
by Dick Hall-Sizemore
The U.S. Supreme Court, in its eagerness to enhance the power of the presidency, has potentially created a real mess over the question of birthright citizenship.
Instead of ruling on the constitutionality of the Presidentโs Executive Order ending birthright citizenship, the Court limited its ruling to the issuance of nationwide injunctions by district courts. The Court ruled that district court judges do not have the authority to issue injunctions affecting persons or entities that were not a party to the case before them. The Court granted the Presidentโs request to stay the nationwide injunctions issued by the district courts, but โonly to the extent that the injunctions are broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue.โ
The injunctions in two instances were issued in cases brought by state Attorneys General, suing the federal government over the implementation of the Executive Order. They were granted standing to sue, the district courts issued nationwide stays, and the relevant appeals courts upheld them. Because the Supreme Court order allowed a district court to issue a stay applicable to the plaintiffs in these cases, i.e. the states, the stay will still be effective in those states.
Maryland was one of the states involved in those suits in which a stay was ordered. So was North Carolina. Virginia was not.
(more…)













