• Judge: “Taxation without Representation is Constitutional”

    It’s indeed a sad day when a judge can rule that (as reported by the Washington Post):

    “nothing in the state or federal constitution blocks the General Assembly from setting up a regional “political subdivision” for the purpose of taxation. And the regional authority’s members are not required to be elected directly by the people, he ruled.” (emphasis added)

    No wonder the NVTA and the cabal of politicians pushing through this shameful bill (HB 3202), went shopping for a judge in the People’s Republic of Arlington! And even though, Circuit Judge Kendrick finds himself in a conflict-of-interest–as he is an Arlington resident and by definition a defendant in the suit brought by the NVTA to validate the bonds–he refused to recuse himself and let a disinterested court rule on the case.

    If the Virginia Supreme Court doesn’t overturn this decision on an expedited basis, Virginians will have done a full circle. We will become the subjects of unelected and unaccounted monarchs–only this time, the “monarchs” will be a bunch of do-good liberals and other profit-seeking businesses who plan on fleecing our wallets.

    Our founding fathers must be turning in their graves…

    Powered by ScribeFire.


  • Wilder and Obama

    I’ll be on WRVA tomorrow morning to discuss Doug Wilder’s commitment to work on behalf of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.

    I can’t recall Wilder ever coming out this early to say he’ll work on anyone’s behalf, though it still puts him months behind Tim Kaine.

    And say what you like about hizzoner — the man knows how to get out the vote (or at least Paul Goldman knows how to get out the vote for him). Should Obama become the nominee, itself a long shot owing to Clinton’s strength, having the Wilder machine working for him in Virginia and elsewhere in the South could sock the GOP in its electoral breadbasket.


  • Making the Most of University R&D Spending

    Increasingly, states are taking the lead in funding Research & Development in public universities, filling a gap left by federal inaction, contends Heike Mayer, an assistant professor of urban affairs at Virginia Tech, in a Times-Dispatch op-ed. Virginia supports R&D at its public universities, although the commitment trails that of many other states.

    Quoting from a Pew Center study, “Investing In Innovation,” she notes that successful states follow some simple guidelines:

    • Embed investments in a 21st-century innovation strategy that moves beyond funding discrete programs to making a coordinated set of investments.
    • Find your strengths — and needs — and fund R&D in those areas.
    • Invest in collaboration. Encourage, or even mandate, that universities, industry, and government work together.
    • Enlist experts. Seek advice from industry, people outside your state, and even from abroad.
    • Be consistent, but not to a fault. Commit to a cycle of investment and assessment.
    • Measure the results of funding, so you can be sure public dollars are well spent.

    It was a goal of the Warner administration to lift the rankings of Virginia’s major research universities — led by Virginia Tech, University of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth — among the nation’s top research universities. You don’t hear much about that anymore. Probably because the Virginia rankings haven’t been climbing. Raising one’s standards in the R&D rankings isn’t easy when every other university in the country is trying to raise its rankings as well.

    According to the latest National Science Foundation study, Virginia Tech, the Virginia state champ, ranked 56th in R&D spending in Fiscal 2005 with $290 million. That’s up from $167 million in 1998, an increase of about 73 percent. Impressive… but not as impressive enough to maintain its standing.

    The University of Virginia fell to a 69th place ranking, with $239 million in R&D. VCU hung in the top 100 with a 99th place ranking.

    I can’t find the documentation online, but as memory serves me, Virginia Tech stood as high as 49 or 50 in recent years, and UVa within the top 60. Do any readers know the numbers?

    Overall, Virginia universities conducted $914 million in R&D in Fiscal 2005, according to the NSF. We trailed:

    California ($6.3 billion)
    New York ($3.6 billion)
    Texas ($3.1 billion)
    Maryland ($2.6 billion)
    Pennsylvania ($2.4 billion)
    Massachusetts ($2.1 billion)
    Illinois ($1.8 billion)
    North Carolina ($1.7 billion)
    Florida ($1.5 billion)
    Ohio ($1.5 billion)
    Michigan ($1.5 billion)
    Georgia ($1.3 billion)
    Wisconsin ($1 billion)

    Missouri was nipping on our heels.


  • Boondoggle Projects and Decaying Infrastructure

    As New Orleans reinvents itself after Hurricane Katrina, political and civic leaders plan to cultivate tourism and “culture-based” industry. The big new idea, writes urbanologist Joel Kotkin, is a publicly subsidized, $1 billion Riverfront development catering to the “creative class.” While the city morphs into a “mildly raucous, hipper Disney World,” the long-term migration of the once-vibrant energy sector to Houston continues unabated. The new New Orleans may be a great place for saxaphone players to make a living, but it won’t offer much for traditional blue-collar and white-collar workers.

    The whole “creative class” thing has gotten out of control, Kotkin argues in an op-ed piece in today’s Wall Street Journal. American’s state and local governments are over-investing in glitzy arts and entertainment complexes, sports stadiums, luxury hotels, convention centers and light-rail lines, and under-investing in the maintenance of its mundane roads, bridges, water-sewer facilities and electric power lines.

    “Public capital spending on convention centers has doubled to $2.4 billion annually,” Kotkin writes. “Nationwide, 44 new or expanded centers are in planning or under construction.” By contrast, he adds, “The American Society of Civil Engineers says that $1.6 trillion must be spent over the next five years to prevent further deterioration. Only $900 billion is now earmarked.”

    Starving critical infrastructure in order to fund money-losing boondoggles like sports stadiums and convention centers is not a long-term path to prosperity, Kotkin contends. Until politicians adopt a coherent, back-to-basics strategy that funds real needs instead of pork-barrel projects, “we can look forward to more natural disasters, bridge collapses, subway malfunctions and power shortages.”

    What Kotkin doesn’t say, but I would add, is this: Many politicians have hijacked the rhetoric of Richard Florida’s “creative class” theory to justify their spending on the glitzy, “urban renewal” projects that Kotkin criticizes. The irony is that sports stadiums, convention centers and performing arts complexes are not what the creative class is looking for. Florida, the creatuve-class guru, regards them as largely a waste of money. He contends that the culturally, entrepreneurially and scientifically creative elements of society are lured to cities characterized by openness and tolerance. They also seek “authenticity” and street-level culture. None of those are attributes that are attainable through Business As Usual, pork barrel politics.

    Bottom line, we’re getting the worst of both worlds: We’re not funding our infrastructure needs, and we’re not even creating the kinds of communities that the creative class wants to live in. We’re just keeping the politicians in power.


  • Education Policy Courtesy of the Hospitality Industry

    How serious is Virginia about preparing itself for the globally competitive knowledge economy? Serious enough to jack up state support for K-12 education year after year with no accountability, but not serious enough to repeal the Kings Dominion law. As Joe Rogalsky at Examiner.com reminds us in an end-of-summer piece:

    Virginia is the only state in the country that prohibits public schools from opening before the Tuesday after Labor Day without permission from the Virginia Board of Education. Local school systems and education advocates have urged legislators for years to remove the restriction. … The Richmond-area amusement park and other tourist attractions are major proponents of delaying classes until September because they rely on student workers.

    Some day Virginia will get serious about education, but it won’t be any day soon.


  • Bicycle Heaven

    Ocracoke Island is the only place Iโ€™ve ever visited where nearly as many people use bicycles as cars to get around. Admittedly, this is a vacation community: People arenโ€™t in a hurry, and they enjoy being in the outdoors. But Iโ€™ve visited many other resort communities where peopleโ€™s posteriors seem super-glued to their car seats. Here in Ocracoke, bikes own the road. It can be downright intimidating at times to drive a car. You frequently find yourself picking your way through clots of cyclists, walkers, joggers, mothers pushing their baby carriages โ€“ even the occasional trail horse.

    I take it as a given that we Americans need our cars โ€“ at least one per household — to enjoy the kind of mobility we crave. But I also recognize that it is desirable to reduce our dependence upon the automobile, with its attendant congestion, gasoline consumption and pollution. Surely, there must be something we can learn from the Ocracoke experience. Somehow, without the imposition of draconian controls, this island community has evolved a human settlement pattern that is hospitable to cars, pedestrians and cyclists alike.

    Ocracoke refers to itself as a โ€œvillage.โ€ Because most of the island is wildlife preserve, all development is concentrated at one end. The village has a distinct center: a cluster of stores, restaurants and hotels lining Silver Lake (which, more accurately speaking, is a lagoon, where ferries land and sailing boats moor). Arrayed around this center is a historic neighborhood of charming cottages fronting winding, interconnected streets, and more recently developed areas where Nags Head-style beach houses line the roads. During tourist season, the village is occupied by up to 6,000 people.

    This is crucial: The geometry of the village configuration reduces the distances that must be traveled between any two destinations. In other Outer Banks communities, by contrast, pod-like subdivisions and shopping centers are strung out along a trunk road. There is no connectivity between pods, which forces all traffic onto a single heavily traveled artery. (There may be two parallel arteries in Nags Head โ€“ Iโ€™m not as familiar with that part of the Outer Banks). Bottom line: If you want to get somewhere in Ocracoke, the distances are shorter. That alone makes bicycling a more viable transportation option.

    The village pattern is conducive to bicycling in other ways. Ocracoke roads and lanes are narrow, and speed limits restrict driving to 20 miles per hour (although some speed demons zip along at 25 mph). As a consequence, people feel safer using the roads. Serious cyclists may not mind hugging the sides of arterial highway with cars zooming by at 55 mph, but you wonโ€™t find many families with children who would choose that way of getting around.

    Finally, there is never a problem parking your bike. Bike racks are ubiquitous. I cycle from my cottage to the local coffee shop every morning where I buy a bagel and cup of java, hook up my laptop into the WiFi connection, and catch up with the Bacon’s Rebellion blog. There is a bicycle rack out front, loaded up with some 20 bicycles. The parking lot, at this moment, contains only seven cars.

    Which brings up a related topicโ€ฆ parking. Because so many people travel by bicycle, and because bicycles take up so little room compared to automobiles, the village surface area is not consumed by acres of parking lots. Parking spaces are squeezed in here and there around the restaurants, stores and houses, and along the sides of the roads, and it all seems to work. Thereโ€™s enough room for everyone — as long as half the population is walking or bikding. The need for less parking creates a virtuous feedback loop โ€“ Ocracokeโ€™s ability to accommodate bicycles keeps the village looking like a village, not a shopping center where isolated buildings are surrounded by asphalt. That, in turn, makes walking and biking more inviting.

    Let me assure readers who jump to ridiculous conclusions that Iโ€™m not arguing that every community in the United States should be organized like Ocracoke. Iโ€™m not calling for the wholesale transformation of our transportation infrastructure to accommodate bicycles at an Ocracoke level of intensity. Iโ€™m simply suggesting that we can learn from Ocracoke, where a bicycle culture has arisen naturally. Developers building new communities de novo particularly should pay attention.

    (Photo credit: National Geographic.)


  • The Lie of Little Tax Increases

    Last month I was a guest at the Colonial Area Republican Men’s Association (CARMA) lunch in Williamsburg. A fellow handed out a table of Virginia State-Local Tax Burden Compared to the U.S. Average (1970-2007) – from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, Department of Commerce. I don’t recall if he made a pitch that the numbers were good or bad.

    I glanced at the numbers again today and they tell the same story that Harvard’s long-term study reported in the Jan 06 alumni magazine.

    • Harvard said the average American’s total tax burden went from 24% to 30% since the mid 70s.
    • This table shows the average Virginian’s total tax burden went from 29.2% to 32.9% – before the Republican-controlled General Assembly raised taxes in 04 and 07.

    If you take the average (median) income of Virginian families (Fairfax Govt web site) across the Commonwealth ($51,689) and in Fairfax ($88,123), it tells quite a tale. The firefighter married to a school teacher making $51k in RoVa and $88k in NoVa had their total tax burden increased 3% over 35 years (not including the latest hikes).

    The tax-and-spend Republicans and Democrats will say, “Virginia is a low tax state.” The increases are small. Look, only 3%.

    If greedy legislators at the local, Commonwealth and national governments hadn’t raised taxes, here is what it would mean to that family of four parented by a firefighter married to a school teacher.

    • RoVa family would have $159.37 more EVERY month.
    • NoVa family would have $270.08 more EVERY month.

    Go ask the firefighter married to the school teacher what that money would mean to them every month – starting right now.

    This is why ‘little’ tax increases are just a lie. That money means a lot to the average family. Even more to the working poor.

    How did government services improve, or what essential new ones were provided, since the early 70s to justify taking this money from the families of Virginia?

    Don’t say the 3% increase in taxes paid the salaries of the firefighter and the teacher. Their inflation adjusted wages didn’t profit from higher taxes.

    Understanding what a couple of hundred bucks means to working families is the genius of Gov. Jim Gilmore’s ‘No Car Tax’. The concept is lost on the Republican leadership in the General Assembly. Witness today’s back pedal on the super max traffic fines from HB 3202 – the ’07 Transportation Tax Panic – they aren’t offering to repeal the whole abortion of Republican principles, just stick the ‘fees’ to out of state drivers too.

    Ask your friends, family and neighbors what an extra couple of hundred dollars a month would mean to them. Maybe they should demand that government give the extra money they’ve taken since the 70s back.


  • THREE QUESTIONS ENCORE

    From bands to bombs, let us change the focus again.

    One of my favorite parts of BRIDGES will be Chapter 14, “What Did I Tell You? Anatomy of Opportunities Lost.”

    The chapter will include reference to many opportunities taken such as preserving the future of the Adirondacks but will focus on opportunities lost. It will contain links to old favorites such as “DOWN MEMORY LANE WITH KATRINA” and others. By the way there will be a new trip on memory lane with Katrina to mark the second anniversary of “rebuilding” the Gulf Coast out soon.

    This new “What Did I Tell You?” caught us by surprise.

    Some of you will recall that in the early days of Baconโ€™s Rebellion Blog, Jim opened the scope of subjects beyond the Commonwealth to explore thoughts on occasion of the US of Aโ€™s invasion of Iraq.

    Our 9th column for Baconโ€™s Rebellion was titled “Three Questions.” Under the second question (“Why is the United States repeating in Iraq, the same mistake made in Afghanistan?”) we outlined an alternative strategy for both pseudo-nation-states.

    Now WaPo, in a 17 August 2007 story by Robin Wright titled “Nonpartisan Group Calls for Three-State Split in Iraq” summarizes a report by the Fund for Peace.

    On 22 August CNN carried a story “U.S. Officials rethink hope for Iraq Democracy” quoting generals and intelligence sources.

    Read “Three Questions” at https://www.baconsrebellion.com/ and then these two stories at http://www.washingtonpost.com/ and http://www.cnn.com/ and see why it will be in “What Did I Tell You?”

    EMR


  • Agree to Disagree — Richmond Schools Edition

    Thad Williamson and I tackle the thorny issue of what to do about Richmond’s public schools in our latest “Agree to Disagree” columns.


  • Come Home, Scott Miller

    Now for something a little lighter… Scott Miller and the Commonwealth is one of the greatest rock and roll bands ever to emerge from Virginia. Itโ€™s a darn shame that Miller, the talented composer, lead vocalist and lead guitar, ever moved to Tennessee.

    The Old Dominion would be justified to claim Miller just for his music, which ranges from hard-driving rock to soft, Civil War-style ballads. But his lyrics are deeply rooted in Virginia, West Virginia and the South. They celebrate a sense of time, place and values that Virginians will find familiar. In the YouTube video clip above, he performs โ€œThe Amtrak Crescent,โ€ describing a railroad ride from New Orleans to Washington, D.C.

    Listen to the words. Miller has is sensitive to dysfunctional human settlement patterns! Watch out, Joni Mitchell (โ€œPave Paradiseโ€).

    You know, it used to be pretty on the Eastern Shore.
    Now itโ€™s more New York down to Baltimore.
    It takes so much effort just to move one train.
    Why does everything around me have to look the same?

    Virginia has many great bands and performers. The Dave Matthews Band is the best known, followed perhaps by Bruce Hornsby. Carbon Leaf, Susan Greenbaum and Robin Thompson — to name some Richmond-area musicians — are enormously talented as well. But Scott Miller beats them all. I donโ€™t know why he hasnโ€™t made it into the big time. Judging by the tenor of his lyrics, Iโ€™m guessing, heโ€™s the kind of guy who sings about whatever the hell he wants to sing about, and if the big record labels donโ€™t like it, thatโ€™s their problem, not his.

    I would link to other YouTube videos, but the fan-made recordings are such poor quality that they donโ€™t convey Millerโ€™s talents very well. If you want to hear clips of his music, including a studio recording of Amtrak Crescent, visit the Scott Miller website. Then send him an e-mail and beg him to move back to Virginia where he belongs. Or, at the very least, urge him to swing through the Old Dominion on his next tour.


  • A QUICK RESPONSE TO LYLE

    On the IT WILL TAKE MORE THAN LINT

    At 3:19 PM, Lyle said…

    Ed, let me express the foundation for my optimism on your two concerns.

    1: A number of excellent ideas are brewing, being tested, and implemented. Congestion pricing is one of them, but there are many, many more such as local food systems, cradle to cradle design, green public revenue shifts (which includes congestion pricing), cutting inefficient subsidies, and improving civic participation with publicly financed elections, proportional representation, instant runoff voting, choice voting, citizen councils, and so on.

    YOU ARE VERY RIGHT, THESE ARE GOOD IDEAS. ALL THESE AND MORE HAVE BEEN ON THE TABLE SINCE THE EARLY 90S WHEN WE FIRST FOCUSED ON THE NEED TO ACHIEVE A SUSTAINABLE TRAJECTORY FOR CIVILIZATION

    In desperation, our politicians and business leaders will look for easy solutions and pick those that can best be implemented. Onward the slapdash evolution of our society goes, in constant fear of Fundamental Change, but constant struggle towards it.

    THERE IN LIES THE PROBLEM. SO FAR WE GET ABUSER FEES, ADVICE TO GO SHOPPING IN THE FACE OF TERRORIST ATTACKS AND A FAILURE TO ENFORCE LAWS OR REBUILD INTELLIGENTLY AFTER NATURAL DISASTERS.

    UNLESS THERE IS AN OVERARCHING CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK SUCH AS FUNCTIONAL HUMAN SETTLEMENT PATTERNS โ€“ OR SOME OTHER THAT YOU OR OTHERS ARTICULATE IN DETAIL โ€“ THE LEADERSHIP OF BUSINESS-AS-USUAL WILL CHERRY PICK THIS AND THAT.

    THUS OUR CONCERN FOR AN AGENDA FOR FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE AND OUR CONCERN THAT THERE WILL NO RESOURCES LEFT TO ACHIEVE THAT CHANGE WHEN IT BECOME OBVIOUS THAT THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE.

    AS I TELL MY OPTIMIST FRIEND JAMES A BACON: EVERY GOOD IDEA IS SEEN AS “SOLUTION” THAT GIVES BUSINESS-AS-USUAL AND EXCUSE TO DELAY FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE

    2: We use a tiny percentage of the solar energy that reaches this planet.

    VERY TRUE BUT READ WITH CARE OUR DISCUSSION OF THE “THICK / THIN” PROBLEM OF SOLAR (AND ALL “RENEWABLE” ENERGY SOURCES) IN OUR COLUMN “THE CONSERVATION IMPERATIVE” OF 19 JUNE 2007.

    We use a tiny percentage of the potential wind energy.

    THAT IS TRUE TOO AND THE SAME LIMITATIONS APPLY TO SOLAR, WIND AND EVERY “NATURAL / RENEWABLE” SOURCE VIS A VIS CREATING FUNCTIONAL HUMAN SETTLEMENTS FOR A TECHNOLOGY DEPENDENT URBAN SOCIETY.

    NATURAL SOURCE STRATEGIES ARE GREAT. THEY ARE THE ONES THAT REA SHOULD HAVE DEVELOPED FOR NONURBAN SETTLEMENT PATTERNS INSTEAD OF STRINGING WIRES. THE NONURBAN POPULATION IS 5 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL.

    INTERREGIONAL BIG GRIDS, INCLUDING NONURBAN DISTRIBUTION, WASTE MORE ENERGY IN GENERATION, TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION THAN THEY DELIVER TO END USERS.

    We still have a hundred years or so of coal,

    BUT DO WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY TO USE IN WAYS THAT DO NOT CAUSE MORE PROBLEMS? ARE YOU PLANNING TO GO TO BEIJING FOR THE OLYMPICS?

    and several decades at least of oil.

    NOT ONLY THAT BUT WE HAVE SYNTHETICS TO REPLACE OIL BUT AT WHAT COST? WHO WILL BE ABLE TO PAY FOR THESE “SOLUTIONS?” NOT ENOUGH WILL BE ABLE TO AFFORD THEM TO ELECT A STABLE GOVERNMENT.

    Thin film solar promises to revolutionize that industry, and I fully expect other innovations in other areas.

    I EXPECT YOU ARE RIGHT BUT AT WHAT COST AND WILL THESE NEW INNOVATIONS PROVIDE EQUIVALENT PROPERTIES TO THOSE PROVIDED BY THE NATURAL CAPITAL WE ARE BURNING UP? FOR EXAMPLE, WHAT WILL POWER LARGE, PRIVATE VEHICLES WHICH ARE IMPERATIVE TO ACHIEVE MOBILITY AND ACCESS? MORE ON THIS IN “THE PROBLEM WITH CARS.”

    Most urgently, we have vast expanses of government subsidized waste to tap, should we require the juice.

    BUT HOW DOES ONE TAP THAT WASTE WITH THE EXISTING GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE? HOW DO YOU CHASE AWAY ALL THOSE WHO ARE FEEDING AT THE TROUGH. WHAT ABOUT ALL THOSE WHO ARE CHANTING: WHAT? ME WORRY?

    If we decide to act within the next decade,

    A DECADE IS THE RIGHT TIME FRAME BUT IN THAT PERIOD CITIZENS AND THEIR ORGANIZATIONS MUST BE TAKING DECISIVE ACTION, NOT JUST DECIDING TO DO “SOMETHING.”
    AND THUS OUR TWO CONCERNS:

    1) LACK OF AN OVERARCHING STRATEGY

    2) TAKING INTELLIGENT ACTION BEFORE THERE ARE NO RESOURCES LEFT

    we have fabulous resources to do so. Still, I do agree that urgency is appropriate.

    Thank you for your good work and inspiration.

    YOU ARE WELCOME, THAT IS OUR JOB

    EMR


  • A Product of Tradition

    Michael Barone offers a somewhat different take on Michael Vick, dogfighting and Virginia history:

    It’s astonishing and saddening that a man would risk his $130 million football contract to engage in such behavior, which seems barbaric to almost all of us. Where did he even get the idea of doing this?

    I got an answer, or rather clues to an answer, while rereading David Hackett Fischer’s superb Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America. In his chapter on how the original settlers of Virginia brought with them folkways from their home territory in Wessex (southwestern England), Fischer notes another striking characteristic of Virginiansโ€”their obsession with gambling. Virginians were observed to be constantly making wagers with one another on almost any imaginable outcome. The more uncertain the result, the more likely they were to gamble. They made bets not only on horses, cards, cockfighting, and backgammon but also on crops, prices, women, and the weather. “They are all professional gamesters,” a French traveler observed of Virginia’s gentry.”… Colonel Byrd is never happy but when he has the box and dice in his hand.”

    The rest of the entry is worth reading, if only to get a sense of our blood-soaked past…which, like so many things in this Commonwealth, seems like only yesterday.


  • FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE IN GOVERNANCE

    A number of good comments in the IT WILL TAKE A LOT MORE THAT LINT string. I (and others who have contacted me off line) will be posting some responses there later but first:

    Groveton, as he has done frequently, added real substance from a perspective that is lacking in many discussions of “shaping the future.”

    That makes it doubly important to support his efforts on governance evolution and the IPoV.

    An article in todayโ€™s WaPo reminded me that I have intended to place a draft survey stake (a tentative marker) out on what Fundamental Change in Governance means.

    The story is “White House Manual Details How to Deal With Protesters.” Read it and weep. This is a democracy with a president is in office due to less than 30% of those who could qualify to vote in two elections? The shielding the Commander-in-Chiefโ€™s eyes from protest sounds like something out of the decline of the Roman Empire or one of the teen kings of France (XIII to XVI). No wonder the mission to spread democracy by this administration is seen as an international joke.

    So here is the survey stake:

    Following Fundamental Change in Governance Structure to preserve democracy and free markets in an educated and technologically sophisticated society:

    1. The most important governance practitioner for any citizen or Household would be their Dooryard representative on the Cluster Board. Not one in a million even know they live in a Dooryard — but their genes do because that is where they evolved. While perhaps five percent of the population live in places that are, or could be, called Beta Clusters, none are functional parts of the existing governance structure.

    2. The most well known governance practitioner for the citizens of any New Urban Region would be the elected head of the administrative branch of the Regional governance structure. There is not yet one functional Regional governance structure outside the European Union so far as we know. Toronto comes closest.

    3. The powers of the President would be more like those of the Rotating Presidency of the European Union than that of a Roman Emperor.

    We outline how this structure might evolve from the Dooryard up in The Shape of the Future and how the regional governance structure might evolve in our column “The Shape Richmondโ€™s Future” from 16 February 2004.

    EMR


  • IT WILL TAKE A LOT MORE THAN LINT

    In the Baconโ€™s Rebellion Blog post “Here, Take My Lint” of 10 August, Jim Bacon profiles the current debate on the role of the Hampton Roads Transportation Authority (HRTA) in achieving Mobility and Access in the Hampton roads New Urban Region.

    In Peter Galuszkaโ€™s Baconโ€™s Rebellion News Service story “Fizzled Launch” and in Jim Baconโ€™s 14 August Blog post “A Stumbling Start” further details of the status of HRTA emerge.

    In a 15 August Blog post Jim Bacon examines “The Conservative Backlash Grows” over the legislation that established HRTA and gave a similar Agency, similar powers in the northern part of Virginia. Jim provides links to six news stories on the topic. Something must be important here to spend all this ink. Or it there?

    The issue being discussed is how to raise money for transportation facilities. The debate rages in spite of the fact that more money, no matter how much is raised or from what source it comes, if spent for more of the things Agencies have spent money for in the past โ€“ primarily roadways for Large Private vehicles โ€“ such new facilities will only make the Mobility and Access Crisis worse in both the Hampton Roads New Urban Region and the Virginia portion of the National Capital Subregion.

    As large an issue as this is, there is a bigger one.

    As reported in Jim Baconโ€™s “Here, Take My Lint” story, George Donley, an “ordinary citizen,” told a 9 August public hearing by HRTA that he had only “lint” left to contribute to the functions of government. Donleyโ€™s plea made for a good quote for the public hearing story in MainStream Media and it caught Jim Baconโ€™s eye.

    A citizen who has the wherewith all to get to a hearing and the ability to make a public statement saying he has only lint and that this foolishness would be newsworthy is a tragedy of epic proportions.

    Citizens may not, for good reason, approve of what government Agencies are doing with the money they are now getting or where these Agencies plan to get more money in the future. However, the reality is that it is “the public,” “the Commons” that is running on empty. Those in the top one half of the economic food chain are spending their childrenโ€™s and grandchildrenโ€™s future.

    It will take vastly more taxes, vastly higher fees and vastly greater amounts of volunteer and sweat equity devoted to public, common efforts (rather than private, self-serving efforts) to create safe and secure Households, Dooryards, Clusters, Neighborhoods, Villages, Communities and New Urban Regions much less safe and secure nation-states.

    Contemporary Civilization is running on fumes. There is a Mobility and Access Crisis, an Affordable and Accessible Housing Crisis and a Helter Skelter Crisis directly related to dysfunctional human settlement patterns.

    The well respected commentator “Anon 12:18” states the issue well (although that may not have been his intent) in a comment under “The Conservative Backlash Grows”:

    “The problem is that no taxes, no new spending is not a principle. It’s a slogan. … A promise to never ever raise taxes, to hold spending to an artificial goal, simply sets up an impossible goal.”

    Bridges are falling down. Lenders are packaging debt and selling it as a speculative investment / asset. Nation-states are tearing down forests to grow sugar to burn in Large, Private Vehicles. The temperature is rising faster than anyone expected a few years ago and the US of A is leading the world in the production of Greenhouse gas and buying everything China and India can produce regardless of health, safety or economic concerns.

    There is staggering private debt, mortgages are being forclosed, credit is shrinking. There is a huge balance of payments deficit, two wars and a federal government that took a 50.1% vote as a mandate and has demonstrated more incompetence and corruption than the U. S. Grantโ€™s administration โ€“ the cannot even rebuild after a hurricane. There is a widening Wealth Gap that threatens free markets and democracy…

    In the face of this fat, self-serving citizens get press quotes for saying they have noting to give but lint?

    Humans has built a technology based civilization that is hugely expensive yet well fed citizens who enjoy โ€“ for now โ€“ unprecedented freedom and luxury and champion ever more private rights are not willing to accept public responsibilities.

    Governance practitioners, in fear of losing their jobs, scramble to see who they need to appease and subsidize โ€“ cotton farmers, oil refiners, autonomobile makers — to keep the ship up for a few more years…

    Those who only have lint to give better save in for their life jackets.

    EMR


  • At Last, a Political Thriller that Libertarians Can Love

    If Jim Bowden pens political potboilers reflecting the perspective of the evangelical wing of the conservative movement (See โ€œAt Last, a Political-Thriller that Cultural Conservatives Can Loveโ€), Matt Carson reflects the libertarian wing. In his slender, self-published novel, โ€œOn a Hill They Call Capital,โ€ Carson places a gang of wise-cracking, tobacco-chewing good olโ€™ boys from Rappahannock County at the center of a plot to spark a second American revolution.

    In the world of Matt Carson, president of a Warrenton web development firm, government has become the leviathan state. The governing class, in the words of Ronald Reagan, has taken on the attitude, โ€œIf it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.โ€ In a post 9/11 twist, government doesnโ€™t threaten only economic liberties, it undermines their civil liberties. To Carson, the Patriot Act aims a double-barreled, sawed-off shotgun at the Bill of Rights.

    In this fast-paced novel, Cat, a bubba philosopher king, organizes his beer-drinking buddies into a conspiratorial brotherhood they name the Grandsons of Liberty. Launching a night-time raid into Washington, D.C., reminiscent of the Boston Tea Party, they hurl PCs out of the windows of the Internal Revenue Service headquarters building. As a follow-up, they roam the East Coast abducting Congressmen, whom they bring back to their compound in the Virginia hills and hold in a redneck re-education camp. Unlike real bad guys, though, the Grandsons of Liberty wouldnโ€™t hurt a flea.

    โ€œOn a Hill They Call Capitalโ€ has a breezy, humorous style full of allusions to popular culture, but it mines a deep vein of disenchantment with the political system. As Carson writes:

    โ€œWe wanted to do something to make a real and lasting difference. Cat was right, enough bitching, we didnโ€™t want to live the rest of our lives in fear of the tyrants in DC. Weโ€™d voted, some of us had written letters, weโ€™d talked to our friends and families โ€“ Spanky even called in to John Stewart. Ultimately, we had tried the routes available to us and no inkling of change was in sight โ€“ so now were going to hold them accountable.โ€

    In the fictional world of the novelist, the grand-standing stunts of Cat and his red-clay compadres succeed in igniting the popular imagination. If onlyโ€ฆ In the real world, the media would portray Carsonโ€™s rollicking revolutionaries as deluded and dangerous fanatics, and the authorities would hunt them down like terrorists. In the real world, the majority of the population would be too stupefied by government-engineered wealth transfers or too consumed by mortgages, car payments and other obligations to ever heed the call. In the real world, the American population is too beset by historical amnesia for the name โ€œGrandsons of Libertyโ€ to resonate with them in any way. Americans are incapable of launching the kind up uprising that Carson imagines. But, hey, itโ€™s fun to fantasize that a few daring men might try.

    To read more about the book, visit the website at http://www.grandsonsofliberty.us/.