More Loose Charges from the Senate

State senators are sticking by their proposal to impose a 6-cent-per-gallon surcharge on gasoline companies, which, according to the Washington Post, “they characterized as a populist effort to make big oil corporations share the cost of improving state roads and transit systems.”

Gas companies “don’t mind sticking it to me and sticking it to every person in Virginia when we come up to that pump, and I don’t mind repaying the favor,” said Sen. R. Edward Houck (D-Spotsylvania). Majority Leader Walter A. Stosch (R-Henrico) said the tax is aimed directly at “profiteering” by the gasoline giants.

I would like to ask Sen. Houck what evidence he has that oil companies are “sticking it to him,” and I would ask Sen. Stosch what, exactly, does he mean by “profiteering”? Do they base their charges upon anything more than a casual observation of rising prices at the gas pump? What proof do they have that gasoline retailers — BP, Hess, Exxon, Shell, Marathon, Amoco, Chevron, Texaco and too many convenience stores to count — are circumventing the normal workings of a free market, in which prices fluctuate according to supply and demand? If they have evidence, they have not presented it.

One of two things would come of this legislation. First possibility: The oil companies pass on the tax to consumers, and the consumers get hosed. Second possibility: The oil companies cannot pass on the tax to consumers, their Virginia operations become less profitable, they are more reluctant to expand gasoline distribution and retailing capacity in Virginia in the face of ever-escalating demand… and the consumers get hosed.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

4 responses to “More Loose Charges from the Senate”

  1. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    How many of the Senators are lawyers? Put a 6% tax on all legal services. See if the lawyers pass it on to the consumers or eat it like they want the oil companies.

  2. Will Vehrs Avatar
    Will Vehrs

    I own a chunk of ExxonMobil stock from my past llife and get quarterly statements on the value of my account.

    Where were these guys during the quarters when my account lost money?

  3. Ray Hyde Avatar

    Huh?

    Are you suggesting that the if the state gets a cut of “excess profits” that they should contribute to losses?

    This conversation goes to the heart of what happens whenever we come up with a plan whereby we think someone else will pay. Remember those input / output tables.

    On the other hand, I don’t understand the problem: this looks like a “user pays” proposal to me, and one that will work to change peoples decisions.

  4. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    It is pretty funny to contemplate anti-corporate rhetoric from Walter Stosch. He knows better, but he is putting a little spin on the deal, and it frankly is clever spin for the average gas customer.

    One also continues to hear examples of people who have made trips across multiple states and seen the same gas price, with a penny or two variation, in states where the gas tax varies widely. It is likely the gas companies wouldn’t be able to pass all of this on, at least not unless it caught on in a series of contiguous states.

    What this really is is a state gross receipts tax, a state version of the local BPOL tax assessed against wholesale and retail businesses. These terminals all already pay that local gross receipts tax, but it is in the cents per hundred dollar range, smaller by a factor of ten or one hundred. It is not an attractive idea, but the logical proposal — additional pennies per gallon at the retail level — remains absolutely radioactive, even though taxes as a percentage of price have probably never been lower since Rockefeller was in diapers.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT