by Matt Hurt

In December JLARC released a report on the School Performance and Support Framework (SPSF), Virginiaโs new accountability system.ย The report states that the new system is better than the old Accreditation system, but improvements are needed.ย From the perspective of an educator who has spent the last twenty years focusing on student outcomes and accountability, I largely agree with the report.ย The following are some facets of the system that should be reviewed and hopefully improved.
Complexity
I used to believe that the old Accreditation system (our previous accountability system) was extremely convoluted. However, compared to the SPSF, I would now consider the old Accreditation system the model of simplicity.
Under the old Accreditation system, there were only a few things that were calculated differently among schools by level (elementary, middle, or high school), namely graduation rates, college and career readiness, and growth.ย Given that there was no summative score for each school, there was more inherent simplicity.ย There were thresholds for each of those categories to identify schools for overall support, and there were predetermined thresholds for subgroup performance for federal accountability purposes that everyone knew prior to beginning the school year.
(more…)










