• SWIFT BOATING THE MORTGAGE CRISIS

    There are both Donkey Clan and Elephant Clan partisans who try to make every problem that citizens face into something that is the fault of the other Clan. Most despicable are those who fain intellectual and academic objectivity in determining blame.

    Blaming the Donkey Clan for causing the mortgage crisis and triggering the financial meltdown because they connived to loan mortgage money to unqualified home buyers is a prime example.

    The rhetoric makes for superficially alarming partisan arm waving but has no substance. The core reasons for the financial meltdown are the responsibility of those in both Clans. The basic rules to achieve a sustainable economic trajectory are spelled out in IT IS ELEMENTARY.

    First to clear the air:

    Yes, lowering the loan standards for home buyers to qualify was done for political purposes. It was done by both parties and has grown worse in recent years with no Agency oversight

    Yes, governance practitioners were trying to beef up home ownership on the assumption it was good for those at the bottom of the Ziggurat and was good politics.

    Yes, ACORN and others may have undertaken illegal activities (See note on this topic in IT IS ELEMENTARY)

    But get real:

    If a prospective buyer got a loan that they could not afford and the dwelling is sound when it is foreclosed is a personal / Household tragedy.

    But what happens? The bank / Fannie / Freddie resells the dwelling to someone else. If the dwelling and its Dooryard, Cluster, Neighborhood, Village and Community have real value the financial system takes a hit for administrative costs and moves on. This happens all the time.

    If there are a lot of those foreclosures in any one component of a Community it can pose a significant problem because there is a problem with the Dooryard, Cluster, Neighborhood or Village.

    What is a nation-state tragedy is that from the start Fannie and Freddie did not set standards — as FHA (and later VA) have done since the 30s — for the quality of the dwelling and its location, design, context and services.

    There has been much that was not good about the cumulative, Regional impact of those old FHA standards but there were standards. By the time Fannie and Freddie came along there should have been real standards that supported functional human settlement patterns at the Unit, Dooryard, Cluster, Neighborhood, Village and Community scales.

    Standards were imperative because of the amount of money pumped into the housing market. Without standards, those billions of dollars leveraged dysfunctional settlement patterns. The lack of standards and intelligent regulation resulted in massive “Wrong Size House in the Wrong Location” problems.

    Call it subsidy, call it bad investment, call it what you please, this vast oversupply of money distorted the market and resulted in dysfunction at the Community, Subregional and Regional scales.

    Now add bundling, derivatives, no oversight, greed, and global trading โ€“ the result is an InterNational disaster.

    Since 1973 Agency and Enterprise leadership in the US of A โ€“ aided and abetted by both political parities โ€“ has been moving toward an economy based on burning up natural capital, importing energy and cheap labor and borrowing from foreign lenders.

    In “IT IS ELEMENTARY,” we noted that if a nation-state wants to expand dwelling ownership then:

    1) The Houses need to be near Jobs and Services and sized for those who need shelter rather than encouraging the Wrong Size House in the Wrong Location.

    2) Agencies, Enterprises and Institutions must discourage speculation on home value.

    Both 1) and 2) are directly related to that fact that there is too much land held for urban land uses and that which has been developed is dysfunctional.

    Over the last 60 years owner occupied dwellings have increased in value at about the rate of inflation. When the current wave a write downs is complete the values will be below inflation.

    It is worth repeating that the internal rates of return on many investment strategies are much higher than on real estate, especially owner occupied dwellings. Depending on ones Household circumstance it may be wise to buy a dwelling for living.

    From a financial perspective, it is almost never wise to buy an owner occupied dwelling as a speculative investment. Speculating on ones dwelling degrades the living experience, encourages Abandonment (See Wild Abandonmentโ€ 8 Sept 2003) and most speculators end up losing money. One hears about the bonanzas in house speculation hyped by real estate agents not from careful analysis of regional data.

    It is important to note that the excuse that impudent loans were created as a way to break โ€œred liningโ€ is a red herring. Almost every upscale component of urban fabric was at one time a place that could be โ€œred linedโ€ — Georgetown, College Hill, Society Hill, Old Town, Vieux Carrie, the list is endless.

    What is needed to enhance residential settings is a Regional strategy to improve settlement patterns Region-wide.

    Implementation of this strategy may entail making loans to some who would not normally qualify for a mortgage but the loan decision must be made within the context of a strategy to ensure that the Unit, Dooryard, Cluster, Village, Community is a good investment.

    The mortgage crisis did not arise because of loans made to prospective home owners with a high risk of defaulting. A foreclosure of someone who had poor credit may be a risk worth taking and if they default it can be a Household tragedy, it is not a banking Enterprise tragedy. If the dwelling is in a functional location, is well built and not too big there are many of potential buyers who desire shelter.

    We have pointed out for years that the real problem with Fannie and Freddie is not the bad accounting or insane compensation but rather that they pumped billions into dwellings that were held to no settlement pattern standards beyond municipal controls.

    The first stage of the mortgage problem is tens of thousands of bad loans on dwellings that cannot be resold for anywhere near the loan amount. This is compounded by fraud induced by front line lenders who do not have to worry about the loan going bad because Fannie and Freddie would buy it and roll it into a package to sell to gamblers. Add to that the fabrication of definitives to โ€˜spread the riskโ€™ and you have the first leg of the financial โ€˜meltdown.โ€™

    EMR

    Note to Jim Bacon: Swift Boating the Mortgage Crisis is a Commonwealth of Virginia issue because:

    1) This is a prime example of a case where the logical Community and Regional responsibility has been overwhelmed by federal action

    2) Part of the Commonwealth is in the National Capital Subregion where these policies are made

    3) A lot of the Swift Boating is coming from partisan Institutions with addresses in the Commonwealth.

    4) The governance of the Commonwealth has done nothing to help citizens address reality.


  • Is This Any Way to Run a Government?

    As I argued in my last post, fiscal crises call for emergency measures. Gov. Timothy M. Kaine has no choice to resort to whatever short-term expediency he can find to close a $2.5 billion revenue gap in the current biennial budget. But it would be nice if Virginia’s fiscal exertions resulted in some lasting gains in productivity.

    Read the governor’s press release, and you’ll see that, at most, there are only $175 million in enduring efficiencies contained in the governor’s emergency financial plan. From the press release:

    The Governor’s reduction strategies include

    • $100 million in improved business practices and efficiencies
    • nearly $32 million in the reduction or elimination of current services
    • over $27 million in reduced personnel costs
    • over $13 million in reduced discretionary expenses

    For example, the Department of Forestry will save $50,000 by sharing the cost of a hydrologist with Virginia Tech; the Science Museum will save $100,000 by closing for an additional day each week; the Department of Taxation will save over $1.7 million by reducing technology costs; and the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse services will save over $2 million by consolidating certain targeted administrative services regionally for their mental health treatment centers.

    The other measures represent fiscal business as usual: withdrawing $400 million from the rainy day fund, borrowing $250 million for capital outlays, delaying pay raises for state employees, a hiring freeze and even 570 layoffs.

    The layoffs sound like a real cut. But how lasting will they be? I went back to the Commonwealth of Virginia’s official employee count and deleted any line items pertaining to higher education in order to get pure numbers on state administration. Here’s the track record since 2001:

    2001….. 66,927
    2002….. 64,908
    2003….. 64,044
    2004….. 64,368
    2005….. 63,099
    2006….. 63,486
    2007….. 65,309
    2008….. 66,193

    However, these numbers don’t tell the whole story. I suspect that the big drop from 2005 to 2006 represents the transfer of many state IT employees to Northrop Grumman — someone please correct me if I’m wrong. Also, I’m not clear about whether these numbers include “contract” employees. Whatever the details, after the temporary austerity budgets of the Warner administration shrunk state payroll, the numbers have crept back up to where they were at the peak of the dot.com prosperity (or even higher, depending on how the state counts IT and contract employees).

    The moral of the story: Freezing positions and laying off employees without re-engineering government processes is a temporary expedient only. These moves will not create any lasting improvements to the cost of administering state government.


  • THE ROLE OF MAINSTREAM MEDIA

    Howard Kurtz writes the Media Notes for the โ€œStyleโ€ section of WaPo. He often makes useful observations about โ€œthe state of the media.โ€ Sometimes a little late.

    In a 6 October story titled โ€œPress May Own a Share in Financial Messโ€ he summarizes the views of several in MainStream Media โ€“ including WaPoโ€™s new Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli โ€œwho was The Wall Street Journalโ€™s top editorโ€ โ€“ about why they were late in breaking the โ€œnewsโ€ of economic turmoil ahead.

    Readers of Bacons Rebellion were not kept in the dark.

    EMR has been profiling the negative impact of transportation and land use decisions on future prosperity for nearly four decades. It has been a constant theme since 1973 when the future trajectory should have been obvious to anyone, even those who were riding the tiger of Mass OverConsumption.

    From 1973 until 1988 EMRโ€™s focus was on building better, more Balanced places โ€œto live work and playโ€ at the Village and Community scale. From the mid 80s more and more of his writing focused on the economic impact of settlement pattern dysfunction โ€“ in the early days it was called โ€œpatterns and densities of land use.โ€

    In the late 80s and through the 90s there was a lot of MainStream Media coverage of these efforts โ€“ the Disneyโ€™s America location, Nissan Pavilion, The Shape of Loudoun Countyโ€™s Future, The Shape of Charlottesvilleโ€™s Future, the Subregional Activities Centers effort, Restructuring METRO, METRO station area settlement patterns, etc. Media staff who cut their teeth reporting on โ€œland use and transportationโ€ issues were Lancastered to โ€œnationalโ€ and โ€œinternationalโ€ beats that paid more and sold more advertising.

    As the realities that became the basis for “The Shape of the Future” became more clearly articulated, those who profit from Business As Usual became more concerned with obscuring the drivers of settlement pattern dysfunction. The lack of comprehensive information from MainStream Media made it easier and easier to nit pick details and ridicule overarching ideas than to try to understand what was happening. Advertisers started to provide back pressure and publishers and editors filtered out coverage that hurt advertising. Everyone focused on the details of the busts โ€“ REIT, Savings and Loan, Dot Com, Office Overbuild and then Housing but they all enjoyed the ride up on the โ€œmore-โ€˜growthโ€™-is-goodโ€, โ€œwho-cares-where-it-is,-we-can-always-drive-our-new-car-to-a-bigger-houseโ€ bubbles.

    EMR was not alone, for decades โ€“ long before there were Ezines โ€“ Jim Bacon was focused on many of the same themes in surveys of โ€œAutocentricโ€ settlement patterns, speculation-driven land development and damaging Agency policies.

    Since Bacons Rebellion appeared six years ago these themes have been explored repeatedly. EMR has prepared 131 columns and half of the first eight note the economic impact of bad transport and shelter decisions. A quick check suggests that Bacon / Bacons Rebellion first examined the housing bubble by name in 2003.

    EMR has been harping on the unsustainable trajectory of recent governance decisions for the past three years. EMRโ€™s 24 March column โ€œGood News, Bad Reportingโ€ (with the Jim Bacon supplied lead โ€œAs the economy weakens, you can count on MainStream Media to defend Mass OverConsumption and Business As Usual in a desperate bid to keep the advertising dollars flowingโ€ ) laid out the MainStream Media dereliction of responsibility to prepare citizens for the coming crash and more important to prepare them for the need to support a sustainable level of consumption.

    MainStream Media has not provided information upon which citizens could make intelligent decisions in the market place and in the voting booth. Some in MainStream Media are now beating themselves about the head and shoulders for not doing more. Why did they not do more? It was not in the best interest of the Enterprises that now own MainStream Media. In a sense, MainStream Media had no choice, they could not do more for the reasons spelled out in THE ESTATES MATRIX.

    Defying citizens from the left and from the right, MainStream Media keeps supporting Business As Usual in editorial after editorial and column after column. Why did they not blow the whistle on credit-default swaps and derivatives with no value? For the same reason they keep running ads for Autonomobiles that insure sexual satisfaction and Wrong Size Houses in the Wrong Locations that insure family bliss.

    Citizens cannot believe politicians because politics is broken. Citizens are learning they cannot believe advertising and have no funds to spend even if they did.

    Citizens have not been getting the information they need from MainStream Media. One wonders how MainStream Media will cover its tracks when citizens find out that dysfunctional human settlement patterns are a root cause of most of the reasons they are concerned about the future trajectory of civilization. For years the MainStream Media has refused to acknowledge that dysfunctional human settlement patterns is even a cause for concern because to do so will hurt their bottom line.

    EMR

    Next SWIFT BOATING THE MORTGAGE CRISIS


  • IT IS ELEMENTARY

    With respect to the current economic pain it is elementary that:

    A. If a nation-state with a democratic governance structure is going to create an economy based on consumer consumption (much less claim to lead the world in creating democracies with market economies) then:

    1) Agencies of that nation-state must insure that the market benefits the vast majority who are expected to consume. The market cannot be tilted in favor of a tiny minority who have an appetite for luxury goods but consume only an insignificant fraction of the total goods and services no mater how much they waste.

    2) When the economy depends on consumer consumption, Agencies cannot ask those at the top of the Ziggurat what they want, they must determine what those who are expected to consume need to be prosperous, happy and safe.

    3) Agencies cannot create a system of governance that privatizes profit and socializes risk, and above all,

    4) Agencies must make sure that the rate of consumption is sustainable and that consumer expectations are rational and that the vast majority benefit.

    Any alternative to these Elementary Rules are unsustainable for a democracy with a market economy. The last 60 years of consumer-driven economic โ€œgrowthโ€ in the US of A has not been sustainable as evidenced by the current โ€œmeltdown.โ€ Both political parties have violated all four Elementary Rules of governance sustainability.

    Right wing nuts are harping on the transgressions of ACORN and similar groups. Illegal and fraudulent actions are wrong. However, with an obscene and widening Wealth Gap, ACORN- like groups are exactly what citizens can expect to happen. The next step is radical populism as documented by nearly a century of experience in South and Central American, Caribbean and African attempts at democracies with market economies.

    No nations-state can:

    1) Import energy and cheaper labor

    2) Burn up natural capital, and

    3) Subsist on loans from those who sell Citizens, Enterprises and Agencies the energy, goods and services they need to survive.

    B. If a nation-state is going to create an economy that depends on trust, enterprise, intelligence, saving and investment then Agencies must manage the money supply such that the cost of money (interest) allows savers to can make a reasonable return from investing and are not forced into:

    1) Speculating on the true value of land

    2) Gambling on stock and commodity markets, or

    3) Swapping valueless definitives of tangible assets.

    If financial Enterprises are to have money to loan, Agencies must ensure that interest rates encourage savings not tax breaks that encourage Global short-term profit seeking, aka Supercapitalism.

    C. If a nation-state desires to evolve a stable economic system it must create a system that:

    1) Does not rely on unsustainable โ€œgrowthโ€, and

    2) Reflects the organic structure of human economic, social and physical activity, the first step is a Fundamental Transformation in governance structure.

    There is a need for several strong, competitive Regional banks in every New Urban Region, not MegaBanks and MegaSpeculators โ€“ Enron, WorldCom, Lehman, AIG, Citi and all the rest โ€“ that have lost touch with the role of banking and investment in a society.

    D. If a nation-state wants to expand dwelling ownership then:

    1) The dwellings must be near Jobs and Services rather than encouraging the Wrong Size House in the Wrong Location.

    2) Agencies must discourage speculation on home value.

    Over the last 60 years owner occupied dwellings have increased in value at about the rate of inflation. When the current wave a write downs is complete the values will be below inflation. This means that the internal rates of return on many investment strategies are much higher than on real estate, especially owner occupied dwellings.

    To paraphrase the current VW ad (โ€œHave a baby for love, not for German engineering), โ€œBuy a house for living, do not buy a house for speculation.โ€ You hear about the bonanzas is house speculation hyped by real estate agents that is not what you learn from careful analysis of regional data.

    While dwelling speculation is bad, far more money is lost than is made in raw land speculation. Raw land speculation loses were the major component of the REIT recession and the Savings and Loan recession. Loans on badly located and inefficient sized dwellings are the lynchpin of the mortgage meltdown. In the end citizens pay for the bail outs of speculators.

    Both D 1) and 2) are directly related to that fact that there is too much land held for urban land uses and that which is developed is dysfunctional because the total location variable costs are not fairly allocated.

    This is the first of four posts on Elementary Rules and Realities, the others will focus on โ€œThe Role of the Media,โ€ โ€œSwift Boating the Mortgage Crisisโ€ and โ€œThe Bottom Line.โ€

    As you can guess, all Elementary Rules and Realities relate to Agency, Enterprise and Institutional actions that generate dysfunctional human settlement patterns.

    EMR


  • Brace Yourself. Here Come the State Spending Cuts.

    The outlines of the spending cuts that Gov. Timothy M. Kaine has in mind to close a looming $3 billion revenue shortfall in the $77 billion biennial budget are coming into view.

    As Jeff Schapiro reports in the Times-Dispatch today, Kaine will focus on controlling state payroll, which runs about $5 billion annually (or $10 billion over two years). The commonwealth could save $250 million by canceling 2 percent pay raises for state employees this year and next. Layoffs are an option, but the savings are offset by expensive severance benefits to state employees. I’m betting that vacant positions will remain unfilled, with reductions to be made through normal attrition.

    The state can tap another $400 million or more in the rainy day fund, and it can finance some construction projects by borrowing money instead of paying cash. (Whether that option makes sense in today’s financial environment, however, may be debatable.)

    The Governor has set an example to the rest of the state administration by finding $900,000 in cuts from the Executive office budget this year and $1.4 million next year. The second-year cuts will amount to 10 percent of the office budget. And that’s on top of $667,000 in cuts from previous initiatives.

    According to a press release, cuts in the Governor’s Office include elimination of 8 positions through layoffs and turnover, trimming the grocery bill for “official events” by 25 percent, reductions in travel on state business, cuts in staff cell phone costs, newspaper subscriptions and travel, sending more invitations by email instead of snail mail, and smaller dry cleaning bills for linens at special events. You know the Governor’s Office is getting serious when the order goes out: No more bottled water.

    Bacon’s bottom line: Emergency measures are fine for emergencies, which the current budget crisis clearly is. But the culture of state government is such that the costs inevitably creep back ito the system. The Warner administration cut hundreds of jobs, but a few years later, state employment levels hit new highs. In other words, there were few long-term gains in productivity that allowed the state to do the same work with fewer employees. Imposing temporary austerity measures is no way to run an organization for long-term efficiency.

    The commonwealth has many smart, highly motivated employees. I’ve met them. They’d be an asset to any organization. But state government has lots of deadwood, too, which no one seems able to root out. I have friends who work as contractors for state government who tell stories, which should horrify tax-paying citizens, of nincompoops in do-nothing jobs. Stae workforce productivity remains a huge issue.

    Have you seen any new restructuring and reform initiatives lately? Does anyone know which of the restructuring initiatives of the Warner administration have been completed? It does little good to slash costs for a year or two then return to Business As Usual. State government needs to find ways to drive costs out of the system permanently.

    Gov. Kaine will have more to say about state spending priorities later today. His personal parsimony sets a good example. But tax-paying Virginians deserve a lot more.


  • The Gulag Archipelago Goes to Farmville

    Virginia’s Gulag Archipelago keeps growing.

    Back a decade or so ago, Republican Gov. George Allen got attention for his proposals to expand the state’s prison system. That was then.

    Today, the hot idea is to create “detention centers” for those hordes of illegal immigrants that we all know are overrunning the Old Dominion doing such awful things as working as gardeners or in poultry or crab-picking plants.

    Up in places like mostly white and affluent Prince William County, the Republican board of supervisors won’t tolerate such Barbarians at the Gate. County police are under orders to check the citizenship of anyone stopped for any crime, including running a stop sign. They are finding that their provincial nationalism if not racism is expensive

    Once you round up all of those illegal immigrants, typically dark-skinned and Spanish-speaking ones, where do you put them while they are waiting to be deported back to Mexico City or Tegulcigalpa or wherever?

    The Town of Farmville and a tiny Richmond-based outfit called ICA-Farmville have an idea.

    They have won approval from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for a $21 million detention facility that will have 1,040 beds just for the typically dark-skinned people waiting the weeks or months for deportation. Town Manager Gerald Spates said that Farmville can use the detention center because it will employ about 200 people, have a $8.2 million payroll a year and generate more than $700,000 in taxes. Farmville is a college town with a few furniture stores so it can use the money.

    The detention center was originally planned for Cumberland County but was rejected. “We decided it would be a good fit and we were very supportive of it,” Spates told me. So, Farmville sought and won an ICE contract for the facility.

    The managers of the detention (or minimum security prison depending upon your point of view) is an outfit based in Richmond called ICA/Farmville. ICA stands for “Immigration Centers of America” and its principals include Ken Newsome who is also president of AMC Bakery in Richmond. Other partners are Warren Coleman and Russell Harper of Harper Associates in Richmond. ICA-Farmville did not return repeated phone calls.

    I could not find out if ICA-Farmville had any experience running detention centers with human beings. I did find out that Newsome gave money to Republican Jim Gilmore’s senatorial campaign, however.

    That’s not the only politically-connected contribution involved. The project has won two grants for $581,760 for water, sewer and other infrastructure for the center from the Virginia Tobacco Indemnification and Community Revitalization Commission. This is the highly politicized body that decides how the state’s share of the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement with four tobacco companies will be spent.

    So, once again, we have people in Virginia making a buck trading in human lives. Richmond, after all, used to be the nation’s No. 1 slave auction center. It raises other points as well:

    The number of illegal immigrants has dropped below the 12 million estimate, Pew Research says. The reason is obvious. With the economy heading south fast to recession it’s harder to find jobs. Plus, the immigration crackdowns have made dark-skinned Spanish people skittish about being around whether they are illegal or not. With trends such as these, one wonders about the long term viability about the Farmville project.

    The Washington Post has reported that ICE’s admininistration of illegals in Virginia is a bad joke. It takes lots of time and money to move captured suspects around and haul them hither and yon to appear before a judge, often via videoconferencing. The system the Post says, is beset by waste and dysfunction. Maybe the detention center is a good idea, if this is the case. But shouldn’t efforts be made to fix the system first before building prisons?

    You have to wonder what the tobacco commission people are thinking. Why are awful projects like this considered so worthy of our share of the tobacco company settlement. Let me give you an idea what other states do with their tobacco money. In North Carolina, the Golden Leaf Foundation, that state’s tobacco commission, has given $20 million to Historically Black North Carolina Central University to create the Biomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise (BRITE). The purpose of BRITE is to help train minority college students for jobs with top pharmaceutical firms in Research Triangle Park nearby.

    Funny that when I mentioned this contrast to an editor of mine up in the DC area, he just laughed and said, “Well that’s Virginia for you.”

    I still am puzzled why this state and some of the people in it are so inclined to create prisons. Spates tells me that the detention facility will feature bunk style housing with televisions and computers.

    But let’s face it. It is still a prison. A handful of private investors will profit from it. Farmville will scarf up some limited tax dollars. And instead of using public money for more worthy purposes, such as helping train a new generation of drug researchers, Virginia will merely end up with more cooks and prison guards and “Cool Hand Luke” style wardens.

    What we have here is “Failure to Communicate.”

    –Peter Galuszka


  • The Pocahontas Parkway Experiment

    Contrast the news of canceled construction projects and maintenance cut-backs at the Virginia Department of Transportation with the ongoing investment that Transurban is making in the 8.8-mile Pocahontas Parkway toll road southeast of Richmond.

    Last week Bacon’s Rebellion published a communique from VDOT Commissioner David Ekern outlining how he planned to prioritize spending — and where he plans to cut back — on the state road system. With stagnant revenues and rising expenses, VDOT has no choice but pare spending and make unpleasant choices.

    The Australian toll road operator, by contrast, has a dedicated stream of toll revenue, and it has the latitude to raise tolls. Indeed, it boosted its toll at the main tollbooth last year from $2.25 to $2.50 in January, with plans to raise it another quarter in January 2009.

    Operating a 99-year lease, Transurban is incentivized to manage the property for long-term profit, not short-term return. Accordingly, it investing in a 1.6-mile connector road linking the highway to Richmond International Airport — a route that will save south-bound passengers several minutes of driving time — and in making operational improvements to the highway. These include:

    • Installing sensors on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Bridge (crossing the James River) to continually monitor snow and ice conditions. The sensors will tie into VDOT’s transportation operations center.
    • Installing cameras, panic buttons and other security measures at the toll booth and administrative offices.
    • Planting native grasses, flowers, shrubs and willow trees in the right of way to promote erosion control and improve storm-water retention.

    Here’s what really intrigues me. Transurban actually advertises to promote awareness of the time-saving (and gas-saving, pollution-reducing) alternative that its toll road provides. Wall-sized poster in to corridors, greets arriving airport passengers trekking to the baggage claim and ground transportation areas. โ€œGet home sooner,โ€ the ad exhorts. โ€œPocahontas 895.โ€

    Renting wall space in the airport is not exactly a huge marketing expenditure, but it represents a departure from VDOT’s no-advertising approach. Markets do require information to operate efficiently, and advertising helps fill the information void.

    For the most part, I regard Transurban’s initiatives as positives, especially its roadway plantings. I do worry about one thing. It is in Transurban’s interest to promote real estate development along its route, in a mostly undeveloped portion of Henrico County. What may be in Transurban’s best interest is not necessarily in the best interest of the inhabitants of the Richmond New Urban Region. More development means more drivers paying tolls, which benefits Transurban. However, the scatteration of development drives up the cost of providing utilities, public services… and secondary roads. Such development puts cars on roads ill equipped to handle them, eventually leading to congestion, safety issues and demands for improvements that cost money the public does not have.

    Those costs are not Transurban’s problem. I have no evidence that Transurban is actively promoting dysfunctional development along its route, but I would be mightily distressed if such evidence surfaced.

    The Transurban experience on I-895 will be an interesting experience to watch — a leading indicator of what we can expect as Virginia privatizes more of its highways.


  • Economic Development in Days Gone By

    In the late 18th century, Virginia was the most populous and most powerful of the 13 colonies. So dominant was the Old Dominion in the affairs of the young United States that it contributed four of the first five presidents of the new republic. But a half century after the nationโ€™s founding, Virginia had not only lost its preeminence but fallen dramatically behind the northern states in population growth and wealth creation. In her book, โ€œDominion of Memories,โ€ Williams College professor Susan Dunn asks why.

    Dunnโ€™s thesis is that the Tidewater slave-holding aristocracy, hewing to the agrarian, small-government ideals of Thomas Jefferson, held back the stateโ€™s progress. While northern states embarked upon internal improvements, encouraged manufacturing and educated its citizens, Virginiaโ€™s aristocracy restricted the franchise, dominated the political system, and thwarted the entrepreneurial vitality that threatened to overturn the stateโ€™s agrarian society.

    There is much to recommend Dunnโ€™s book, especially for those who, like me, have only the foggiest notion of Virginia history between the American Revolution and the Civil War. It makes fascinating reading, and I recommend it to the readers of the Baconโ€™s Rebellion blog. While the slave-holding aristocracy undoubtedly did hamper Virginiaโ€™s evolution to an industrial economy, it strikes me, based upon information that Dunn herself provides, that there was more to the story.

    What most intrigued me was Dunnโ€™s chapter, โ€œRoads, Canals and Railroads: Moving in Place,โ€ which chronicled Virginiaโ€™s โ€œtransportation policyโ€ of the early 19th century. Although Virginia lacked the economic vitality of the northern states, it was not entirely devoid of entrepreneurial energy. The Old Dominion took part in the canal-building mania that gripped the nation around the turn of the century. Business interests launched canals along the James River and the Potomac River with the goal of breaching the barrier of the Blue Ridge the Alleghenies to link up with the fast-developing Ohio River Valley.

    Neither enterprise succeeded in its goals. (Dunn doesnโ€™t explain why, although I suspect it was a matter of geography โ€“ the distances involved and the challenges entailed with crossing mountain chains required far too much capital.) But the canals did form a potent constituency that lobbied effectively against the competitive threat of the railroad. Writes Dunn:

    The investors in the James and Potomac canals, along with Tidewater planters, were among the first in the 1820s to oppose the development of railroads in Virginia, especially lines leading into the interior of the state that might have competed with the canals. Even into the 1850s, their influence held sway in the General Assembly, where legislators killed proposals for the expansion of railroads in some parts of Virginiaโ€ฆ

    The canal interests ultimately hampered the economic growth of the entire state. A vital line, only 15 miles long, from the Midlothian coal district to Richmond was delayed again and again.

    (Ah, the power of special interests โ€“ plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose.)

    But the economic case for building railroads was so compelling that the canals could not halt construction forever. In 1816, the General Assembly created a state-controlled โ€œBoard of Public Worksโ€ to mobilize capital and invest in internal improvements. The board would invest in private companies if entrepreneurs supplied three-fifths of the capital; the board would supply the rest. (The first public-private partnerships!)

    Dunn argues that the Board was a half-hearted effort, lacking sufficient capital to carry out its task. But it could be equally argued that the institution was flawed from its inception by allowing political considerations to supplant economic ones.
    The problem, noted Dunn, is that the Board of Public Works had no overarching vision for conceiving, planning or coordinating projects, much less to build a unified transportation system. Instead of cooperating, cities competed with one another to gain commercial advantage. Furthermore, the Board spread its resources so thinly โ€“ among 11 navigation companies, seven railroads and 38 turnpikes โ€“ that it accomplished little. Writes Dunn: โ€œThe projects were unprofitable, the quality of work poor.โ€

    Itโ€™s not clear to me how this represents a failure of the Jeffersonian vision of limited government. Rather, it looks like a classic case of a failed government program, in which Virginiaโ€™s scarce investment capital was misallocated by a government board driven by political considerations rather than economic ones.

    By the 1850s, Virginia had built 2,000 miles of railroads. Nineteen different companies operated rail lines. But the lines were often unconnected and had incompatible gauges; Richmond was served by six different rail lines, but there was no central depot for the transfer of cargo or passengers. While Virginia was busy launching under-funded enterprises in response to special-interest lobbying, it failed in a crucial legitimate role that government could have played: creating a blueprint that would have allowed private companies to integrate into a unified system.

    By the 1850s, Virginia could boast almost 5,000 manufacturing establishments, writes Dunn. That may have been an impressive number by the standards of the slave-holding states, but it lagged industry and commerce in the North. Dunn argues that โ€œif the state government had energetically supported a network of internal improvements, Virginia might have developed large, vital cities that could have attracted skilled labor, capital and consumers.โ€ Virginia possessed coal and iron deposits โ€“ it potentially could have been a leader in the industrial revolution.

    Dunn has captured elements of the full picture, but I sense that her analysis is incomplete. While Virginiaโ€™s entrepreneurial vitality lagged that of the north, it exceeded that of other slave-holding states. Where did that industrializing impulse come from? Who were Virginiaโ€™s ante-bellum entrepreneurs and where did they get their capital? What role did the tariff (the subject of a different chapter) play in transferring wealth to Northern states and inhibiting capital formation in Virginia? To what extent did the Board of Public Works misallocate the limited supply of capital that was available?

    โ€œDominion of Memoriesโ€ may not have all the answers, but Virginia public policy junkies will find Dunnโ€™s account of the great economic development issues of Virginiaโ€™s early 19th century to be fascinating nonetheless.


  • WORTH NOTING AGAIN

    It is worth noting on the first Friday in October when:

    The front page of WaPoโ€™s Business Section has stories on persistent economic worries (employment, factory orders), risky trading practices, Pearlsteinโ€™s column is titled โ€œGreed is Fine. Itโ€™s Stupidity That Hurtsโ€ and the big story is โ€œPinched and Watching Pennies: Long a Bulwark of the Economy, Consumer Spending Stallsโ€ that:

    The only systematic, overarching strategy to achieve to sustainable economic prosperity โ€“ as well as social stability and physical (ecological) sustainability โ€“ is to evolve functional human settlement patterns.

    Dysfunctional human settlement patterns are the driver of the Mobility and Access Crisis. The Chevron ad on page A-5 of WaPo says: โ€œI will leave the car home more.โ€ How can the smiling model do that when Large, Private Vehicles are the only way to get to Jobs / Services / Recreation / Amenity?

    Dysfunctional human settlement patterns are the driver of the Affordable and Accessible Housing Crisis. The right size house in the right location would allow citizens to work for Regionally competitive wages, achieve competitive levels of productivity and enjoy a quality life.

    Dysfunctional human settlement patterns ARE the Helter Skelter crisis in the Countryside. They have driven up the speculative price (not value) of land for urban land uses to the point that those who want to farm cannot afford to do it. That is especially true in the R=20 to R=100 Radius Band where fresh, secure food could be produced for the urban population.

    A sustainable Countryside outside the Clear Edge provides the air, water, food, fiber and biological diversity necessary to support urban life and an urban civilization. An attractive Countryside also provides Recreation / Ameinty that supports those who choose to live in the Countryside and pay all their location-variable costs.

    AOL, shooting themselves in the foot with advertisers by the way, today profiles 43 Top Ways to Waste money. The list includes a lot of good ideas โ€“ do not buy new cars, do not buy big houses, do not spend money creating mown grass pollution (aka, lawns), do not buy things you do not need, do not fight wars on false pretenses, etc.

    Taken together all 43 are the โ€œgoodโ€ ideas โ€“ if they had been implemented in 1973. However, Business-As-Usual has resulted in a nation-state economy dependent on wasting natural capital, importing energy and cheap labor and begging for loans from foreign investors.

    In 2008 the 43 good ideas โ€“ and all the Green Greed one can pile on the roof โ€“ will make some feel better. These ideas may keep a few from falling over the edge but the overall trajectory is still down.

    EMR


  • Ekern Makes the Tough Decisions at VDOT

    David Ekern, the Virginia Department of Transportation Comissioner, has kept a lower profile than his predecessor Philip Shucet, but he seems to be a capable, even impressive, administrator in his own way. He has been thinking hard about how to maximize Virginia’s road/highway revenues in an era where revenues are stagnant and costs, especially for materials, are rising.

    A VDOT employee has passed along an e-mail communication to much (or all) of the VDOT workforce in which Ekern lays out “what I believe about our future and the challenges we are facing.” In a logical and dispassionate fashion, he makes the case for focusing on the “basics” and the “have-to-haves,” such as maintenance of pavement and bridges, over desirables such as mowing and hedge trimming. Ekern also talks about targeting 18,000 to 20,000 miles of roads that bear the most traffic, and consolidating VDOT’s organizational structure.

    Sounds like Ekern is the kind of guy you want on the team when you’re managing for hard times. Given the parlous condition of the economy and state finances right now, we’ll be facing hard times for a long time to come. His communication follows:

    Over the last week you have likely heard Secretary of Transportation Pierce Homer say that every part of our business must be “on the table” as we face changing economic conditions. You have read in my previous correspondence that no part of VDOT “will be untouched by the actions we must take” in order to manage the huge shift in transportation funding we are experiencing.

    Over the last seven days, I have had the opportunity to visit with over 500 of you from all over the state to hear your concerns, gather your ideas and listen to your questions. I will meet with more of you in the coming weeks. This helps me to develop plans to address these difficult times.

    I want to share what I believe about our future and the challenges we are facing. More.


  • I’ll Be Back

    Please forgive my unexplained absence from this blog over the past week. I have taken on a full-time job, which starts today, and my time has been consumed by the winding up of a number of projects and ensuring a smooth hand-off on others. As soon as I get acclimated to my new schedule, I shall return.


  • TOWARD A SUSTAINABLE TRAJECTORY

    Todayโ€™s events suggest the existing governance structure is skating ever closer to the abyss. On Sunday, 21 September we posted a note titled โ€œFundamental Transformationโ€ that focused on Fundamental Transformation of governance structure.

    As of 28 September there were 37 comments following the post but only one addressed the issue of Fundamental Transformation of governance structure. That one (Anon 7:21) discussed a change that would abrogate a major tenant of the Constitution.

    In our view, Fundamental Transformation of governance structure requires NO change in the Constitution.

    The Constitution is fine, the problem is that implementation of the intent of the Constitution is thwarted by a failure of governance structure to evolve. This failure to evolve reflects a complete lack of understanding about the economic, social and physical changes that have taken place over the past 220 years.

    There has been a failure to respond to changes with a contemporary version of the governance structure that is framed by the Constitution because those in control benefit from Business-As-Usual. For this reason they deny the need for change providing only lame excuses such as โ€œtraditional values.โ€

    Groveton made a very important point in the comments:

    โ€œAmerica has overspent and/or under-taxed for too long.โ€

    He is absolutely right. Whether by taxes, fees or sweat equity, citizens individually and collectively must contribute more to the good of society and less to the greed and aggrandizement of a few at the top of the Ziggurat. If there is to be a sustainable trajectory for civilization there must be a new metric of citizen well being, a commitment to Balance and less focus on competition. There must also be a fair allocation of costs, especially location-variable costs.

    As we note in the post โ€œFROM CNN:โ€

    โ€œCitizens of the US of A cannot continue to expect to live off of natural capital, imported energy and loans from foreign investors.โ€

    We argue that the economy must be restructured so that citizens do not have to rely on Mass OverConsumption โ€“ specifically buying more Large, Private Vehicles and buying more Wrong-Size Dwellings in the wrong location as the way to end recessions and create a prosperous, sustainable society.

    A sustainable trajectory for civilization requires a steady state economy, not a consumption driven โ€œgrowthโ€ economy.

    In this regard:

    Small IS beautiful and Speed does kill.

    With respect to Small IS beautiful: The Winner-Take-All / Consumption-Uber-Alles / Supercapitalism trajectory is based on the assumption that big is better and biggest is most competitive. Global organizations may be super-competitive from a price perspective but not from a value / sustainability perspective. There are finite limits to competition.

    As we document in โ€œThe Shape of the Future,โ€ the first step toward a sustainable trajectory is to evolve functional human settlement patterns. That means a recognition that the New Urban Region is the Fundamental Building Block of contemporary society and that sustainable Regions are made up of Balanced Communities.

    Organizations โ€“ Enterprises, Agencies and Institutions โ€“ that are larger than Region in scope must become the focus of intelligent Transformation. That is impossible to do within the existing governance structure.

    At some point in the near future citizens will look at Global / Multi-National and dominate nation-state Enterprises, Agencies and Institutions the way tourists not look at the Pyramids:

    โ€œWhy did they do that?โ€

    โ€œHow did they get all those people to work so hard for the aggrandizement of a few?โ€

    Some have considered mega-Agencies with suspicion for a long time. More and more view mega-Enterprises as a problem, not a solution. Next up are mega-Institutions and MegaRegions.

    Credit where credit due: MainStream media is now raising a caution flag: The current bailout proposals will create more mega financial Enterprises, ones that are too big to fail e.g. Enterprise socialism. So far it is only a yellow flag. Why only a yellow flag when it should be obvious? For this answer see THE ESTATES MATRIX.

    With respect to Speed kills: The complexity of society and the rate of churn increases the befuddlement of the RHTCs and paralyzes the aging population. Research shows marketers that Forest Gump spends more when he is befuddled. We now have $700 million of befuddlement according to some Agency heads. Without Fundamental Transformation there will be a lot more and nothing with which to cover the debt.

    EMR


  • God, Jesus and Virginia’s $3 Billion Deficit

    Taking a break from the all-consuming matter of the six chaplains who resigned from the state police over the prohibition of mentioning Jesus in their invocations — in which the Northern Virginia Daily, the Washington Post, the Lynchburg News & Advance, and the Richmond Times Dispatch collectively devote 1,516 words to the subject — we turn our attention to the yawning, $3 billion state budget deficit.

    And what do we find in the newspapers today?

    A 123-word brief in the Times-Dispatch on Attorney General Bob McDonnell’s moves to rein in his expenses (plus 127 words more on the same topic in the WaPo); a 498-word article in the News & Advance on threats to mental health services; and a 410-word story in the Virginian-Pilot on how Gov. Timothy M. Kaine is looking at cuts to the state workforce and, next year, cuts to public school budgets. Grand total: 1,158 words.

    Judging by the volumes of ink dedicated to topics competing for readership, many Virginians aren’t remotely serious about the real problems confronting the commonwealth. Purely symbolic issues stemming from America’s raging culture wars are so much more diverting.

    Pardon me for dissenting, but a debate over whether or not state chaplains mention “God” but not “Jesus” in their invocations is stupefyingly not what we need right now.

    Implicit in the debate as it has been framed so far is that, while the commonwealth deems it unacceptable to mention “Jesus,” it is permissable to mention a single, monotheistic deity acceptable to Christians, Jews and Muslims. Ah, but would that not “offend” the polytheistic faith traditions like Hinduism and animism or the non-theistic traditions like Buddhism? Are the Abrahamic religious traditions privileged somehow? Let’s not even get started on the need for a follow-up ruling on how to treat the “Holy Ghost.” Perhaps we need to create an office of state theologian to sort it all out.

    Fortunately, some state officials remain undistracted by the questions currently consuming the State Police. Bob McDonnell announced yesterday that he is cutting his office spending by $3.8 million, or 9 percent, to do his part to address the state’s revenue shortfall. Economies include a hiring freeze, leaving currently vacant positions unfilled and eliminating some fax machines and phone lines.

    Additionally, McDonnell and his 10 executive attorneys are taking two percent reductions in their salaries, for a savings of $17,000. The AG also is giving up the leased 2005 Ford Explorer the state provides its attorney general, saving another $5,000 over the rest of his term, which expires in January 2010.

    The $3.8 million savings represents about 0.125% of the statewide budget shortfall, so there’s a loooong way to go. But McDonnell has a high-profile position, and he’s setting the right tone. Let’s just hope he’s not called upon to weigh in on the matter of how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.


  • Creeping Socialism in Virginia Agriculture

    The steady transformation of the United States economy from a predominantly market-driven economy to a rent-seeking economy proceeds apace. Nowhere is this more evident than in the agricultural sector where, despite rising commodity prices, government accounts for an increasing percentage of industry receipts.

    The chart above, showing government payments as a percentage of Virginia gross farm income, comes from a recently published report, “The Economic Impact of Agriculture and Forestry on the Commonwealth of Virginia.” (Click on the image to see a larger, clearer version of the chart.)

    Who, or what, benefits from this wealth transfer? Are consumers any better off? Are Virginia farms becoming more environmentally sustainable? Are agriculture products more competitive in the global economic arena? Are we at least contributing to Ray Hyde’s retirement fund? Across the board, the answer appears to be no.


  • Now, Now, Children, You Need to Learn to Get Along with One Another

    Let me see if I’ve got this straight. The Commonwealth Virginia is facing a $3 billion shortfall in its two-year budget, a hiring freeze has been put into place, and state agency chiefs face a deadline to submit contingencies for chopping spending by up to 15 percent. And what has Virginia’s newspapers all in a tizzy?

    Five members of the Virginia State Police chaplains program.

    The chaplains resigned after being told they must abstain from praying in the name of Jesus or Christ during department-sanctioned events involving the public. (I am following the account appearing in the Times-Dispatch, although the Washington Post, Virginian-Pilot and at least four other newspapers published their own stories.)

    It seems that state police Superintendent W. Steven Flaherty directed the agency’s 17 chaplains to begin delivering neutral or non-denominational prayers at public events such as trooper graduation ceremonies and annual memorial services for fallen officers. Five chaplains have resigned in protest.

    The state followed a predictable multi-cultural line. Flaherty said government agencies need to be “inclusive and respectful of the varied ethnicities, cultures and beliefs of our employees, their families and citizens at-large,” implying that prayers mentioning the name of Jesus are offensive to minority religious communities (or, more likely, militant atheist, ACLU types). For their part, the chaplains intemperately say the order disses Jesus. Said one: “What we have here is an attack on the name of Jesus, on the name of Christ. And I’m not going to sit back and just let it happen.”

    Oh, brother. There has got to be some way to recognize the fact that the overwhelming majority of people who practice a religion in Virginia are Christian while at the same time acknowledging that there are increasing numbers of Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, Jews, Druids, Wiccans and animists who do not embrace Christianity. Are we so obtuse that we can’t work in good faith to accommodate the sensitivities of all? Is it really that difficult?

    As long as our culture celebrates aggrievement and victimhood, I suppose, it may well be impossible to accommodate everyone.