Virginia’s Parole Board Frees Another Killer

by Kerry Dougherty

Well. They did it again.

Virginia’s Parole Board released another murderer. This may be the most psychotic killer yet.

And, no, these hairballs are not being released because of the COVID-19 virus. The Department of Corrections is freeing non-violent criminals nearing the end of their sentences. This is the soft-on-crime Parole Board setting killers loose. Because they can.

When Suffolk’s Commonwealth’s Attorney Phil Ferguson got to work Friday morning he found an email from the parole board that stopped him cold.

The board, in its infinite wisdom, had apparently released Patrick Schooley Jr., one day earlier. He was a murderer Ferguson prosecuted in 1979.

One he’d never forget.

Schooley, who was 15 at the time of the killing and 16 when he was convicted, abducted, robbed, raped and stabbed to death 78-year-old Bessie Rountree in her home on the evening of February 1, 1979.

The details of the crime could be the plot of a horror film.

Schooley had moved to rural Suffolk from Shreveport, Louisiana, to live with relatives.

On the night of February 1, 1979 Schooley walked to a nearby home where Ms. Rountree lived alone.

Did I mention she was 78?

According to Schooley’s confession, which I’ve read, he asked to use Ms. Rountree’s telephone and she let him in her home.

Once inside he pulled a knife on the elderly woman and asked for money. She gave him cash from a chest.

For reasons that he didn’t explain, Schooley forced the woman into her car and drove her down the road. He then drove her back to her house where he asked for her purse, which was in her bedroom. He followed her.

He forced her to undress at knifepoint, raped her and then stabbed her five times.

By the time Rountree’s body was found Schooley was on a bus back to Louisiana, but one of his relatives gave prosecutors a bloody knife with “PS” engraved on the handle.

Schooley entered a guilty plea and was sentenced to three life sentences. One for capital murder (murder in the commission of rape), one for abduction and one for armed robbery.

“That judge did not want him getting out,” Ferguson told me Friday.

Friday’s email to Ferguson was dated April 29. It informed him that Schooley had been granted “discretionary parole” and his release date was April 30.

Not a thing Ferguson could do about it.

“They are opening the floodgates,” Ferguson told me. “They’re releasing the worst of the worst. They’re releasing people who have no conscience. People who should never be released.”

Ferguson added that it appears the parole board is looking for murderers who committed their crimes while they were juveniles and setting them free.

“Where does it stop?” he asked.

It should never have started. There are some crimes so grotesque, so heinous, that no matter the age of the perpetrator, that person has forfeited his right to ever walk freely in society.

Bessie Rountree lived 78 years. Her last hours were nothing but terror, humiliation, pain and finally death at the hands of a merciless predator.

Now he’s out.

This column was published originally at www.kerrydougherty.com.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

36 responses to “Virginia’s Parole Board Frees Another Killer”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Another one-dimensional post. However, the Parole Board records (prison records, risk assessment score, investigative reports, etc.) that would shed light on why specific offenders are released are not available.

    Here are some factors: the offender was 15 years old at the time of his crime; one press report described him as “simple-minded”; he has been in prison 41 years.

    This is the basic question: If an offender has been imprisoned a long time (41 years in this case) and he is no longer considered a danger to society, should the state continue to keep him prison? At what point does the need for rehabilitation/punishment/protection of society cross over to being vengenance?

    1. Steve Haner Avatar
      Steve Haner

      I had put up a comment making reference to the infamous Briley brothers (long time Virginians remember them) but it was a cheap shot and I deleted it. That said, few issues have been as potent or successful as the abolition of parole a quarter-century ago, and I don’t recall either Northam or the legislative candidates campaigning on a promise to reverse that. Perhaps I just wasn’t focused. It might be perfectly safe to release this guy and it might not. It won’t be universally recognized he poses no threat. Granted, he was not covered by the no-parole law but the more people with this history released, the more likely a bad outcome.

      But there is an element of vengeance. which is inappropriate. A “hair on fire” story on each release will get old fast. Already starting to.

      1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
        Reed Fawell 3rd

        Dick says: “Another one-dimensional post. However, the Parole Board records (prison records, risk assessment score, investigative reports, etc.) that would shed light on why specific offenders are released are not available.”

        Why does not this say it all?

        Why are Dick’s personal musings on the subject relevant?

        Why is Coved-19 relevant?

        Why is Virginia’s Government, and its administrative state, here not acting like a lawless, out of control, despot?

      2. djrippert Avatar
        djrippert

        Anthony Briley dodged the hangman (or, more accurately, the electric chair) and is still incarcerated in Virginia. He just turned 62. He was 21 during the killing spree. He’s eligible for parole. I guess we’ll have to wait and see.

        1. Steve Haner Avatar
          Steve Haner

          I was in the newsroom the night of that famous escape, and participated in the old-fashioned reporting (one phone call after another after another) on that amazing story. In Roanoke we hadn’t heard of the Brileys, but we learned fast.

      3. Nancy_Naive Avatar
        Nancy_Naive

        Well, it beats the “2,000,000 dead for a day at the beach is well worth it” story.

    2. TooManyTaxes Avatar
      TooManyTaxes

      Dick, are the records considered by the parole board public? If so, where are they made public? If not, why not?

      On the substance, the convict’s age at the time of the crime provides support for possible parole, but I sure want to see the rest of the information. As far as being “simple-minded,” I’m not sure that it cuts in favor of release. This case is different from the earlier one in that there is no second murder by the convict.

      Does the parole board contact any remaining family members of the victim in time for them to make their views known? If not, why not?

      I think we need more information on this case.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        The Code of Virginia exempts the Parole Board from the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, except to require it to release a list of its decisions, along with some demographic information about the offenders. Therefore, the Parole Board records are not public records.

        The law requires that the Parole Board “endeavor diligently” to contact the victim of a crime before making a decision on parole. The law includes a fairly lengthy list of the rights of victims to information concerning parole decisions. For example, victims may present oral or written testimony to the Board regarding the impact that parole would have.

        As a practice, a member of the Parole Board will meet upon request with any victim or the victim’s family, as well as any family member of the offender, when an offender is being considered for parole. These meetings take up a considerable amount of the time that Parole Board members spend on the job. Note: this was the practice before the onset of the pandemic and social distancing. I do not know how the Parole Board has been handling these responsibilities under the current circumstances.

        1. TooManyTaxes Avatar
          TooManyTaxes

          Dick, thanks for the information. I struggle as to why the materials considered by the Parole Board are secret. Nothing in a criminal trial is secret. I guess it’s just the Virginia Way.

    3. John Harvie Avatar
      John Harvie

      “Another one-dimensional post.”

      Aren’t most all of them?

      “At what point does the need for rehabilitation/punishment/protection of society cross over to being vengenance?”

      Never.

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Another one-dimensional post. However, the Parole Board records (prison records, risk assessment score, investigative reports, etc.) that would shed light on why specific offenders are released are not available.

    Here are some factors: the offender was 15 years old at the time of his crime; one press report described him as “simple-minded”; he has been in prison 41 years.

    This is the basic question: If an offender has been imprisoned a long time (41 years in this case) and he is no longer considered a danger to society, should the state continue to keep him prison? At what point does the need for rehabilitation/punishment/protection of society cross over to being vengenance?

    1. Steve Haner Avatar
      Steve Haner

      I had put up a comment making reference to the infamous Briley brothers (long time Virginians remember them) but it was a cheap shot and I deleted it. That said, few issues have been as potent or successful as the abolition of parole a quarter-century ago, and I don’t recall either Northam or the legislative candidates campaigning on a promise to reverse that. Perhaps I just wasn’t focused. It might be perfectly safe to release this guy and it might not. It won’t be universally recognized he poses no threat. Granted, he was not covered by the no-parole law but the more people with this history released, the more likely a bad outcome.

      But there is an element of vengeance. which is inappropriate. A “hair on fire” story on each release will get old fast. Already starting to.

      1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
        Reed Fawell 3rd

        Dick says: “Another one-dimensional post. However, the Parole Board records (prison records, risk assessment score, investigative reports, etc.) that would shed light on why specific offenders are released are not available.”

        Why does not this say it all?

        Why are Dick’s personal musings on the subject relevant?

        Why is Coved-19 relevant?

        Why is Virginia’s Government, and its administrative state, here not acting like a lawless, out of control, despot?

      2. djrippert Avatar
        djrippert

        Anthony Briley dodged the hangman (or, more accurately, the electric chair) and is still incarcerated in Virginia. He just turned 62. He was 21 during the killing spree. He’s eligible for parole. I guess we’ll have to wait and see.

        1. Steve Haner Avatar
          Steve Haner

          I was in the newsroom the night of that famous escape, and participated in the old-fashioned reporting (one phone call after another after another) on that amazing story. In Roanoke we hadn’t heard of the Brileys, but we learned fast.

      3. Nancy_Naive Avatar
        Nancy_Naive

        Well, it beats the “2,000,000 dead for a day at the beach is well worth it” story.

    2. TooManyTaxes Avatar
      TooManyTaxes

      Dick, are the records considered by the parole board public? If so, where are they made public? If not, why not?

      On the substance, the convict’s age at the time of the crime provides support for possible parole, but I sure want to see the rest of the information. As far as being “simple-minded,” I’m not sure that it cuts in favor of release. This case is different from the earlier one in that there is no second murder by the convict.

      Does the parole board contact any remaining family members of the victim in time for them to make their views known? If not, why not?

      I think we need more information on this case.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        The Code of Virginia exempts the Parole Board from the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, except to require it to release a list of its decisions, along with some demographic information about the offenders. Therefore, the Parole Board records are not public records.

        The law requires that the Parole Board “endeavor diligently” to contact the victim of a crime before making a decision on parole. The law includes a fairly lengthy list of the rights of victims to information concerning parole decisions. For example, victims may present oral or written testimony to the Board regarding the impact that parole would have.

        As a practice, a member of the Parole Board will meet upon request with any victim or the victim’s family, as well as any family member of the offender, when an offender is being considered for parole. These meetings take up a considerable amount of the time that Parole Board members spend on the job. Note: this was the practice before the onset of the pandemic and social distancing. I do not know how the Parole Board has been handling these responsibilities under the current circumstances.

        1. TooManyTaxes Avatar
          TooManyTaxes

          Dick, thanks for the information. I struggle as to why the materials considered by the Parole Board are secret. Nothing in a criminal trial is secret. I guess it’s just the Virginia Way.

    3. John Harvie Avatar
      John Harvie

      “Another one-dimensional post.”

      Aren’t most all of them?

      “At what point does the need for rehabilitation/punishment/protection of society cross over to being vengenance?”

      Never.

  3. Mergus Avatar

    If it was not for the through and thoughtfully challenging COVID coverage, I would delete this bookmark. These posts are better fitted for supermarket tabloids, or whatever rock Nancy Grace lives under these days.

    1. djrippert Avatar
      djrippert

      I have to disagree. Steve said it best – “That said, few issues have been as potent or successful as the abolition of parole a quarter-century ago, and I don’t recall either Northam or the legislative candidates campaigning on a promise to reverse that.”

      Are these releases an efforts by elements within the state government to effectively overturn Virginia’s limits on parole?

      That seems to be a relevant question to me.

      1. Mergus Avatar

        I like dhis comment on parole, I think it’s a valid and useful argument. It’s the article that I took issue with. It features none of the same nuance, just hyperbole.

        There’s been an ongoing debate on the purpose and nature of criminal punishment that has not been settled and older than our republic. Is it to reform, or to segregate (in the true meaning of the word).

        To his point of, “it won’t be universally recognized he poses no threat,” who does? Is that the point of justice, to ensure someone can never be a threat again? If so, how could we ever really release a violent criminal.

        1. TooManyTaxes Avatar
          TooManyTaxes

          Why would we want to release a truly violent individual earlier than the end of his sentence? I can see some leeway for a convict who was a young teenager when the violence was committed and who has never done anything wrong since incarceration. But even then, the nature of the crime and the impact on the victim’s family should be considered.

    2. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
      Reed Fawell 3rd

      Mergus is upset. That’s real Progress.

      1. Mergus Avatar

        Wow, thanks for the insight. It really goes to reinforce my general opinion of the breadth and depth of current conservative discourse.

        1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          Current?

  4. Mergus Avatar

    If it was not for the through and thoughtfully challenging COVID coverage, I would delete this bookmark. These posts are better fitted for supermarket tabloids, or whatever rock Nancy Grace lives under these days.

    1. djrippert Avatar
      djrippert

      I have to disagree. Steve said it best – “That said, few issues have been as potent or successful as the abolition of parole a quarter-century ago, and I don’t recall either Northam or the legislative candidates campaigning on a promise to reverse that.”

      Are these releases an efforts by elements within the state government to effectively overturn Virginia’s limits on parole?

      That seems to be a relevant question to me.

      1. Mergus Avatar

        I like dhis comment on parole, I think it’s a valid and useful argument. It’s the article that I took issue with. It features none of the same nuance, just hyperbole.

        There’s been an ongoing debate on the purpose and nature of criminal punishment that has not been settled and older than our republic. Is it to reform, or to segregate (in the true meaning of the word).

        To his point of, “it won’t be universally recognized he poses no threat,” who does? Is that the point of justice, to ensure someone can never be a threat again? If so, how could we ever really release a violent criminal.

        1. TooManyTaxes Avatar
          TooManyTaxes

          Why would we want to release a truly violent individual earlier than the end of his sentence? I can see some leeway for a convict who was a young teenager when the violence was committed and who has never done anything wrong since incarceration. But even then, the nature of the crime and the impact on the victim’s family should be considered.

    2. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
      Reed Fawell 3rd

      Mergus is upset. That’s real Progress.

      1. Mergus Avatar

        Wow, thanks for the insight. It really goes to reinforce my general opinion of the breadth and depth of current conservative discourse.

        1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          Current?

  5. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead V

    Isn’t this the second time this has happened to the Suffolk Commonwealth Attorney? I can appreciate the anger and frustration in this matter. What troubles me is that Mrs. Rountree is here and Mr. Schooley is not.

    https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/44100794/bessie-l-rountree

  6. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead V

    Isn’t this the second time this has happened to the Suffolk Commonwealth Attorney? I can appreciate the anger and frustration in this matter. What troubles me is that Mrs. Rountree is here and Mr. Schooley is not.

    https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/44100794/bessie-l-rountree

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT