by Kim Acquaviva
At the University of Virginia (UVA), we stand with our feet firmly planted in two worlds: the world of our founding and the world we now inhabit. The tension between those two worlds is an alchemical force, capable of transforming memory into momentum and history into hope. It is this very tension that propels the university ever forward.
UVAโs Board of Visitors also straddles two different worlds, per se. According to the โStatement of Visitor Responsibilities — Board of Visitors of the University of Virginia — December 7, 2018,โ members of the Board of Visitors are expected to serve โโฆ as conduits for conveying the interests of citizens and political leaders of the Commonwealth to the University.โ At the same time, they are expected to โโฆactively safeguard principles of academic freedom for the University and its faculty and endeavor to protect the University from outside influences seeking improperly to shape it.โ
Considering the recent BOV resolutions designed to compel UVA to carry out President Trumpโs executive orders (consistent with directives from Attorney General Miyares and, by extension, Governor Youngkin), the BOV must grapple with a question that strikes at the heart of our identity as an institution: should BOV members prioritize serving as the conduit for conveying the interests of the Governor and AG over protecting the University from outside influences seeking improperly to shape it?ย Put another way: should the University abandon Thomas Jeffersonโs call to โfollow truth wherever it may leadโ and instead allow elected officials to define truth on our behalf?
The news regarding Columbia University agreeing to President Trumpโs list of demands increases my sense of urgency that UVAโs Board of Visitors needs to grapple with these questions sooner rather than later. The University of Virginia cannot fulfill its mission if the scope, focus, or direction of scholarly inquiry is restricted to align with the ideology of the sitting Presidentโregardless of party affiliation. Students and faculty alike cannot follow truth freely if the price of federal funding is compliance with a political agenda.











