The making of an intellectual monoculture at UVA
by James A. Bacon
“Conservative students at the University of Virginia,” a fourth-year student once confided to me, “know who all the conservative professors are. … All seven of them.”
That was only a slight exaggeration. Through my work with the Jefferson Council I have identified dozen faculty members openly identifying as conservative and/or libertarian out of roughly 1,700 faculty members. I have met three or four more not yet willing to come out of hiding.

Whatever the precise number, it is pitifully small. And it shrank by one this month when James W. Ceaser retired from the Department of Politics, where he has taught for half a century. He ran the Program for Constitutionalism and Democracy (PCD), which provided the few courses at the University where students could gain exposure to major intellectual traditions of American politics, including the thinking of the founding fathers.
Ceaser’s efforts to find a replacement to run the program with a professor sharing similar philosophical views long foundered on a reef of indifference. He has no idea if the program will survive in a form remotely resembling his vision for it. With no one passionately devoted to the program’s founding spirit, he fears, it could well be co-opted to serve other ends.
UVA has become a political monoculture. Despite their reputations as counter-culture radicals, Baby Boomer professors were an intellectually diverse lot. As Boomer faculty members retire, UVA is replacing them almost uniformly with younger scholars with a center-left orientation. The tale of the Center for Constitutionalism and Democracy is a case study in what that process looked like and how, despite the protestations of President Jim Ryan that he is committed to intellectual diversity, conservatives are approaching extinction at UVA.
The problem isn’t that conservative professors get purged or canceled, says Ceaser, it’s that departments dominated by leftist professors don’t give attention to conservative ideas and research, and they are not inclined to hire or promote those who are. The indifference runs through the academic hierarchy from deans and department heads to the provost and president.
“The lack of interest is endemic,” Ceaser says. “No one is pushing for intellectual balance.”
(more…)














