial discrimination, was structured in such a way constitutionally as to create far-reaching, unintended consequences. It created a new regime of social engineering and a new set of rights and obligations organized around group identities. The new elite, concentrated in academia, media, and politics, has used the language of civil rights to maintain its power and status. The new order has undermined traditional social structures such as family and community, and the dissolution of those structures has been disastrous for working people.

The Dying Citizen: How Progressive Elites, Tribalism, and Globalism Are Destroying the Idea of America

Victor Davis Hanson, whose conservative critique of American society is rooted in his background as a professor of classical history, argues that the concept of citizenship is under threat in America. Citizenship is not just a legal status but a set of responsibilities and privileges that binds individuals to their community and nation. He sees two main threats: globalization and tribalism.

Globalism, in the form of outsourced jobs and an influx of cheap, often-illegal foreign labor, has undermined the economic security of the American middle class, weakened the social fabric, and made it difficult for citizens to fulfill their civic responsibilities. Meanwhile, America’s elites are fragmenting society by promoting divisions based on race, gender and ethnicity rather than uniting citizens under a common national identity. Dividing the lower orders by race, gender, and ethnicity rather than income and wealth allows the elites to maintain their privileged economic position.

According to Hanson, no society can long maintain stability and democracy without a strong middle class. As America’s middle class erodes, so does the foundation of the republic.

I am still digesting these critiques of American society, but they are largely in accord with what I have observed. It is through this lens that I interpret what I see occurring in Virginia, which is a microcosm of the forces at work nationally and even globally.

 

 

 


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

12 responses to “Globalism, Wokeness and the Great Political Realignment”

  1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    I like Victor Davis Hanson. His columns are good. Dying Citizen is a great read. I think he is right about many things.

  2. Clarity77 Avatar

    If you are a student of American history and understand behavior pattern recognition when you focus on the democrat party since its inception it is no different then as it is now. Especially in terms of its basic obsession over money and power at the expense of the general well being of the people, especially the middle class, which is viewed as a threat to the power structure it craves.

    It is good though to see black Americans like the Thompsons writing in the paper of record for the capital of the Confederacy and waking up to the fact that the democrat white plantation owners of 1860 are in fact no different than the current leadership of the democrats. Just different variations in the intervening years but all the while serving to confirm that as to the democrat ego and mind you cannot change the stripes on a zebra.

  3. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Alexis Tocqueville wrote;

    "Our contemporaries are constantly excited by two conflicting passions: they want to be led, and they wish to remain free. As they cannot destroy either the one or the other of these contrary propensities, they strive to satisfy them both at once. They devise a sole, tutelary, and all-powerful form of government, but elected by the people. They combine the principle of centralization and that of popular sovereignty; this gives them a respite: they console themselves for being in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own guardians. Every man allows himself to be put in leading-strings, because he sees that it is not a person or a class of persons, but the people at large who hold the end of his chain.โ€

    The result has been a peculiarly American compromise, an abiding tension between state power and popular sovereignty. Tocqueville had faith that the US could keep the two in balance. At the same time, he warned against a slide into โ€œdemocratic despotism.: The people, he wrote, might someday vote to cede their power and place the government โ€œin the hands of an irresponsible person or body of persons.โ€

    Pending the publishing of more detailed data of voter views in 2024, it may be said that the voting majority selected the simplest political messaging while abstaining from the more difficult choice of wishing to be governed.

    IMO, neither political party has connected with a sufficient majority of qualified voters to claim a mandate.

  4. Thanks for the reading list. Gives me something more to do while I wait for the sun to return and the days get longer.

    Here's a couple more for your list:

    Thomas Frank, "The People NO a Brief History of Populism"

    Along with a history of populism it is an in depth exploration of the Democratic Party's rejection of its New Deal Populist base that was the core of its political reign for 40 years and its embrace of well off elitists.

    That rejection in the early '70s culminated half a century later in the election earlier this month where the Dems won households with greater than $100k income, lost those with less than $100k income and gave populism a new ascendancy, much to the discomfort of the Repubs.

    Another Frank book "Listen, Liberal: Or, What Ever Happened to the Party of the People?"

    Prescient for what happened in 2016 and this year.

    John McWhorter "Woke Racism: How a New Religion Has Betrayed Black America"

    It is a wonderful exposition of the profound dysfunction of woke elitists and a simple prescription for how we can fix our culture. It is a primer on how we can make things better that starts from a very simple premise that is hard to execute; teaching every kid how to read and write gives them the possibility of a descent life.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    You won. We lost. Please try to relish your victory for the full, long, four years.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar

    The "hit" is that the Dems "Elites" have forgotten the working man and middle class. The party that fought for Medicare, Medicaid, the ACA, Pell grants, Title 1, Head State and a few other things that the GOP is now talking about cutting or worse.

    THe GOP has been superb at exploiting the culure war, no question.

    Now, let's see how it plays out for the working man and the middle class.

    Could be the GOP has indeed made changes to benefit the working man
    and middle class.

    I remain a bit of a skeptic but who knows? Certainly almost no mention of
    "working" folks and "middle class" in the Project 2025 thing.

    here's an excerpt:

    " HHS is home to Medicare and Medicaid, the principal drivers of our $31 trillion national debt. When Congress passed and President Lyndon B. Johnson signed into law these programs, they were set on autopilot with no plan for how to pay for them. The first year that Medicare spending was visible on the books was 1967. From that point on through 2020โ€”according to the American Main Street Initiativeโ€™s analysis of official federal talliesโ€”Medicare and Medicaid combined cost $17.8 trillion, while our combined federal deficits over that same span were $17.9 trillion. In essence, our deficit problem is a Medicare and Medicaid problem."

    A lot of discussion about the Affordable Care Act also – the primary way workers who don't have employer-provided get health insurance.

  7. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    As a provocateur and at the risk of drawing Dickโ€™s ire, Iโ€™m rather enjoying Trumpโ€™s โ€œwhimmingโ€ his nominations.

  8. Malcolm Oaxaca Avatar
    Malcolm Oaxaca

    "They view those who do not conform to their views, especially working class Whites, as not merely misguided or wrong but morally deficient."

    Exactly. Deplorable, bitter clinger garbage, anyone?

  9. Malcolm Oaxaca Avatar
    Malcolm Oaxaca

    "(F)ree trade and globalism have hollowed out regional economies, devastated communities, and undermined social cohesion."

    Globalism undermines social cohesion by mass immigration of foreign cultures into long established white communities.

  10. Malcolm Oaxaca Avatar
    Malcolm Oaxaca

    "Americaโ€™s elites are fragmenting society by promoting divisions based on race, gender and ethnicity rather than uniting citizens under a common national identity."

    The divisions exist because we're putting too many different races and cultures too close together. How do you "unite citizens under a common national identity"? Do newcomers simply move here to the magic dirt and proclaim loyalty to Brand USA(TM)?

  11. DJRippert Avatar

    From the liberal playbook … a definition of "woke":

    โ€œPower is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing.โ€
    โ€• George Orwell, 1984

  12. DJRippert Avatar

    The Democrats have learned nothing. Their asinine claim that Trump is "literally Hitler" fell on deaf ears so they moved on with Pete Hegseth having "White Nationalist tattoos." A Jerusalem Cross and "Deus Vult"? Tulsi Gabbard, a US combat veteran, is a spreader of Syrian disinformation and a Russian plant? Side note: When confronted with a decision over whether to deploy or run for office, Tulsi Gabbard gave up her political plans and went to war, unlike Tim Walz. And she's a Russian plant?

    I guess just saying that the nominees lack the experience or managerial tenure for the positions would fail to appeal to the mollycoddled, snarky, gutless, keyboard warriors that form the core of the new Democratic Party.

    Two standouts from the recent Democratic Party stupidity:

    1. Abagail Spanberger just couldn't keep her pie hole shut about Tulsi Gabbard. What a shame. I had hope that she might be a voice of reason, or at least sanity.

    2. Jen "Little Red Lying Hood" Psaki quotes Russian television as joking that Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian Asset. Of course, Putin also went on Russian television to endorse Kamala Harris.

    https://x.com/newsbusters/status/1858600407825572125

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT