By Steve Haner
Dominion Energy Virginiaโs proposed changes to how and how much it charges data centers for electricity appear to have divided the industry, based on testimony filed at the Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC).
The utilityโs ideas are in general being supported — with some caveats — by the Office of the Attorney General and the staff of the SCC, both of which are charged by law with watching out for consumers.
Several state legislators have also filed letters supportive of Dominionโs application with the State Corporation Commission, but they avoid taking positions on the many specific provisions that the data centers have complained about. If the typical SCC case is as complex as rocket science, this one borders on high energy particle physics.ย
โI support the idea of a separate class for such customers, agree with the need for significant minimum charges, and believe that Dominion’s proposal should be a floor, not a ceiling,โ wrote Senator Scott Surovell, D-Fairfax, chair of the legislatureโs Commission on Electric Utility Regulation. The prize for understatement goes to Senator Jennifer Boysko, D-Fairfax, who put in her letter: โI acknowledge that consensus may be elusive.โ
One of the strongest statements in opposition to the proposal was filed by Google, which just this week stood beside Governor Glenn Youngkin to announce another $9 billion in Virginia capital investments. A state media that was paying any attention might have picked up some of the controversy to ask about in the news conference.ย
Amazon Data Services, on the other hand, filed testimony generally supportive of Dominion. Microsoftโs expert is closer to the middle, focused on major amendments to Dominionโs proposal but not calling for rejectionย Three 800-pound economic and political gorillas, three different positions for the SCC to ponder. The file contains many more.















