When Will These Guys Stop Insulting Our Intelligence?

My first reaction upon reading the latest Kilgore campaign attack on Tim Kaine was disgust. Just how stupid do those guys think we voters are? Then, after referring to the Kaine campaign website, I concluded that contempt for the truth — and the voters’ intelligence — may be universal. Here are the facts. You decide for yourself.

Kilgore held a press conference yesterday with former Richmond Mayor and Congressman Tom Bliley and blasted Kaine for his “dismal track record” as mayor. Among the failings the Kilgore campaign pins on Kaine: Deteriorating student-teacher ratios in city schools, rising drop-out rates, low student achievement, a 47.5 percent increase in unemployment, and higher taxes. (See the press release.)

As a campaign gimmick, this may be effective. If the charges are mindlessly repeated in the press in the usual he said/she said format of campaign coverage, and if the voters are as ignorant as the Kilgorites seem to assume they are, the charges just may stick. Here’s the problem: Four of the five of Kilgore’s points are totally bogus.

Tim Kaine was elected as one of seven city council persons. Chosen by his peers as mayor, he was simply a first among equals who chaired city council meetings and fulfilled ceremonial duties. Kaine enjoyed no executive power. Furthermore, the city school board, not Tim Kaine, ran the Richmond city schools. School systems enjoy extraordinary autonomy in Virginia. To blame Kaine for the problems of Richmond city schools — problems that he had no power to influence — is ridiculous. Similarly, to blame Tim Kaine for an uptick in unemployment is nonsensical as well. Unemployment in the city reflects the strength of the national, state and regional economy, which are matters beyond the mayor’s control.

The one legitimate charge is taxes. As mayor, Kaine could influence the city’s budgetary choices and its tax rate. The city’s tax take did increase during his tenure, and he is legitimately vulnerable to criticism on this front. If the Kilgore campaign wants to display some intellectual integrity, that’s what it should focus on. Leave the rest alone.

As contemptible as the Kilgore attacks are, the Kaine campaign invited them by grotesquely inflating Kaine’s record of achievement. Read this passage in Kaine’s campaign biography: “Tim Kaine improved the city’s business climate, cutting taxes such as the property tax and the business license fee. Over 76,000 jobs were created in the metro Richmond area. To enhance public education, he built the city’s first new schools in a generation…” Yadda, yadda, yadda.

Those puffed-up claims are just as irresponsible as Kilgore’s attacks. Yes, Kaine cut the property tax rate, but rising property values drove up the total tax burden. As for claiming credit for 76,000 jobs in “metro Richmond” — including Henrico, Chesterfield and Hanover counties — that’s downright laughable. And if Kaine wants to hog credit for building new schools, then he needs to take responsibility for the rest of the Richmond school system.

I really shouldn’t be reading this garbage before breakfast. It ruins my appetite.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

  1. Will Vehrs Avatar
    Will Vehrs

    Jim, your post raises a larger issue … just what is a legitimate/credible/meaningful differentiation among candidates? If we don’t want candidates inflating their records or attacking their opponent’s record on misleading grounds, what do we want them to do?

    More importantly, if they do campaign the way we want them to, would the press pay any attention at all? Would the voters?

  2. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    Ok, Jim, having read the press release, read the Kaine propaganda and based on your own years in the Richmond metro area — what do you conclude? Does Kaine’s experience as mayor increase or decrease his qualification as governor? Surely it was not news to you that politicans put things in the light that suits them best — but your are the gatekeeper, the journalista — sort it out for us.

  3. SouthoftheJames.com Avatar
    SouthoftheJames.com

    Jim, your feelings about insulting our intelligence is absolutely on point. It also shows why it’s still important for bloggers and MSM folks to softly remind people of the civics lessons that we got in grade school about checks & balances, separation of powers, and Dillon’s Rule. Sadly, the average voter doesn’t factor in the nuances of how public schools are governed or that being a city mayor/county board chairmain in VA doesn’t mean much from an executive or even political perspective. For example, in Chesterfield, our board chair is the lone Democratic supervisor among 4 GOP’ers but got his spot because of a gentleman’s agreement hatched over a decade ago.

    It also begs the question of what makes a candidate “qualified” for the governor’s office. In terms of this race, Kaine has only his term as LG (a part-time gig) and 7 years on city council – no executive or state legislative experience. Kilgore only served 3 years as AG, and held an appointed executive position under Allen for 4 years. Classically speaking, neither is all that experienced, but they’re following a governor who had ZERO experience in public office and wasn’t a native Virginian. So, the bar has definitely been lowered.

    Virginia really hasn’t elected a politically-experienced governor since Allen, and even then, the Democrats deemed him unqualified back then despite his 8 years in the state House and 1 term in Congress because Terry had done 8 years in the state House and 8 years as AG.

    – Conaway

  4. This is just the beginning of many negative attacks from the Kilgore group. That is just the way these people operate. Stand for nothing, atack all others. Always have, always will.

  5. Kaine’s really achilles heel is that he helped push Jamison into power as Richmond’s City Manager.
    Jamison oversaw a lot of the problems that Wilder is dealing with today.

    Kilgore’s problem in using this vulnablility is that a lot of his supporters helped Kaine push Jamison into power. Jamison was their puppet. Gottwald, Goodwin, Bates, and others loved Jamison.

    Potts could take this on as a third voice, but he is also beholding to the same people. Which is also why he and none of the other candidates will say anything against the VaPAF.

  6. Jim Bacon Avatar
    Jim Bacon

    Steve, You asked my opinion on whether Kaine’s experience as mayor increase or decrease his qualifications for governor. I’m going to give you a cop-out answer. Obviously, experience of any kind in municipal government is valuable. So is his experience as Lieutenant Governor. Kaine is obviously well versed in the major problems confronting the Commonwealth, so he can’t be disqualified on the grounds that he lacks knowledge and experience. Does that mean I’ll vote for him for governor? That’s a different question entirely. I still haven’t made up my mind. We still have a lot to learn about the two major candidates. The only thing I know for certain is that I will not vote for Potts.

  7. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    South: Allen was our last experienced Governor? Allen had 9 years in the GA and what, one term in Congress when he was gerrymandered out and ran for Governor. His life outside the assembly did not include heavy-duty business experience.

    Gilmore had six or seven years as a local commonwealth’s attorney and three and a half as attorney general — a much better spot than LG to prepare you manage the whole state (lots of CEOS first served as general counsels.) His private law practice was no more heavy duty than Allen’s. I’m not denigrating Allen’s preparation, and his record demonstrates he learned a few things coming along — but I think you shortchanged Gilmore.

    What is true about Allen is he is the last governor with any experience in the legislature as a voting member, which did help him hit the ground running faster than Gilmore or Warner. Warner really hit his stride with the legislature in his third session, and the Gilmore relationship with the Assembly was somewhat rocky. Neither Kilgore and Kaine has that legislative experience, either (no being LG is not quite the same.) Of course Potts does…but that’s another story.

    Kaine’s service on council counts. Overall Kaine and Kilgore are not out of line (experience-wise) with previous candidates for Governor, except for lacking service in the GA (which Robb also lacked, but Wilder, Baliles, Dalton, Godwin had.) It really bothers me when a governor lacks that. Of course there is Potts…but that’s another story.

  8. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    The real problem is that the story of Kaine’s time in Richmond is impossible to tell honestly if you are committed, as Kilgore is, to keep insisting that Kaine was an all-out liberal.

    I still don’t understand how the tax issue can be so confusing. Kaine supported cutting taxes, and they got cut. Property values rose. The overall tax burden increased with incomes and property values. Yes. That’s not a clear plus or minus for Kaine, but it’s laughably dishonest, as Kilgore and his allies do, to claim that he has no record of cutting taxes. The city’s tax take would have been even larger if the taxes hadn’t been cut. So how is this not “improving the business climate”?

    And for a blog that’s normally so on point about how changes in government to make it more business friendly can improve employment, among other things, why is it laughable that Kaine can cite a record of support for those reforms and then cite a healthy job growth in the area and put the two together? He doesn’t claim he personally created those jobs. He claims he supported reforms to make the city (and thus the area) more business friendly. Do pro-business reforms help attract and create jobs or not? If not, then why support them?

    The Calvin Jamison issue is likewise bizarre. Citing nothing in particular about Jamison while still treating him as a criticism, they leave out the fact that he was their pick too. Again, a little hard to tell the story of Kaine in Richmond when you have to keep insisting that he was a die-hard liberal that opposed Republicans at every turn.

  9. SouthoftheJames.com Avatar
    SouthoftheJames.com

    Anon: Essentially, the whole notion of what makes someone “qualified” for statewide office is now really murky. About the only thing consistent things that we can say about our governors over the last 20 years are that they had law degrees and were politically active in some form. Otherwise, it’s been a crap shoot.

    You always have to question the real impact – negative or positive – of any legislator (municipal or GA) on a particular issue as they make the jump to state executive positions. Claims for or against Kaine’s Richmond tenure can really be spun anyway folks want to, and for voters in other parts of the Commonwealth, Richmond issues (Jamison, etc.) may not register.

  10. In response to anonymous:

    Jamison was Richmond Renaissance’s pick. He was seen as the corporate voice who would keep pushing the Broad Street white elephants. He could cover up the double taxing on gas utility bills.

    Kaine, being the too nice guy he is, played right along with Renaissance’s plan.

    I am not a Kilgore supporter because I disagree with his stances. I am not a Kaine supporter because I do not think I can trust his stances. I am not a Potts supporter because I still have not heard any real stances.

    All of these guys say they are against unjust increases in taxation, but they refuse to address the hypocrisy of the VaPAF’s meals tax increase.

    I can tell you one thing- as a Richmond taxpayer I hope Richmond Renissance and other corporate welfare schemes are demolished.

  11. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Jim,

    While I realize Kaine was not a dictator on the council, didn’t the council have authority over the school budget and to appoint the school system’s administrator like in many counties? Doesn’t this at lease as well as with taxes mean he shares some of the blame and therefore make Kilgore’s case plausible?

    At least if he felt there were problems in these areas he could have made dissenting votes and public statements to that effect as well as publicly bring forth his own ideas on how to solve them. To say he’s not to blame because he only had one vote on the council is a bit of a stretch to remove him from any responsibility. Especially if he attempted no change to the status quo or supported changes that caused problems. I’d like to see some specifics on how he voted on the issues while on the council.

  12. Jim Bacon Avatar
    Jim Bacon

    Anonymous 12:52, Yes, the mayor has the ability to jawbone the school board (much as Doug Wilder is doing), and some influence over the size of the school budget, and some say-so in the appointment of the school superintendent. However, as I recall (perhaps imperfectly) from my days of covering Martinsville city council meetings, city councils do not have the authority to change line items in the school budget. With all the layers of insulation between Kaine and the city school system, to blame him for rising drop-out rates and poor academic performance just strikes me as unreasonable.

    Does that mean that I agree with Kaine’s prescription for education in Virginia — e.g. dump more money into the system? No, I don’t. If I were Kilgore, I would attack Kaine’s prescriptions on their own merits/demerits, not by blasting Kaine’s mayoral track record on education. Kaine was mayor, for pete’s sake, not school board chairman.

  13. He voted for Jamison despite numerous complaints that the whole search process was rigged.

  14. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Given that the AG position has been for many years blown into things that it is not (watch Deeds and McDonnell battle over issues their office will have no control over whatsoever), I’m not sure it should really rank up there as being tons more experience oing anything than any other involvement in politics, local or statewide. I know someone that used to work in the Kilgore AG office, and she said that the basic day to day job of the actual officeholder was to prepare, via press releases, to run for Governor, much like LG. Kilgore was not, by any account, a stunningly impressive lawyer, and that’s fine, because the AG position, much like the LG position, is largely about managing the public politics of its duties, not actually doing casework, research, etc. There isn’t even anywhere near as much discretion as to what the office can or cannot do as most people think. The only real difference between Kaine and Kilgore’s officies was that different fundraising restrictions and Kaines surprising fundraising success made it advantageous for Kilgore to quit early in order to catch up. Otherwise, both were basically spending all their time positioning themselves to run.

    I think people have to be reasonable and understand that we are electing politicians here, not legislative experts, lawyers, or whatever else. Their expertise will be found in getting things done within Viriginian politics as a whole, not because they have a particular title on their resume.

  15. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Interesting points Jim (I’m not being sarcastic either), but on my end my school board member constantly gripes about how she has no control over the school spending and really only affects curriculum and school policies. So, maybe the real problem is this “insulation” thing you mentioned. Perhaps our local county school boards and supervisors have in fact created an “insulated” situation where they always have plausible deniability. I’d like to see some board chairmen tackle this issue and then maybe we could solve some real problems at the local level.

  16. Jim Bacon Avatar
    Jim Bacon

    Anonymous 1:39, I think you’re on to something. Look at how public education is structured today. The federal government is playing an increasing role, providing increasing funding and imposing more requirements. Virginia has a state board of education and a highly centralized educational bureaucracy that administers Standards of Learning, Standards of Quality and who knows what else. Then you have the municipality, which is putatively in control. Of course, it’s not. Even worse, local authority is fragmented. School boards, superintendents, and city councils/boards of supervisors all have slivers of power. Meanwhile, there are local bureaucracies to exercise oversight over school principals, school administrators and teachers. Oh, let’s not forget the role of the courts and the politicization of the schools. Local activists and/or aggrieved parents influence policy through the filing of lawsuits affecting everything from the teaching of evolution to undermining disciplinary standards.

    The system could not be better designed to defy accountability. No one has real power, no one is truly accountable. Everyone feels helpless to change anything. Everyone can plausibly blame someone else. It’s amazing that anyone gets educated.

  17. subpatre Avatar

    Anonymous1:39 said. “my school board member constantly gripes about how she has no control over the school spending

    If she’s elected, she’s fibbing. Schools budgets belong to the schools board, with full control over each line or item. In practice, no board exersizes that nit-picking control, but it’s available.

    VA § 22.1-94….The amount appropriated by the governing body for public schools shall relate to its total only or to such major classifications prescribed by the Board of Education pursuant to § 22.1-115 Nor does the governing body have any control over School Board hiring.

    Control over education –like control over any local issue– is a straightforward mix of federal and state mandates, accompanied by federal and state funding that usually doesn’t match the mandates. With the sole exception of local funding, School Boards don’t have any plausible deniability over local education.

    Hence elected School Boards should get independent real-estate taxing power for education.

  18. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Subpatre,

    I think my School Board member was implying exactly what you say above. They spend the money alotted, but have no control over how much there is.

  19. subpatre Avatar

    Anonymous3:57, I’m unconvinced.

    At the most restrictive, they have absolute latitude within the eight categories; at the least restrictive they can do whatever they want with the total amount budgeted.

    A school board given a 10% increase for instruction can hire new teachers, or distribute it all as raises. A 10% increase for health can be applied to administrative raises.

    Rarely does education get significant local cuts to proposed budgets. When they do, school boards are the worst offenders of padding budgets, because the year inevitably continues normally.

    Re-appraisal, reform, and re-engineer just don’t seem to be in education’s vocabulary. Budget controls consist of moves like reducing paper purchased, so that pupils or teachers foot the bill.

    If it sounds like I have little repect for school boards, it’s based on observation. Maybe not all are like that, but elected school boards have no responsibility: there is no direct connection between money and performance.

    School boards taxing authority will be the biggest shock they ever dreamed of, and the best thing for students.

  20. Ray Hyde Avatar

    Jim, your 2:13 post may be your best ever.

    Our schools are so politicized and regimented that they will never be able to make the changes necessary.

    If this keeps up, home schooling and private schools will increase to the point that public schools are irrelevant except as day care for working parents.

  21. Becky Dale Avatar
    Becky Dale

    Back when I was fighting my battle to get Richmond officials to acknowledge discrepancies in Richmond public school financial statements (as compared to computer reports of transactions), I asked Tim Kaine about it. His reply was that he believed what I was telling him about the discrepancies I found and that Richmond city council had the same problem I did in getting correct financial information from the school system. They’d ask for information and wouldn’t get it. Or it would be incomplete. We’re talking about the city council and school system of over 10 years ago. I hope they’re doing better now with sharing information. If council is going to be responsible for providing the funding, they must have full access to information.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT