Three Choices — Just Like With Porridge

The books have been closed on Virginia’s most recent fiscal year and the report was released today. Pick your surplus figure:

  • $1.125 billion
  • $544 million
  • $0.00

The first is the “unreserved fund surplus,” the cash in the bank at the end of the day on June 30 (less the amount needed to pay any actual bills that really were in the drawer.) There was a time when a Governor would be proud to report that the state had a billion bucks in the bank on the first day of the new fiscal year, but no more. Not politically correct.

The second figure — $544 million — is the figure Governor Warner used in his speech and the press will focus on, the amount that General Fund revenue exceeded the official forecast. But of course that ignores the fact that not every dollar appropriated by the Assembly actually gets spent. When the books are closed some money is left over is just about every agency’s budget, and the dribs and drabs add up. But we don’t talk about that anymore, even though it is the soul of good management.

The third figure — $0 — is the new Politically Correct number. There is no surplus. The entire $1.125 billion has already been allocated or designated or earmarked or whatever euphemism you like for “pulled off the table before the taxpayers could see it.” The biggest chunk is going to the “Rainy Day” reserve fund, the second biggest chunk ($300 million) was assumed to be on the way and already spent by the 2005 General Assembly. The rest is parceled out either by law or at the Governor’s discretion. Surplus? What surplus?

In my book (and any accountant’s I suspect), the unreserved fund balance is the surplus. I don’t really understand why they are so shy about using it. Historially the $1.1 billion surplus is not out of line — good, but not out of line. It was less than ten percent and in other years it has exceeded ten percent. I had a chart showing previous end of year balances in a Bacon’s Rebellion Reality Check last September. In some of those years — some I can remember — the final results were equally at odds with the initial forecasts. Adjectives applied to the Warner Administration need to be carefully chosen, since they might apply to some governors from the other party, as well.

Moving off the General Fund’s rosy news, the report on the transportation revenues is very different. Overall revenue in the transportation accounts was up 3.3 percent — far from the 14.8 percent growth in the General Fund. The FY 2005 motor fuels tax collections were up only .4 of one percent, against a forecast of 1.5 percent. Anybody think highway and transit usage grew only four tenths of a percent last year? Prediction: that revenue source will not only not hit its foreast this fiscal year, it might actually decrease from this year’s collections as gas prices continue to climb.

But it’s only transportation. Barely rated a mention in the Governor’s speech and Secretary Bennett’s presentation.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

  1. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Thanks so much for the info and the link. I always like to read the original documentation.

  2. Jim Bacon Avatar
    Jim Bacon

    Steve, Thanks for the report and analysis, which is generally fair and reasonable. I want to nudge you for just one statement: “There was a time when a Governor would be proud to report that the state had a billion bucks in the bank on the first day of the new fiscal year, but no more. Not politically correct.”

    Not politically correct? That implies there is some right-wing dogma that deems budget surpluses to be wrong. As one of those who inveighed against the 2004 tax increases, I normally love budget surpluses. The only reason I have a problem with this budget surplus is that it is so large and it originates not only from economic growth but from a tax increase that was never needed in the first place.

    Permit me to point out that, based on the figures in your “Reality Check” column, the surplus was higher than any year between 1996 and 2004 — higher even than 2000 at the peak of the Internet bubble.

    What’s more the final 2005 numbers don’t take into account the fact that midway through the fiscal year, the General Assembly saw the surplus looming and decided to spend some $800 million that had not previously been budgeted.

    In sum, General Fund revenues exceeded originally projected expenditures by nearly $2 billion. Virginia could have paid for Gov. Warner’s educational initiatives and still had nearly a half billion dollars left over without increasing taxes.

    Bottom line: We was robbed.

  3. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    Jim: It wasn’t until after I posted this and tested the links that I noticed that the unreserved balance was indeed a record amount — in nominal dollars. It is not a record in inflation adjusted dollars nor is it a record as a percentage of gross collections. (Let me save SOME points for the full Rebellion piece.) There will come a time when this Governor will say that he proudly left a billion in the bank in his final full fiscal year — but it might not be uttered in this state.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT