
by Shaun Kenney
One of the great things about being a conservative is that we are inherently an anti-ideology. As the late William F. Buckley Jr. once put it, the great task of the modern conservative movement is to stand athwart history yelling STOP!
Yet in a wider sense, it is far easier for conservatives to tack with the wind than our counterparts on the left. Liberals tend to wed themselves to institutions and then find themselves besieged by conservatives who continue to ask why and progressives who demand more on the what and how.
One of the particular demands on the conservative movement at present is whether or not we are a big tent or a fortress.
More particular is this: do we have to surrender what we believe in order to become more palatable to the wider public?
Or is there simply a better way of packaging what we believe and describing why it matters to working class families? In short, if what we believe has a kernel of truth to it, isnโt persuasion better than fighting?
The truth is that Republicans are far better at adapting what we believe to the times than our counterparts on the left precisely because we keep asking the same question over and over again: Does this expand the cause of human freedom โ or not?
For Virginia Republicans, the sentiment is as old as there has been a Republican Party of Virginia โ thank you General William Mahone. The maxim was best articulated by one Richard D. Obenshain, who by sheer force of will resurrected what we know as the present-day Virginia GOP from mere footnote to statewide conscience, serving as state party chairman in 1972 before his U.S. Senate bid in 1978. (more…)

from Liberty Unyieldingย 





by Victoria Snitsar Churchill
from The Republican Standard

