Will Helicopter Dollars Improve Virginia Schools?

by James A. Bacon

Governor Glenn Youngkin is dumping money into Virginia’s public education system like a liberal Democrat. He’s not putting the funds to work in the quite same way — there’s more for accountability measures and Lab School Partnerships — but it’s hard to see a big difference.

I don’t know if he’s just bowing to the political reality that Democrats control the General Assembly and he might as well claim credit for what Dem politicians would compel him to do, or whether he genuinely believes that dropping helicopter dollars onto the K-12 system is the best path to improvement.

Either way, Virginia is conducting a vast and expensive public policy experiment. We’ll find out if lack of funding is really what ails public schools.

In a press release issued last week, the Governor boasted that with additional proposals to amend the 2025-26 budget, spending on K-12 education in the Commonwealth will leap to more than $22 billion over this biennium — a 54% increase over pre-COVID levels.

“Today’s investments address the real needs of our students and families by delivering on our commitment to unleash opportunity, raise the bar for academic excellence, and keep our children safe,” Youngkin said.

To be sure, Youngkin has set his administration apart from his predecessor’s by speaking honestly about the decline in student performance, focusing on student outcomes, setting higher standards, and pushing back on woke ideology. He also supports charter schools. But he has been second to none in pouring money into the system. The press release details the increases in this biennial budget:

  • $517.6 million in direct aid to localities.
  • $110.7 million in support for English Learners.
  • $25 million for New Lab School Partnership with Virginia’s accredited Historically Black Colleges and Universities. 
  • $35 million Increase to fund high school dual-enrollment and Career and Technical Education (CTE).
  • $66 Million Increase for a fully funded Student Assessment System, which will benchmark definitions of proficiency to the highest standard in the nation for all SOL tests. 
  • $6.8 million increase for School Resource Officers and School Security Officers, bringing the total to $50.3 million for SROs and SSOs this biennium. 

Plus, as an added bonus, these new spending programs announced last week:

  • $290 million for school construction and modernization, bringing the total biennial investment to $700 million. 
  • $50 million for school performance and support framework for schools identified as in need of support to improve student performance. 

That’s on top of an 18% increase in teacher salaries.

I will say this: Throwing unprecedented sums of money at K-12 while raising educational standards is better than throwing unprecedented sums of money at K-12 while maintaining the status quo. But my sense is that the rot in K-12 runs deeper than Youngkin can reach — a dysfunctional culture arising from out-of-touch central district administrators issuing insane directives to schools and classrooms. The same people at the district level who brought us the disastrously prolonged school shutdowns during the COVID epidemic are still in charge.

Youngkin’s executive order cracking down on cell phone use in classrooms — which will cost minimal dollars — will do as much to improve academic performance as all of his spending initiatives combined. But there’s not much he can otherwise to rein in out-of-touch ideologues in district offices who answer to local school boards, not the Virginia Department of education. Will handing over hundreds of millions more dollars to the people who largely created the problem lead to improved educational outcomes?

I suppose we’ll find out.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

6 responses to “Will Helicopter Dollars Improve Virginia Schools?”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar

    After his campaign and revamping of DOE, and reform of accountability, what I expected was a "plan" for addressing the schools that need "additional state resources", along with a request for funding of same.

    I expected him to try to "own" the "solutions" since he very much showed the problem and indicated that the state WOULD take action!

    Instead, we get what?

  2. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    "We're going to need a bigger Helicopter" in NoVA… how about a C130 Hercules military transport or two?

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Depends. If by โ€œaccountabilityโ€, it means hiring outside consultants, organizations, contractors , etc., etc., to conduct testing and measuring, building and the such then it may just be in keeping with the adage, โ€œWhen thereโ€™s a problem, Democrats throw money at it and Republicans throw money at their friendsโ€.

  4. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    The item that really caught my eye was $66 million "for a fully funded Student Assessment System, which will benchmark definitions of proficiency to the highest standard in the nation for all SOL tests."

    First of all, Youngkin promised that the cut scores on the SOL's would be the highest in the nation by 2023. The Board of Education has yet to act on that issue. Now, Youngkin is saying they will be in effect in the spring of 2026. https://dailyprogress.com/news/local/education/youngkin-education-cut-scores-standardized-tests/article_6c1f9c2f-fe87-5d77-94a6-e7e34d800771.html

    Second, $66 million sounds like a request to build a new data system. Why is that needed? The existing data system was able to handle a reduction in the cut scores. Why couldn't it handle an increase in the cut scores?

  5. LarrytheG Avatar

    I'm just trying to understand what to expect at the schools in my county that are designated as needing improvement.

    What should be expected? Is there a written plan?

  6. Itโ€™s not funding that is the problem. Last time I looked, District of Columbia schools have the highest per pupil cost and are last among the 50:states in performance.

    Virtually all public schools and many private schools lard the curriculum with non-academic material. This means that less time is spent on teaching knowledge and skills that kids need to get a job or further their education. For decades the public schools have been asked to solve social problems not of their making and on which they have not had and cannot have any effect.

    The latest is โ€œsocial emotional learningโ€ which is basically therapy practiced by teachers given a quick introduction. The entities making big bucks on this time waster claim that research results find improved behavior and academic performance. Not true – in fact the opposite is true. However, these programs are not alone: there is also drug abuse education, family life education, child abuse education, anti bullying and violence prevention and others. Lazy teachers like these programs because there are no objective tests of results and everyone can get a good grade that boosts their gpa.

    If he must dump money on public schools he should use it to replace time wasted on non-academic programs with tutoring and/or additional staff to support classroom teachers concentrating on standard disciplines.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT