Who Will Report the News II

Media General, parent company of newspapers in Richmond, Charlottesville, Lynchburg, Danville, Bristol and several smaller Virginia communities, has reported that 3Q revenues and earnings will far short of targets. I cannot imagine a scenario in which the news gathering function at these newspapers does not suffer.

Publishing division revenues in August increased only 2.9 percent, considerably short of the five or six percent anticipated. According to a Media General press release issued today, the disappointing revenue outlook reflected weakness in “retail” advertising and circulation. (In other words, newspapers continue to lose readers), as well as higher-than-expected expenses.

If Media General remains true to form, it will issue emergency edicts to all operating units to cut costs by clamping down on new hires, curtailing travel, saving paperclips, etc. Enjoying no exemption, newsrooms may be tempted to reduce staff through attrition. The trends affecting Media General apply also to Landmark Communications (owner of the Norfolk and Roanoke newspapers), the Washington Post and the independents.

I agree with comments on my previous “Who Will Report the News” post that the Internet, laptops and other technology have improved newsroom productivity. But I maintain that reporting and writing remains a labor-intensive business. The only meaningful way to contain costs is to reduce pay (a real morale killer) or tighten staff size. Virginia’s journalistic future (in which I take no pleasure, not even schadenfreude, trust me): Fewer enterprise stories, fewer in-depth pieces, more rewriting of press releases, and more he said/she said reporting.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

  1. CosmicMojo Avatar

    As much as I may complain about the editorial opinions of the RTD, I’d hate to see even fewer editors or writers. Newspapers have virtually eliminated editing from the process anyway, we can hardly stand to lose even more.

    I have an idea: relate news to us and eliminate the “note from my quaint corner of the state” bylines. What a waste: am I really interested in how many cardinals you saw last week? Does it improve my quality of life? And eliminate the “30-something lingo-dropping wah’s hap’n in R-town?” columns. They do not serve the primary function of informing us.

    I think the RTD has tried so hard in the last few years to get “more hip” in hopes of attracting the 20- and 30-somethings who get their entertainment online. But they dug themselves into a hole. They’re so flip that no one takes them seriously anymore. Whatever!

  2. Anonymous Avatar

    I guess this is partly my fault. I must not be bringing in new readers. In fact, I wouldn’t be at all surprised that Jim did a much better job of getting people to subscribe, if only so they could read his columns and complain about them.

    I do think that if the local papers did a better job of asking the questions people are interested in knowing the answers to, they might get more people subscribing.

    I do my part, I subscribe to the Potomac News (a media general company).

    Charles R.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT