Ugo Betti is right. ‘Mad’ IS a term used to describe a person who is obsessed with one idea and nothing else.
We believe strongly in the economic, social and physical imperative of evolving functional human settlement patterns.
On the other hand, we also believe strongly in the need to avoid large falling objects and toxic substances, the need to Balance nutrition and exercise, that the Earth is not flat and revolves around the Sun as well as the Periodic Table of Elements, the Electromagnetic Spectrum, the dynamics of complex organic structures. We believe these and most of the other science based theories and facts humans have articulated over the past 2.8 million years.
The difference between these things and the exploration of functional and dysfunctional human settlement patterns is that there are many advocates and supporters of those facts, theories and realities.
Many agree with EMR. The reason that it appears that many disagree is not the validity of attacks by those that disagree, it is the failure of those who agree to make that point, especially in the Blog context. Among other things they say:
“EMR is (or may be) right about functional and dysfunctional human settlement patterns. However,
• His ideas upset some of our key donors;
• I could not get reelected if I took forceful stands on human settlement pattern issues;
• My employer would fire me if I supported these ideas;
• He is years ahead of us and we need short-term fixes;
• We do not have to go as far as Fundamental Transformation, just implement this idea of mine and we will be fine, for now.
• He said negative things about New Urbanists or ______ so we cannot support him;
• He is holding his own, why risk having to catch spears aimed at him?
• We will not make as much money if we change from Business-As-Usual so just ignore him.
• If we endorse what he says, that means we have been wrong for years.
EMR

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.