Ranking States by “Bang for the Buck”


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

5 responses to “Ranking States by “Bang for the Buck””

  1. Cville Resident Avatar
    Cville Resident

    I’ve posted before about being skeptical of this site. It’s an aggregation of data, I rarely see much analysis of the data to tease out meaningful variables.

    When you just rely on data, you end up with conclusions such as the City of Richmond has the 7th best public education ROI in the nation:

    https://wallethub.com/edu/cities-with-the-most-least-efficient-spending-on-education/9390/

    But more laughable than Richmond is St. Louis being in the top 20! Wallethub reminds me of Microsoft’s chatbot….when you simply rely on raw data, there are a lot of poor conclusions/outcomes.

    1. I agree, that the validity of WalletHub’s methodology is debatable. That’s why I don’t draw any hard-and-fast conclusions from it. Rather, I see the rankings as useful for posing questions and prompting discussion.

      1. Cville Resident Avatar
        Cville Resident

        A question for your question about ROI:

        Do you want public policy to produce an “elite” elite OR

        Do your want public policy to provide the most bang for the buck for all?

        Obviously, anyone would like to see both, but I think policy visions tend to produce one or the other. Both have pluses and minuses for ultimate societal outcomes.

        I tend to think economic growth in the 21st century is going to be about producing the smartest, most innovative citizens as companies like the ones mentioned in the Case article are being manned by some very bright people.

  2. JOHN BR Avatar

    “Most people would acknowledge that there is a trade-off between taxes on the one hand and the quality of government services on the other.”

    I don’t think “most people” would necessarily agree with that. Basic services can be paid for with reasonably low levels of taxation. It is when (too often) government gets involved in everything and anything that taxes get too high and government quality goes down.

    Too little taxes – bad, as we can’t supply needed services.
    Too much taxes – bad, as we will find wasteful or corrupt ways to spend all the money we collect.

  3. slowlane Avatar

    I’m surprised the chart shows Delaware is shown as being higher-taxed than Maryland ?? In fact, Southern Delaware is a popular retirement haven for retirees from Maryland and New Jersey seeking lower personal taxes. This is possible because the tiny state with its tiny population, for decades has gotten windfall revenue from busloads of out-of-state gamblers visiting its casinos, as well as from having the nation’s most permissive incorporation laws, that have attracted some 250,000 corporations to incorporate in Delaware.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT